|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1720
   |
Posted - 2013.02.27 04:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Fractal Muse wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:I swear to god I must be the only person that don't mind miners getting bumped or suicided and at the same time hate James 315. Same here. We never hear the end of his supposedley amazing acheivements. Yet, what he does is simply something anyone else with half a brain can do and then he acts like he poops gold bricks because he does it. Whooptee-*******-doo Okay, challenge accepted. Go ahead and start a movement that engages hundreds, if not thousands of players, and gets talked about all the time in the forums and in various EVE Online blogs. Go ahead. Since anyone else with half a brain can do that you can. So, back up your claim. Do it.
Hundreds if not thousands of players?
Looks like you need to get on to them paying him, his scam money, ooh I mean share money as there are no where near that and frankly I have never been in a system with one of these wonderful cowards.
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1720
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 22:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Hundreds if not thousands of players? There are currently 350 unique shareholders. That's hundreds. minerbumping.com receives around 4000 hits per day. That's thousands. And that's not counting many of the miners who get ganked (well over 1200 just this month), or the miners who get bumped (no way of tracking this number). I think that qualifies as hundreds, if not thousands.
ok so hundreds of suckers but as to the 4000 hits a day is that uniques?
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1720
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Primary Me wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Looks like you need to get on to them paying him, his scam money, ooh I mean share money. How is it a scam?
Ok I wont call it a scam for you
I will just use the old adage "There is a sucker born every minute"
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1721
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
While I agree with his reasoning, I must admit the idea that CCP will ever nerf Hi-sec in any real manner, now days is laughable. They have made more money making hi-sec more user friendly and will probably continue down that path.
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1729
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 06:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:You can't nerf high-sec without losing subs. It'll be painful in the short term but, coupled with buffs in other areas, it's the best thing CCP could do for the game.
Unless the surge in high-sec population is because of low-sec, null-sec, and WH alts, in which case they'll empty back out to where they belong and we lose some terrible **** carebears the game didn't need anyway.
Also, Amyclas Amatin, good to see you out of the Uni, your posts indicated you were too good for them. Thanks, I even changed my hairstyle and look so that it looks better with a WANTED sign on it. While I agree with them that every play-style is valuable, it is maddening to see the uni turned into a political tool that pushes for a safe high-sec playground under the banner of the "new player experience". They're using us newbies to make themselves an authority on what new players go through, and claiming that we need to be sheltered from the "bad guys" who would exploit and gank us. (Kelduum's CSM 7 post: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67217) Now they're mad with me for claiming that the U-Mad war is a valuable pvp learning experience. If they had their way, they would have no non-consensual wars in high-sec. The care-bears have and will continue to use every political edge (mostly numbers) they can to create a playground for themselves. I truly support any endeavor to thin their numbers and return "true" EVE industry, industry with risks and rewards for the bold and daring, to EVE. P.S. This noob has indy alts that do not operate in highsec.
Actually the whole war dec issue mostly comes about not from people wanting good fights but people acting like bullies. They just need to alter the formula to be about kills rather than members.
So say my corp has 50 kill total in the last 12 months and I war dec Goonswarm for example so 50 mill a week fee. If on the other hand my corp is war decd by a merc corp for example 12000 kills in the last 12 months, so the bill is 5 billion a week.
This would make pvp corps go after other pvp corps of the same kind of level or ones with more kills, without completely removing the occasional fun of wasting miners.
Yeah you want to beat up baby seals you have to pay for the privilege. Unlike the current system where if you want to attack a bigger opponent you must pay more. That was just stupidity.
Easy fixed.
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1731
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 13:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Primary Me wrote:Frying Doom wrote:
Actually the whole war dec issue mostly comes about not from people wanting good fights but people acting like bullies. They just need to alter the formula to be about kills rather than members.
So say my corp has 50 kill total in the last 12 months and I war dec Goonswarm for example so 50 mill a week fee. If on the other hand my corp is war decd by a merc corp for example 12000 kills in the last 12 months, so the bill is 5 billion a week.
This would make pvp corps go after other pvp corps of the same kind of level or ones with more kills, without completely removing the occasional fun of wasting miners.
Yeah you want to beat up baby seals you have to pay for the privilege. Unlike the current system where if you want to attack a bigger opponent you must pay more. That was just stupidity.
Easy fixed.
Wouldn't people just keep creating new corps with zero kills before wardeccing?
How the number of kills is attached to a person? Haven't you noticed for example on Battle clinic that a corps kills increase and decrease on who joins or not. It is just EvE keeping a database of player kills.
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1731
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 13:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Quote:Actually the whole war dec issue mostly comes about not from people wanting good fights but people acting like bullies. They just need to alter the formula to be about kills rather than members.
So say my corp has 50 kill total in the last 12 months and I war dec Goonswarm for example so 50 mill a week fee. If on the other hand my corp is war decd by a merc corp for example 12000 kills in the last 12 months, so the bill is 5 billion a week.
This would make pvp corps go after other pvp corps of the same kind of level or ones with more kills, without completely removing the occasional fun of wasting miners.
Yeah you want to beat up baby seals you have to pay for the privilege. Unlike the current system where if you want to attack a bigger opponent you must pay more. That was just stupidity.
Easy fixed. To paraphrase Jame's article on The Mittani, the reason why a combat game is fun is because we get to blow people up. While getting blown up is a sad experience, we don't mind being blown up because the same mechanics that get us blown up also allow us to blow others up. The carebears are trying to get away from this interaction altogether by petitioning for a safe high-sec. Eve wouldn't be a true hardcore game without the predator and prey dynamics that we see in high-sec wars. Of course a "hardcore" game favours the bold, and culls the passive. We shouldn't make the game easier just because casual players from "easy" MMOs won't learn the skills needed to survive in EVE.
Personally I would call it cowardice but at the end of the day it is being bullies.
Now I have no objection to bullies in EvE if you are willing to pay for the privilege, that way more indy players will continue to play the game as has now happened after the barge buff and the PvP guys get to splat indy types for fun.
You want to kill defenseless people go right ahead but pay for your pleasure if not just go and shoot NPCs (they even give you money back)
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1737
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 03:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Looks like you need to get on to them paying him, his scam money, ooh I mean share money as there are no where near that and frankly I have never been in a system with one of these wonderful cowards. You really have a fixation on the word 'coward'.
No I suppose I could consult a thesaurus but coward fits well, so why stop using it?
EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
|
|
| |
|