Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
520
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 12:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
leoplusma wrote:ahoy Kiger :) i am quoting some phrases from your latest blog post. Kiger Wulf wrote:IThe 90 Acolytes were all purchased today. Interestingly, someone bought all 90 of them, but actually paid more for the last 22 than he did for the first 68. I'm not sure what exactly happened there, but I'll take the extra 8,714 ISK. I literally did nothing for that money. i really look forward to reading comments on this ^^
The way the market works is that the person with the lowest sell order ALWAYS gets the sale.
So say you had 50 acolytes on the market and you were the lowest sell order, at 1000 isk
Also, lets say there was another sell order for 300 acolytes at 1050 isk.
Now I come along and I need 250 acolytes. If I want to save isk, I will click on your order and buy 50, and then click on the next order and buy 200.
If however I'm lazy, I will click on the order that is higher than yours, but had 300 items. I will then buy 250 at 1050 isk. What ACTUALLY happens however, is that the first 50 I purchase are actually yours, at 1050, and the remaining 200 from the order I actually clicked on. |

Chelly Tau
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 23:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:The way the market works is that the person with the lowest sell order ALWAYS gets the sale.
So say you had 50 acolytes on the market and you were the lowest sell order, at 1000 isk
Also, lets say there was another sell order for 300 acolytes at 1050 isk.
Now I come along and I need 250 acolytes. If I want to save isk, I will click on your order and buy 50, and then click on the next order and buy 200.
If however I'm lazy, I will click on the order that is higher than yours, but had 300 items. I will then buy 250 at 1050 isk. What ACTUALLY happens however, is that the first 50 I purchase are actually yours, at 1050, and the remaining 200 from the order I actually clicked on.
I had the same happen to me once and never got around to finding out what went on there, good to know how that happened. At the time I thought it had something to do with people putting up buy orders for more.
So now I wonder, what happens in that situation if you didn't even check sell orders at all and instead decides to put up a buy order for 250 acolytes at 1100? Would I get 1000 ISK per acolyte, or 1100? |

Droxlyn
TOHA Heavy Industries TOHA Conglomerate
115
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
Chelly Tau wrote:I had the same happen to me once and never got around to finding out what went on there, good to know how that happened. At the time I thought it had something to do with people putting up buy orders for more.
So now I wonder, what happens in that situation if you didn't even check sell orders at all and instead decides to put up a buy order for 250 acolytes at 1100? Would I get 1000 ISK per acolyte, or 1100?
In the real world, you would pay 1100, the seller would get 1000 and the broker would pocket the difference. In Eve, the seller gets 1100 and you pay the 1100.
Drox |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 04:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tomorrow, the three batches of goods I have been working on will come off the line. Hopefully, this explains the lack of updates on the blog for today and yesterday.
We'll be back tomorrow! |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:02:00 -
[35] - Quote
Greetings, capsuleers.
There's a new post over at www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
I'd appreciate if you read it and let me know what you think! |

Dudley North
Interstellar Investments and Securities
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 18:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
The one thing that ultimately saved me a lot of pain was realising that mining,manufacturing and selling are entirely seperate activities and should be priced and calculated as such.
It's tempting to value things according to the end-to-end cost of am item from mined ore to final sale on the market, but that herds you into the MIMMAF trap and is vulnerable to severe losses and missed opportunities.
Say you are making an item all the way from mined materials to selling them on the market, there are multiple seperate processes there:
1.) Mine Ore - OK straightforward enough.
2.) Refine Ore - can you sell the ore for more than the minerals can be sold for? Possible, especially if your refining skills aren't maxed.
3.) Manufacture Item - can you sell the item for more than the minerals cost bought from the market? If not it's a good indicator that you should sell your minerals rather than build a loss-making item! (Forget you already have the minerals in stock - you could reasonably sell them for what they'd cost you to buy!)
4.) Market the Item - can you even sell the item at all? How long is it going to stay on the market for before it sells? Is it going to be stuck on the market that long that it's worth dumping it to an existing "buy" order so effectively you act as a wholesaler passing the pain of selling individual items to people who make money by doing that?
Decisions, decisions! I found that considering each step as a seperate process made things much easier and I was able to compromise on those aspects I ddn't like and do more of the stuff I liked
e.g. I hate marketing. I found that it was worth taking a small hit in sales profits by selling to buy orders in order to massively improve my cashflow so I could buy more materials to make more stuff. Essentially I improved my turnover by reducing my profit margin to the point that I improved my overall income. I was able to do that by concentrating on just the marketing stage of the process - trying to include the mining and refining stages in that decision would have made it wildly over-complicated.
|

Skorpynekomimi
277
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 20:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
Dudley North wrote: e.g. I hate marketing. I found that it was worth taking a small hit in sales profits by selling to buy orders in order to massively improve my cashflow so I could buy more materials to make more stuff. Essentially I improved my turnover by reducing my profit margin to the point that I improved my overall income. I was able to do that by concentrating on just the marketing stage of the process - trying to include the mining and refining stages in that decision would have made it wildly over-complicated.
Pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap? |

Dudley North
Interstellar Investments and Securities
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 20:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
Skorpynekomimi wrote:Dudley North wrote: e.g. I hate marketing. I found that it was worth taking a small hit in sales profits by selling to buy orders in order to massively improve my cashflow so I could buy more materials to make more stuff. Essentially I improved my turnover by reducing my profit margin to the point that I improved my overall income. I was able to do that by concentrating on just the marketing stage of the process - trying to include the mining and refining stages in that decision would have made it wildly over-complicated.
Pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap?
Exactly! And it's not something I would have spotted had I gone through the whole chain as one huge transaction. |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 04:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
The Planetary Interaction post I promised is UP!
www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
Thanks for reading! |

knowsitall
Adeptus iNdustry and Logistics Silent Eviction
8
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 14:36:00 -
[40] - Quote
I work out what stuff cost by working out what they cost to replace at that point in time. So however i am going to replace them that is the cost.
Eg
raw materials cost me A (at the time i bought them) manufactoring cost is B wallet is at C sell price of all the item (for the quantity i produce) is D
basically i put buy orders (if the market says buy orders are filled in the quantity i need) otherwise the sell price for the quantities i need up for the raw materials . Build the item and sell them. So long as the below is true The price to replace materials is E So if E + B < D it is profitable to produce. ie A is irrelivant.
If the above is true, you end up increasing your total assets. You end up with raw materials (same as before) wallet = C + D - E - B (but we know E + B < D) so D - E - B should always be a positive number. ie your wallet is bigger than it was before and you have still have all the raw materials you had before.
Knowsitall |
|

Celgar Thurn
Department 10
70
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 16:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kiger Wulf wrote:
I definitely don't fall into the Minerals I Mine Are Free category, because I know they aren't free. They just didn't cost me any ISK to buy. Is there a price I could set on them if I were selling them? Absolutely. But, I never mined them with the intention of selling them. I mined them with the intention of using them. So, no cost directly to me, just potential ISK lost because I could've sold them directly.
Not sure whether to file your statements under 'troll' or 'the customer is always right'. Probably the latter. Read what you are saying. You are a proponent of the MIMAF philosophy when you say the ore you mined didn't cost you anything to buy. I agree that the primary function of playing EVE Online is to have fun and enjoy playing a game but the MIMAF philosophy is totally illogical. It is also not dissimilar to the RL practices of corporations such as Tesco(UK based supermarket chain.) who sell produce at a loss to destroy others businesses and cripple their suppliers. In other words MIMAF is not a healthy way of running a business whether in RL or in New Eden. 
|

Pyus
Hand Of Midas My Other Laboratory is a Distillery
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 18:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
Celgar Thurn wrote: It is also not dissimilar to the RL practices of corporations such as Tesco(UK based supermarket chain.) who sell produce at a loss to destroy others businesses and cripple their suppliers. In other words MIMAF is not a healthy way of running a business whether in RL or in New Eden. 
Well, the other way of looking at this is that predatory pricing like this is very good for Tesco if they do in fact drive their competition out with this practice and then get to set prices wherever they want due to a lack of competition. It can be bad for the public of course 
To the OP:
Kiger Wulf wrote: But, I never mined them with the intention of selling them. I mined them with the intention of using them. So, no cost directly to me, just potential ISK lost because I could've sold them directly.
Like a lot of us, you're not always playing solely for the ISK, and you're enjoying the RP side of the game etc.. That perspective and play style is very healthy and good for long-term success and happiness in this game I think. "Success" as an industrialist can be rather subjective in this respect.
Where things get sticky with this perspective however is when looking for advice on forums, comparing notes, or bragging to others about recent exploits in chat, etc.. In these situations objectivity rules, and we need to describe activities with more detail and accuracy in order for them to be meaningful. This is where the Opportunity Cost must always be accounted for to some reasonable degree of precision (no need to get too crazy tracking costs).
When talking about the profitability of any manufacturing activities with others, you really must account for the cost of materials that went into the product, regardless of how you came by the materials. Whether you mined them yourself with the intention of just having fun out under the virtual stars while watching a movie, or Santa gave them to you, they're cost must be accounted for in some objective fashion when discussing profitability with others.
Very glad you are enjoying EVE and I think your blog is great and helpful to others.
|

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 15:43:00 -
[43] - Quote
Pyus wrote:Like a lot of us, you're not always playing solely for the ISK, and you're enjoying the RP side of the game etc.. That perspective and play style is very healthy and good for long-term success and happiness in this game I think. "Success" as an industrialist can be rather subjective in this respect.
Where things get sticky with this perspective however is when looking for advice on forums, comparing notes, or bragging to others about recent exploits in chat, etc.. In these situations objectivity rules, and we need to describe activities with more detail and accuracy in order for them to be meaningful. This is where the Opportunity Cost must always be accounted for to some reasonable degree of precision (no need to get too crazy tracking costs).
When talking about the profitability of any manufacturing activities with others, you really must account for the cost of materials that went into the product, regardless of how you came by the materials. Whether you mined them yourself with the intention of just having fun out under the virtual stars while watching a movie, or Santa gave them to you, they're cost must be accounted for in some objective fashion when discussing profitability with others.
Very glad you are enjoying EVE and I think your blog is great and helpful to others.
Thanks for the kind words regarding the blog!
You guys are definitely making your point heard. =) |

Skorpynekomimi
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
PI: I can safely say 'ur doin it rong'.
Of COURSE selling to buy orders is making a loss due to taxes and materials. Either stick it up on sell orders, or make PoS fuel blocks with the stuff.
I've done the maths. I know that, with my PI setup, my BPOs, and buying basic materials and ice products off the market, I can make a profit with PoS fuel blocks, and get a quick sale with little market games. Even just buying the components for the stuff off sell orders, I get a profit margin. I don't get what you're doing wrong. Maybe you're just using the wrong system?
Mind you, I got a bunch of help with my fuel block setup. The BPOs were a CCP gift, circumstances in lowsec mean a relatively low tax rate with little risk, and someone in my alliance swapped their researched BPOs for my fresh ones for a decent price. |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:45:00 -
[45] - Quote
Skorpynekomimi wrote:
PI: I can safely say 'ur doin it rong'.
Of COURSE selling to buy orders is making a loss due to taxes and materials. Either stick it up on sell orders, or make PoS fuel blocks with the stuff.
I've done the maths. I know that, with my PI setup, my BPOs, and buying basic materials and ice products off the market, I can make a profit with PoS fuel blocks, and get a quick sale with little market games. Even just buying the components for the stuff off sell orders, I get a profit margin. I don't get what you're doing wrong. Maybe you're just using the wrong system?
Mind you, I got a bunch of help with my fuel block setup. The BPOs were a CCP gift, circumstances in lowsec mean a relatively low tax rate with little risk, and someone in my alliance swapped their researched BPOs for my fresh ones for a decent price.
I am ABSOLUTELY certain that you are right about me doing it wrong. This is one of those things that I'm going to work on in depth at some point in the future, but I haven't taken a lot of time with it right now.
It also highlights one of the aspects of this blog and that is from someone who doesn't know anything to (hopefully) someone who has some good advice on industrial life in the future.
Thanks for the comments! =) |

Skorpynekomimi
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
Kiger Wulf wrote:Skorpynekomimi wrote:
PI: I can safely say 'ur doin it rong'.
Of COURSE selling to buy orders is making a loss due to taxes and materials. Either stick it up on sell orders, or make PoS fuel blocks with the stuff.
I've done the maths. I know that, with my PI setup, my BPOs, and buying basic materials and ice products off the market, I can make a profit with PoS fuel blocks, and get a quick sale with little market games. Even just buying the components for the stuff off sell orders, I get a profit margin. I don't get what you're doing wrong. Maybe you're just using the wrong system?
Mind you, I got a bunch of help with my fuel block setup. The BPOs were a CCP gift, circumstances in lowsec mean a relatively low tax rate with little risk, and someone in my alliance swapped their researched BPOs for my fresh ones for a decent price.
I am ABSOLUTELY certain that you are right about me doing it wrong. This is one of those things that I'm going to work on in depth at some point in the future, but I haven't taken a lot of time with it right now. It also highlights one of the aspects of this blog and that is from someone who doesn't know anything to (hopefully) someone who has some good advice on industrial life in the future. Thanks for the comments! =)
You're welcome. And thanks for not hurling abuse like so many others tend to, here.
How are you calculating your profits, anyway? Excel spreadsheets? |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 23:58:00 -
[47] - Quote
I do use Excel spreadsheets. However, so far, I'm just kicking it old school with a journal =) |

Skorpynekomimi
283
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 09:07:00 -
[48] - Quote
Ahh. I'm running off stuff I learned in school, with fancy stuff in the spreadsheets and automatic calculations. And details of all my BPOs in another sheet so I can copy and paste them.
General rule of thumb is that the more of the work you do yourself, you more ISK you make, but the longer it takes. Just a question of how much your time is worth. |

Maire Gheren
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 19:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
Kiger Wulf wrote:I've taken Economics, so I completely understand the idea of opportunity cost. I understand why I need to value my TIME. However, I still don't understand why people are so against calling minerals "free." If they don't cost me anything, then, yes I could be shorting myself the price of just selling the minerals, but I also am doing what I want, which is to manufacture products to sell on the market. The minerals, then, are free, in that they don't have an ISK cost attached to them when I mine myself. Once you acquire all the materials you need to build a batch of whatever, run a plan B set of numbers in which you just sell the ore/metal without building anything. If it is more profitable to just sell the ore, don't build the module and just sell the ore. Later on, you can get scrapmetal processing and be able to run the numbers for "buying the competitions' stuff and turning them into metal to sell". After getting in the habit of doing that stuff you'll understand why people think "metal I mine is free" is silly. Spending the time building something to sell it at a loss is just throwing money away, like self destructing ships instead of unfitting them. |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
15
|
Posted - 2012.12.29 05:13:00 -
[50] - Quote
You've all been fantastic readers and commenters. Thanks for all the feedback so far.
There's a new update on the blog. As always, feel free to comment here or there. I read them all!
www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
-KW |
|

Hans Tesla
RigWerks Incorporated
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.29 14:49:00 -
[51] - Quote
Enjoying the blog.
Welcome to the wild world of rigging. I've found rigs to generally be pretty profitable. As with all things, it all depends on what you manufacture. Rigs can be a bit more challenging due to the fact that they all pretty much get lumped together in the market depending on what kind of system they apply to (i.e. armor, hybrid weapons, etc). The problem is that some rigs are such corner cases that they rarely get used. Market history is key for that. I'd suggest going to a big trade hub and see what the market history is for any rig you want to consider manufacturing.
I'm also interested to see what, if any, effect the new Salvage drones are going to have on the rig materials market. Day Trading? More like-áAll Day Trading... |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
19
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 22:13:00 -
[52] - Quote
Happy New Year Capsuleers!!
Today, December 2012 is officially drawing to a close. I closed the books a couple of minutes ago and wrote up a report for this month.
You can find the report at www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
Thanks everyone for reading, commenting and thrashing me for believing that Minerals I Mine are Free. You've been great for the first month. I appreciate the support!
See ya in 2013! |

Sidrat Flush
Eve Industrial Corp
114
|
Posted - 2013.01.02 08:15:00 -
[53] - Quote
Congratulations on your first 20 days, with prevoous experience and pe5 even higher profits will be yours.
The new home of the Eve Industrial Organiser is here. Enjoy the first in a series, EIO:Refinery now http://www.eve-files.com/media/corp/Sidrat/ Read about it http://eveindustrialorganiser.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0 |

Toku Jiang
Jiang Laboratories and Discovery
79
|
Posted - 2013.01.02 16:12:00 -
[54] - Quote
You seem to be gravitating in the right direction. The blog is an interesting view of a new industrialist and how they are basically learning on the fly. I would however recommend that you either put all of the items you produce (PI or otherwise) up for sell orders rather than selling to a buy orders, and switch to buying any materials you don't acquire yourself through buy orders. Patience I find is the key to making larger profit margins.  |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.03 04:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Good evening, Capsuleers!
There's a new post over at wulfbrothers.blogspot.com detailing the first days of an Industrialist and some steps you can take to expand and enhance your profitability. Check it out, leave comments there so that new players can see the discussion on that post for all of eternity, or until my blog is destroyed by the Minmatar (who absolutely hate me, although I can't figure out why).
I also added a small contest to the post for those of you with super sharp eyesight and the gift of finding things. It's not a huge prize, but it's a prize none-the-less!
Go check out www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
Big thanks to Sidrat Flush for all the support both here, on the blog itself and through EVEMail. Make sure you check out EIO, it represents a lot of work from Mr. Flush!
Fly Safe, my friends!! |

Skorpynekomimi
354
|
Posted - 2013.01.03 14:08:00 -
[56] - Quote
You've officially inspired me to take my industrial dabblings seriously, at least for a while.
Although, things are again on hold until some things SHIFT. PoS fuel blocks are not the most reliable of markets. |

Hellynx84
The Learning Curve.
6
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 07:12:00 -
[57] - Quote
Just finished reading you blog, and will be watching for updates. Great to read on this subject from the POV of someone who is just starting.
This is something I have wanted to do, alongside my freighter runs, but never found any blogs like this to get me going.
Cheers and Keep up the Good Work. |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 18:09:00 -
[58] - Quote
Happy Friday everyone! There's a new post at:
www.wulfbrothers.blogspot.com
Thanks for reading! |

Skorpynekomimi
356
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 20:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
On marketing: They're not buying from the other guy's order because they think you're a jerk; they're doing it because the other guy has more stuff up, and they want to save clicks. At least, that's what I do when buying off sell orders in bulk.
Also, train up trade skills! Tax reduction is a thing. |

Kiger Wulf
Wulf Brother Insustries
19
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 20:19:00 -
[60] - Quote
Skorpynekomimi wrote:
On marketing: They're not buying from the other guy's order because they think you're a jerk; they're doing it because the other guy has more stuff up, and they want to save clicks. At least, that's what I do when buying off sell orders in bulk.
Also, train up trade skills! Tax reduction is a thing.
Ah yes, good point. I didn't think of that =)
When I was a noob, I always clicked on the "normal" priced link because I didn't like that they were trying to undercut the competition so shamelessly. Now I understand it's just a game mechanic. =) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |