| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6430
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 08:00:00 -
[91] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:But have you considered starting and I don't know, destroying each others fleets to pass the time while structure grinding?
yeah guy the two coalitions that have recently finished what was essentially a massive structure grind of like 10 regions over 2012 just want to do it all again
there's a huge difference between fighting under a sov/moon NIP and staying blue for eternity ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

BrutalButFair
Fleet of the Damned Happy Endings
60
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 08:22:00 -
[92] - Quote
They kissed and made up. This is getting real old real fast. Null-sec is dieing more and more every minute. (IRC just gave away an entire region to CFC. Just like that )
Is it me or are these guys (CFC & HBC) just terrible pussies.
Ow btw. TEST is run by Shadoo it seems. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
269
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 08:27:00 -
[93] - Quote
BrutalButFair wrote:They kissed and made up. This is getting real old real fast. Null-sec is dieing more and more every minute. (IRC just gave away an entire region to CFC. Just like that  ) Is it me or are these guys (CFC & HBC) just terrible pussies. Ow btw. TEST is run by Shadoo it seems. Good post, would read again. |

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
261
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 10:47:00 -
[94] - Quote
Nullsec is a RMT joke. And not finding anything better to do, they are ruining the game experience for low and highsec inhabitants. Nullsec bigheads dont care about the game at all. They care only for their pockets. LF CSM8 candidate. Are you what lowsec needs? --->-átinyurl.com/afaawrb
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6433
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 11:27:00 -
[95] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Nullsec is a RMT joke. And not finding anything better to do, they are ruining the game experience for low and highsec inhabitants. Nullsec bigheads dont care about the game at all. They care only for their pockets.
since you clearly have infallible evidence about nullsec leaders and RMT, perhaps you should send it to [email protected] ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Roderick Grey
Assisted Genocide Black Legion.
229
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 11:29:00 -
[96] - Quote
Andski wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I constantly hear people from Null stating that this is a PvPcentric game and that all of EvE is based on PvP.
So there is an opportunity for PvP in an epic scale and the 2 biggest alliances don't want to fight.
Now who are the carebears? "those damned nullbears don't want to grind 200 systems worth of structures, hypocrites"
I heard RvB's easy to get into. GÇ£We could learn a lot from crayons; some are sharp, some are pretty, some are dull, while others bright, some have weird names, but they all have learned to live together in the same box.GÇ¥- Special needs division of Fcon. |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
51
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 11:52:00 -
[97] - Quote
EI Digin wrote:I concede.-á
Shadoo has talked me off of the ledge, I have released the hostage and dropped my knife. After discussing this with other HBC leaders a reset and expanded NIP / OTEC agreement is the best path forward. It isn't what I want, but it is what you want. I want war. I want gigantic ******* battles. I want to crash nodes because people are so ******* interested in this ****** game.
Shadoo has promised to give me what I want without the nastyness of sov grinds.
#### SENT BY Montolio to All online hbc @ 2013-01-23 00:55:11 EVE Time ####
Who would have thought that PL of all people would pull him off the edge? How did this guy get on top of such an influential alliance? That is not the kind of wording used by someone who wants to be in control.
That is someone who is tired of being where they are but is too scared/comfortable to leave. I thought this guy was a megalomaniac bent on Eve domination.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
261
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 12:07:00 -
[98] - Quote
Andski wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:Nullsec is a RMT joke. And not finding anything better to do, they are ruining the game experience for low and highsec inhabitants. Nullsec bigheads dont care about the game at all. They care only for their pockets. since you clearly have infallible evidence about nullsec leaders and RMT, perhaps you should send it to [email protected]
oh pls... LF CSM8 candidate. Are you what lowsec needs? --->-átinyurl.com/afaawrb
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
752
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 12:54:00 -
[99] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Andski wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:Nullsec is a RMT joke. And not finding anything better to do, they are ruining the game experience for low and highsec inhabitants. Nullsec bigheads dont care about the game at all. They care only for their pockets. since you clearly have infallible evidence about nullsec leaders and RMT, perhaps you should send it to [email protected] oh pls... You mean you don't have any evidence? Is today unfounded accusation day or something?
Zloco Crendraven is a botter and likes WoW and has a secret crush on CCP Falcon! LOL LOL
|

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
261
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 13:01:00 -
[100] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Zloco Crendraven is a botter and likes WoW and has a secret crush on CCP Falcon! LOL LOL
Lol what an exceptional chap.
LF CSM8 candidate. Are you what lowsec needs? --->-átinyurl.com/afaawrb
|

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
749
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 14:21:00 -
[101] - Quote
delete the code that enabled outpost docking rights if you want people to move to null
If CCP wanted super powers to fight and they refuse to shorten their blues list, CCP could just shorten it for them.
Their game, not CFCs
--- GÇ£If you think this Universe is bad, you should see some of the others.GÇ¥ GÇò Philip K. **** |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
52
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 14:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
Spurty wrote:delete the code that enabled outpost docking rights if you want people to move to null
If CCP wanted super powers to fight and they refuse to shorten their blues list, CCP could just shorten it for them.
Their game, not CFCs
I liked that post. It just wasn't enough though. hell yeah, open stations and open PI in null.
Although there is already plenty of NPC open stations in null. Are those systems open to PI?
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Axis Raikkonen
Dropbears with Kebabs SpaceMonkey's Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:05:00 -
[103] - Quote
ITT people who've never been in a structure grind want to have a structure grind. Also, Snot Shot taking the opportunity to proclaim that everyone needs to play his version of EVE and not their own.
Objective: People want to shoot at each other. Outcome: People can now shoot at each other.
Op success. |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2970
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:05:00 -
[104] - Quote
Sala Kyss wrote:Zagdul wrote:Who the hell actually wants SOV warfare?
How hard is it to get an FC, some ships and go shoot dudes?
In reality, the false drama, such as this thread is getting rather boring. TEST need to stop selling their members that the CFC is bad and instead undock, bring a fleet and fight. If they want a Sov warfare, they need to **** or get off the pot by resetting Goons.
Until that happens, it's all hurf blurf with a bunch of children at the helm. I honestly feel bad for the smarter TEST pilots who see through the BS. I'm pretty sure they're just as bored with it all as I am. Go hump your daddy mittani's leg some more about it because you can't stand that your pilots are actually dumb enough to die to the "bunch of children" blopsing the hell out of them.
"Member for 7 months"
New rule - if you're in TEST and don't remember OWXT / the Testagram, your opinion on FA and Goonswarm doesn't mean ****. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

Random Majere
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
56
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:41:00 -
[105] - Quote
Andski wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:Nullsec is a RMT joke. And not finding anything better to do, they are ruining the game experience for low and highsec inhabitants. Nullsec bigheads dont care about the game at all. They care only for their pockets. since you clearly have infallible evidence about nullsec leaders and RMT, perhaps you should send it to [email protected]
Is that a faction Damage Control unit you are using?
You know there is a saying: "There is no smoke without fire" People may have no valid proof, but they sure see a lot of smoke! |

Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
71
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:49:00 -
[106] - Quote
Random Majere wrote: Is that a faction Damage Control unit you are using?
You know there is a saying: "There is no smoke without fire" People may have no valid proof, but they sure see a lot of smoke!
Why so angry? |

Random Majere
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
56
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:56:00 -
[107] - Quote
Singular Snowflake wrote:Random Majere wrote: Is that a faction Damage Control unit you are using?
You know there is a saying: "There is no smoke without fire" People may have no valid proof, but they sure see a lot of smoke!
Why so angry?
Not angry at all m8...To be honnest, I'm lmao atm at this whole drama thing. It reveals a lot on what really drives null sec politics!!! |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
52
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 16:02:00 -
[108] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote:ITT people who've never been in a structure grind want to have a structure grind. Also, Snot Shot taking the opportunity to proclaim that everyone needs to play his version of EVE and not their own.
Objective: People want to shoot at each other. Outcome: People can now shoot at each other.
Op success.
If structure grind sucks and no one wants to do it then your sovereignty is actually pretty safe. Which free's up pilots to do other things...
Hmmm, how can all these free pilots be used to attack your enemy? What item of value is easier and more fun to take?
What is the real currency here, and what buys them?
I for one am here for excitement and game play. Give me that and I will follow.
While structure is currency it does not move quickly, its a PITA to move actually. If your opponent goes after structure they tie themsleves up in a fight that their pilots hate. Giving you time and materials to create excitement and drive. And to manufacture the real currency of excitement. Which can be used to purchase pilots to take back any losses of "structure".
This isn't a war for structure, it is a war for currency waged with resolve and understanding which Montolio has just conceded. Even though he actually had the upper hand.
*****
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Axis Raikkonen
Dropbears with Kebabs SpaceMonkey's Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 16:41:00 -
[109] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote: If structure grind sucks and no one wants to do it then your sovereignty is actually pretty safe.
Structure grinding sucks and there are thousands of idiots out there who have never been around for it, or when they are around for it, they're not the ones joining the fleets to F1 a tower for 2 hours. It's boring, monotonous, and burns out even the best pilots. Consider how many systems are held between the CFC and HBC, and then consider that the average EVE system holds a dozen or more moons. Multiply and then subtract all the moons that aren't valuable or strategic. The number is staggering. If a sov-and-structure war breaks out between the two largest coalitions in the game, every pilot involved will suffer and burn out.
Corey Fumimasa wrote:While structure is currency it does not move quickly, its a PITA to move actually. If your opponent goes after structure they tie themsleves up in a fight that their pilots hate. Giving you time and materials to create excitement and drive. And to manufacture the real currency of excitement. Which can be used to purchase pilots to take back any losses of "structure".
I don't even know WTAF you're talking about here. "manufacture the real currency of excitement" You sound like a hurf blurf EVE journalist. STRUCTURE GRINDING IS NOT CONTENT. STRUCTURE GRINDING IS LIKE FARMVILLE. OH LOOK, I ALARM-CLOCKED THAT TIMER AND NOW I HAVE MORE SPACEBUX! I THINK I'LL GO SHOVE MY GENITALS IN THE TOASTER.
Corey Fumimasa wrote: This isn't a war for structure, it is a war for currency waged with resolve and understanding which Montolio has just conceded. Even though he actually had the upper hand.
It isn't a war for structure now that structures have been taken off the table because ^^^^^^^ HEY CCP, STRUCTURE MECHANICS SUCK. Also, Montolio never had the upper hand in "resolve" and "understanding." He's a spoiled pyromaniac manchild who wanted to gather up all the toys someone else bought for him and light them on fire just to watch them burn. |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
52
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 16:46:00 -
[110] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote:
It isn't a war for structure now that structures have been taken off the table because ^^^^^^^ HEY CCP, STRUCTURE MECHANICS SUCK. Also, Montolio never had the upper hand in "resolve" and "understanding." He's a spoiled pyromaniac manchild who wanted to gather up all the toys someone else bought for him and light them on fire just to watch them burn.
You are solidly on the first floor of understanding. I can't believe that "Structure grind sucks so much that it can be used to burn pilots out."
I concede to your intimate understanding of the complete and udder understanding of the absolutely obvious.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
243
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 16:46:00 -
[111] - Quote
Never knew in sov warfare you can't defend your own towers with ships and stuff, or use cynos or titan jump bridges to move ships into place to defend those structures.
Apparently I really don't know null at all! Here I thought power projection was just for having null alliances move 99+ jumps to go gatecamp in npc null.
I guess that other 20+ page thread was wrong after all. "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Axis Raikkonen
Dropbears with Kebabs SpaceMonkey's Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 16:53:00 -
[112] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Axis Raikkonen wrote:
It isn't a war for structure now that structures have been taken off the table because ^^^^^^^ HEY CCP, STRUCTURE MECHANICS SUCK. Also, Montolio never had the upper hand in "resolve" and "understanding." He's a spoiled pyromaniac manchild who wanted to gather up all the toys someone else bought for him and light them on fire just to watch them burn.
You are solidly on the first floor of understanding. I can't believe that "Structure grind sucks so much that it can be used to burn pilots out." I concede to your intimate understanding of the complete and udder understanding of the absolutely obvious. For a FW pilot who's likely never shot a tower, you seem oddly optimistic about all the fun to be had grinding/repping structures. Please find other people like yourself and form an alliance to create this structure-based content you seem to enjoy so much. |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
52
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:04:00 -
[113] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote: For a FW pilot who's likely never shot a tower, you seem oddly optimistic about all the fun to be had grinding/repping structures. Please find other people like yourself and form an alliance to create this structure-based content you seem to enjoy so much.
I could be upset with your lack of understanding...but for some reason it makes me smile. Its strange, for so long I have been under the impression that we should all strive to find the "truth", to see the world in the same way.
My grandfather used to say that if we all thought the same way then everyone would want my squaw.
Do you not want to ever grind structure again?
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Axis Raikkonen
Dropbears with Kebabs SpaceMonkey's Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:19:00 -
[114] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote: Do you not want to ever grind structure again?
When my or my allies' space is in danger, I will grind structures. But I will not support talk of "LOL LET'S GO STRUCTURE GRIND FOR FUNSIES!"
Analogy since they seem to be in vogue in this thread: I don't like getting flu shots. I get one every year when it's necessary to protect myself. But I'm not about to walk into Walgreens every day at lunch and say "stick me! I feel like getting a shot today." |

Corey Fumimasa
The Advent of Faith
53
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:37:00 -
[115] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote:Corey Fumimasa wrote: Do you not want to ever grind structure again?
When my or my allies' space is in danger, I will grind structures. But I will not support talk of "LOL LET'S GO STRUCTURE GRIND FOR FUNSIES!" Analogy since they seem to be in vogue in this thread: I don't like getting flu shots. I get one every year when it's necessary to protect myself. But I'm not about to walk into Walgreens every day at lunch and say "stick me! I feel like getting a shot today."
Are you an alt of Whitehound?
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
243
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:38:00 -
[116] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote:Corey Fumimasa wrote: Do you not want to ever grind structure again?
When my or my allies' space is in danger, I will grind structures. But I will not support talk of "LOL LET'S GO STRUCTURE GRIND FOR FUNSIES!" Analogy since they seem to be in vogue in this thread: I don't like getting flu shots. I get one every year when it's necessary to protect myself. But I'm not about to walk into Walgreens every day at lunch and say "stick me! I feel like getting a shot today."
That would be awesome if NOT getting the shot meant you wouldn't get the flu.
"I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Murk Paradox
Dvice Shipyards No Value
243
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:40:00 -
[117] - Quote
Axis Raikkonen wrote:Corey Fumimasa wrote:Axis Raikkonen wrote:
It isn't a war for structure now that structures have been taken off the table because ^^^^^^^ HEY CCP, STRUCTURE MECHANICS SUCK. Also, Montolio never had the upper hand in "resolve" and "understanding." He's a spoiled pyromaniac manchild who wanted to gather up all the toys someone else bought for him and light them on fire just to watch them burn.
You are solidly on the first floor of understanding. I can't believe that "Structure grind sucks so much that it can be used to burn pilots out." I concede to your intimate understanding of the complete and udder understanding of the absolutely obvious. For a FW pilot who's likely never shot a tower, you seem oddly optimistic about all the fun to be had grinding/repping structures. Please find other people like yourself and form an alliance to create this structure-based content you seem to enjoy so much.
It's even more fun piloting a small little crucifier and ewar'ing the snipers who are trying to pick off the pos defenders.
Or you know.. float by in a covops and give the battleships a warp in, or something.
Just pretend the tower isn't by itself, or if it is, go afk and pretend its ice. "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1292
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 18:01:00 -
[118] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Axis Raikkonen wrote:ITT people who've never been in a structure grind want to have a structure grind. Also, Snot Shot taking the opportunity to proclaim that everyone needs to play his version of EVE and not their own.
Objective: People want to shoot at each other. Outcome: People can now shoot at each other.
Op success. If structure grind sucks and no one wants to do it then your sovereignty is actually pretty safe. Which free's up pilots to do other things... Hmmm, how can all these free pilots be used to attack your enemy? What item of value is easier and more fun to take? What is the real currency here, and what buys them? I for one am here for excitement and game play and conquest through calculated risk. Give me that and I will follow. While structure is currency it does not move quickly, its a PITA to move actually. If your opponent goes after structure they tie themsleves up in a fight that their pilots hate. Giving you time and materials to create excitement and drive. And to manufacture the real currency of excitement. Which can be used to purchase pilots to take back any losses of "structure". This isn't a war for structure, it is a war for currency waged with resolve and understanding which Montolio has just conceded. Even though he actually had the upper hand. *****
Content is currency, not structures. Structures are a tax you pay in order to get to content and right now, we're over taxed.
I've heard a lot of 'why not a ~real~ war instead of this fake one?'... The simple answer to this is:
We've given EVE what they asked for, less long blue lists. Anyone who's played this game for any length of time in long campaigns or taken part in space conquest knows that 50% of the time its boring tedious work of sitting on titans to babysit a cap fleet that runs around doing all the heavy lifting. 9% is formup time spent getting these titan babysitting fleets together and 1% is actual war and combat. The last bit is for horrible forum posting.
The 'epic wars' can happen without involving structures.
Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Ivan Ward
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
124
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 19:01:00 -
[119] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:CCP should make ships free if you loose one in good PvP. So many people pay to be here, you shouldn't have to grind ISK for 10 hours a week just to get a few ships to play with. This game sucks sometimes.
What ****** up kind of alliance are you in?
"Hot pilots we have problems too, we're just like you." |

Max50
Parental Control Raiden.
24
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 19:31:00 -
[120] - Quote
Oh boys lets just face it... null sec players are 99% are carebears.... If you want content,you just shoot a tech moon.There are enough tech moons out there to make any null sec alliance comeout of their hole and play.You might be unlucky and shooting for 10 minutes a POS so your different TZ bros can take a fight from it.
All the crap about a war that cant be fought etc is ********. Lets face it,zagdul guy is right.You either go and shoot whatever you like whenever you like,or you just stfu and move on.
RDN fought a war against all odds last year,if the current block leaders were leading us we might even had some sort of tech goo too,just to stand out of big CFC out of the way and spare them the trouble.But we played,smacked and shot each other in the face no matter the possible outcome.
Lets face it.We,HBC are a guttless entity that does the talk...but not the talk. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |