Hey, looks nice!

I especially like the invention calculator. One of the clearest one's I've seen to date.

Ive tried a couple of things for invention

lets say i want to invent 100 425mm Autocannon bpc, then it should give you all the requirements to invent the bpc (datacores , etc), as well as the costs of it and then all the materials needed to manufacture all the successful bpc (lets say i have 50.40% of success). or at least it should give you the opportunity to enter the numbers manually that you want to invent or the t2 bpc you want to manufacture and then add it to the materials needed, its cost, etc

ive tried to change in the material detail the quantity of 425mm auto II i want to manufacture but lets say that i enter the number 50 (ive tried on the old version and it lets you do that). the calculator changes the quantity to 19 automatically and sometimes changes the decryptor used by it self and when it does says that i need for the datacores 1 mechanical and 1 nuclear.

i know this is a work in progress, but i takes too much time to update once you change some things. or is it just my Internet connection :P

what do you think of the possibility of adding a shopping list not just for one bpc or bpo (because it already gives you the total materials required), but for several as well for datacores in invention?

First off, amazing tool! Good work.

I noticed sometimes the program chooses max run BPC when actually a single run BPC is higher profit due to the time required to copy a max run BPC (such as for some ships and covert ops cloaking II). I would suggest including an ISK/hr functionality into the invention section as this is the second piece to the puzzle as an industrialist - maximizing your slot efficiency to generate income. You could also include whether or not the build the components depending on how long it takes to put all the pieces together...the logic to properly implement the latter may be far to difficult though.

Also check out T2 ammo numbers...they seem a bit off

Finally, you may want to add the profit/loss for the 'combined cost per unit' vs 'market price'. Maybe just print the amount of isk and then color the text depending on profit/loss.

Much props on the layout and all the work put into the tool. Very very good...I may not have to use EVE-HQ in parallel to my spreadsheets once ya add a few things!

Your comments are much appreciated, as is your time you've spent digging around and thinking about it. The tool is still quite new, so there's plenty left to do and it's under slow-but-steady work.

I have been using this for a few day now using my Corps BPO in order to manufacture items. For me the amount of materials is incorrect though. Ive set the PE to my skills, I've set the ME to the level of the BPO and the numbers are out.

For example. Caldari Shuttle, with an ME of 70 and a PE of 4 it says I need 2604 Tritanium to make. In reality it says I need 2629 Tritanium, and whilst the difference isnt vast it does show a difference and i wonder where else it would show different figures.

If you can advise on this it would be great.

Very nice, thank you for sharing the tool!

I noticed there was an error with rigs invention chance; base is marked at 25%, but rigs have a 40% base success in game.

I just discovered, excellent application!

Something that you can add : the assembly array modifier (for T2 ships assembly).

Any plan to create a little API for the materials ?
It would be awesome for integration on existing application !

Something that can take on parameter for example :
- the typeID of the Blueprint
- the production efficiency skill level
- the ME of the blueprint

And which return a list of material, with for each :
- the typeID of the material
- the quantity
- if the material can be build or not

For example a PHP page that take GET parameter and return XML or Json.

Thanks Jognu. Not saying never, but probably not. The reason is there is no unique data in Production Mixer that isn't available elsewhere. Having said that, I've been thinking about doing an Android version, which would end up connecting to something very similar to what you suggest on the serverside. So who knows