And this whole little thing proves MY point,

that you all are still as easy to manipulate as small children.

My will causing your actions. Sabik principles made manifest.



I say a few words to one of yours, he follows like a dog.

I say another few words, and PIE jumps like 1st year cadets to do my bidding and have him removed.

Spin it any way you like, but everyone else has seen how easily you all are moved like pieces on a board game.

And this whole little thing proves MY point,

that you all are still as easy to manipulate as small children.

My will causing your actions. Sabik principles made manifest.



I say a few words to one of yours, he follows like a dog.

I say another few words, and PIE jumps like 1st year cadets to do my bidding and have him removed.

Spin it any way you like, but everyone else has seen how easily you all are moved like pieces on a board game.

Tell me one thing, though - in your book, not putting out is a negative quality?

I'm sure in your head where you are the exact centre of the entire cluster that made perfect sense.






It is when you're a tease.

The rest will merely think you a tease who doesn't put out.

in your book, not putting out is a negative quality?

Good to know that PIE pilots are pigs.

Good to know that PIE pilots are pigs.

Maybe now that I've extracted the relevant quotes you can see the context, Mr. Thessalonia. I do happen to think that not "putting out" is a very negative quality in one who makes it seem they will. Harlotry not followed through on is as bad at least as straight up harlotry. Does that make me a pig?

Good, then I procure bacon from their corpses. I understand humans absolutely love bacon.

If not approving of Silas' disgusting display and the way she debased a promising young man's to the point of near madness mind makes me a misogynist then so be it. I guess the majority of the women I know are secretly men.

Maybe now that I've extracted the relevant quotes you can see the context, Mr. Thessalonia. I do happen to think that not "putting out" is a very negative quality in one who makes it seem they will. Harlotry not followed through on is as bad at least as straight up harlotry. Does that make me a pig?

Do not fault them all for the folly of the individual (or the few in this case), Ikiryo.

While the comments of many in this thread are bile inducing and/or mockery warranting, the majority of the Amarr do not lack sense or composure in matters like these.

I imagine, if nothing else, PIE has a few things to look into and I have complete confidence they will do so.

And this whole little thing proves MY point,

that you all are still as easy to manipulate as small children.

My will causing your actions. Sabik principles made manifest.

I say a few words to one of yours, he follows like a dog.

I say another few words, and PIE jumps like 1st year cadets to do my bidding and have him removed.

Spin it any way you like, but everyone else has seen how easily you all are moved like pieces on a board game.

I have been instructed not to post further but I will gladly accept and am ready for any and all consequences that may come of making this post. But a man cannot stand by while he is being viscously slandered apropos of nothing and maintain his dignity.

Allow me to state explicitly and unambiguously the sequence of events which has just occurred over the course of the last handful of contributions of this thread for the skimmers among you who have me suddenly billed as a terrible person.

1. Knoot wrote a sentence.
2. Jev responded to a fraction of it.
3. I pointed out the qualifying part of said sentence.
4. A whole lot of people read into that things that were not there at all.

Now allow me to point out that I am not privy to logs. I am not even acquainted with the involved parties beyond the writings of one once-promising essayist. So I am not commenting on the particular event. I cannot believe she asked for it when I am not aware of the specifics. Nor am I condemning women for behaving in a similar manner to men in their sexual expression. Quite the opposite. Harlotry of the sort I object to occurs more frequently in men as they seem less able to exert self control, as von Khan has unfortunately become a tragically prominent example.

I pointed out to someone something they seem to have not read or to have misinterpreted.


"PUSH BUTTON RECEIVE GENITALS"? How dare you read such rot into my words where there is no such thing.

I have devoted my live to the Empress. Claiming that I "hate women" because my values do not agree with sexual promiscuity in general calls this into question and I cannot abide this sort of slander.

I am afraid you have entirely misread the point. Go back and try again. This is not an apology for or an explanation of any of the behavior you have demonstrated in this thread.

You assumed from the get go that Silas was "asking for it", as it were, and then doubled down upon that error in judgement by stating that a woman who teases but does not "put out" is as bad as a woman who "puts out", both of which assume that a woman ought to be utterly powerless when it comes to sexual relations. You then doubled down further on this in your explanation for your belief that this is the case.

People are, rightly, jumping on you because the opinion you have stated is utterly barbaric in nature.

Your post did not state that it was against promiscuity in general. It stated that you expected the woman to "put out" when, laughably, you believed that is what she implied. You, sir, are entirely for promiscuity. You are also then for calling the woman a harlot.

You are a misogynist, and you are being rightly attacked for it.

You should have listened to your admiralty and not posted again.

Once again you have read into my posts things which are not there in an effort to sully my reputation, and I foolishly am not remaining aloof and ignoring it. My pride prevents me from allowing you to drag me through the mud unhindered.

My presumption at the outset was not that Silas was 'asking for it', but that she was using sexuality as a weapon to manipulate someone to her desires. This is the harlotry I am against, be it performed by man or woman. Then for someone already engaged in such a sinful act to void their part of the bargain, to remove the carrot as it were, the incentive to von Khan's supposed betrayal and disgrace compounds the sin. Rescinding on a contract is grave enough a crime but on such a demonic pact worse still. The pair of them can go screw each other and whoever else the please for the rest of eternity for all I care, I will still regard sexual manipulation as sinful, dishonest sexual manipulation moreso. This doesn't even relate to gender, but morality.

I fully agree that women are not put here to be used and taken advantage of by men.

The same is true of the reverse.