Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
744
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Anunzi wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Obviously Goons called in a favor from the DEVs, all of which are, of course, Goons themselves (lol). WTF CCP? I got a 3 month ban for saying the same thing! Clearly you forgot to turn your hardeners on I did have them on, just didn't overheat... I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner. Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
Dheeradj Nurgle
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
321
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 15:29:00 -
[32] - Quote
What Blue donut? Last I checked only EXE had a blue moon.... |
Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
58
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 15:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
Dheeradj Nurgle wrote:What Blue donut? Last I checked only EXE had a blue moon....
You know, THE Blue Donut. The one that exists solely in the warped mind of Riverini and those who partake of his particular brand of bitterness.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vot for bacon! |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1714
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Primary This Rifter
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:29:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. We don't need any more sov than we already have, and the benefit we gain is pretty trivial compared to the amount of effort expended. Yes, I'm an alt. Congratulations. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1714
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. We don't need any more sov than we already have, and the benefit we gain is pretty trivial compared to the amount of effort expended. And hence: The Blue Doughnut. Maybe not in terms of standings, but in terms of actions. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Trendon Evenstar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Pantiy wrote:Tribe would never reset, they would be crushed and homeless with in a week.
Dont talk back to TEST? |
Armstrong Geten
S-Words And Snakes
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:40:00 -
[38] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who.
Because it would take years to grind the sov of either side |
Primary This Rifter
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:40:00 -
[39] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. We don't need any more sov than we already have, and the benefit we gain is pretty trivial compared to the amount of effort expended. And hence: The Blue Doughnut. Maybe not in terms of standings, but in terms of actions. Except that we're shooting each other, so your analogy fails. If you really want a sov war, go start one yourself. Stop demanding that others play the way you want them to play. Yes, I'm an alt. Congratulations. |
Anunzi
High House Of Shadows Tribal Band
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:40:00 -
[40] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. We don't need any more sov than we already have, and the benefit we gain is pretty trivial compared to the amount of effort expended. And hence: The Blue Doughnut. Maybe not in terms of standings, but in terms of actions.
So not taking territory we donGÇÖt need, just blowing the crap out of our enemies ships makes a blue donut.
Keep on drinking that kool aid man, it seems to be working.
Malcanis for CSM8, Its about damn time.
A vote for Malcanis is a vot for bacon! |
|
Primary This Rifter
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:48:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Chiana Moro wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Every time I hear "blue donut" I want to reach through the screen and choke a hoe.
It's the dumbest belief to come out of hisec. Even before Goons and TEST started shooting at each other, i and the entire rest of the HBc was "wrastlin" with the CFC.
The people screaming Blue Donut should send me isk to replace the ratting Rattlesnake of mine the goons and FA killed in Querious. If you were ratting in a Rattler with Goons and FA in local .... I wasn't ratting with FA/Goons in local, I was ratting alone...I just happened to be in warp to a haven in huge ass system (140au warp) when they came in. And OF COURSE i get scrammed by a Blood Raider elder corpii frig when I land (seems someone started the haven but didn't finish it, Havens don't have scram frigs in the 1st wave), and as soon as I got it killed and was about to warp the OTHER Elder frig scams me right on time for a Goon to find and point me. I knew I should have just run incursions that night...... Obviously Goons called in a favor from the DEVs, all of which are, of course, Goons themselves (lol). Where I did mess up is by not immediately running to this forum and crying foul while trying to get CCP to change the game to suit me. CCP lied to me, I had an INVULNERABILITY Field on my 'snake and still died. I demand free skill points for my trouble. Next time try Forsaken Hubs. Yes, I'm an alt. Congratulations. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1714
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 16:53:00 -
[42] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:If there is no "blue doughnut" then why no fights for Sov? It cannot be its too much of a grind. The rules for Sov are the same now as they were a year ago, and people were fighting over Sov then. Could it be that the alliance leaders have made a agreement to not fight for Sov, thus creating a virtual blue doughnut?
So the issue is not who has who set blue, its who is willing to take sov from who. We don't need any more sov than we already have, and the benefit we gain is pretty trivial compared to the amount of effort expended. And hence: The Blue Doughnut. Maybe not in terms of standings, but in terms of actions. Except that we're shooting each other, so your analogy fails. If you really want a sov war, go start one yourself. Stop demanding that others play the way you want them to play. I'm not demanding you fight for sov. If you all want to hold hands I will not stop you, I'm not even sure why its a bad thing. And I'm not saying ships are not exploding. They are. I'm saying that you have all decided to not fight for sov any longer, hence, in that one narrow way, turned null into a big blue doughnut. Its like all the TCUs are blue. The Big Blue Doughnut of TCUs.
If that's the way you want to play, go right ahead. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Kristopher Rocancourt
Quality Assurance The Marmite Collective
88
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 17:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tarn Kugisa wrote:I heard TRIBE being talked about what's going on here?
[Kristopher Rocancourt makes noise that sounds like a Tornado Volleying]
/watches Tribe guy curl up in fetal position and cry.
Proud member of MYM8 Jita Police.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |