| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Denrace
   |
Posted - 2005.07.15 19:14:00 -
[1]
Yup. We want those please. We want shiny, black and covered-in-weird-spinny-things battlecruisers. 
Tech 2 Battelcruisers would add a new element to gameplay being that they should be able to take on multiple battleships. A Heavy Assault Cruiser can nearly (read that, "nearly") beat a single Battleship 1vs1, so a tech II battlecruiser should be so much more pwning than that. Plus, us HAC flyers want something a little more uber to play with.
Think about it:
[TECH II PROPHECY]
Low Slots:7
Medium Slots:2
High Slots:7
Turrets:6
Launchers: 0
Armour:2500
Shield:1750
Armour EM Resistance: 60%
Armour Thermal Resistance: 35%
Armour Kinetic Resistance:60%
Armour Explosive Resistance:80%
PG:1500
CPU:380
Bonus 1: 10% Reduction in medium energy turret Cap use per level and 5% bonus to all armour resistances per level.
Bonus 2: 5% Reduction in Armour Repair Systems duration per level and 5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret Damage per level
Lovely, eh?
Please feel free to post your own ideas for the loadout of tech II BC's.
PLEASE CCP, WE WANT TECH II BC'S !!!! 
Denrace
_______________________________________________
Custom sigs made on demand, convo me in-game.
|
Steppa
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 00:08:00 -
[2]
A skilled pilot in a properly fitted HAC can easily kill a battleship 1 v 1. And visa versa, but you'd expect the BS to be able to kill a HAC. HACs are the best ships in the game :)
|
Del Narveux
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 02:12:00 -
[3]
Patently disagree with tech2 BC or destroyers as it would further take away from the effectiveness of 'normal' ships i.e. frigs cruisers and BS. Due to the way destroyers/BC were set up (special non-standard skills, lots of inherent bonuses/gimps) it just wouldnt be a good idea...they were meant to plug some holes in fleet loadouts, not create new ship classes per se.
_________________
[SAK] And Proud Of It!
aka Cpt Bogus
Is that my torped sig cloaking your base? |
MIstress Saki
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 11:09:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Del Narveux
Patently disagree with tech2 BC or destroyers as it would further take away from the effectiveness of 'normal' ships i.e. frigs cruisers and BS. Due to the way destroyers/BC were set up (special non-standard skills, lots of inherent bonuses/gimps) it just wouldnt be a good idea...they were meant to plug some holes in fleet loadouts, not create new ship classes per se.
Which fleet loadout? The all "BS with some tackler fleet"?
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 12:21:00 -
[5]
i like the idea - specially as that way u might have BCs with enough CPU to fit multiple command modules 
still - a t2 BC shouldn't be a Really Heavy Assault Ship or whatever they will call the next size up from HACs. i think it would make a good dedicated command ship
|
BM Alt
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 19:29:00 -
[6]
*signed*
I fly the proph and i want to see T2 BC's, gotta make training BC5 worth the time it took.
|
Kael D'mende
|
Posted - 2005.07.19 20:32:00 -
[7]
*signed* t2 BC would be awsome, since not every one is training for bs, i for one concentrate on med range weapons, so i say bring it :O)
/Kael
|
Takigama
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 15:24:00 -
[8]
actually, i think i'd like a tech 2 destroyer rather than a bc.
simply because the diff between the bc and the cruisers isnt quite so big as the diff between the destroyers and frigates. The destroyers fill a gap thats larger then the ones bc's fill.
imho, anyways.
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 15:25:00 -
[9]
a t2 destroyer that is an uber frig killer in fleet battles would be nice
even so, it would be an easy target for BSs 
|
Sirkill
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 15:28:00 -
[10]
HACs beat BS more of the time than Bs beat HACs mnainly becuase to fly a HAc you need to be highly skilled and experienced player. Almost anyone can fly a BS. But theres not much to chose between a skilled HAC and a skilled BS
|
Takigama
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 15:43:00 -
[11]
Originally by: HippoKing
a t2 destroyer that is an uber frig killer in fleet battles would be nice
even so, it would be an easy target for BSs
Well, it would certainly fill a hole that does (kind of) exist, a flying gun boat with no armor/shield;)
|
Lagar
|
Posted - 2005.07.23 08:13:00 -
[12]
T2 battle crusier is going to be command ship.. i am QUITE sure of that fact.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |