| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
286
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 06:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Personally, I am disappointed in the community for making this troll thread 11 pages long. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
317
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 06:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
How much isk/hour do you earn for reporting intel these days? |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
317
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 04:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ra'Shyne Viper wrote:miners could simply have someone(s) watch the gate(s) i mean come on, you guys( 0.0 carebears) are pros at gate camping
EI Digin wrote:How much isk/hour do you earn for reporting intel these days?
Look, I countered your point before you even brought up it up! I must be Nostradamus or something.
What is the incentive for someone (or a group of people) to run security for anyone? You can just make the same amount of money mining/npcing/whatever in highsec and not have to pay a security group off, or worry about being scammed or your security people being sub-par, because it simply isn't necessary in highsec.
The security group can make more money doing activities themselves in highsec as well, so everyone is happy, and nobody encounters any risk at all! A win-win scenario.
Purchasing plex for additional accounts also reduces your bottom line, as you are having to pay/plex for two accounts instead of one. Why worry about that when you can just live in highsec? |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
318
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 16:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pron Fron wrote:Now we know you don't want realtime local updates because you cannot be bothered to watch the gates or use probes or use dscan or have enough friends to watch your back. You are just a lazy solo nullbear.
Mirima Thurander wrote:So this is nothing more than 40 pages of u ranting how no local messes up your isk/h.
Forum warrioring sure is easy when you get to pick and choose which thoughts you get to respond to, and ignore ones that have thought put into them and clearly counter your arguments.
Spaceman Jack wrote:You making a claim as to what everyone "would do" is nothing more than a far-fetched assumption. I make over a billion a month in Nullsec activities alone, and I don't even have alliance support structure in there.
Congratulations, you've made enough isk to fund yourself a plex, and two combat battleships which should inevitably be lost over the course of a month. Maybe you lose a ratting T3 and you only have enough money to replace that one ship that month. I know a billion is a nice large number but for any person who has space to defend (the primary objective in 0.0) and whose alliance does not have enough isk for full reimbursement programs (because large alliances have taken all of the moons), and for someone who needs to plex multiple accounts (you need two to scout yourself, right?), a billion isk is nothing.
Why worry about any of this stuff when you can live in highsec and make similar amounts of money, but with much less costs? |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
318
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 16:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
1. Does watching gates cover wormholes? No... But, you could have someone dedicated to scanning them out and watching them.
3. Do these friends get anything for watching gates besides hours of boredom? Not really. if there is isk to be made, everyone should agree to split profits to everyone that pitched in and did their jobs. You also have the added benefit of getting to know your corp and ally mates. TS works wonders and you also can't be afraid to talk.
I know you're new and all but this is only really done in wormholes (which you have lots of experience in) because people make enough money that splitting profits is not a big deal. In 0.0 splitting the pittance you make is not really worth it, and because everyone needs to be able to fund their activities, it's not fair or profitable to put people on gate duty for free.
If you made 0.0 as profitable as wormholes are then maybe we could start talking. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
320
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 17:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kenneth O'Hara wrote: EVE Unwritten Rules 1. Don't fly what you can't afford to replace. 2. You are never alone in space.
Why do so many people choose to fly nothing, leaving nullsec pretty much empty?
Kenneth O'Hara wrote: In terms of POSes and Alliances and defending everything, the corps should at least be able to defend themselves somewhat. The alliance is there as a fallback or a cushion and can be rerouted to high attack locales in case a corp's or corps' poses are under attack. This is where military strategy and logistics to fuel battles and wars come in. It is amazing what people can do when faced with a lack of resources and overwhelming odds. The brain is an amazing thing.
How many smaller, unaligned alliances own major money moons? Why do so many people complain about blobbing? |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
322
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 18:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
MasterEnt wrote:Lord Zim wrote:MasterEnt wrote:Are you kidding me - They get a cut of the profits, and a few kills if they are quick enough. Or they'd get more, with less tedium and less work, if they made money in hisec instead. MasterEnt wrote:Aren't you part of an alliance? WTF do you guys do over there. They PVP in nullsec, and make isk in hisec. So go make money wherever you can. Make in Null, Make inHi, Make in WH. Go be a master at this **** and own it. Besides, what does this have to do with the fact real time local is risk-averse.
Because if you take away things that nullsecers use as basic homeland defense and replace it with nothing, you are going to leave nullsec more of a barren wasteland than it already is. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
323
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:We have the same risk in WH anoms.
WHers don't have to deal with (covert/normal) cyno hotdrops where if you mistake one covops for a friendly, miss the time that it takes for them to recloak from a gate, or be out of range from the gate, you get pointed and suddenly a 25 man cloaky gang pops up on your overview and ends you. Or a titan shows up and dds your ratting carrier/dread.
|

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
324
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Kenneth O'Hara wrote: We have the same risk in WH anoms. No. You. Don't. You have less. Cry baby!!! Frankly, I don't think you have the balls to run in a W-space or without local. Cut away from local you crybaby carebear who wants to keep playing on easy mode.
Good argument |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
325
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 02:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Someone please stop this thread, I want to get off. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
325
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 06:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/01.jpg
This is a good jpg and more people should see it.
MasterEnt wrote:What does his corp/alliance have anything to do with his ability, or lack there of, to formulate an argument.
If you can't read your own posts, why should anyone bother responding to you?
|

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
326
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:22:00 -
[12] - Quote
Soma Khan wrote:oh look the empire space has higher population density. gosh what a surprise
It's a shame that the endgame for so many people is doing level4 missions in highsec, don't you agree? What should be done about it?
Soma Khan wrote:"What we're trying to do right now is develop a long-term roadmap, and the reason we're talking to players a lot is that we want to be sure you're all on board with what we're planning. The reason I'm not worried about local in this context is that it's a no-brainer that we need to do something, and "doing something about local" is assumed to have the support of the community provided it's something good. What we're more concerned about right now is what our next step should be after that, because we don't want "change local" to be the only thing about intel on our long-term plan." - CCP Greyscale, August 22, 2011you should read that whole thread, it's pretty educational
It's a good thing that the only fix isn't to remove local, or to have a delayed local and nothing else, which is what most "fix local" people in this thread think is the only option. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
327
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 08:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:I'm In a buffer tanked omni resist ship running sleeper sites with RR and corp mates. I'm in a far better spot than they are 90% of the time unless there's a wh I missed and there more of them than us.
Thank you for telling us that WHs are safer than nullsec. Do you enjoy playing eve on easy-mode?
Frying Doom wrote:Or they just don't want the same crap that has turned Null into an empty waste land.
Here we go again!
|

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
328
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 09:09:00 -
[14] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Something just dawned on me.
U say null ISK sucks.
CCP says the best ISK is where the most risk is at.
Maybe null ISK sucks because there's really no risk to null.
Very close, null "ISK" sucks because there's really no isk in null for the common member in the alliance, or for small alliances that are unable to hold moons. Only one letter off, not bad.
Put sleeper sites, or wormhole-esque ish/hour in 0.0 so that small powerblocs can survive, larger ones can allow their members to replace their own losses on a regular basis, be able to pay for scouts, and for people to be able to PVE in small fleets effectively and we can talk about removing local from 0.0. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
328
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 09:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Andski wrote:Mirima Thurander wrote:Maybe null ISK sucks because there's really no risk to null. nullsec is the riskiest space, period wormholes have a fourth the population of nullsec but 1/20th the ship kills statistically that makes wormholes safer than hisec, let alone k-space 0.0 And if you take out the corporately sponsored kills coming from ship replacement programs funded by moon mining how much do you have left? Null has so many kills due to its hand outs, not due to anything else. I asked a goon pilot one day why he blobs, his response "They pay me"
You don't get reimbursed if you lose your ratting tengu to stupidity, you only get reimbursed if you are actively helping the alliance in a fleet.
Fun fact: You don't earn any isk/hour when you are in a fleet. |
| |
|