| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zensige
   |
Posted - 2005.07.21 00:41:00 -
[31]
Can i sign twice?
|
Coolgamer
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 01:18:00 -
[32]
Also, please add a role so that someone doesn't need to be promoted to director in order to recieve the status mails about the POS such as fuel levels, kill mails, and "POS is under attack" mails. I solo a POS but I am not a director in my corp so I don't recieve these mails =/
|
Balki Gruniet
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 02:03:00 -
[33]
Signed...
|
Discodude
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 03:11:00 -
[34]
Definitel needed
Signed
-----------------------------------------------
|
Hellwasp
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 03:12:00 -
[35]
Signed
|
Marvel Master
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 08:40:00 -
[36]
Signed.
|
Tas Devil
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 11:06:00 -
[37]
signed... this is LONG overdue...and bordering on the ridiculous CCP... you promised this many times (even if you always include reservations and ways out of your own promises) ... not impressed
|
Aimee Black
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 16:36:00 -
[38]
Signed!
|
Headlong
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 18:07:00 -
[39]
Signed.
---
Director - As[G]ard Schiffswerften
Join Public Channel: ASW |
MickeyFinn
|
Posted - 2005.07.21 21:15:00 -
[40]
I started this exact petition about 4 months ago and after recieving well over 100 signatures the devs did **** about it.
Signed, for what its worth 
--------------------------------------
The Artist Formely Known As Wishdokkta |
Nosferatu Zodd
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 02:05:00 -
[41]
Signed
|
Asfa
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 02:20:00 -
[42]
/emote signs.
|
Derisor
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 08:49:00 -
[43]
Signed with modification.
They should have VERY FINE GRAINED permissions at POS. You should be able to have a corp mate that can change modules without having to give him access to starbase config. So on so forth.
---------
The words "Exciting" and "Safe" are mutually exclusive; pick one.
Wanna populate 0.0 CCP? Get Rid of showing pilots in space and docked on map and neuter local!
|
RijS3
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 10:35:00 -
[44]
signed
|
Nasral Sima
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 10:44:00 -
[45]
Signed
|
Zyrla Bladestorm
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:03:00 -
[46]
I think its near impossible to not want this If you've ever even thought about using a starbase.
.
-----
Apologys for any rambling that may have just occurred.
|
Fillmeup
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:16:00 -
[47]
Signed big time
|
Adrian Kerensky
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 12:02:00 -
[48]
Signed
|
Arngorf
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 12:41:00 -
[49]
signed |
Caldess
|
Posted - 2005.07.22 23:51:00 -
[50]
Signed, can't believe they haven't put this in the game already.
|
Darkcommander
|
Posted - 2005.07.23 10:34:00 -
[51]
signed
|
IonHammer
|
Posted - 2005.07.23 14:46:00 -
[52]
signed ....
|
Sha Dar
|
Posted - 2005.07.23 14:47:00 -
[53]
signed
|
csebal
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 11:56:00 -
[54]
Signed,
Even though i used this 'bug' to take down a large pos of my 'enemy', this is definitely wrong, and result of missing corporate roles.
Roles i can imagine:
** Hangar access - Allows the character to access the corp hangar arrays and the ship maintenance arrays.
** Refinery management - Allows the onlining / offlining of the Refineries, allows their operation.
** Harvester management - Allows the onlining / offlining of the harvester arrays, the reactors, silos. Allows the management of the reactions and related stuff trough the control tower interface.
** Supply manager - Allows access to the cargo space of control towers and weapon platforms. Role intended to allow refuelling, reloading pos structures, without givin any more unnecessary rights. (Different roles for taking items from the cargo, to avoid the shutdown of POS by removing fuel for example)
** Administrator - Allows complete access over the POS, including anchoring / unanchoring of pos structures, onlining / offlining them, etc. Basically what the current role does.
---
This post is nothing more than my personal opinion. It does not represent the official standpoint of the HUN Corporation in any way.
---
|
csebal
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 11:59:00 -
[55]
Signed (still) :P
I forgot: give all POS structures a 'set name' option. So you can look at the POS, and tell what's there by their name.
Atm you go there and see: 11 corporate hangar arrays. Then you go: omgwtf, which one did i put my zyd in? Solution, go there, and open all 11 of them one by one, until you find it.
Bad, very bad. Same goes for ship maint. arrays ("where is that damn BS?")
I dont care for guns and stuff to be renamed, but why not? I would love to have Big Bertha I and II defending my POS :)
---
This post is nothing more than my personal opinion. It does not represent the official standpoint of the HUN Corporation in any way.
---
|
Druida
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 17:54:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Druida on 26/07/2005 17:59:24
category: omgrawr.net devchats
category: Second chat (2005 May 5)
LINK to Dev Chat
issue: Q17: (Druida) Hi, Is there any future plans to share POS Arrays with alliance members? allow player list etc?
<Oveur> Yes, absolutely, it's just that access control management isn't always that straightforward, not to mention if you want it integrated into thecurrent corp roles, which we really do have lots of already
<Oveur> so, we just have to get around to designing and implementing it but it hasn't gotten a timeslot yet in our development
<Oveur> but it's quite high on the list of desired POS features, so when we get dev time for new POS features, it's in
--
We just have to keep waiting until the devs implement it....
Signed 
|
Deus Exincompositus
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 18:50:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Deus Exincompositus on 26/07/2005 18:52:54
signed
edit:
note to self, read the whole thread before posting next time.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Zzazzt
|
Posted - 2005.07.27 08:25:00 -
[58]
My thread has a better title 
(clickeh the linkeh)
____________________________________________
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=202351 |
rusker
|
Posted - 2005.07.27 22:45:00 -
[59]
SIGNED
|
Drosssk
|
Posted - 2005.07.28 05:46:00 -
[60]
signed,
Drosssk.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |