EVE Search - Updating Destroyers

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Famine Aligher'ri	Posted - 2005.04.11 16:07:00 - [121] If the ECM changes stay the same like on the test server. You only need 1 jammer II with supporting skills to jam a Battleship at random. That's a BS, think of how well it will do with Frigates... 1 non-racial jam, amarr destroyer jammed a Battleship. Group of destroyers with EW, will be able to throw down like crazy. Anyways, you lack any real support if you don't use good EW defense. Sorry but you just die, no matter how many guns you have. Famine Aligher'ri, of The Aligher'ri -The Frig-
Famine Aligher'ri V i L e	Posted - 2005.04.11 16:07:00 - [122] If the ECM changes stay the same like on the test server. You only need 1 jammer II with supporting skills to jam a Battleship at random. That's a BS, think of how well it will do with Frigates... 1 non-racial jam, amarr destroyer jammed a Battleship. Group of destroyers with EW, will be able to throw down like crazy. Anyways, you lack any real support if you don't use good EW defense. Sorry but you just die, no matter how many guns you have. Vile - Recruiting Pirates
James Draekn	Posted - 2005.04.11 18:28:00 - [123] Another option is to make all destroyers have 6 med and 6 low slots. Creating basically a stackable ship capable of being properly tanked if you really want to. If CCP leaves the CPU and Powergrid alone you could still create a fast tankable ship with awesome cap regen capablities. that is still in the heavy frigate class.
James Draekn X.E.N.O. Breidablik	Posted - 2005.04.11 18:28:00 - [124] Another option is to make all destroyers have 6 med and 6 low slots. Creating basically a stackable ship capable of being properly tanked if you really want to. If CCP leaves the CPU and Powergrid alone you could still create a fast tankable ship with awesome cap regen capablities. that is still in the heavy frigate class.
Alexi Borizkova	Posted - 2005.04.11 19:28:00 - [125] Originally by: Gariuys cruiser guns? on something that's obviously ment to put it's firepower on small targets? I said a new class of destroyers of tier II or III that used cruiser guns, not alterign the existing destroyers, I like them fine as is.
Alexi Borizkova Caldari New Age Solutions	Posted - 2005.04.11 19:28:00 - [126] Originally by: Gariuys cruiser guns? on something that's obviously ment to put it's firepower on small targets? I said a new class of destroyers of tier II or III that used cruiser guns, not alterign the existing destroyers, I like them fine as is. In Corporate Caldari, taxes pay YOU.
Nyxus	Posted - 2005.04.11 19:33:00 - [127] Like so many have pointed out...... the Amarr destroyer (Coercer) is pretty much trash. It can't fit the heavier gun (beams) so it can only fit the weaker pulses and only 1 midlot means that it is complete trash. As it lacks any decent bonus (no damage, optimal, or falloff) it's limited to a roughly 15km range with Radio and no utility. The overall abundance of tech 2 frigs just shows the SCREAMING need for the release of Tech 2 Destroyers. Are they in the works? Are they planned? Does anyone know? Nyxus
Nyxus GALAXIAN Rule of Three	Posted - 2005.04.11 19:33:00 - [128] Like so many have pointed out...... the Amarr destroyer (Coercer) is pretty much trash. It can't fit the heavier gun (beams) so it can only fit the weaker pulses and only 1 midlot means that it is complete trash. As it lacks any decent bonus (no damage, optimal, or falloff) it's limited to a roughly 15km range with Radio and no utility. The overall abundance of tech 2 frigs just shows the SCREAMING need for the release of Tech 2 Destroyers. Are they in the works? Are they planned? Does anyone know? Nyxus Originally by: keepiru I cant imagine a stronger signal of how pants 3/4 of new BS are than the fact that Matari will be training Amarr BS and Amarrians will be training Large Projectile to use the same ship
Famine Aligher'ri	Posted - 2005.04.11 23:17:00 - [129] Edited by: Famine Aligher''ri on 11/04/2005 23:18:34 Originally by: Nyxus Like so many have pointed out...... the Amarr destroyer (Coercer) is pretty much trash. It can't fit the heavier gun (beams) so it can only fit the weaker pulses and only 1 midlot means that it is complete trash. As it lacks any decent bonus (no damage, optimal, or falloff) it's limited to a roughly 15km range with Radio and no utility. The overall abundance of tech 2 frigs just shows the SCREAMING need for the release of Tech 2 Destroyers. Are they in the works? Are they planned? Does anyone know? Nyxus Latta [Multiple] - Are T2 versions of destroyers and battlecruisers planned? Oveur : Yes! Oveur : Not much more to say about them than that at this point :) Tomb : these ships are being planned for t2 versions but they might get special roles Tomb : me neither (Just incase you didn't see this) Famine Aligher'ri, of The Aligher'ri -The Frig-
