|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Xavier Thorm
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
   |
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Danika Princip wrote:Xuixien wrote:Danika Princip wrote:Nullsec industry does not need to be nerfed. Hichsec income does not need to be buffed.
next. Obviously did not read the post. Next. Tell me again how adding nullsec ores to highsec, even in limited quantities, does not constitute a nerf to nullsec mining? The answer is in the post. YOOZ UR BRANE
I'm honestly not seeing it either, care to explain? |
Xavier Thorm
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 17:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:
Okay how does supply and demand work?
Also, adding unnamed medium to high ores to gravimetric belts (non-static, non-predictable) would not be a major "buff" to HiSec. Removing the named ores from HiSec would actually represent a nerf.
NullSec mining would still be king over the others. Add a few buffs to NullSec industry and it would be even more attractive.
LowSec Industry would start to become viable.
This doesn't clarify your argument, it just restates it as a fact. Nullsec industry is currently almost nonexistent with the exception of things that can only be manufactured in sov space (supercaps), your claim that "NullSec mining would still be king" even after a change which gives people less incentive to mine in nullsec does not make sense to me. |
Xavier Thorm
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 19:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:
I'm going to reply to this in the proper EVE-Troll Fashion:
"Please explain to me how removing named ores form HiSec and making them only available in NullSec removes incentive to mine in NullSec."
Belt mining is already unpopular (in other words, basically nonexistent) in many parts of NullSec due to the danger. You seem to be suggesting that your idea of removing named ore from hisec while simultaneously adding more types of ore TO hisec is a net gain for nulsec, which is which I don't believe is correct.
|
Xavier Thorm
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 22:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
What you seem to be missing, Xuixien, is that the changes you have proposed (if considered alone, which I see no reason for them not to be) would exacerbate problems instead of fixing them. Vague suggestions of fixing nullsec industry are all well and good, but this wouldn't accomplish that.
That said, the core concept of your idea is interesting. If combined, for example, with some kind of change to limit the ease with which mass quantities of minerals can be moved between nullsec and hisec, it could help to shift more mining and manufacturing into nullsec while still allowing hisec industry to function. |
|
|
| |
|