| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Benco97
   |
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:36:00 -
[1]
Hello everyone, this isn't a rant about thieves so don't worry ^^
I propose an option on Jettison cans which causes them to self destruct, similar to the option available for our ships but without the timer.
I know that i'd rather blow up my ore so that I get nothing than let a thief take some.
This doesn't make thieving impossible though, I realise that some people play the game like that and I have no problem with that. You can only destroy your can when you are within range of it, thieves just have to wait for you to go get your hauler.
The only thing this will stop is the people who just fly up to your can while you are next to it, give you some smack about being a carebare miner and then steal a small amount, this way only stealthy theives will get any. What do you all think?
--------------------------------------------
NEW! 1/1 scale assembled plastic model benco97, Six different poses, Buy one NOW!*
*not suitable for people under 21, May include some small parts and/ |
TuRtLe HeAd
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 10:06:00 -
[2]
Its a valid play style, And every one says use Secore containers.
What about making Jettisoned cans Passwordable.
Sure the enemy Can Blow them up but thats the risk you take along with Jettisoning the can in the Firstplace. |
AKAAK
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 12:52:00 -
[3]
It says on the description, jetcans are poorly constructed and can only survive for an hour or so. Yet, even though they are so poorly constructed, they offer the most increadible compression technology ever concived! They are like mini back holes when you compare them to the "giant" containers! I still think that instead of being able to destroy jetcan, or be able to put passwords on them, they should be no bigger than the cargo hold of the ship that jetted it (for obvious reasons, how can a ship drop a container that is larger than the ship itself?!) I know a lot of people will disagree with me on that. Considering the physical size of both giant and jetcans, the giant should be able to hold way more than a jetcan. Lets ballance the cans!
Once this is the case, everyone will get secure containers and people stealing ore from containers will be a thing of the past (unless someone is stupid enough to forget to set the password). It would also make a lot more sence.
|
TuRtLe HeAd
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 13:32:00 -
[4]
Planck Generator technology.
Acutally When u think about it now it does seem a little weird .
With the cold war patch out and reduced size of Packeged Ships you could probably Fit Close to 30 interceptors in One Can.
but yeah Planck Generator Technology |
Jack Da
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 14:33:00 -
[5]
well you can mess with thieves if you have a small secure can in hold fill it up then jettion it in the normal way for ore then when the Thieves look in and see it they cant get the ore.. but they might be able to get the secure can
thinking about it the way the game is setup up at the moment they are able to take the can and recycle it to get the ore maybe?
|
Kedishen
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 02:49:00 -
[6]
If ccp reduced the size of jettison cans, asteriod belts would be completely jack full of secure cans and eventually there would be no space left.. cus lets face it.. nobody gives a damn about parking their cans so that others can also park theres in a nice spot. Just like american cars in english car parks, taking up 3 car parking spaces instead of the designated 1.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |