Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jackson Steely
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Basically |

Revman Zim
Aura of Darkness Nulli Secunda
41
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
I will agree with you that it is not the optimal way to fit a ship for PvP, however, for PvE it is the best way to go in an Amarr ship.
Armor tanking is necessary for some extended high level missions.
IMHO
|

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
273
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
No ****, got some content? |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
953
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
It really depends on the ship. Active armour tanking is very good on the right ship.
Hell, i'd say it's more effective than active shield tanking (not using an ASB) since ASBs made that totally obsolete. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
ibtl for rant You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
244
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Active armor tanking fleets need to be done remote to escape the game breaking cycle times. That requires high slots and a lot of Cap so yes, Active armor tanking is off the doctrine for most people. The additional logistics in fleet take from would be dps and it doesn't work out as an end benefit. R.I.P. Vile Rat |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
401
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 01:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:It really depends on the ship. Active armour tanking is very good on the right ship.
Hell, i'd say it's more effective than active shield tanking (not using an ASB) since ASBs made that totally obsolete. How so? Even before the ASB active shield boosting was more effective than armor tanking in my opinion. The ASB only seemed to exasperate the issue further. The only time Armor tanking appears to be beneficial to me would be when the hull bonuses enhance it and mids are in short supply. |

Transmaritanus
Sinister Elite Black Legion.
18
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378
Check that EHP.
And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy.
Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub. |

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
668
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub.
Double Rep Incursus would like to talk to you as well. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
350
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub.
T1 frigate kills active armor T2 frigate. What side of this debate are you on again? |
|

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub. T1 frigate kills active armor T2 frigate. What side of this debate are you on again?
er... they're both T1 frigates. The fact that an Incursus managed to take over 35000 damage before it died is what he's talking about. And an active-tanked Incursus with a cap booster will almost always outperform (depending on the pilot) a passive tanked Incursus. It definitely depends on the ship.
What makes it even more epic is that it was only a 10-mil loss. At 10 mil, you can get 35,000 ehp by active-tanking an Incursus.
Gallente FTW!! You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
350
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Ocih wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub. T1 frigate kills active armor T2 frigate. What side of this debate are you on again? er... they're both T1 frigates. The fact that an Incursus managed to take of 35000 damage before it died is what he's talking about.
Corrected. Not sure why I saw Ishkur. It's still difficult to convince me the ship you just blew up was well fit. |

Jackson Steely
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm?
So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus?
Thank you for confirming my OP. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
353
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus? Thank you for confirming my OP.
To make this a little closer to relevant in EVE Online, you could change the title as well.
Active Armor Ganking Sucks.
Gank beats tank. EVE is EVE. It will never change. |

Shinzhi Xadi
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:47:00 -
[15] - Quote
How about a hypothetical tanking comparison here, just to illustrate how fail active armor tanking is: This is from a omni tanked mission perspective. Yes I know that many missions only do 2 types of damage, but thats not the point, the point is to see how much tank can be done as omni with these ships.
Take the 4 marauders, designed for active tanks, designed for missions.
Allow them to have 2 damage mods in the lows, rest is tank. Golem gets 1 TP in mid. Tanking modules can be anything up to A-type. No X-type, and no officer, and no ASB. Must be cap stable or stably running on cap boosters. Use any implants you want. Do not overheat any modules
Golem: HG crystal implants, and A-type tank, with 2 BCS, and 1 target painter, EFT shows cap stable 2249 dps OMNI tank. Rigs are not used for tank.
Vargur: HG crystal implants, similar tank to the golem, 2 gyro's, cap stable 2211 dps OMNI tank. Rigs not used for tank.
Paladin: A-type tank, 2 heat sink, cap stable 971 dps OMNI tank, Rigs used for cap.
Kronos: sorry, don't fly them, so skipping, but I suspect its similar to the Paladin.
Just for fun, how about a nightmare fit for extreme heavy tanking in missions, must be cap stable, 2 damage mods like above?
Nightmare: HG crystal implants, A-type tank, 2 heat sink, cap stable 1772 dps OMNI tank, Rigs used for cap.
What does this show? with high end modules, active shield tanking is very strong for PVE. Armor tank sucks no matter how much you spend. All these fits can be easily checked in EFT. I'm not saying shield tanking is overpowered, I think its working as intended. Armor tanking needs to be fixed badly.
I invite anybody to figure out a paladin or kronos tank that can approach the tanks of the golem, vargur, or even the nightmare using up to a-type modules while keeping at least 2 damage mods in low. |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
126
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 02:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus? Thank you for confirming my OP. Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp.
Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Disturbed Acquaintance
197
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 03:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Basically
Your Joking .... you must be
The Dominix has an Awesome active tank The Typhoon is built like a brick, and it shield-reps squishy ravens like a Boss at the same time.
EFT/Pfya ... play with fits see what is possible with good skills because yes as a noob you will suck, royally. |

Nylith Empyreal
Crowbar Industries. Rebel Alliance of New Eden
190
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 03:03:00 -
[18] - Quote
Dual Rep Hyperion FTW. "Oh, you can't help that," said the troll: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" -ásaid the forumwarrior. "You must be," said the troll, "or you wouldn't have come here." |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
727
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 04:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
I watched 10secondrule's Megathron sit and tank alot of abuse for quite awhile last night in Rens...before he misclicked and got WTFPWNOMGBBQD right on the undock. Was quite hilarious, and he did quite well until he died. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
953
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:The only time Armor tanking appears to be beneficial to me would be when the hull bonuses enhance it and mids are in short supply.
that's about the same as saying that lasers are only good on ships with a laser bonus... (No sh*t sherlock)
as for armour tanking, it's actually not true. vindicators, domis even buffer fit proteus and legion without the rep bonus sub work very well with armour reppers. and im talking just PVP here since man many unbonused hulls get armour tanked for PVE.
in any case, the exact same thing can be said of active shield tanking where the only ship without a boost or resist bonus that i can think of that works (or worked, more realistically) well with a non ASB active shield tank is the nightmare. |
|

fukier
244
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:05:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Basically
you say this as if its a bad thing... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

fukier
244
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:10:00 -
[22] - Quote
Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub.
i wonder how much ehp it has against a thrasher with arities using fusion?
incursus is great if you can tank the incomming dps and have a crap load of cap boosters...
i would not mind if you could use nanite repair paste in amor reps to make them better... kinda like what they did with asb but instead of cap boosters you used nanite paste... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
348
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
need to boost armor tanking How the **** do you remove a signature? |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2736
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Commander Ted wrote:Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp. Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How the idiots he was shooting could easily have won that fight:
Give him something supertanked to chew on and warp in at 20+ km, preferably with some heavy alpha. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

fukier
245
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp. Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA How the idiots he was shooting could easily have won that fight: Give him something supertanked to chew on and warp in at 20+ km, preferably with some heavy alpha.
all those dead ships and not one ecm drone or bb?
ffs... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Twopah
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tanking in EVE is a waste of time.
280,000 EHP freighters drop in under 5 seconds and we aren't talking 300 man blobs to make that happen. PvP in EVE is a last man standing cage match.
Unless that changes, this is a thread about novelty battles and making soup from peelings. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 05:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ya know, I once flew a mission with a guy flying an Navy Apocalypse with mad armor tank abilities. It was very impressive... at least up to the point where his tank started to fail and he had to warp out to make repairs.
Meanwhile, my shield tanked Myrmidon stayed behind and soaked 100% of the aggo until he could make it back several minutes later. It was pretty rough - I got knocked down to barely 75% shield by the time he got back! This was, up until then, unheard of.
But that was PvE... the general consensus for PvPers is that armor tanking is the way to go. PvE though? Shield tank > Armor tank, hands down.
Look, that armor repair module may look nice until you break everything down to a second-by-second pile of math. Let's say that I've got a shield tank Gila that can heal 200 points of shield per second, passive (and I do). Now let's say that someone else has a armor repair module that can heal 800 points per cycle. Looks like armor repair is cooler, so long as they can handle the battery drain, right? But then look at the cycle times... is it 10 seconds long? Opps - looks like his repair rate is actually only 80 points per second... and he's wasting his battery to do it. Shield tank wins the argument.
Yes, you shield boat has a higher sig and missiles blah blah blah. So what? If they can't hurt you then it doesn't matter how often they hit you. Plus there is the basic "general safety" issue - meaning that if your shield tank fails, you have until your armor dies to warp out. If your armor tank fails, you're basically toast because everyone knows that whenever your down to hull the game always experiences a sudden & mysterious burst of lag that keeps you from warping out in time. So when the poop hits the fan, it's a question of "repair ship" or "buy a new one."
Again, I'm only talking about PvE, not PvP, so spare me your PvP arguments because I'm actually agreeing with you in that area. I've seen enough active tank done in PvP to see that it works there. Just talking about missions running here. Go with shields, kids. It's easier, safer, costs less and won't suck down your battery.
Addendum: The battery issue especially important for Amarr ships using lasers. Why on earth CCP thought it would be a good idea to make a race that is so helplessly dependent on batteries for their weapons also have to depend on that same already stressed-out battery to defend their ships with armor tanking is beyond me. Actually, I take that back. I was assuming that they honestly believed it was a good idea. From the people who brought you the Amarr drone destroyer in the same patch that killed drone use... yeah, thanks for nothing CCP. EvE Forum Bingo |

Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
135
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 06:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Medium dual rep + armor pumps rigs + booser 525 armor hp eatch, Dual large rep on dominix + dual cap inectors even more awesome.
I cant agree with OP, its depend enemy and damage output you got... you cant stand to few man blob even you got faction tank... EvE isn't game, its style of living. |

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
343
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 06:55:00 -
[29] - Quote
Commander Ted wrote:Jackson Steely wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus? Thank you for confirming my OP. Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp. Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Lol @ local chat.... go to about 6:00 in and read local.
"throw more ships at it"
MOAR SHIPS!!! You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Jawas
The Scope Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 10:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tom Gerard wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub. Double Rep Incursus would like to talk to you as well. Dual rep Omen does a good job too with decent skills. However, that was over a year ago, not sure about how good it is now though.
|
|

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace That Red Alliance
216
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 10:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
active tank myrmidon works pretty well |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 11:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub.
Next: - 1x T2 Medium Armor Repairer on Harbinger - 1x T2 X-Large Shield booster on Cyclone |

Mirima Thurander
Estrada Dynamics - Exploration and Acquisition
448
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 13:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
Yes It Does
A Dark time comes. A time of terror comes. My time. If it offends you. Stop me. |

Darius Brinn
Iberians Iberians.
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 13:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus? Thank you for confirming my OP.
Didn't Liang prove that a ASB fit Myrmidon tanked better than a triple DEADSPACE repper Myrmidon, in every possible way?
Also, to make the triple Myrm good, you need perfect Repair systems and Battlecruisers V, and still you will get alpha'd by damage that would still allow a ASB Harpy to make it back to the gate :P |

Jitalt Pirkibo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 13:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Plus there is the basic "general safety" issue - meaning that if your shield tank fails, you have until your armor dies to warp out. If your armor tank fails, you're basically toast because everyone knows that whenever your down to hull the game always experiences a sudden & mysterious burst of lag that keeps you from warping out in time. So when the poop hits the fan, it's a question of "repair ship" or "buy a new one." No.
If your armor drops despite your repper running at full load you know at 95% armor that you will need to leave. On the other hand you won't know if your PST can soak up all that damage until it's close to being broken - which means most of your buffer is gone already and your in for a ride down a steep slope.
And that measly bit of armor most shield ships have is gone in the blink of an eye - it's not a safety net worth mentioning.
Anyhow, if you let it come this far you deserve to pop - doesn't matter if armor or shield tanked.
Talking PVE of course... |

Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
382
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 13:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
So you are basically saying why aren't there crystals for armor tanking?
same reason there aren't slaves for shield tanking.
same reason why there is no caldari-minmatar or gallente-amarr pirate boats.
because screw fairness. |

James Amril-Kesh
RAZOR Alliance
1458
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 14:16:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jitalt Pirkibo wrote:Katran Luftschreck wrote: Plus there is the basic "general safety" issue - meaning that if your shield tank fails, you have until your armor dies to warp out. If your armor tank fails, you're basically toast because everyone knows that whenever your down to hull the game always experiences a sudden & mysterious burst of lag that keeps you from warping out in time. So when the poop hits the fan, it's a question of "repair ship" or "buy a new one." No. If your armor drops despite your repper running at full load you know at 95% armor that you will need to leave. On the other hand you won't know if your PST can soak up all that damage until it's close to being broken - which means most of your buffer is gone already and your in for a ride down a steep slope. And that measly bit of armor most shield ships have is gone in the blink of an eye - it's not a safety net worth mentioning. Anyhow, if you let it come this far you deserve to pop - doesn't matter if armor or shield tanked. Talking PVE of course... I guess it's a good thing nobody uses PST in PVP. -áObjects in mirror are redder than they appear. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 14:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:So you are basically saying why aren't there crystals for armor tanking?
same reason there aren't slaves for shield tanking.
same reason why there is no caldari-minmatar or gallente-amarr pirate boats.
because screw fairness.
Main advantage for shield tanking is the fact that you can use oversized shield boosters. With armor tank you have to use repairer that is meant to be used in your ship.
Armor: Frigate: small Cruiser/BC: medium BS: large
Shield: Frigate: small Cruiser/BC: medium/large/X-large BS: large/X-large |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
132
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 16:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp. Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA How the idiots he was shooting could easily have won that fight: Give him something supertanked to chew on and warp in at 20+ km, preferably with some heavy alpha. Like all those maelstroms? Also you aint gonna alpha a vindicator without an entire gang, AND even if he couldn't break you he could just jump through the gate. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
924
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 17:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
Unless you're in an incursus, in that case you're an unstoppable death machine that no other T1 frigate in the game can reasonably kill.
10% rep bonus on the Myrm and Brutix too, please. |
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
165
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 17:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:You are just terrible at EVE. Active Armor tanking kicks ass. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15154378Check that EHP. And that's not an isolated case either. When I fight Incursuses they go for 20 minutes at a time, because the tank is sexy. Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? Or a Active Tank Sacrilage? Learn to undock scrub. Next: - 1x T2 Medium Armor Repairer on Harbinger - 1x T2 X-Large Shield booster on Cyclone
That's the main problem. Ever tryed to use a Large Armor Rep on a Harbinger?
It is FAR to easy to use oversized Shield Boosters!
If you compare a empty Harbinger with just a Med Rep and a empty Hurrican with jus a MED Booster they are similar in HP/S. Harbinger get 51(53) armor/s and Hurrican 54(59) shield/s. BUT who uses MED Booster? Not even Cruiser fits use MED Booster as it should be! If you find a kill mail with a "only" a Large Booster on a Cyclon you get flaimed allready as it is a "must be" to fit X-Large. The sad part is: THEY FIT! Sure, you lose alot PG and CPU but it is not imposible to fit them. Just for fun try to fit a Large Repair on a Harbinger. It's not posible as you miss over 400 PG WITHOUT anything else fitted!
Fitting requierments for Shield Boosters are simply 100% broken. Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

BearJews
Secure Arms Trade Coalition Secure Arms Trade Coalitions
57
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
i dont think it's broken, just a different mechanic. Are you going to say missile system are broken because they don't do insta damage? Because velocity and both signature affect the applied dps? Come on, differmt systems, different results. It was never meant to be the same |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
64
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
I have a dual plate dual rep prophecy that's pretty meaty. "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url] for details. |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
134
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:I have a dual plate dual rep prophecy that's pretty meaty. Say again? x2 plates and x2 reps? Not a very good idea, you should use armor resist hardners instead of plates or else your just wasting powergrid and making your ship slower with no bonus to your active tank. Plates should only be used when your going straight buffer. Two eanms give you similar EHP too two plates anyway at a bonus to your active tank.
Their are exceptions though to mixing reppers and plates don't get me wrong, but in any situation where your using a prophecy your probably not going to be mixing. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

YoYo NickyYo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
71
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:35:00 -
[45] - Quote
Jackson Steely wrote:Basically
Clearly you have never flown a double rep Navy Domi.... "Working as intended" |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
165
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 19:10:00 -
[46] - Quote
BearJews wrote:i dont think it's broken, just a different mechanic. Are you going to say missile system are broken because they don't do insta damage? Because velocity and both signature affect the applied dps? Come on, differmt systems, different results. It was never meant to be the same If it is posible to fit BS-sized systems without much problem on BC- or even Cruiser-sized hulls they YES, they ARE broken.
If you could fit Cruise Missile Launcher on a Drake then they would be broken too. Not only 1 but a full reg of them. And not only with all over fitting moduls but with just 1 fitting modul or even without any.
But if you don't belive they are broken tell me when you saw the last not-rookie fitting for a Frig with SMALL Booster which is realy flown and not just EFT-warrior. They use MED Booster as they fit so easily! Ever tryed to fit a MED Rep on a Frig-Sized hull?
XL-Booster are oversized BS moduls like Tachions are. But hey who cares, they are SO easy to fit, let's use them everywhere. EVEN on BC-sized hulls! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
304
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 19:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
Active armor tanking ROX!!!
For the 3 seconds you have it running until your cap is gone. So you fit a Booster.
Like that? Fly Minmatar Air --- "Trust in the Rust!" |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
64
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 20:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
Commander Ted wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:I have a dual plate dual rep prophecy that's pretty meaty. Say again? x2 plates and x2 reps? Not a very good idea, you should use armor resist hardners instead of plates or else your just wasting powergrid and making your ship slower with no bonus to your active tank. Plates should only be used when your going straight buffer. Two eanms give you similar EHP too two plates anyway at a bonus to your active tank. Their are exceptions though to mixing reppers and plates don't get me wrong, but in any situation where your using a prophecy your probably not going to be mixing.
There's more to it, just not the point of this thread. "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url] for details. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 20:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Active armor tanking ROX!!!
For the 3 seconds you have it running until your cap is gone. So you fit a Booster.
Like that?
Triple rep Harbinger vs dual ASB Cyclone
Fight! |

Rath Kelbore
Eviscerate.
297
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 20:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
ASB's are broken. It was one of those "wouldn't it be cool if" things that CCP said they weren't doing anymore.
I mean, sure they're cool but obviously not very balanced. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |
|

Roosevelt Coltrane
Rupakaya
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 22:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
Truth.
The Myrm has active tank bonuses but unless you TRIPLE rep it, a passive shield will be a better tank. It might be a great ship, but its basically the fourth Minmatar BC. Projectiles and shield tank make it awesome. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
68
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 22:06:00 -
[52] - Quote
No evildoer will break my active shield tanked GOLEM, nevar!
Armor? Is that an ancient knighly pantaloon and jacket set?  Inside mining barge, true story |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
134
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 22:10:00 -
[53] - Quote
Roosevelt Coltrane wrote:Truth.
The Myrm has active tank bonuses but unless you TRIPLE rep it, a passive shield will be a better tank. It might be a great ship, but its basically the fourth Minmatar BC. Projectiles and shield tank make it awesome. What is wrong with triple repping if I get sick tank and can still scram, web, and have prop with a cap booster? Not to mention on a passively tanked drake your true tank doesnt kick in until your at 40% ish hp. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Kiteo Hatto
Equanimity Order
380
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 22:16:00 -
[54] - Quote
what. "That's okay it annoys me when people pile on new definitions to the word sandbox every time CCP does something they don't like." - Alara IonStorm GD is where 60% of threads make you dumber and 10% which provide you with entertainment, the remaining 30% is a mix of both. |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:
That's the main problem. Ever tryed to use a Large Armor Rep on a Harbinger?
It is FAR to easy to use oversized Shield Boosters!
If you compare a empty Harbinger with just a Med Rep and a empty Hurrican with jus a MED Booster they are similar in HP/S. Harbinger get 51(53) armor/s and Hurrican 54(59) shield/s. BUT who uses MED Booster? Not even Cruiser fits use MED Booster as it should be! If you find a kill mail with a "only" a Large Booster on a Cyclon you get flaimed allready as it is a "must be" to fit X-Large. The sad part is: THEY FIT! Sure, you lose alot PG and CPU but it is not imposible to fit them. Just for fun try to fit a Large Repair on a Harbinger. It's not posible as you miss over 400 PG WITHOUT anything else fitted!
Fitting requierments for Shield Boosters are simply 100% broken.
Also, What's funny is that you'd need five, yes FIVE medium armor repairers to nearly match the boosting per second an x-large ASB can do on a BC. To match and pass a large ASB on a cruiser you'd need three medium armor repairers and far more PG. I don't even want to look at the amount of capacitor required for the armor repairers to compete.
One classic argument is that shields favor boosting more at once, using more resources at once, and don't last as long while armor tanking has the longevity, but repairs less. The thing is you can stop the shield booster from cycling again. Now ASBs have the longevity as well as using no cap to do it. Sure, you have less mid-slots to use for tank as you need a couple for, but you have an active omni-resistance module and the damage control doesn't take up one of your potential tanking slots. So, why do ASBs get to be so absurdly effective for their fitting with no capacitor use?
Another argument, "the ASB lasts only so long since you have to wait a minute to reload." So, fit two of them. One will boost while the other reloads. Either that or put an oversized ASB and a fitting rig on to get twice the boost for the single slot, doubling your longevity.
Anyone who says armor tanking is fine is out of their mind. I wear my sunglasses at night. |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2736
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Commander Ted wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Double rep is also effective and your a scrub if you don't know how powerful a triple rep myrm is in average pvp. Also your whole argument utterly destroyed by this link HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA How the idiots he was shooting could easily have won that fight: Give him something supertanked to chew on and warp in at 20+ km, preferably with some heavy alpha. Like all those maelstroms? Also you aint gonna alpha a vindicator without an entire gang, AND even if he couldn't break you he could just jump through the gate.
Maelstroms at point blank scream either incompetence or an AC fit.
He was tanking in low armor - a high alpha ship like an arty mael could continuously knock him into structure, meaning the damage would keep piling up as he tanked the armor portion. Wouldn't take long to finish the job bleeding through like that. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

Irya Boone
Escadron leader
86
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
like everything related to gallente playstyle
Active armor tanking Hybrid turrets Drones
All sucks badly
nothing new under the sun of JIta !!! Improve C2 class WH More anos more signs ...RENAME null sec system With the name Of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It xill be awesome-á |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:34:00 -
[58] - Quote
On a 6 midslot shield tanking boat with 4 lows I can fit a damage control, scram prop and 4 tanking modules in my shields. So boost amp invuln and 2 asbs (and maybe a cpu unit in the lows). That is only a scram and prop on your epic tanked ship.
Meanwhile a 5 mid 6 low slot myrmidon has 6 lows for tanking and 5 for cap/ewar. The heavy use of the armor reppers is compensated by the fact I can fit a webifier, have cap boosters in case of heavy cap warfare, and I have no 60 second reload, a fair trade off in my opinion.
If armor reppers took up the same room as a shield booster then the armor tankers have a clear advantage, you have multiple TE's and damage mods along with extra webs.
If a shield tank used all of their midslots then you would only be a bait brick with no point or prop.
Although ASB is just plain OP to. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:38:00 -
[59] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:like everything related to gallente playstyle
Active armor tanking Hybrid turrets Drones
All sucks badly
nothing new under the sun of JIta !!! The thing that makes blasters suck is armor. It's too damn slow and active tanking no longer tanks enough. The myrmidon is an exception since fitting three repairers, two cap boosters, and a MWD causes you to gimp the guns. The damage on that ship is based around the drones, not guns.
Shields are good on gallente ships since you can put plenty of damage and tracking/range modules in the lows. Speed is much better, too. I wear my sunglasses at night. |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 00:01:00 -
[60] - Quote
Perihelion Olenard wrote:Irya Boone wrote:like everything related to gallente playstyle
Active armor tanking Hybrid turrets Drones
All sucks badly
nothing new under the sun of JIta !!! The thing that makes blasters suck is armor. It's too damn slow and active tanking no longer tanks enough. The myrmidon is an exception since fitting three repairers, two cap boosters, and a MWD causes you to gimp the guns. The damage on that ship is based around the drones, not guns. Shields are good on gallente ships since you can put plenty of damage and tracking/range modules in the lows. Speed is much better, too. Fit projectiles on your myrms dood https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |
|

Fer DeLance
PERONOSPOROS
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 00:16:00 -
[61] - Quote
No need to argue about the superiority of shield tanking over the armor tanking, active or passive (well there isn't real passive armor tank anyway, armor doesn't regenerate passivly).
Just ask your selves this question, and try to answer honestly: "Why do i have a large smile on my face when i see a blinking red Gallente ship?" |

Galphii
Sileo In Pacis THE SPACE P0LICE
95
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 00:19:00 -
[62] - Quote
I actually thought shields were weaker before the ASB came out, and those Awesome Shield BoostersGäó balanced things out nicely. Shields are better for bursts of extra defence, armour is a lesser amount, but can be run permanently if need be. Seems to work fine  Enjoy epic fantasty adventure? Check out my free ebook at www.aielundsaga.com/novels.html-á |

Tesal
56
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 02:07:00 -
[63] - Quote
armor tanking myrmidon. |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 02:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
I agree with OP. Active armor tanking sucks.
The argument that armor tanking allows for more EWAR is invalid; because shield boats almost always have enough mids so they can maintain a superb shield tank (better than a comparable armor tank) and still have slots left over for EWAR. Additionally, shield tankers put out significantly more DPS.
Why not just remove armor tanking from the game if you don't plan on improving it, CCP? We have less tank and less gank than shield tanks.
Edit: Stop posting Myrmidons and Incursus to say how active armor tanking is fine. If you can only find 2-3 ships that active armor tanking actually works on, then that in itself highlights the problem I have with active armor tanking. |

Commander Ted
Dookie on the flowah
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 02:44:00 -
[65] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:I agree with OP. Active armor tanking sucks.
The argument that armor tanking allows for more EWAR is invalid; because shield boats almost always have enough mids so they can maintain a superb shield tank (better than a comparable armor tank) and still have slots left over for EWAR. Additionally, shield tankers put out significantly more DPS.
Why not just remove armor tanking from the game if you don't plan on improving it, CCP? We have less tank and less gank than shield tanks.
Edit: Stop posting Myrmidons and Incursus to say how active armor tanking is fine. If you can only find 2-3 ships that active armor tanking actually works on, then that in itself highlights the problem I have with active armor tanking.
Go fit a cyclone and tell me you have plenty of mids for ewar. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec. |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 02:44:00 -
[66] - Quote
Galphii wrote:I actually thought shields were weaker before the ASB came out, and those Awesome Shield BoostersGäó balanced things out nicely. Shields are better for bursts of extra defence, armour is a lesser amount, but can be run permanently if need be. Seems to work fine  Have you compared the tank of, say, a Tengu to a Legion? Tengu can tank far more DPS and be capstable (while dealing more DPS) than a Legion. because it uses a Large Shield Booster (not ancillary).
Either nerf the Tengu and/or shield tanking, or buff the Legion and/or armor tanking. I'm all for buffs instead of nerfs. |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 13:00:00 -
[67] - Quote
Just because one ship using a triple armor repairer setup can take decently does not mean active armor tanking is fine in general. It's like picking one guy out in a city, seeing he's wearing women's underwear, and saying that all guys in that city wear women's underwear and that's it's normal to do so.
Try a dual rep cruiser. Try a dual rep or even triple rep brutix. They will be terrible. I wear my sunglasses at night. |

Jackson Steely
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 13:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
Perihelion Olenard wrote:Just because one ship using a triple armor repairer setup can take decently does not mean active armor tanking is fine in general. It's like picking one guy out in a city, seeing he's wearing women's underwear, and saying that all guys in that city wear women's underwear and that's it's normal to do so. Try a dual rep cruiser. Try a dual rep or even triple rep brutix. They will be terrible.
Maybe CCP can change MAR's to Myrmidon armor repairer. Smalls can be changed to Incursus armor repairer, and larges can be recycled back into minerals, Deadspace/Officer LAR's can be given for free with every purchase of a Vindi as long as they promise to post Youtube videos about how awesome they are. |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
808
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 13:19:00 -
[69] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Jackson Steely wrote:Transmaritanus wrote:Ever heard of a Triple rep Myrm? So in order to effectively active armor tank I need three repairers on a ship with a repair bonus? Thank you for confirming my OP. To make this a little closer to relevant in EVE Online, you could change the title as well. Active Armor Ganking Sucks. Gank beats tank. EVE is EVE. It will never change.
Little bold statement about the 'never change'. It's true ganking was the way to go early on, and in some sense is now. But the nos/LAR/no bandwidth days would like to have a word with you..  AFK-cloaking in a system near you. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
228
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 16:25:00 -
[70] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Edit: Stop posting Myrmidons and Incursus to say how active armor tanking is fine. If you can only find 2-3 ships that active armor tanking actually works on, then that in itself highlights the problem I have with active armor tanking.
You make an excellent point. This is especially true for Amarr ships, which CCP has clearly said are meant for armor tanking. Yet in reality they fail in being actually designed for that job.
Consider that in T1 there are:
7 types of Amarr frigates, yet only 1 even gets a bonus to armor resist. None get a bonus to armor self-repair.
2 types of destroyer and neither gets any kind of armor bonus.
4 types of cruiser, only 1 gets a bonus to armor resist - none get a self-repair bonus.
3 types of battlecruiser, again only 1 gets an armor resist bonus and none get a self-repair bonus.
3 types of battleship, and yet again, 1 armor resist and zero self-repair bonus.
Does that look like a winning line-up for armor tanking? Out of 19 ships only 4 even get an armor resist bonus and NONE of them get a self-repair bonus.
And the real irony of the Myrmidon not only does it get the armor repair bonus that zero Amarr ships do, but it's also (IMHO) one of the best T1 shield tank ships out there. And it's a Gallente ship. You know what other ships get self-repair bonus? The Incursus & Hyperion - both are also Gallente ships. Meaning that all three of the best active-armor tank ships in the game are Gallente exclusive.
Biased much, CCP? EvE Forum Bingo |
|

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 16:30:00 -
[71] - Quote
And anyone filling up the lows on any missile boat can brag about their DPS. You see the point here? Fly Minmatar Air --- "Trust in the Rust!" |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 17:01:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:And anyone filling up the lows on any missile boat can brag about their DPS. You see the point here?
Umm... You can't fit three armor repairers to Tengu?
Btw, Tengu has more midslots for cap boosters so running three armor repairers should be easier than in Myrm. |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 17:41:00 -
[73] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:Edit: Stop posting Myrmidons and Incursus to say how active armor tanking is fine. If you can only find 2-3 ships that active armor tanking actually works on, then that in itself highlights the problem I have with active armor tanking. You make an excellent point. This is especially true for Amarr ships, which CCP has clearly said are meant for armor tanking. Yet in reality they fail in being actually designed for that job. Consider that in T1 there are: 7 types of Amarr frigates, yet only 1 even gets a bonus to armor resist. None get a bonus to armor self-repair. 2 types of destroyer and neither gets any kind of armor bonus. 4 types of cruiser, only 1 gets a bonus to armor resist - none get a self-repair bonus. 3 types of battlecruiser, again only 1 gets an armor resist bonus and none get a self-repair bonus. 3 types of battleship, and yet again, 1 armor resist and zero self-repair bonus. Does that look like a winning line-up for armor tanking? Out of 19 ships only 4 even get an armor resist bonus and NONE of them get a self-repair bonus. And the real irony of the Myrmidon not only does it get the armor repair bonus that zero Amarr ships do, but it's also (IMHO) one of the best T1 shield tank ships out there. And it's a Gallente ship. You know what other ships get self-repair bonus? The Incursus & Hyperion - both are also Gallente ships. Meaning that all three of the best active-armor tank ships in the game are Gallente exclusive. Biased much, CCP? Defensive armor-tanking ship bonuses were once just a bonus and not a requirement to armor tank. I remember when active armor-tanked hurricanes were good. I wear my sunglasses at night. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |