| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dierdra Vaal
Koshaku
Gentlemen's Agreement
196
   |
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi everyone.
Every election since the CSM4 elections I've ran CSM Vote Match, a website where you can match your views and opinions about Eve with the views and opinions of the CSM candidates. Since the Vote Match website looks like it is from 1997 I'm currently building version 2.0 from scratch which will offer much greater functionality and more nuanced matching! You can preview the new website here, but keep in mind it's currently still filled with placeholder and mockup content.
But I need your help!
I need statements to present to the candidates (and the voters), and I like them to be as diverse and useful as possible. It's not easy coming up with 40 statements by myself so that is why I am asking you.
I am specifically looking for statements that:
- Are unambiguous and clear in their meaning
- Can be answered with "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "No opinion", "Agree", "Strongly agree"
- Do not require a full paragraph of text to explain themselves
So an example of a good statement would be:
Quote:A complete POS overhaul should be a priority for the summer expansion
This statement is clear in it's meaning, can be answered as needed and is fairly succinct.
Additionally, I am also including open questions in Vote Match this year. The open questions will not be used in the matching process but will be visible on each candidate's profile page. So I also need suggestions questions you would like all candidates to answer.
Please help, because the questionnaire will only be as good as the statements we can come up with!
TL;DR
I need you to give me statements that can answered with "Strongly disagree", "Disagree", "No opinion", "Agree", "Strongly agree" for use in CSM Vote Match. Also I am looking for open questions to ask the candidates.
Veto #205
* * *
Director Emeritus at EVE University
* * *
CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman |
Gomohr
Les chevaliers de l'ordre
Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 19:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Old and outdated pve content, such as COSMOS missions should be brought to the general pve content of the game.
Rogue drones should be a real faction with deadspace items, Ded complexes droping them, faction items and faction spawns dropping them. |
Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District
92
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 21:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Should all NPC's be looked at and revamped/updated to suit the modern EVE. (more details is their EWAR, Long range torpedos)
Should there be more missions/content with fewer ships but more challenging engagements. (better boss NPCs for missions)
"Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves." |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
3951
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Storyline BPC's gained from Cosmos Agents need to be rebalanced. ie; material amounts be reduced.
Storyline BPC material's should be more easily obtainable. ie; have higher spawn rate and be seeded into various exploration sites.
Storyline Modules need to be rebalanced. ie; attributes increased to properly represent their current Meta Level rate.
Cosmos Agent information window should show the correct amount of Faction standing required for access. ie; base and modified standing.
Cosmos Agent mission offers, when declined, should be re-offered until accepted. ie; like regular mission agents.
Cosmos Agent mission offers, when accepted, should remain active until completed. ie; like Epic Arc missions.
Multi-part missions (5 part and higher) should have a 30 day timer count on all parts of the mission. ie; not just the very first part.
The 60 original 'Tutorial Agents' offering 'The Endless Battle' mission for one time Faction Standing increase should be re-activated and split up into different levels (level 1 to level 5) with their title changed in-game to 'Political Agents'. ie; mission difficultly and reward increased to match the higher Agent levels.
I'm sure I could come up with some more later. Anyway, food for thought.
DMC |
Louis deGuerre
The Dark Tribe
Against ALL Authorities
618
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Should a player be able to solo L4 missions without having to resort to multibillion isk ships ?
Should L4s, which are insane now, get better rewards than Incursions ?
Does CCP want to remove solo PVE completely ?
Why does CCP ignore the outcry of their players both during testing and after deployment ?
Should droneboats be viable in PVE ?
Will CCP rollback the EWAR madness ?
FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES !
Louis's epic skill guide v1.1 |
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
63
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Inspired by previous posts, but anyways...
- Research should be done in order to find out remaining bugged missions (L5s and COSMOS may be in need to be looked at) and fix them; community can help with this one;
- Sansha Nation, Serpentis Corporation and Blood Raiders should have their own epic arcs;
- Drop tables of higher level complex loot (OPE and modules) should be looked at to be more worthy of small PvE gangs they currently require to beat (as opposed to feasible soloing);
- Scout incursion sites payout system should be tweaked to benefit cruiser gangs so that relatively new players could do them using new T1 logis as inmpovement over grinding L2 missions solo; in order to prevent grinding them solo with stronger ships (BCs come to mind) provide full payouts only to 3-5-man fleets instead of keeping it the same for 1-5 people per fleet, but overall payment should be slightly increased; add them into 0.0-0.4 sec incursion constellations aswell and further increase payouts for such sites. |
Cosmoes
Peraka
8
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Should low sec pve content be boosted (aside from FW) - bit general
Should low sec missions such as lvl 5's be boosted or looked at.
Should mining profitability be increased in low sec.
Should low sec exploration be increased in reward, number of sites OR respawn rate.
Should more booster/drug production be moved to low sec (higher chance of cyto clouds etc.)
Yeah mine are mostly geared toward low sec pve =s |
Hakan MacTrew
Caledonian Heavy Industries
Sick N' Twisted
67
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 15:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
"Should all PvE NPCs be reworked to fight more like a PvP opponent? (Not just their AI but their stats and attributes too.)"
"Should PvE be split into two styles; one where a player can choose to do the current style of PvE through mission running and another type for those that want a system more similar to PvE through missions and exploration?"
"Should the whole mission system be reworked from the ground up, (making it more interesting and involving while being less predicatable and boring,) to suit the needs and desires of the player base?"
"Do you think that CCP should introduce the Incursion mechanic in a broader spectrum, allowing other factions, (including pirates, corporations and maybe even empires,) to launch Incursions into constelations, not just Sansha."
MODULAR DRONES
MORE ORE SHIPS |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
3966
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 19:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Current Empire Cosmos Agents should have equal amounts of agents available. ie; more Caldari, Gallente and Minmatar Cosmos Agents added to equal the amount of Amarr Cosmos Agents currently active in game.
Thukker Tribe should be a full fledged Empire Faction allied with Minmatar, Gallente, SoE, ORE, The Interbus, Concord, Jove and The Society. ie; Thukker Tribe currently has negative standing with all other Factions except Minmatar.
Thukker Tribe Faction should have it's own Epic Arc standing gain tied in with the Minmatar Epic Arc. ie; 1/2 way through Minmatar Epic Arc offer option to complete it for Thukker Tribe.
DMC |
Alticus C Bear
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
102
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
Some statements below. Note that I do not necessarily agree/disagree myself.
Hi sec missions should be changed to promote group activity.
Hi sec PVE rewards are too high.
Null sec PVE is too safe.
NPC e-war should be in line with player e-war.
EVE needs a new PVE "Jesus Feature" as the priority for the next expansion.
COSMOS content was a better PVE format than the Epic Arcs.
PVE Rewards should have more Unique Items rather than Isk in the form of bounties and mission payments.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |