EVE Search - Chendow Decent for csm 8

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Chendow Decent for csm 8

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 1	Posted - 2013.01.16 12:55:00 - [1] - Quote Hey guys and gals, Tonight I announced my candidacy for the next CSM on the Podside podcast. From talking to all the CSM members that have come on the show or are a part of the podcasting and blogging community, I've heard that the CSM is not listened to and just something ccp installed to keep the masses placated. I know I'm just 1 person, but I'd like to be your voice this go around. Most of the active CSM7 members have decided not to run again. I know that "fresh blood" is needed and I can bring a point of view unique to my experiences. I know I can't represent every person in this massive game, however I can represent your view as long as your willing to share it with me. Unlike a lot of the past CSM's, I look forward to hearing from the eve players. I look forward to representing you all as a member of CSM 8. Thank you for your consideration. Chendow
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 925	Posted - 2013.01.16 13:40:00 - [2] - Quote It would be nice if you told us what your views on the way forward are. This is not a signature.
Ovv Topik Proposition Thirteen The Third Rail 199	Posted - 2013.01.16 23:30:00 - [3] - Quote So you have our attention. What is it you want to advocate for change to CCP? ti'n siarad Cymraeg?
Kainotomiu Ronuken Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 652	Posted - 2013.01.17 09:12:00 - [4] - Quote I don't listen to the podcast, and it doesn't look as if you've contributed a great deal on the forums, so I'm afraid that I have absolutely no idea who you are, where you come from and what you're likely to push for as a CSM member. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Perhaps update the OP with at least some of that information? It is never too late to change your ways. --- -+-+-+-+-+ www.MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½
Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1400	Posted - 2013.01.17 21:11:00 - [5] - Quote So what are the reasons anybody should vote for you besides "I'm on a podcast"? Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge **.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Rengerel en Distel Amarr Science and Industry 1010	Posted - 2013.01.18 03:06:00 - [6] - Quote Scatim Helicon wrote: So what are the reasons anybody should vote for you besides "I'm on a podcast"? That seems to be all he had.
Kainotomiu Ronuken 712	Posted - 2013.01.18 12:15:00 - [7] - Quote I've taken the liberty of using your OP to whip up a quick, better version that might be more likely to persuade people to vote for you. You just need to fill in the blanks. Hey guys and gals, I'm Chendow Decent from the Podside podcast. Some of you may know me. I come from the ______ region in EVE, and I spend much of my time ______. I feel that ______ has been in need of a good CSM candidate for a long time, and I'd love to represent the views of all you who also engage in ______ to CCP. I know that "fresh blood" is needed and I can bring a point of view unique to my experiences, which are _____ and some ______. I've heard that the CSM is not listened to and just something ccp installed to keep the masses placated. I intend to do something about this by ______ and by ______. This will have a profound effect on the way CCP responds to the CSM, and should ultimately lead to ______. I feel that the most effective members of CSM7 were ______, ______ and ______, and for the most part I agree with their views on EVE, although I feel that the Winter CSM Minutes uncovered some less-than-desirable facts about ______. I know I can't represent every person in this massive game, however I can represent your view as long as you're willing to share it with me. I shall endeavour to circumvent the fact that every single one of you probably has different views by ______. I suggest you bulk it out a bit as well as replacing the lines with words, because it is still a bit skinny. It is never too late to change your ways. --- -+-+-+-+-+ www.MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½
Arronicus Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made. 108	Posted - 2013.01.19 00:14:00 - [8] - Quote I think this pretty clearly illustrates to everyone what good it would be to have this guy on the CSM; No platform. No details. No replies. (From the 'candidate') And yet he is going to further communications with CCP? Not with my votes.
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 16	Posted - 2013.01.20 16:29:00 - [9] - Quote As far as what I've done in Eve: I've done the high sec miner, mission runner, and corp ceo stuff. I've lived in low sec for a couple months heading up the LS arm of a corp (mostly PvE stuff). For the last year I've been living in 0.0 both in the CFC and now HBC. I've also been a CEO of a renting corp in Solar. I've used all the sov mechanics except for station management (outpost). I lived in a c5 for 6 months with a great WH alliance and lived in a c2 with a couple corpies for a couple months. I helped educate an alliance ceo on what happens when the corps hate you and vote another corp in as the executor. Done a little spying, nothing major. Helped with some corp theft, for a small fee of course. Overall, I've experienced a lot of the ideas and concepts that make EVE such an interesting and unique game. I had a very long explaination of each area of the game, but the forums hate me and the post button erased it all
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 16	Posted - 2013.01.20 16:32:00 - [10] - Quote The reason it took me a couple days to respond to you all is that I've been upgrading my desktop and recieved a few DOA parts. Sorry for the delay. I'll be posting some more about me thru out the day. If you more questions, I hope to answer them.
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 16	Posted - 2013.01.20 16:57:00 - [11] - Quote High sec: As many of you know, the safety of HS is an illusion. The new crimewatch and bounty systems make it a little easier to see who maybe harmful to your ships well being. The risk vs reward in HS is fairly balanced, lower risk & lower reward than LS, 0.0 or WH space. Low Sec: LS has seen a lot of love leately. The updates to Faction Warfare have increase the population and activity in LS. With the introduction of Dust into the mix, LS might get more than 5% of the player base involved in that area of the game. 0.0 space: The sov mechanics aren't perfect, but they are completely borked. They need work and CCP knows it. POS mechanics are on the long list of future updates, so that should help eliviate some of the pains. There is a lot of old code that needs to be updated before they can really move forward and design a newer sov mechanic, that takes time. I've used a lot of the current sov mechanics and look forward to seeing what CCP has in mind to improve them. WH space: CCP implemented this area of the game with a lot of success. A lot of people have talked about improving WH space, but you have to admit, it's fine the way it is. To impliment a lot of the ideas out there, you'd have to introduce 0.0 sov mechanics that already need to be updated. Once the sov mechanics are updated, maybe WH space will get some tweeks, but it's fine the way it currently is.
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 7245	Posted - 2013.01.20 17:38:00 - [12] - Quote Most of the richest players in the game are based in hi-sec. People who laugh at those of us who scrabble for scraps like Tech moons. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
Rengerel en Distel Amarr Science and Industry 1048	Posted - 2013.01.20 18:53:00 - [13] - Quote Malcanis wrote: Most of the richest players in the game are based in hi-sec. People who laugh at those of us who scrabble for scraps like Tech moons. To be fair, that's because that's where the hubs are. If the trade hubs were all in low somehow, all the richest people would be in low. It's not like those people making trillions a month are doing it mining or running level 4 missions.
Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1434	Posted - 2013.01.20 20:54:00 - [14] - Quote Rengerel en Distel wrote: Malcanis wrote: Most of the richest players in the game are based in hi-sec. People who laugh at those of us who scrabble for scraps like Tech moons. To be fair, that's because that's where the hubs are. If the trade hubs were all in low somehow, all the richest people would be in low. It's not like those people making trillions a month are doing it mining or running level 4 missions. Saying 'highsec is only rich because of the trade hubs' misses the point as to why those trade hubs are in highsec in the first place. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge **.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1434	Posted - 2013.01.20 21:03:00 - [15] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: High sec: As many of you know, the safety of HS is an illusion. The new crimewatch and bounty systems make it a little easier to see who maybe harmful to your ships well being. The risk vs reward in HS is fairly balanced, lower risk & lower reward than LS, 0.0 or WH space. Thanks for demonstrating that you literally have no idea what you are talking about whatsoever. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge **.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Frying Doom Zat's Affiliated Traders 1646	Posted - 2013.01.20 21:33:00 - [16] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: High sec: As many of you know, the safety of HS is an illusion. The new crimewatch and bounty systems make it a little easier to see who maybe harmful to your ships well being. The risk vs reward in HS is fairly balanced, lower risk & lower reward than LS, 0.0 or WH space. So is there some where else I can catch your stand up act or is it only limited to the forums? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
Arronicus Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made. 111	Posted - 2013.01.21 02:01:00 - [17] - Quote Scatim Helicon wrote: Rengerel en Distel wrote: Malcanis wrote: Most of the richest players in the game are based in hi-sec. People who laugh at those of us who scrabble for scraps like Tech moons. To be fair, that's because that's where the hubs are. If the trade hubs were all in low somehow, all the richest people would be in low. It's not like those people making trillions a month are doing it mining or running level 4 missions. Saying 'highsec is only rich because of the trade hubs' misses the point as to why those trade hubs are in highsec in the first place. Because of safe logistics and availability of goods, as well as being a central location in Eve? By god, you're right! Who'd have ever drawn such a conclusion...
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 740	Posted - 2013.01.21 10:35:00 - [18] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: I had a very long explaination of each area of the game, but the forums hate me and the post button erased it all lol "I spent ages persuading CCP to change X for the good of the game, but then they all magically forgot and I'm back to square 1 again. Sorry guys." It is never too late to change your ways. --- -+-+-+-+-+ www.MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½
Sugar Kyle The humbleless Crew Capital Punishment. 206	Posted - 2013.01.23 15:38:00 - [19] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: Low Sec: LS has seen a lot of love leately. The updates to Faction Warfare have increase the population and activity in LS. With the introduction of Dust into the mix, LS might get more than 5% of the player base involved in that area of the game. Faction Warfare has seen a lot of attention but faction warfare does not define low sec. There is a large chunk of low Dec that does not participate in or even see faction warfare. Tilde soaked words from something kinda like a pirate.
Two step Aperture Harmonics K162 3205	Posted - 2013.01.23 16:13:00 - [20] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: WH space: CCP implemented this area of the game with a lot of success. A lot of people have talked about improving WH space, but you have to admit, it's fine the way it is. To impliment a lot of the ideas out there, you'd have to introduce 0.0 sov mechanics that already need to be updated. Once the sov mechanics are updated, maybe WH space will get some tweeks, but it's fine the way it currently is. First, invest in a browser that spell checks your text. Firefox does this, I am pretty sure most other major browsers do so as well. Secondly, I don't have to admit that wormhole space is fine as it is. Lack of private storage at POSes, lack of any new wormhole content in years, useless T3 subsystems, and issues with many of the balance changes that CCP makes elsewhere would be the start of my list. Thirdly, do you have some sort of blog or website with any further information? You may have noticed that it is pretty common with just about every other candidate. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
Scooter McCabe SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation 72	Posted - 2013.01.23 20:22:00 - [21] - Quote Chendow Decent wrote: Hey guys and gals, :Fluff: Chendow This would have been more honest.
Callduron 171	Posted - 2013.01.24 01:03:00 - [22] - Quote Malcanis wrote: Most of the richest players in the game are based in hi-sec. People who laugh at those of us who scrabble for scraps like Tech moons. You're blurring the distinction between players and characters. Mynna recently posted a screenshot of one of his high sec characters with almost a trillion isk on the account but one wouldn't consider him a high sec player.
Callduron 171	Posted - 2013.01.24 01:04:00 - [23] - Quote Chendow is your corporation still a no women allowed corporation?
Poetic Stanziel Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 1693	Posted - 2013.02.06 22:22:00 - [24] - Quote Get yourself interviewed: http://crossingzebras.com/post/40699271518/electioninterviews Amarr Militia - Fweddit - http://fweddit.com Poetic Discourse - http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.com
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 836	Posted - 2013.02.06 22:31:00 - [25] - Quote Poetic Stanziel wrote: Get yourself interviewed: http://crossingzebras.com/post/40699271518/electioninterviews Not even worth it at this point. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Endeavour Starfleet 843	Posted - 2013.02.27 19:49:00 - [26] - Quote Hello there! I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s) POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready? Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard) Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining? The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts. The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE. Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi. Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet. Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.
Snot Shot Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx 581	Posted - 2013.03.06 06:05:00 - [27] - Quote Do you promise that your commitment to CSM8 will be similar to your commitment to this thread....or did you forget to poast that this thread was a troll.... . Twitter = @Snot_Shot-á --áCatch My Interview!-á-á VFV Episode 56 & Blogsperg GÇ£If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything"
Poetic Stanziel Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 1797	Posted - 2013.03.07 21:24:00 - [28] - Quote What is your stance on AFK skill training? Amarr Militia - Fweddit - http://fweddit.com Poetic Discourse - http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.com
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 18	Posted - 2013.03.10 17:11:00 - [29] - Quote snot shot, you need to troll better
Chendow Decent Multiplex Gaming Li3 Federation 18	Posted - 2013.03.10 17:20:00 - [30] - Quote Callduron wrote: Chendow is your corporation still a no women allowed corporation? The corp (Multiplex Gaming) has never been "no women allowed". However, single women are not allowed.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.