| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Ybytlan
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:20:00 -
[91]
Lag makes baby jesus cry, i lagged for bout 20mins and then CTD'd and cant get back in 
|

benwallace
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:21:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Ishana actually acording to our intel we are severly outnummbered. You only jumped because you got lost of reinfocements, while we actually lost some pilots. The ratio would be more like foundation 75 ships vs -v- + [5] with 120. We still stuck around to fight. Would you? (the answer is no) and don't blame us for the drones, that's ccp's fault.
STFU no one cares this is lag disscussion not who gots bigger balls
|

Burnhard Brutor
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:21:00 -
[93]
tbh, with server instability at the moment, perhaps a big fleet battle wasn't the smartest idea you guys ever had. 
|

Sir Squire
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:21:00 -
[94]
This is my 1st post ever and I've been playing over 2 years and this is freaking pathetic. They push to get people to 0.0 and CCP can't even come close to handling it. How about fixing the lag problem that's been around since before I can remeber before introducing new content. I would gladly pay & play for 6 months without this extra so called content as long as CCP gets their crap together. I'm tired of seeing the blame on peoples PCs, local ISPs, & lack of their logs. They should just concentrate on the fundementals 1st. Oh and by they way, I really feel for the GMs tonight. |

Tenashi
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:21:00 -
[95]
damn nice blob, even bigger then anything in empire (atleast they don`t lag )
|

Avalon Beholder
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:22:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Ishana actually acording to our intel we are severly outnummbered. You only jumped because you got lost of reinfocements, while we actually lost some pilots. The ratio would be more like foundation 75 ships vs -v- + [5] with 120. We still stuck around to fight. Would you? (the answer is no) and don't blame us for the drones, that's ccp's fault.
We sat on the gate for 10 mins with 2:1 odds in your favour and you didnt jump to us. Its not our fault you waited so long that we got reinforcements.
Yes, it is predominantly CCPs fault. Your tactics are...understandable if not honourable. As to whether we would DEFEND when outnumbered slightly? Of course we would, we do it all the time. We also ATTACK too.
Now CCP SORT THIS **** OUT AND GIVE US OUR SHIPS BACK
|

Clay101
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:22:00 -
[97]
the drones BAH - it's not just the drones, it's the fact we had about 200 or so people in one system - half jumping in - PLUS the drones - the battle would have been legendary (locally anyways) - the battle would have been great - cmon CCP
atleast respond and replace ships :)
|

thoth foc
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:22:00 -
[98]
35+ minutes now.. with a great view of the system scenery...  
--thoth
|

Eddie Gordo
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:23:00 -
[99]
Velios, we are on the side of free space. V do not encourage free movement, nor do they encourage shared resources. They operate a closed space policy.
We are simply defending ourselfs from V who ordered us to move a system they have no rights too. The fact that M.corp decided to make the trip over to us means that you are the corp who chose sides. Your new alliance or your old friends.
I am more than happy to forget about any hostilities, but I will not tolerate my alliance members being threatend or shot at.
Instas??
|

munchy
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:23:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Lig Vieta 2005.07.24 21:50:04notifyWarping to M-MD3B IV ... 2005.07.24 22:17:18notifyWarping to M-MD3B IV
I'll probably wake up in a clone station with a deathmail dated within those times. Could've been a good fight.
i dont think anyones seen you yet, so you're probly at a ss ---
|

Tr4XX
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:23:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Eddie Gordo I have an idea for this thread :
1) if you have something new and fresh to say, say it. if you dont shutup. 2) if you want to say signed, then sign the thread and leave it at that.
Im stuck
|

Velios
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:23:00 -
[102]
I propose an amnesty after this lag so we each can regroup our ships. Lets not go for cheap ganks and let each side recover their position.
M.Corp BPC Packages |

DrunkenOne
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:24:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Shayla Sh'inlux
Quote:
Uhh no, you outblob us for an hour. We then get a fleet formed up and although still outnumbered, WE jump in. We had one of our guys ask Maggot to put drones away, and he just quits the convo. This is all Foundations fault IMO.
Woha easy there cowboy.
We made a statement to V that we are far from dead and showed it in force. They called in your alliance to help them fight us. We were 78 strong when you jumped in on us with just over a 100 pilots.
Considering you jumped in and had to deal with the lag it was fairly even. To even start blaming us for this is not even remotely realistic and pretty pathetic as well.
Haha, Foundation outblobbing The Five. That must a joke right?
K, first of all, stop talking about it, because you guys had ushrakhan with you as well. And we have a gang of 52 and V has 33, while local in M-M was 104 before we jumped in. Second of all, it doesnt matter, who cares, flame ccp not eachother.
Originally by: Sochin
CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
|

Eddie Gordo
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:24:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Velios I propose an amnesty after this lag so we each can regroup our ships. Lets not go for cheap ganks and let each side recover their position.
I agree. However I have told ushra'khan not to log in for next 20-30mins
Instas??
|

Hellcore
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:24:00 -
[105]
Ah well Im showing insurance money on character select  -- CEO, RCSAS |

Noobjuice
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:24:00 -
[106]
I was 3 jumps out of e02 and froze on jump in, tried rebooting eve and haven't been able to login. With the amount of monthly payments ccp recieves there is absolutely no excuse why the hardware or bandwith or whatever these server side problems are, can't be fixed. Get on it before you upset the most active players in the game!
|

DaHeaVYFo
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:27:00 -
[107]
Edited by: DaHeaVYFo on 24/07/2005 22:27:30 ALL sing the happy crash song \o/
For ppl with website issues: EVE client build: 3548 |

Clay101
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Ishana actually acording to our intel we are severly outnummbered. You only jumped because you got lost of reinfocements, while we actually lost some pilots. The ratio would be more like foundation 75 ships vs -v- + [5] with 120. We still stuck around to fight. Would you? (the answer is no) and don't blame us for the drones, that's ccp's fault.
Ishana no - the numbers were damn near equal - don't use this thread as a way to say "ooh, ya, we were outnumbered we are best" ... it was equal numbers, we jumped in, like you guys would have done
serve node DEAD!!!
|

Jherek Cornelian
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[109]
server now crashed \o/
|

maria stallion
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[110]
we first had 70 foundation + 20 ushra khan
|

Mark A
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[111]
BOOM. We just killed the whole node by the looks of it... ____________________________________
Killmail wh÷re. |

Pastor Wallace
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[112]
Signed.....
I think we ARE All stuck. So lets lay the blame where it needs to be, and thats with CCP. We could argue about the drones all day, but to be honest, i dont think the drones were the big factor. I beleive that drones or not, this would have been a lag fest, and we all know this. But the locking up, is way beyond anything i have seen in the past 1.5 years. So lets stop bashing drone users, and start finding a way out of this damn system. CCP needs to addres this issue at once. This weekend has been a complete mess, and though we are tolerant people, when i pay-to-play a game, i hope that i can play from time to time.
Pastor Wallace Shinra Corp. The [5]
|

Shayla Sh'inlux
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[113]
Woohoo we crashed the server :-)
|

Tr4XX
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:28:00 -
[114]
Edited by: Tr4XX on 24/07/2005 22:28:37 COngratz all our, cooperated event "crash the server" has been succesfull
same time tommorow?
|

DrunkenOne
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:29:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Shayla Sh'inlux
Quote:
K, first of all, stop talking about it, because you guys had ushrakhan with you as well. And we have a gang of 52 and V has 33, while local in M-M was 104 before we jumped in. Second of all, it doesnt matter, who cares, flame ccp not eachother.
Agreed.
Now tell your pilots to stop spouting all that bullsh!t in local and just respect each other. Say 'okay this sucks' and leave it at that.
I would if i was logged on :S, im still crashed
OMG LOGGED IN, THERES NO LOCAL WTF?!?!
Originally by: Sochin
CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
|

Obiwand
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:29:00 -
[116]
I'm stuck with the rest of the brave souls in M-M.. CCP please fix.. More emphasis on Lag reduction then new features.. In all fairness CCP I've been playing this game for over 2 yrs and lag is still a show stopper with respect to major fleet battles. Please no more addons, no more nerfs, no more anything but focusing your man hrs to fixing the lag. Forever an EvE lover but now highly fustrated.
Obiwand M.Corp Co-CEO Five
|

Hellcore
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:30:00 -
[117]
This is a real shame, despite all the blame, hostility and smack... we all really just wanted an awesome fleet battle which we were denied not by each other but by CCP. -- CEO, RCSAS |

DrunkenOne
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:31:00 -
[118]
mahahahaha back up
Originally by: Sochin
CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
|

anister
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:35:00 -
[119]
logged back in and yup, i lost my ship...
didn't even know i got hit  ___
|

munchy
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 22:35:00 -
[120]
so much for amnesty when we log in =/ ---
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |