| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
274
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 20:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
Shamus O'Reilly wrote:Hisec is the epitome of a low risk isk fountain. Where anyone with half a brain can get billions monthly with very little work. I have a blue that uses 3 hulks and an orca daily. within 4 DAYS in a month he has already plexed all of his toons. All because of hisec mining done very much unattentively.
Max hypothetical profit would be something like 70 million ISK an hour, or 30 hours to PLEX all accounts.
But that is not even possible in the high sec belts that are gone in anywhere from 20-60 minutes depending on how fat it is. Then you have to move, have to empty the orca, are going to have some half-cycles no matter how attentive you are. So max "realistic" profit from 3 hulks and an orca would be more like 60 million ISK an hour, or 35-40 hours. BUT, that is highly attentive mining.
Inattentive mining, maybe 45-50 million, or 45-50 hours.
And that doesn't including any travel, transport, market time.
I don't know, but I've been told, that null sec ratters in carriers can put in the neighborhood of 50 million a tick, or close to 150 million ISK an hour.. in complexes that auto re-spawn as soon as they complete. Deposited directly into their wallets without having to haul, market, blah, blah. With 1 account... so, PLEX in 4 hours compared to 40-50+ hours of high sec mining.
Now, this isn't a call to nerf carrier ratting in null.
I'm simply saying that if he is PLEXing all his accounts high sec mining in 4 days, those are 4 LONG, HARD days of high attentive mining, and then adding that high sec mining is far from the most profitable activity in the game. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2420
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 20:40:00 -
[32] - Quote
As a casual player in a PVP game and one who uses stealth and intel to avoid PVP, I always felt that the real theme of a sandbox is to play it in a manner not entirely intended.
That's probably the real contradiction around here, PVPer's screaming what a sandbox this is supposed to be, while claiming we should all be into PVP.
But real liberty is not requiring acceptance and permission from someone else. They have a right to their opinions, and we have the right to ignore them.
|

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
1261
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 20:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Shamus O'Reilly wrote:Hisec is the epitome of a low risk isk fountain. Where anyone with half a brain can get billions monthly with very little work. I have a blue that uses 3 hulks and an orca daily. within 4 DAYS in a month he has already plexed all of his toons. All because of hisec mining done very much unattentively. Max hypothetical profit would be something like 70 million ISK an hour, or 30 hours to PLEX all accounts. But that is not even possible in the high sec belts that are gone in anywhere from 20-60 minutes depending on how fat it is. Then you have to move, have to empty the orca, are going to have some half-cycles no matter how attentive you are. So max "realistic" profit from 3 hulks and an orca would be more like 60 million ISK an hour, or 35-40 hours. BUT, that is highly attentive mining. Inattentive mining, maybe 45-50 million, or 45-50 hours. And that doesn't including any travel, transport, market time. I don't know, but I've been told, that null sec ratters in carriers can put in the neighborhood of 50 million a tick, or close to 150 million ISK an hour.. in complexes that auto re-spawn as soon as they complete. Deposited directly into their wallets without having to haul, market, blah, blah. With 1 account... so, PLEX in 4 hours compared to 40-50+ hours of high sec mining. Now, this isn't a call to nerf carrier ratting in null. I'm simply saying that if he is PLEXing all his accounts high sec mining in 4 days, those are 4 LONG, HARD days of high attentive mining, and then adding that high sec mining is far from the most profitable activity in the game.
OR, you just playing the game wrong.
That carrier in null sec making "150 mil an Hour" (lol, i'd love to see that btw) is under constant threat, and needs certain anomalies to be open, and will have to safe up if any non blue is in system.....
Our you could take about the same isk investment and a LOWER sp investment, get in a priate faction ship and make 180 mil an hour doing high sec HQ fleet incursions, where it doesn't matter who is in local (you can be in an HQ fleet wardecced anyways so all you have to worry about is suicide ganking.....with 11 logi ships on your side....) and an FC is going to tell you what buttons to push when.
i make more than 70 mil an hour doing high sec missions with a mach and tengu. if you can't make more than 70 mil an hour in high sec, your isk making operation is horrible.
|

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
274
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 21:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:OR, you just playing the game wrong.
It is a game, and therefor, exists for enjoyment.
I'm playing the game how I enjoy playing it, and therefore, am playing it correctly.
Anyone who thinks that they know what I enjoy, better than I know what I enjoy, must be one serious egotistical fool.
Jenn aSide wrote: i make more than 70 mil an hour doing high sec missions with a mach and tengu. if you can't make more than 70 mil an hour in high sec, your isk making operation is horrible.
I was not attempting to assert that high sec mining is max profit activity. I was simply addressing the person's comment that his "friend" was able to PLEX 4 account in 4 days by mining, and mining is done unattentively. Yeah, maybe 14 hours a day for 4 days, unattentively.
Your entire post appears to be a straw-man... making a false image of my post to burn. Fail on you.
How about responding to what I was actually saying? |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
1263
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 21:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:OR, you just playing the game wrong. It is a game, and therefor, exists for enjoyment. I'm playing the game how I enjoy playing it, and therefore, am playing it correctly. Anyone who thinks that they know what I enjoy, better than I know what I enjoy, must be one serious egotistical fool.
If you enjoy inefficient grinding, more pwoer to you. it doesn't take me a week to make a plex in high sec.
Quote: I was not attempting to assert that high sec mining is max profit activity. I was simply addressing the person's comment that his "friend" was able to PLEX 4 account in 4 days by mining, and mining is done unattentively. Yeah, maybe 14 hours a day for 4 days, unattentively.
Your entire post appears to be a straw-man... making a false image of my post to burn. Fail on you.
How about responding to what I was actually saying?
I did, YOU were the one who compared it a CARRIER in null sec. Why aren't you comparing mining to mining?
|

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
136
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 21:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Change the game or lose subs thread# 108973450892341-298462143-98213457-21394687234698234707-971niner.
Troll thread reply # 108973450892341-298462143-98213457-21394687234698234707-97 as usual no value to add. |

Solstice Project
T E R R O R I S T S
2678
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 22:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
lol @ OP Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Solstice Project
T E R R O R I S T S
2678
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 22:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:I'm playing the game how I enjoy playing it, and therefore, am playing it correctly. If you really believe that to be true, then there's really no help for you.
Hey, let's all play whatever we want, the way we want, because when we enjoy it we are doing it right, no matter what.
*rollseyes*
Nice troll thread, really. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
313
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 22:45:00 -
[39] - Quote
I'm in what I'd like to call a border Alliance, one that operates in hisec as well as lowsec. We are experiencing firsthand that PVE, PVP manufacturing and the economy go hand in hand, and aren't seperate 'playstyles' unless you fully solo. During peacetime you might find a few pvp-ers camping the gate people use when hauling materials. During war these same pvp-ers go out into hisec to scout for WT's and escort the occasional low-value transport. At all times our POSes remain up because of miners and industrialists. So all of these 'playstyles' can actuually converge into a single gameplay experience in which you have a certain role. It's almost as if this were a Role Playing Game...
I want to respect any and all playstyles, but the trick is you can't. It's a sandbox, some people will inevitably play in a way that irritates you. Whether they camp the same gate 24/7, are not active enough, have only their own interest at heart etc... and I feel people should be free to judge and act on these matters. You can oppose or be against a certain type of playstyle, but there's no reason to burn a person to the ground for the way they play a sandbox game. There are many ways to show your discontent ingame (and possibly halt or stagger the activities you despise) without attacking someone on a personal level. Think in wardecs and hulkageddons. That's how we should show each other some damn disrespect!  |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
278
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 22:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
Most people argue for their own little corner, and look to keep things the way they want it to be. This is doublely so for most nullsec and lowsec players. Its pretty rare for them to support suggestions that improve EvE as a whole. Mostly its just "my way is the way the game should be played, your way is wrong, etc etc".
I'm a strong supporter of EvE as a whole, and embrace the fact that many people play EvE for many different reasons. Limiting the game to one side of these opinions just reduces EvE, lessens its greatness.
When it boils down to it, most people are just selfish i guess.  Post with your main, like a BOSS! |

Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
77
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 23:07:00 -
[41] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Shamus O'Reilly wrote:Hisec is the epitome of a low risk isk fountain. Where anyone with half a brain can get billions monthly with very little work. I have a blue that uses 3 hulks and an orca daily. within 4 DAYS in a month he has already plexed all of his toons. All because of hisec mining done very much unattentively. Max hypothetical profit would be something like 70 million ISK an hour, or 30 hours to PLEX all accounts. But that is not even possible in the high sec belts that are gone in anywhere from 20-60 minutes depending on how fat it is. Then you have to move, have to empty the orca, are going to have some half-cycles no matter how attentive you are. So max "realistic" profit from 3 hulks and an orca would be more like 60 million ISK an hour, or 35-40 hours. BUT, that is highly attentive mining. Inattentive mining, maybe 45-50 million, or 45-50 hours. And that doesn't including any travel, transport, market time. I don't know, but I've been told, that null sec ratters in carriers can put in the neighborhood of 50 million a tick, or close to 150 million ISK an hour.. in complexes that auto re-spawn as soon as they complete. Deposited directly into their wallets without having to haul, market, blah, blah. With 1 account... so, PLEX in 4 hours compared to 40-50+ hours of high sec mining. Now, this isn't a call to nerf carrier ratting in null. I'm simply saying that if he is PLEXing all his accounts high sec mining in 4 days, those are 4 LONG, HARD days of high attentive mining, and then adding that high sec mining is far from the most profitable activity in the game. he gets up, logs in mines iin hulks for max isk or macks for max studying. finishes studying and work. logs off after mineral refining with estimate of 300 to 500 mil daily. he has it down to a science that he knows which systems for the day have max yield and wipes at least a system clean daily |

Din Chao
167
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 23:15:00 -
[42] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Hey, let's all play whatever we want, the way we want, because when we enjoy it we are doing it right, no matter what. OK! *takes off pants*
 |

Ptraci
Militaris Industries Northern Coalition.
1220
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 01:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
Shamus O'Reilly wrote: with estimate of 300 to 500 mil daily. he has it down to a science that he knows which systems for the day have max yield and wipes at least a system clean daily
He has to make over 1.5 billion a day if he just wants to plex 100 accounts. 500 million a day is less than 30 accounts plexed.
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2804
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 01:46:00 -
[44] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:Most people argue for their own little corner, and look to keep things the way they want it to be. This is doublely so for most nullsec and lowsec players. Its pretty rare for them to support suggestions that improve EvE as a whole. All of my suggestions improve eve as a whole, your claim is flawed. |

Slymah
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 01:57:00 -
[45] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Michael Nezerol wrote:Sure, you can get suicide ganked, even in high sec. You can get robbed, tricked, etc. All part of the gameplay (those who don't accept this, have failed to read the description, guidelines and reviews). The thing is, just this statement alone separates you from those you feel are being "disrespected" for the most part. I've never seen anyone pile on a player who takes their lumps in stride. I have, however, seen the mad dash for every tear available the minute the crying starts. For example: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=149212
ThreadWinner post #3
|

Aza Ebanu
Crunchy Crunchy Peregrine Nation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 01:57:00 -
[46] - Quote
Michael Nezerol wrote:I've played plenty of MMOs. But IMHO, the relative disrespectfull attitude towards people who want to take it more 'casual' (relative speaking, since there's no true 'casual' in this game) is amazing and annoying and one of the worst examples that I've met to date.
Yes, I know that PvP is a major theme in this game. But it isn't the only theme. Sure, you can get suicide ganked, even in high sec. You can get robbed, tricked, etc. All part of the gameplay (those who don't accept this, have failed to read the description, guidelines and reviews). No harm done there.
And certainly in every game I've played so far major alliances have tried to push the dev to insert stuff favorable to especially them. But the way long-term players (especially 0-sec players) treat 'casual' players is astonishing - and on about the same level as 'WoW-kiddies (as I like to call them), and that's saying something, and that's not positive.
Certainly, the game needs progress and new updates. But never ever before I've even seen that NOWHERE any long-time member speaks up and says 'Shouldn't we try to keep this game together?' Since of ALL suggestions by long-term players, NOWHERE I see something that not only will benefit both 0-sec, high-sec, 'hardcore' and 'casual' - and 99% of the cases it the suggestion benefits the 0-sec, 'hardcore' players, with the other 1% benefitting the high-sec, 'hardcore' players. While you DO want new players into this game, or are you really that narrow-minded? No CCP doesn't want new players in the game.
CCP noticed about 5 years ago that they had amassed all the people that were going to play their game. They then switched focus on player retention and organic growth (getting more money from subscribed players.) When WiS failed, they turned to plex and multiple accounts as their primary focus. Also they stopped new expansions and are focused on "fixing" what the majority of the existing players consider "broken"
They are taking brilliant steps from a business point of view. |

Onyx Nyx
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
194
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 02:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Michael Nezerol wrote:I've played plenty of MMOs. But IMHO, the relative disrespectfull attitude towards people who want to take it more 'casual' (relative speaking, since there's no true 'casual' in this game) is amazing and annoying and one of the worst examples that I've met to date.
Yes, I know that PvP is a major theme in this game. But it isn't the only theme. Sure, you can get suicide ganked, even in high sec. You can get robbed, tricked, etc. All part of the gameplay (those who don't accept this, have failed to read the description, guidelines and reviews). No harm done there.
And certainly in every game I've played so far major alliances have tried to push the dev to insert stuff favorable to especially them. But the way long-term players (especially 0-sec players) treat 'casual' players is astonishing - and on about the same level as 'WoW-kiddies (as I like to call them), and that's saying something, and that's not positive.
Certainly, the game needs progress and new updates. But never ever before I've even seen that NOWHERE any long-time member speaks up and says 'Shouldn't we try to keep this game together?' Since of ALL suggestions by long-term players, NOWHERE I see something that not only will benefit both 0-sec, high-sec, 'hardcore' and 'casual' - and 99% of the cases it the suggestion benefits the 0-sec, 'hardcore' players, with the other 1% benefitting the high-sec, 'hardcore' players. While you DO want new players into this game, or are you really that narrow-minded?
I want targets in the game and if that happen to be new players, great. Does it mean have I have to be respectful? No.
You want my respect, earn it. Simple. I kill kittens, and puppies and bunnies. I maim toddlers and teens and then more. |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1079
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 02:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
The "disrespect" goes for those who believe that 100% safety is needed, and that just because they are in High-Sec that they are a special flower and deserve complete safety. Those who are casual but still understand the concept of combat and risk in Eve shouldn't get much flak. |

Kane Alvo
Coronis Corporation
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 02:18:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mai Khumm wrote:Welcome to EVE, play the way I want you to or I'll harass and insult you until you do or get out.
Pretty much sums it up right there. Any further discussion is pointless. Just in case anyone is wondering why it took 10 years for this game to peak subs (and still under 500k), this is why. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 02:43:00 -
[50] - Quote
To all those who hate hi-sec and their easy way of life...
Why aren't you trying to use the current in game mechanics to encourage emergent gameplay instead of complaining on the forums.
Those miners in hi-sec couldn't mine if you ganked them every time they leave the dock for example.
Its time you got your act together like James and his miner bumping crew and do something about it instead of complain about it on the forums and demand CCP to change the game to suit the way you feel it should be played.
If CCP felt that hi-sec and NPC corps was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it.
So do something about it rather than try to complain and whine in a vain attempt to get CCP to change something they will obviously never in their existance consider doing. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Aza Ebanu
Crunchy Crunchy Peregrine Nation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 02:59:00 -
[51] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:To all those who hate hi-sec and their easy way of life...
Why aren't you trying to use the current in game mechanics to encourage emergent gameplay instead of complaining on the forums.
Those miners in hi-sec couldn't mine if you ganked them every time they leave the dock for example.
Its time you got your act together like James and his miner bumping crew and do something about it instead of complain about it on the forums and demand CCP to change the game to suit the way you feel it should be played.
If CCP felt that hi-sec and NPC corps was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it.
So do something about it rather than try to complain and whine in a vain attempt to get CCP to change something they will obviously never in their existance consider doing. Its so easy to do huh? Whats wrong with people nowadays? |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2804
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 03:02:00 -
[52] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Its time you got your act together like James and his miner bumping crew and do something about it instead of complain about it on the forums and demand CCP to change the game to suit the way you feel it should be played. Good point. Hopefully James315 will be elected to the CSM and he can share his well established opinions on what he feels should be adjusted with highsec. Seems fairly likely he will. And he makes me look like a moderate. |

Aza Ebanu
Crunchy Crunchy Peregrine Nation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 03:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Its time you got your act together like James and his miner bumping crew and do something about it instead of complain about it on the forums and demand CCP to change the game to suit the way you feel it should be played. Good point. Hopefully James315 will be elected to the CSM and he can share his well established opinions on what he feels should be adjusted with highsec. Seems fairly likely he will. And he makes me look like a moderate.
Yeah I hope James gives the game the shot in the arm it really needs. |

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
1589
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 03:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:I'm playing the game how I enjoy playing it, and therefore, am playing it correctly. If you really believe that to be true, then there's really no help for you. Hey, let's all play whatever we want, the way we want, because when we enjoy it we are doing it right, no matter what.
I think you're missing that people play games to have fun. CCP provides entertainment for people, and that's it.
Really. That's it. "The nice thing about quotes is that they give us a nodding acquaintance with the originator which is often socially impressive." ~Kenneth Williams |

Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
77
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 05:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Shamus O'Reilly wrote: with estimate of 300 to 500 mil daily. he has it down to a science that he knows which systems for the day have max yield and wipes at least a system clean daily He has to make over 1.5 billion a day if he just wants to plex 100 accounts. 500 million a day is less than 30 accounts plexed. Where... did you get 100 accounts from? As ive said he has 4 mining accounts. He also has a combat account. so a total of 5 accounts. Say plex is 600mil (havent checked in a while) he can at max get all 5 accounts plexed in 6 days. my math is off but meh iirc he says he plexs 4 out of 5 i dont know. But in less than a week he plays for free and has the month for fun |

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
193
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 08:47:00 -
[56] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:If CCP felt that hi-sec and NPC corps was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it. If CCP felt Incarna was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it.
What CCP do or do not think is good for business has very little bearing on what is or is not good for the game.
@OP - Any changes made to benefit casuals will benefit core players tenfold. That's why their opinion is irrelevant - no matter how you change the game, casuals will always be casual compared to everyone else. Hence the name. [img]http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sig.php?r=*rnd*[/img] Desusigs can be seen on the terribad new forums using bbcode enabling script (scroll down to my post for sig rotation) |

Lilan Kahn
The Littlest Hobos Whores in space
124
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 11:17:00 -
[57] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:If CCP felt that hi-sec and NPC corps was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it. If CCP felt Incarna was bad for business they wouldn't have ever created it. What CCP do or do not think is good for business has very little bearing on what is or is not good for the game. @OP - Any changes made to benefit casuals will benefit core players tenfold. That's why their opinion is irrelevant - no matter how you change the game, casuals will always be casual compared to everyone else. Hence the name.
incarna was a spin off of there production of World of Darkness. |

Flag Bravo
9
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 12:43:00 -
[58] - Quote
A corp-mate once told me that there are those, that play eve only to wave their wangers, and have no interest in the games future ,unless it threatens to zip them up. I believe there is some truth in this.  |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
13924
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 13:07:00 -
[59] - Quote
PvP is not solely related or limited to combat and this is why Eve, is PvP centric.
Play the game however you want, it's not anyone's right to dictate that. Just understand that as a sandbox, others can do as they wish in game. Sometimes this messes with your goals and must be accepted.
Take what most say, with a pinch of salt.
Vote Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
211
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 15:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kalle Demos wrote:This game isnt about PvP its about hand holding, smacktalking, docking games and botting
You missed "scamming".... shame on you. 
As to the sandbox issue some folks would say "Litter box" rather than "sand box", but that's just crazy talk.  |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |