EVE Search - Armour tanks

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Armour tanks

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Jenshae Chiroptera	Posted - 2011.08.14 03:17:00 - [1] I was told that they don't increase signature radius. Freaking lies! My 42K eHP Cane has 1440m sig My 41K eHP Cyclone has 297m sig While comparing shield and armour tanking, trying to get info from corp about our main tanking for logistics. All while being inspired by the incursion Drake, I made this (sorry, yes it is in MS Paint) Greetings and salutations all who reside here. May your flames be warm and your trolls tasty.
Demon Azrakel Gallente Defiant.. Narwhals Ate My Duck	Posted - 2011.08.14 03:27:00 - [2] Need more details, like...is your MWD on?
Baraka Saibot	Posted - 2011.08.14 03:27:00 - [3] So, what's your point? Other than you can't comprehend what the module descriptions say? 1440m signature radius? Both the Hurricane and Cyclone have a base signature radius of 240m.
Jenshae Chiroptera	Posted - 2011.08.14 03:32:00 - [4] Sorry, this was more about the image. I was just telling you how I came up with it. As to the Hurricane vs Cyclone ... I am embarrassed to admit that I forgot the Hurricane has a MWD and 240m sig when it is off. 04:31 here. Please forgive me. Greetings and salutations all who reside here. May your flames be warm and your trolls tasty.
Wedding Peach	Posted - 2011.08.14 04:12:00 - [5] Fishing for trolling, are we, Jen? -------------------------------------------------- I am the Love Angel, Wedding Peach, and I am very displeased by your lack of love!
Coffee Shopper	Posted - 2011.08.14 04:45:00 - [6] World of Tanks
Jenshae Chiroptera	Posted - 2011.08.14 04:48:00 - [7] Originally by: Wedding Peach Fishing for trolling, are we, Jen? Depends who is trolling Greetings and salutations all who reside here. May your flames be warm and your trolls tasty.
Johnny May	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:09:00 - [8] whats an armour tank?
Oglyn	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:12:00 - [9] Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It's the way people with an education spell "Armor", thus keeping the correct etymology of the word intact.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:15:00 - [10] Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? English spelling, as opposed to the "americanized" version. _ Akita T USEFUL EVE LINKS collection

Dub Step Minmatar Death To Everyone But Us	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:19:00 - [11] This is a bad thread.
Magnus Veyr	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:19:00 - [12] Edited by: Magnus Veyr on 14/08/2011 12:19:50 Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It's something used in various parts of the world, you know; outside land of the clueless.
Sonva Lat	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:22:00 - [13] Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It is what an armor tank looks like when it is spelt correctly.
Dirk Magnum Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:29:00 - [14] Manly men always armor tank Caldari. 1600mm Moa for life.
Grimpak Gallente The Whitehound Corporation Frontline Assembly Point	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:45:00 - [15] Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? it's the result given by the spell checker when you have selected HRM's English. --- Quote: The more I know about humans, the more I love animals. ain't that right.
Esu Nahalas Yote Patrol	Posted - 2011.08.14 12:59:00 - [16] Originally by: Sonva Lat Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It is what an armor tank looks like when it is spelt correctly. What is "spelt?"
Dub Step Minmatar Death To Everyone But Us	Posted - 2011.08.14 13:04:00 - [17] Originally by: Esu Nahalas Originally by: Sonva Lat Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It is what an armor tank looks like when it is spelt correctly. What is "spelt?" A tasty grain alternative to wheat.
Erim Solfara Amarr inFluX.	Posted - 2011.08.14 13:11:00 - [18] Originally by: Esu Nahalas Originally by: Sonva Lat Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It is what an armor tank looks like when it is spelt correctly. What is "spelt?" The past tense of spelling, assuming you're speaking English.
Esu Nahalas Yote Patrol	Posted - 2011.08.14 13:23:00 - [19] Originally by: Erim Solfara Originally by: Esu Nahalas Originally by: Sonva Lat Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It is what an armor tank looks like when it is spelt correctly. What is "spelt?" The past tense of spelling, assuming you're speaking English. I'm showing that it's a form of wheat primarily used as livestock feed.
Dub Step Minmatar Death To Everyone But Us	Posted - 2011.08.14 13:27:00 - [20] There certainly are a lot of dim people that read these forums.

Swynet State War Academy	Posted - 2011.08.14 14:45:00 - [21] Originally by: Erim Solfara The past tense of spelling, assuming you're speaking English. Who speaks that silly language? American wins. Even English people speak it all the time
Ammzi	Posted - 2011.08.14 15:43:00 - [22] Hvad foregsr der her? Engelsk? ... o.0
Pok Nibin Amarr	Posted - 2011.08.14 16:10:00 - [23] Originally by: Oglyn Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It's the way people with an education spell "Armor", thus keeping the correct etymology of the word intact. Yeah, I love it how the Brits have carefully kept the French influence more than a little visible. Cheerio. Pip. Pip. Please wait as this sig- nature finishes loading
Meridian Siri	Posted - 2011.08.14 16:25:00 - [24] Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? Similar to an "amour" tank - protect by love and love alone.
Lt Angus Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2011.08.14 17:16:00 - [25] Originally by: Pok Nibin Originally by: Oglyn Originally by: Johnny May whats an armour tank? It's the way people with an education spell "Armor", thus keeping the correct etymology of the word intact. Yeah, I love it how the Brits have carefully kept the French influence more than a little visible. Cheerio. Pip. Pip. you do know pip is a name and not a general term? Shhhh, Im hunting Badgers
Dub Step Minmatar Death To Everyone But Us	Posted - 2011.08.14 17:31:00 - [26] I love how Americans are arrogant and think their bastardisation of the English language and hatred of other cultures makes them superior but really just makes them look dumb.
Titus Phook	Posted - 2011.08.14 19:43:00 - [27] Rumour has it that an armour tank is used by those with a sense of honour, also a sense of humour is required to understand what I did here :P --------------------------------------------- CCP just shat in the sandbox, so they could try and sell us a gold plated shovel to remove said turd. :(
Internet Knight The Kobayashi Maru	Posted - 2011.08.14 19:50:00 - [28] Originally by: Titus Phook Rumour has it that an armour tank is used by those with a sense of honour, also a sense of humour is required to understand what I did here :P Only people of colour would try something so blatant as that. ---
Titus Phook	Posted - 2011.08.14 19:54:00 - [29] Edited by: Titus Phook on 14/08/2011 19:55:34 Colour... Damn, knew I'd missed out a word somewhere :) --------------------------------------------- CCP just shat in the sandbox, so they could try and sell us a gold plated shovel to remove said turd. :(
Kent Reeves	Posted - 2011.08.14 19:56:00 - [30] Originally by: Dub Step I love how Americans are arrogant and think their bastardisation of the English language and hatred of other cultures makes them superior but really just makes them look dumb. Looking at the America-bashing in this thread we're clearly the only arrogant people on this forum. Also, firefox doesn't know "bastardisation." Languages are ever changing, they do not stay the same. Your version of English isn't even the original version, it evolved from other languages as its evolving from your language in our home.

Casanunda Minmatar	Posted - 2011.08.14 20:01:00 - [31] Originally by: Kent Reeves Looking at the America-bashing in this thread we're clearly the only arrogant people on this forum. Also, firefox doesn't know "bastardisation." That's because you spell it with a Z in the US Bastardisation or bastardization may refer to: Corruption (linguistics), the process of corruption of the meaning of linguistic terms An Australian term for hazing ---
Teryl Manara	Posted - 2011.08.14 20:10:00 - [32] Originally by: Titus Phook Edited by: Titus Phook on 14/08/2011 19:55:34 Colour... Damn, knew I'd missed out a word somewhere :) To be fully candid about your arduous circumstance, I think you should favour my prevalence in google search and devour oh fick it http://www.morewords.com/ends-with/our/
Lonox Gallente Hilmar is Lord	Posted - 2011.08.14 20:13:00 - [33] America! ** yeah! Originally by:** Holly Cleland has red bruising and veins popping up where the monocle plugs in. No wonder you people are so angry, you're doing it wrong.
Erim Solfara Amarr inFluX.	Posted - 2011.08.14 20:14:00 - [34] Originally by: Kent Reeves Originally by: Dub Step I love how Americans are arrogant and think their bastardisation of the English language and hatred of other cultures makes them superior but really just makes them look dumb. Looking at the America-bashing in this thread we're clearly the only arrogant people on this forum. Also, firefox doesn't know "bastardisation." Languages are ever changing, they do not stay the same. Your version of English isn't even the original version, it evolved from other languages as its evolving from your language in our home. I have an axe to grind on this one. 'English' is the language spoken by the English, in England. Americans should not logically claim they speak 'English'. As soon as there are any significant differences between the languages, they are not speaking the 'English' that is defined above, so it should be called something else, even if it's highly compatible (as are some other languages in the world, that are very similar, but named differently). If an American wants to I'm not using 'English' properly, he hasn't got a leg to stand on. If he wants to say that American (as a language) differs, feel free!
Internet Knight The Kobayashi Maru	Posted - 2011.08.14 20:32:00 - [35] Originally by: Erim Solfara If an American wants to I'm not using 'English' properly, he hasn't got a leg to stand on. If he wants to say that American (as a language) differs, feel free! You, good sir, are speaking on the Internets, and I think my plumbing needs to have more mail messages. ---
Herping yourDerp	Posted - 2011.08.14 22:48:00 - [36] armor is in AR-MORE not arm-hour. same thing with color, col-or not col-hour.
Erim Solfara Amarr inFluX.	Posted - 2011.08.15 00:56:00 - [37] Originally by: Herping yourDerp armor is in AR-MORE not arm-hour. same thing with color, col-or not col-hour. Whoever said there was an H in it?
Barbelo Valentinian Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2011.08.15 01:08:00 - [38] Isn't there some linguistic argument that American English preserves some of the older English spellings? I seem to remember reading something like that somewhere on the internets once. ***** "To wake up is to wake the world up" - D.E. Harding
The Offerer Minmatar	Posted - 2011.08.15 04:42:00 - [39] Is this thing derailed?
Sonva Lat	Posted - 2011.08.15 17:11:00 - [40] Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian Isn't there some linguistic argument that American English preserves some of the older English spellings? I seem to remember reading something like that somewhere on the internets once. It certainly does in some cases, such as using fall rather than autumn, but generally the trend has been away from traditional spellings to simpler versions (often by ignoring irregular verb use). Whilst seemingly innocuous in itself, it can lead to incorrect usage of words because the subtle difference in their meanings is lost (eg. learned vs learnt). I tend to get annoyed about the American obsession with turning nouns in to verbs, it just seems lazy. I would much rather put my books "in alphabetical order" rather than "alphbetize" them. People should "disembark" from aeroplanes, rather than be "deplaned". People sometimes have to go to hospital, but are hardly ever actually turned in to hospitals as implied by "hospitalized". Generally, however, I am happy to cope with Americans inability to use English well; however, I do get somewhat irate when they then berate people who do not fall in line with their terrible usage. Also, I love hearing Americans talking about ***** packs and not knowing why it is so funny. :)

Toriessian Amarr Helion Production Labs	Posted - 2011.08.15 17:22:00 - [41] Originally by: The Offerer Is this thing derailed? Its more of a continued conversation than a derailment. The original question has been resolved.
S3na Amarr	Posted - 2011.08.15 17:44:00 - [42] To make it clear. Nowadays we have American English and British English. Both are English because both are made out of Original English (just English). As time passed by, to distinguish differences in dialects, English was split into American English and British English. British English is often referred to as Standard English. American English is just what red-necks managed to learn over the hundreds of years
Lyrrashae Minmatar Crushed Ambitions	Posted - 2011.08.16 02:20:00 - [43] Originally by: Titus Phook Rumour has it that an armour tank is used by those with a sense of honour, also a sense of humour is required to understand what I did here :P Praat u Engels, boet?
Serpent Kamri	Posted - 2011.08.16 02:33:00 - [44] Originally by: S3na To make it clear. Nowadays we have American English and British English. Both are English because both are made out of Original English (just English). As time passed by, to distinguish differences in dialects, English was split into American English and British English. British English is often referred to as Standard English. American English is just what red-necks managed to learn over the hundreds of years Well, not exactly. British English is the origin "version". In the Americas the settlers came into contact with the Spanish, Danes, French and so on, who all added a little something into the local language. You can practically map out the old dialect map of the US according to which country settled down where. So, British English is more pure. The US English mostly a mixed pot of English and influences from other European languages.
Sharon Anne Caldari	Posted - 2011.08.16 03:00:00 - [45] I was going to say something about the Canadians, but I can't think of anything. *The general epidemic of rectal-cranial inversion*
Vasentic Lyonesse. The Remnant Legion	Posted - 2011.08.16 03:09:00 - [46] Originally by: Sharon Anne I was going to say something about the Canadians, but I can't think of anything. Because we are not a bunch of yankee ****ers?
Just Another Killmail	Posted - 2011.08.16 04:44:00 - [47] You get it from Ye olde Shoppe :)
Cambarus Malicious Destruction War Against the Manifest	Posted - 2011.08.16 05:01:00 - [48] Originally by: Just Another Killmail You get it from Ye olde Shoppe :) My knowledge of the origins of the English language is at best shaky, but I'm pretty sure you meant ¦e, not Ye.
Simetraz	Posted - 2011.08.16 05:06:00 - [49] Edited by: Simetraz on 16/08/2011 05:07:58 You know back oh never mind how many years now. British friend of mine and I sat down one night discussing this very subject, after having several pints. So the short of it we found a unabridged dictionary and found every last word in it. American and British same book same language English. Probably why people trying to learn this language get such a headache. And as far as the usage, well US and British are not strangers to accents, and word usage that differs from region to region. My friend grew up in Suffolk County and even though he lost the accent over the years he could put it back when he wanted too. And let me tell you, we both had a laugh as normally he sounded like he was from London which funny enough after so much time in England so did I. It was not uncommon for people to think I was British (long gone now), great for watching the American tourists that you can here a mile away and have a laugh. Loud American is very accurate and that is coming from one of your own. The point is everyone can get over themselves as we aren't that different.
Sadayiel Caldari Inner Conflict	Posted - 2011.08.16 06:02:00 - [50] Originally by: Simetraz Edited by: Simetraz on 16/08/2011 05:10:58 You know back oh never mind how many years now. British friend of mine and I sat down one night discussing this very subject, after having several pints. So the short of it we found a unabridged dictionary and found every last word in it. American and British same book same language English. Probably why people trying to learn this language get such a headache. And as far as the usage, well US and British are not strangers to accents, and word usage that differs from region to region. My friend grew up in Suffolk and even though he lost the accent over the years he could put it back when he wanted too. And let me tell you, we both had a laugh as normally he sounded like he was from London which funny enough after so much time in England so did I. It was not uncommon for people to think I was British (long gone now), great for watching the American tourists that you can here a mile away and have a laugh. Loud American is very accurate and that is coming from one of your own. The point is everyone can get over themselves as we aren't that different. And all this discussion mostly comes because no one even bothered to try this with the english language. DEAR MONOCLE OVERLORDS JOIN TO FORCE CCP ADD LORGNETTE FOR THE OVERLADIES!!

Steve Ronuken	Posted - 2011.08.16 06:39:00 - [51] If you want to know about why Americans spell things the way they do, go read about Noah Webster.
Thorn Galen Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2011.08.16 07:19:00 - [52] Edited by: Thorn Galen on 16/08/2011 07:19:40 Sometimes I dread accessing these forums because of threads such as this one. It started off with a post about armour tanking and degenerates into a futile language-bashing tirade....... It is true that English has many different flavours - delight in them, don't fight ? Eve, I despair!! BTW - @Op, I noticed the same effect, sig radius does increase.
Dr Offensive	Posted - 2011.08.16 09:47:00 - [53] BY GOD, IF YOU AMERICANS CANNOT SPEAK THE QUEENS ENGLISH PROPERLY, THEN YOU SHAN'T BE ALLOWED TO USE IT AT ALL!!! There, i've said it now and i'm not taking it back.
Vlad Chistian	Posted - 2011.08.16 09:56:00 - [54] Armour HACs, Armour HACs, ARMOUR HACS!
Thorn Galen Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2011.08.16 10:49:00 - [55] This sentence has exactly three erors in it,
Myfanwy Heimdal Caldari	Posted - 2011.08.16 11:05:00 - [56] Originally by: Pok Nibin Yeah, I love it how the Brits have carefully kept the French influence more than a little visible. Cheerio. Pip. Pip. To quote a recent American President, "The French have no word for entrepreneur."
Josie Ironside Caldari Augnais Enterprises	Posted - 2011.08.16 11:20:00 - [57] To be honest, English has always been pretty much a grab-bag of whatever words from other places we found handy. Whole bunches of Anglo-saxon, Norman french, bits and bats of latin, a smattering of danish and norwegian, and words from a thousand and one places that have just been assimilated (in a lot of cases over the last few hundred years or so, from cultures we "invited" to be part of our empire.) Spelling's only really become important since literacy became the rule, rather the exception. Linguistic purity? Whats that again? "What am I supposed to do, talk to them sternly?" - Ms Ironside, on finding out just how few guns her first ship could carry.
ChromeStriker	Posted - 2011.08.16 11:20:00 - [58] ALUMINIUM! try that one out for size - Nulla Curas
Long John Silver	Posted - 2011.08.16 11:25:00 - [59] Originally by: Dr Offensive BY GOD, IF YOU AMERICANS CANNOT SPEAK THE QUEENS ENGLISH PROPERLY, THEN YOU SHAN'T BE ALLOWED TO USE IT AT ALL!!! There, i've said it now and i'm not taking it back. But the Yanks don't speak Queen's English, they speak American English. Myself, I prefer Pidgin English. As for the French, parlay vous Franglais?
Chimera Ur Nibado Inc	Posted - 2011.08.16 11:35:00 - [60] Originally by: Barbelo Valentinian Isn't there some linguistic argument that American English preserves some of the older English spellings? Such as 'lite' beer and 'tonite'? :P .

Sirinda	Posted - 2011.08.16 12:06:00 - [61] Originally by: Lonox America! **** yeah! What is wrong with the world, eloquently summarized.
ChromeStriker	Posted - 2011.08.16 12:06:00 - [62] aye dnt knoe wat u mene? th tyme 4 reel spellinks az looong gon! - Nulla Curas
Narillius Gallente	Posted - 2011.08.16 12:40:00 - [63] Originally by: Dub Step I love how Americans are arrogant and think their bastardisation of the English language and hatred of other cultures makes them superior but really just makes them look dumb. It's not a matter of "looking" dumb, they are dumb - they voted Bush in...TWICE!!! I will grant you though, Texas is a pretty dumb state over all.
Velicitia Gallente Open Designs	Posted - 2011.08.16 13:34:00 - [64] Originally by: Narillius Originally by: Dub Step I love how Americans are arrogant and think their bastardisation of the English language and hatred of other cultures makes them superior but really just makes them look dumb. It's not a matter of "looking" dumb, they are dumb - they voted Bush in...TWICE!!! I will grant you though, Texas is a pretty dumb state over all. Not all of us voted for him. ========================= Originally by: CCP Games, 2010 Creation is so precious; and greed, so destructive. Your choices can make a diference
Ana Vyr Caldari	Posted - 2011.08.16 15:51:00 - [65] What cracks me up is that the improper usage of words, given enough time, become legitimate dictionary entries. For example "irregardless", which is the incorrect usage of "regardless" has been added to the American Oxford with the same definition as regardless. Languages evolve, but its kinda funny how it happens sometimes.
Velicitia Gallente Open Designs	Posted - 2011.08.16 16:00:00 - [66] Originally by: Ana Vyr What cracks me up is that the improper usage of words, given enough time, become legitimate dictionary entries. For example "irregardless", which is the incorrect usage of "regardless" has been added to the American Oxford with the same definition as regardless. Languages evolve, but its kinda funny how it happens sometimes. seeing as the prefix 'ir-' essentially meanins "not", shouldn't it mean the opposite of "regardless"...? granted I stopped taking "formal" (Am.) English/grammar classes once they were no longer required at university (although, I did continue taking "English" classes, since certain literature classes fell under "English" for whatever reason). ========================= Originally by: CCP Games, 2010 Creation is so precious; and greed, so destructive. Your choices can make a diference
Tethys Atreides The Audacity of Huge	Posted - 2011.08.16 16:05:00 - [67] Edited by: Tethys Atreides on 16/08/2011 16:05:59 Originally by: Ana Vyr What cracks me up is that the improper usage of words, given enough time, become legitimate dictionary entries. For example "irregardless", which is the incorrect usage of "regardless" has been added to the American Oxford with the same definition as regardless. Languages evolve, but its kinda funny how it happens sometimes. "Orientate" burns me up...
Dr Offensive	Posted - 2011.08.16 20:51:00 - [68] Originally by: Ana Vyr What cracks me up is that the improper usage of words, given enough time, become legitimate dictionary entries. For example "irregardless", which is the incorrect usage of "regardless" has been added to the American Oxford with the same definition as regardless. Languages evolve, but its kinda funny how it happens sometimes. Yes, a devious tactic. I think we have misunderestimated our American chums.

CCP Zymurgist Gallente C C P	Posted - 2011.08.16 20:54:00 - [69] This thread has derailed right into a lock. Zymurgist Community Representative CCP NA, EVE Online Contact Us



Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.