| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harisdrop
   |
Posted - 2005.04.22 13:33:00 -
[1]
The dream mod
Please mr Dev come out and say you think this will be here in the next major patch!!!
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
Elve Sorrow
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 13:36:00 -
[2]
Yes.
Delivered to my R&D agent please.
/Elve
New Video out! Watch me!
|
ZeeWolf
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 14:29:00 -
[3]
Looks like when you recycle them you get more minerals back than it took to build.
|
Janus Ovellian
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 14:33:00 -
[4]
Yes, but the cost in construction blocks and RAM offset the gain of 1 nocx and 9 iso...
Interesting times await... |
Dionysus Davinci
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 14:42:00 -
[5]
The supposly extra resources you get is from the regular expanded cargo hold 
|
Vicker Lahn'se
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 15:13:00 -
[6]
That module is ridiculously easy to produce and would sell for a ridiculous amount of ISK. It would also be in super high demand because every player has a use for it. I think if the devs release that they need to send out LOTS of bpos to the agents.
|
Finix Jaeger
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 15:21:00 -
[7]
nah, one BPO is enough... *hint, hint
|
Ticondrius
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 15:37:00 -
[8]
If this is ever released...they better make 5,000 BPOs at LEAST. It's one of the most heavily used and lost modules in the game.
"If I'm brutally honest and it offends you, that's not my fault."
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Sadist
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 16:05:00 -
[9]
The module itself should cost the price of miner II's seeing as they are the cheapest tech 2 module available (and one most widely used).
However that would totally bring down the named expanders market.
_______________________________________________
|
Lord Morkoth
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 16:33:00 -
[10]
wtf? max passenger bonus= 0 .... does that mean that there will be later a mod that allows a passenger bonus?
|
Elithiomel
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 17:19:00 -
[11]
 Originally by: ZeeWolf
Looks like when you recycle them you get more minerals back than it took to build.
In case you had failed to notice, all tech 2 items are like that. The difference is usually the minerals returned from recycling the tech 1 version.
---------------------------------------------
Engineers motto; If it doesn't fit, force it. If it breaks it needed replacing anyway. |
Aliksr
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 17:54:00 -
[12]
They'll release 8 bpos and these things will cost 80mil isk each and i don't see why it should be any other way
It's the same with dreadnaughts, T2 gallente industrials, and all the other things that nearly everyone would like to have. You can't all have them! Then what's the point!
Who uses miner Is any more? They probably only flooded out so many miner II bpos to keep down mineral prices. Cargo expanders are not nearly so important for game balance
|
Dawnstar
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 18:01:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Vicker Lahn'se
That module is ridiculously easy to produce and would sell for a ridiculous amount of ISK. It would also be in super high demand because every player has a use for it. I think if the devs release that they need to send out LOTS of bpos to the agents.
::Coughs::
Well, they'd be real useful... assuming we finally get Expanded Cargo I BPOs on the market. Going to be a mite tough to build otherwise.
I'd love to see one of them too tho.
-D
Proposal for Overhauling Manufacturing. |
Voltron
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 18:22:00 -
[14]
WTB license to print isk
Volt
|
Sewell
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 18:42:00 -
[15]
The stats are probably just placeholders, so don't take em to seriously.
That being said - that print will earn whoever gets it more money than the isk generating screen-saver...
|
ExChange
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 19:45:00 -
[16]
Edited by: ExChange on 22/04/2005 19:46:31
putting 5 on a itheron5... gives 16350 m3
so owning some is isk printing to
|
Lucci
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 19:51:00 -
[17]
Should be 27315 m3 actually.
|
Dark Silver
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 21:11:00 -
[18]
Did anyone else notice that in its stats it sais -29.5% cargo space and extra 20% structure?
|
Xendie
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 21:47:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Dark Silver
Did anyone else notice that in its stats it sais -29.5% cargo space and extra 20% structure?
hehe i thought"wtf why would he want -29,5% cargospace" 
|
Selim
|
Posted - 2005.04.22 21:50:00 -
[20]
Awesome, now my structure tank will be even better!
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |