Or you could just take your small gang into a wormhole.

I don't think you are that stupid....or maybe you are!
If you don't understand the difference between wormhole entries and stargates you are really really one...

Fact is... any entity would have to make aditional effort to keep their space..and actually defend it! This isn't happening...ant it won't happen as long mechanics stay the same.

Cheers

And I hope you aren't stupid enough to think a "small gang" is in any way a threat worth defending from to many thousand player alliance that can field titans and multiple fleets with multiple hundreds of ships.

...or maybe you are

And I hope you aren't stupid enough to think a "small gang" is in any way a threat worth defending from to many thousand player alliance that can field titans and multiple fleets with multiple hundreds of ships.

...or maybe you are

Or you could just take your small gang into a wormhole.

Useless, any carebear pocket of any worth would have one of these structures so that the small gang can bash them
No. I fly small gang so I can AVOID structure bashing.

Go away and rethink your life.

or just make low/null local like W-space. and remove local from highsec and have constalation chat as default .

(This would give a target to small gang so it could be hit and locals become blind unless they repair said module. This would make them getting in fleet, repair module and continue their jobs... )

This is how its working pretty much atm on tq. When small gang enters local everyone need to stop their activities in space and usually counter fleet is formed. Then we either get pew pew or small gang runs away back in their caves. And after that we can go back to our activities.

You can also reinforce control towers. Which for they need to stop their activities and form defence/repping fleet.

Guerilla tactics and disturbance is allready on tq aswell. Ever heard of afk cloakies, cov opses, force recons, bobs and stuff. We kill ratters daily with guerilla tactics on tq.

Bad idea imo.. I would just prolly perma quit eve and go look some new game. That just would be too bad as i really like eve as it is.

Edit: And btw u dont need dreads to bash. U can even bash with tengus if u got enough of them...

So you are saying you don't like the idea because you like eve as it is. So no improvements whatsoever? You only needed to adapt like you do every time CCP makes a change to mechanics.



Why going for tengus when you can do it solo with SC?

But good luck soloing alot stuff in SC

You probably are too stupid and don't deserve it.... but i will bite the troll.

In any of these replies you saw anything about a threat? No...
I think you know the difference between disruption and threat. Of course a small gang can't be a threat to a large coalition, but how about guerrilla warfare? You saw what i did... i will repeat again...not a threat, is a disruption and oportunities to generate PvP content.

Big coalitions don't like it? probably not...

You are just playing with semantics. You can't disrupt anything if you aren't a threat.

Suppose you warp into a popular nullsec ratting system in a shuttle, and the locals see you are in a shuttle. They'll keep ratting because your shuttle is not a threat and won't disrupt them.

Now if you jump into system in a cloaky T3 or a stealth bomber or something that is a threat, the locals will dock up or for defense fleets or do what ever to mitigate that threat.

For the most part though, the only activity in nullsec that a small gang can disrupt is ratting, and since those potential small gang targets can go shoot red crosses anywhere, they rarely fight to protect any particular ratting system.

The fact is, local lowers the bar on gameplay by handing out intel with trivial effort of glancing at the chat roster.

This means that there is no such thing as actual stealth or covert gameplay. You are perfectly known to everyone present who bothers to glance at the roster.

You can always go to w-space, which is arguably more accessible to the average Eve player than most of nullsec.

And lose outposts and markets?

That's like going camping with no plumbing or electricity just so you can avoid the noises of traffic. You would be exchanging one set of problems for another, with little to no net gain.

And while anyone could claim removing local would be the same, no improvement with different sets of problems, it would be disingenuous by assuming many details as a given. These details are quite disputed, and by many.

Useless, any carebear pocket of any worth would have one of these structures so that the small gang can bash them
No. I fly small gang so I can AVOID structure bashing.

Go away and rethink your life.