Famine Aligher'ri V i L e	Posted - 2005.04.11 23:17:00 - [130] Edited by: Famine Aligher''ri on 11/04/2005 23:18:34 Originally by: Nyxus Like so many have pointed out...... the Amarr destroyer (Coercer) is pretty much trash. It can't fit the heavier gun (beams) so it can only fit the weaker pulses and only 1 midlot means that it is complete trash. As it lacks any decent bonus (no damage, optimal, or falloff) it's limited to a roughly 15km range with Radio and no utility. The overall abundance of tech 2 frigs just shows the SCREAMING need for the release of Tech 2 Destroyers. Are they in the works? Are they planned? Does anyone know? Nyxus Latta [Multiple] - Are T2 versions of destroyers and battlecruisers planned? Oveur : Yes! Oveur : Not much more to say about them than that at this point :) Tomb : these ships are being planned for t2 versions but they might get special roles Tomb : me neither (Just incase you didn't see this) Vile - Recruiting Pirates
Sadist	Posted - 2005.04.12 00:21:00 - [131] I wonder what role would a Tech 2 battlecruiser get... Maybe something like a stealth bomber, only without cloak, and able to mount 2-3 citadel torp launchers and getting bonuses to fittings and speed of torps. Bombardier class ftw. Or an advanced drone ship? The possibilities are engless. _______________________________________________
Sadist Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2005.04.12 00:21:00 - [132] I wonder what role would a Tech 2 battlecruiser get... Maybe something like a stealth bomber, only without cloak, and able to mount 2-3 citadel torp launchers and getting bonuses to fittings and speed of torps. Bombardier class ftw. Or an advanced drone ship? The possibilities are engless. òòòòòòòòòòòò VIP member of the [23] Quote: - Numbers alone do not win a battle - No, but I bet they help.
Nyxus	Posted - 2005.04.12 01:47:00 - [133] Quote: Latta [Multiple] - Are T2 versions of destroyers and battlecruisers planned? Oveur : Yes! Oveur : Not much more to say about them than that at this point :) Tomb : these ships are being planned for t2 versions but they might get special roles Tomb : me neither (Just incase you didn't see this) General Famine Aligher'ri, of the Voice of One -The Frig- <cheers crazily> I didnt see that Famine! Thank you! Hope springs eternal and all that.... I hope that they plan on releasing those puppies soon. Everyone likes new ships, and especially tech 2 ones. And in this case, tech 2 destroyers are severely needed. Nyxus
Nyxus GALAXIAN Rule of Three	Posted - 2005.04.12 01:47:00 - [134] Quote: Latta [Multiple] - Are T2 versions of destroyers and battlecruisers planned? Oveur : Yes! Oveur : Not much more to say about them than that at this point :) Tomb : these ships are being planned for t2 versions but they might get special roles Tomb : me neither (Just incase you didn't see this) General Famine Aligher'ri, of the Voice of One -The Frig- <cheers crazily> I didnt see that Famine! Thank you! Hope springs eternal and all that.... I hope that they plan on releasing those puppies soon. Everyone likes new ships, and especially tech 2 ones. And in this case, tech 2 destroyers are severely needed. Nyxus Originally by: keepiru I cant imagine a stronger signal of how pants 3/4 of new BS are than the fact that Matari will be training Amarr BS and Amarrians will be training Large Projectile to use the same ship
Murehk	Posted - 2006.11.30 13:16:00 - [135] Originally by: James Draekn Another option is to make all destroyers have 6 med and 6 low slots. Creating basically a stackable ship capable of being properly tanked if you really want to. If CCP leaves the CPU and Powergrid alone you could still create a fast tankable ship with awesome cap regen capablities. that is still in the heavy frigate class. So you rekon that a dessy with maxed high slots and AB, web scram and 3ecm wouldnt be overpowered. I mean cmon, I can take cruisers with that but only ab, scram and 2 ecm.
Skawl GeoTech	Posted - 2006.11.30 13:28:00 - [136] Originally by: Murehk Originally by: James Draekn Another option is to make all destroyers have 6 med and 6 low slots. Creating basically a stackable ship capable of being properly tanked if you really want to. If CCP leaves the CPU and Powergrid alone you could still create a fast tankable ship with awesome cap regen capablities. that is still in the heavy frigate class. So you rekon that a dessy with maxed high slots and AB, web scram and 3ecm wouldnt be overpowered. I mean cmon, I can take cruisers with that but only ab, scram and 2 ecm. Holy necromancy batman!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.