In a cave

My GPU is not maxed and I m here, the client crashed because it allocated 2 gigabytes of memory, whenever any 32 bit software not properly coded reach's that amount of memory on windows, it crashes. I m not having syncing issues.

Eve its CPU bound not GPU bound, maybe you should read some more dev blogs.

So I was at asakai and my client crashed after hitting the stupid 2 gigabytes memory limit of 32 bit applications, what good is it for me to have 8+ GB of ram if I cannot use it on the game.

Additionally FPS went downhill as a single core of my processor turboed its way to 5900mhz and then chocked on heat, we need multithreading seriously, and 99% time dilation... multithreading for the nodes too please and automatic reinforcement.

And the multitudes from the peanut gallery are insisting that we must do that day and night for about the year or two it would take for a CFC/HBC war

While I really don't support the idea of a CFC/HBC war, wouldn't it be at least a little less painfull since it would be in 0.0 where DD can make the fight go a bit faster but more importantly it would happen on pre-determined system so it could be reinforced in advance?

A fight like that would have even less of a chance happening in 0.0 as it did in lowsec. Sure DD would remove a few caps with a quickness but no one, and I mean no one is gonna commit that many capitals to an area where they can be bubbled. And the whole pre-determined thing is like a red herring because the aggressor forms up dudes to contest a timer, the defender forms up dudes to defend a timer, and usually if one side has a pretty big advantage the forecast is blueballs. If the numbers are pretty even then there might be a goodfight.

But in 0.0 titans and supercaps are used 95% of the time for bridging (titans) killing structures quick (supers) usually ninja-quick unless theres a reasonable guarantee of safety. Goons will camp nearby opponents into whatever station they base out of then let capitals run willy-nilly but then again theres the safety measure. PL will camp a freakin gate in lowsec with supers but would never dream of doing that in 0.0 Everyone else has to ninja around with extreme paranoia with their caps.

So at the end of the day- in lowsec they are too hard to catch, in 0.0 they are too easy to catch (no one wants to commit to using them) and theres no happy medium or balance

That sucks... I have a laptop with a dualcore celeron processor with only 2GB of ram... and my client was stable. It was laggy, yes but I couldn't tell if it was lag due to the ridiculous 10% dilation or low fps.

that was a cool video, and accelerated to compensate for tidi it was 18 minutes and some seconds

that was a cool video, and accelerated to compensate for tidi it was 18 minutes and some seconds

While I really don't support the idea of a CFC/HBC war, wouldn't it be at least a little less painfull since it would be in 0.0 where DD can make the fight go a bit faster but more importantly it would happen on pre-determined system so it could be reinforced in advance?

if you want eve to use all your cores, run another game

Did you use any of the options available to reduce the load on your client, like turning off brackets?

And the multitudes from the peanut gallery are insisting that we must do that day and night for about the year or two it would take for a CFC/HBC war

That being said; death to ALL supercaps!

If the game looked like that in real time, Eve would be unstopable

Lies. EVE doesn't have sound. :colbert:

So I was at asakai and my client crashed after hitting the stupid 2 gigabytes memory limit of 32 bit applications, what good is it for me to have 8+ GB of ram if I cannot use it on the game.

Additionally FPS went downhill as a single core of my processor turboed its way to 5900mhz and then chocked on heat, we need multithreading seriously, and 99% time dilation... multithreading for the nodes too please and automatic reinforcement.

Sounds like server was doing just fine and your system ran into a bottleneck.

Goons and friends (ie. the ones shooting them, because null = NAP ) did manage to kill something however, the myth of Eve being a PvP centric game stone dead .. twenty-five hundred people in a system for Goddess knows how many hours and less popped ships than a weekday afternoon in Amamake ...

if you think you can rewrite Stackless Python from ground up, refactor 10 years of patched up code to the original framework, expecting to retain the same functionality it has today, and expect it to do it in this lifetime, please do.

Removed a personal attack post from the thread.

Why only a 64-bit multi-threaded client?

Better ask for a "multi-account" client to run multiple characters!

Instead of running multiple clients could CCP wrap the existing client into a meta client, which then allows for an easier control of multiple accounts. This will spread CPU load across multiple CPU cores, too, and it gets more money for CCP, because then everybody wants to have multiple accounts.

Actually, thinking about it, wouldn't that also reduce load for running multiple accounts since it wouldn't have to load everything completely seperately? Like, if you have the Myrmidon texture loaded, its loaded for all clients basically and that sort of thing? Maybe I'm misunderstanding how that'd work. Either way, yeah, I can see it being time consuming. They'd need to clean up all the old code first... which I think they mentioned in the CSM meeting that they were doing that?