| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Axelay
   |
Posted - 2003.07.06 03:45:00 -
[1]
Such a load of crap.
All the grief I got over my signature and yet here are some examples of appearanlyt PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE signatures that others are using.
Vulgar:
*snip*
Foul language:
*snip*
I don't wanna hear any more crap from any of you moderators about my pink bat, m'kay?
Edited by: Axelay on 06/07/2003 03:47:12
_____
m0o
|
jabb0r
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 03:58:00 -
[2]
oh, u missed something ....
like i said before.... this isnt what u think.. this is a bottle of yellow "nerf" lemonade
Edited by: jabb0r on 06/07/2003 04:00:52
----------------------------------------------
this is a signature
winamp-radio-list |
Axelay
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 03:59:00 -
[3]
Not really, it's not important.
_____
m0o
|
netburnr
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 04:00:00 -
[4]
lol, someone pees on your corp and its vulger, someone uses the word 'damn' (which is allowed on TV) and its profanity. HA!
And as it stands now, there is nothing wrong with the bat, except the fact that everyone and their dog was using it for a day. (ohhh and the fact that you are breaking the table with your sig axe.
Edited by: netburnr on 06/07/2003 04:00:18
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 04:02:00 -
[5]
my sig is related to 'Communism'
does that offend you too?
_____________________________________
Perpetually driven, your end is our beginning.
"Can I be a consultant for EVE II?" - WhiteDwarf |
Snoop
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 04:02:00 -
[6]
i dont see what was wrong with the bat in the 1st place.......
|
Axelay
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 04:09:00 -
[7]
Im not trying to start a special-olympics debate with my fellow players about the content of their signatures.
My point is that MY SIGNATURE is fine, and the mods should not have given me such a hard time for it.
I don't PERSONALLY have any problem with any of your signatures (so far) except that they seem to go unchallenged when my pink bat ellicited a firestorm from the mods.
_____
m0o
|
Cymoril
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 05:35:00 -
[8]
Yes, Axe, you figured it out. It's a conspiracy. They're out to get you. <rolls eyes> They are singling you out, and you alone. They have your telephone tapped, and they can see everything you type on your computer. They may even be hiding in your closet or under your bed. "They" are out to get you.
Would ya give it a rest already? |
Emizzon
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 05:46:00 -
[9]
I'll have to agree with Axelay on this one, I don't mind the bat, but the urinating on the corp logo. . . that's just a little disturbing.
لللللللللللللللللللللللللللللل
¾.ب
Check out my corp here:Taggart Transdimensional |
Sanru
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 07:01:00 -
[10]
I don't see what is wrong with it other than the reason for it coming to be is incorrect.
Bug fixes are not nerfs.
Small turret skill bonus being applies to medium turret then in turn being applies to large turret was a bug. Fixing it was not a nerf.
Ammo/crystal range modifications not being applied to the weapon was a bug. Fixing this was not a nerf.
Surgical strike applying a bonus to damage add modules was a bug. Fixing it was not a nerf.
Changing the name of a weapon is not a nerf.
Did fixing these things make weapons weaker ? Yes, but they were only as strong as they were due to bugs. Cry about it, but you should have known it wasn't going to last forever. (In fact, you DID know about it, so what all you m0o guys are fussing over is beyond me).
Let's see, what else are you calling a nerf. Ah yes, gate camping. Yes, god forbid they get the security system working properly. Pirate's life should be easy and risk-free! How dare they hold you accountable for criminal actions.
|
Tristan
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 07:03:00 -
[11]
it - was - not - just - about - FIXING - weapons
im sick of explaining that. infact im not going to explain it again.. look a few pages back and see.
|
Emizzon
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 07:06:00 -
[12]
o.O I thought this was a thread about the pink bat. . .
لللللللللللللللللللللللللللللل
¾.ب
Check out my corp here:Taggart Transdimensional |
Joshua Calvert
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 07:18:00 -
[13]
My signature now boasts italicized text.
w00t!
LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! |
Endureth
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 07:23:00 -
[14]
Isn't it a forum rule to NOT discuss the moderators decisions? Just forget it already. You got your new bat, live with it. I think it's a fine looking bat, with or without Richard Simmons.
Damn, some people just don't know when a discussion is over.
-E
|
Molly
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 11:29:00 -
[15]
"Isn't it a forum rule to NOT discuss the moderators decisions?"
Isn't it a forum rule to NOT **** a few people off as a moderator and to allow some to use their signatures and some not?
As I already suggested once, you would perfectly fit in my current picture of a forum moderator here. Feel free to apply.
---
"Molly > funny thing is, if they warn me for attacking in 1.0, why does a GM wish me luck doing so?
Jash Illian > perverse sense of humor?
Molly > lol
Jash Illian > honestly tho, because he prolly doesn't know bships" |
Lowlayer
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 12:09:00 -
[16]
Axely, the big difference is your signature is aimed somewhat negatively at the game developers whereas the other examples you gave were either aimed at noone im particualt or at an in-game fictitous entity (a corp).
Personally, I find the signature with the guy beating something much more disturbing....
|
jabb0r
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 12:53:00 -
[17]
seems like most of you have some problems with my sig. , so.....+zap zap+ its gone ..(till i have an idea for a better1)
Edited by: jabb0r on 06/07/2003 13:03:42
----------------------------------------------
this is a signature
winamp-radio-list |
Wrangler
|
Posted - 2003.07.06 13:02:00 -
[18]
Yes, it is a rule to not discuss forum moderation.
*click*
[Read the Rules!] - [Email the Moderators] |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |