| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ywev
   |
Posted - 2003.07.26 15:33:00 -
[31]
Personally, I like the containers, kill a bunch of ships, and voolah! have a lag fest at the gate, that I can't do anything about. Ship comes in soooo lagged they don't even know they are targetted. Half dead before they realize it. These cans are great.
Pod ya later..
Ywev
|
drunkenmaster
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 15:48:00 -
[32]
"and (more likely) to replace a forgotten password"
C'mon, they're indestructible and un*****able, you want them retard-proof too?! What would be next? fit them with a mining laser?
If someone locks their **** away and forgets the password, then we should all be able to point our fingers at them and laugh heartily.
.
|
Intruders
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 21:22:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Intruders on 26/07/2003 21:32:14
Edited by: Intruders on 26/07/2003 21:25:00
-------
How do you implement a lock with no way to pick it when there's a portion of your players that rely on the goods inside for income? You don't unless you either don't give a damn or you don't think past the Programmer's Orgasm of successfully coding something.
-------
The same way they never thought of implementing containers with armor, or a skill for having this, since the largest portion of players in eve rely on container safety in order to receive the income from the ore they have mined.
As far as hacking containers I would propose an HQ hangar hacking skill and tools too. heh
And where is the most fun aspect of this game that devs promised, the ability of tracking down other players with a homing device they probably wouldnt detect easily? Now that would be fun for tracking down pirates or other kind of perpetrators at their leisure or mining time eh?
Opps forgot, bounty hunting supposed to be the funniest aspect of the game, but instead of implementing all bounty hunting tools they promissed, they messed around with pirate security in low high secs. torturing pirates and legal players alike. If someone has the beta 5 official forums topics saved he can confirm me on this. You fellow pirates could at least demand these features to be implemented as we should, and stop CCP from playing with sec. patches and our nerves. I guess we all are shortsighted when it thinking about security..
Every man lives..but not every man dies!
My sig sux |
Jash Illian
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 21:27:00 -
[34]
 Quote:
As far as hacking containers I would propose an HQ hangar hacking skill and tools too. heh
That would mean people would be capable of scooping the container before *****ing the password. Which isn't an option
I mean its like you want corporations to oblige each other like its sex or something. Pffft I would rather **** my enemy.- Rohann
Be careful out there. That other guy waiting in the queue for the gate MIGHT be a baby-munching frock-burner, YOU JUST DON'T KNOW!- Lallante |
Scrapyard Jack
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 21:33:00 -
[35]
Regarding hacking, Scrapyard Jack would like to see the introduction of a "ship module" to break through the passwords on secure containers; along with a skill that would have the twin effect of increasing the chance that the hack is succesful, and decreasing the time taken to attempt the hack.
A failed hack attempt would cause a security hit, and be considered a hostile act against the owner of the container.
Then ol' Jack could truly train to be a real space-rogue, ehehehe!
|
Intruders
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 21:34:00 -
[36]
During a corp war, a hacking skill for opponents station HQ's could be implemented for taging ships and special equipment, but thats a long shot.
Every man lives..but not every man dies!
My sig sux |
Intruders
|
Posted - 2003.07.26 21:43:00 -
[37]
Damn forgot again, with these bounty hunteing skills who would dare to talk down to a pirate or a counter bounty hunter working for him, since he could deploy same tracking skills against player x, bounty hunter skills could do a lot also in helping corps. with inferior firepower against larger ones when in war, in order for some balance to be given.
Sorry if I was off the threads topic ppl.
Every man lives..but not every man dies!
My sig sux |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |