EVE Search - Lol CQ uses the same resources as Crysis while looking 10 times worse

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Lol CQ uses the same resources as Crysis while looking 10 times worse

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kolya Medz Gallente PyroStorm Enforcers STR8NGE BREW	Posted - 2011.08.15 02:40:00 - [1] Both Crysis and EVE CQ at max settings use about 80% to 99% of my gpu. Crysis runs smooth at around 30-35fps(8xAA). CQ not so much, it hangs horribly whenever I rotate the camera. CPU usage is even worse with CQ. Where crysis would rarely go above 60% total cpu usage, even when sprinting through a jungle fighting dozens of enemies. CQ jumps well past 80% when I walk around. My specs: Phenom 720BE @ 3.5ghz 4gb DDR3 1333 @ 6-6-6-18-1 gigabyte 790FX NB @ 2.6ghz 64GB kingston SSD ATi 5850 (900core/1100mem) I can only imagine how much it sucks trying to run CQ on older AMD hardware... The good news is CQ is completely useless and has NO gameplay value. So turning it off isn't a big deal
Kolya Medz Gallente PyroStorm Enforcers STR8NGE BREW	Posted - 2011.08.15 02:43:00 - [2] Wasn't there supposed to be a blog about CQ optimization or something?
Andr Katelo Caldari Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.08.15 02:46:00 - [3] To be quite honest with you, EvE does not like ATi in general. I personally have no problems with the CQ dropping bellow 45 FPS (talking from the top of my head here). Try and update your drivers. It cant screw worse then you are at the moment. Please ensure your signature is within the allowed size of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24,000 bytes. Navigator
Monstress	Posted - 2011.08.15 02:49:00 - [4] I heard CPUs kickass at rendering graphics.
Kolya Medz Gallente PyroStorm Enforcers STR8NGE BREW	Posted - 2011.08.15 03:02:00 - [5] Originally by: Andr Katelo To be quite honest with you, EvE does not like ATi in general. I personally have no problems with the CQ dropping bellow 45 FPS (talking from the top of my head here). Try and update your drivers. It cant screw worse then you are at the moment. My drivers are up to date. Eve doesn't like ATi because CCP only tests on Nvidia/intel hardware. Hardly what I would call "Excellence".
Tippia Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2011.08.15 03:07:00 - [6] Originally by: Monstress I heard CPUs kickass at rendering ~~graphics~~ physics. àand that's part of the problem when it comes to running Incarna on AMD cards. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
fgft Athonille	Posted - 2011.08.15 04:06:00 - [7] its taken them years to get large fights playable right before dominion and then years after dominion trying to fix everything they broke then dont expect anything Originally by: Skippermonkey keep trying and you can be an hero just like fgft Athonille Originally by: Singeaboot Raj Tbh i am beginning to see the win - it's the haircut, makes people take notice.
Grey Stormshadow Starwreck Industries	Posted - 2011.08.15 04:22:00 - [8] I have nvidia card nowdays and still think that CQ is way too heavy and lacks options to make it lighter. You can not even lower the quality without nerfing the space graphics on same go.
Obvious Forum Troll	Posted - 2011.08.15 04:53:00 - [9] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Monstress I heard CPUs kickass at rendering ~~graphics~~ physics. àand that's part of the problem when it comes to running Incarna on AMD cards. WHOOOSH
Kogh Ayon	Posted - 2011.08.15 05:07:00 - [10] They should made the CQ like counter strike, that is much easier and cost effective

Sir Substance Minmatar Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service	Posted - 2011.08.15 05:17:00 - [11] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Monstress I heard CPUs kickass at rendering ~~graphics~~ physics. àand that's part of the problem when it comes to running Incarna on AMD cards. Choosing to force a technology that is only available nvidea cards is like designing roads that will only work well with cars made by volkswagon.
Herping yourDerp	Posted - 2011.08.15 06:29:00 - [12] hm.... maybe , go with me... if we had the old hanger, then we press a button on the right side,then; keep with me... u enter CQ.. best of both worlds, cant be that hard to program and everyone is happy, people with $3000 PC's can use CQ and us folks with 1 year old PC's can keep if off and keep our fan usage low
Jaari Val'Dara Caldari Deep Space Nomads Corp	Posted - 2011.08.15 07:17:00 - [13] I use only lowly laptop, but still it's ridiculous that I can run crysis with no problem, but whenever I try to run CQ my whole system starts screaming and begging for mercy, like it's being burnt alive (coincidentally that's exactly what is happening to everything bellow my waist).
Raknarg Valklear	Posted - 2011.08.15 07:24:00 - [14] Originally by: Andr Katelo To be quite honest with you, EvE does not like ATi in general. This is "Flawlessly Fail" policy that any gaming company can take. you just don't do that.
Alissa Solette	Posted - 2011.08.15 11:01:00 - [15] So what OP is saying is that CCPs graphics engine for CQ is sub-par and of generally low quality? Sounds like it is perfectly in keeping with everything else CCP is involved in.
Mr Kidd	Posted - 2011.08.15 11:18:00 - [16] Originally by: Kolya Medz Wasn't there supposed to be a blog about CQ optimization or something? Optimizations were due to come out last month. However, CCP chose to postpone that update, which as everyone knows means they've moved onto something completely different. ETA on revisiting optimizations, given CCP's past performance, 6 to 8 years.
Kunming Amarr T.H.U.G L.I.F.E	Posted - 2011.08.15 11:33:00 - [17] Its the RT radiosity that slows it down compared to Crysis, I suppose. The GFX engine still needs alot of work apparently but its definetly a higher technology than Crysis.
Sandviched	Posted - 2011.08.15 11:54:00 - [18] Originally by: Kolya Medz Both Crysis and EVE CQ at max settings use about 80% to 99% of my gpu. Crysis runs smooth at around 30-35fps(8xAA). CQ not so much, it hangs horribly whenever I rotate the camera. CPU usage is even worse with CQ. Where crysis would rarely go above 60% total cpu usage, even when sprinting through a jungle fighting dozens of enemies. CQ jumps well past 80% when I walk around. My specs: Phenom 720BE @ 3.5ghz 4gb DDR3 1333 @ 6-6-6-18-1 gigabyte 790FX NB @ 2.6ghz 64GB kingston SSD ATi 5850 (900core/1100mem) I can only imagine how much it sucks trying to run CQ on older AMD hardware... The good news is CQ is completely useless and has NO gameplay value. So turning it off isn't a big deal I heard you had a small epeen untill you posted your computers spec..
Brooks Puuntai Minmatar Nomadic Asylum	Posted - 2011.08.15 11:59:00 - [19] Whats really interesting is whats going to happen when/if it expands from just CQ. Imagine trying to render a large interior with 30-40 people ~~running~~ slowly walking around in station.
Alissa Solette	Posted - 2011.08.15 12:53:00 - [20] Originally by: Brooks Puuntai Whats really interesting is whats going to happen when/if it expands from just CQ. Imagine trying to render a large interior with 30-40 people ~~running~~ slowly walking around in station. Somewhere in the back of my head a word just popped into my mind... oh right, I think it was "scalability".



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.