| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
General Jung
Asgard Intelligence Services
Most Usual Suspects
9
   |
Posted - 2012.12.07 11:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dear CCP,
Hello Forum,
it has been mentioned by CCP Greyscale at FanFest 2011, and a few times by other 2nd bank CCP employers, that this feature is still on the agenda. And that wouldn-Št be a minor change, because the lowsec as a whole will take use of such a treshhold. One of the obvious reasons is that more players will use that bufferzone to nullsec a lot more, including new players.
I think the lowsec community wants a clear statement from a CCP Employer.
What are the current plans for that feature?
What are the potential problems you may have encountered, that must be solved?
Talk to us CCP, talk to us ! |
Shokre O'Corwi
The Squid Squad
Slumdogs
17
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 12:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
General Jung wrote:P.S.: Don-Št forget that we should get a security increasement when killing the right people, like criminals. :-)
This shouldn't happen. It's too easily exploitable by using alts. |
General Jung
Asgard Intelligence Services
Most Usual Suspects
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 12:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Again, this all is already mentioned by CCP Greyscale.
Furthermore I can-Št see where this would be exploitable: A -3.0 player kills a -7.0 players and gains a security status increasment. |
Shokre O'Corwi
The Squid Squad
Slumdogs
17
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 13:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
General Jung wrote:Again, this all is already mentioned by CCP Greyscale.
Furthermore I can-Št see where this would be exploitable: A -3.0 player kills a -7.0 players and gains a security status increasment.
Create a new character, use it to attack people until it's security status is low enough (people PvP-ing in LowSec and ganking in HiSec say it's incredibly easy to do so), set it's medical clone to a station of your choice, undock it, kill it, rinse and repeat. |
Ashriban Kador
Amarrian Retribution
Amarr 7th Fleet
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 14:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Shokre O'Corwi wrote:]Create a new character, use it to attack people until it's security status is low enough (people PvP-ing in LowSec and ganking in HiSec say it's incredibly easy to do so), set it's medical clone to a station of your choice, undock it, kill it, rinse and repeat.
More effort than going to Null and ratting. Seems fair and balanced.
Your goals may align with some ... and with others, collide with the force of suns. |
Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mordus Angels
777
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 14:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ashriban Kador wrote:Shokre O'Corwi wrote:]Create a new character, use it to attack people until it's security status is low enough (people PvP-ing in LowSec and ganking in HiSec say it's incredibly easy to do so), set it's medical clone to a station of your choice, undock it, kill it, rinse and repeat. More effort than going to Null and ratting. Seems fair and balanced.
He has a point here.
it is not that it cannot be abused, so long as it is not practical to be abused.
People simply will not do extra work to abuse something, when they can achieve the goals easier in the correct manner.
Abuse of something is only a problem when it becomes the easy way out.
Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata)
Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |
General Jung
Asgard Intelligence Services
Most Usual Suspects
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 15:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ashriban Kador wrote:Shokre O'Corwi wrote:]Create a new character, use it to attack people until it's security status is low enough (people PvP-ing in LowSec and ganking in HiSec say it's incredibly easy to do so), set it's medical clone to a station of your choice, undock it, kill it, rinse and repeat. More effort than going to Null and ratting. Seems fair and balanced.
Exactly. I mean I see the point, but CCP should really revamp the security status system. And the changes CCP Greyscale mentioned are already pretty good, even if its still not solid.
The point I headed is that we don-Št have a single offical statement since that. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |