| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
AcidDeath
   |
Posted - 2003.07.27 00:58:00 -
[1]
please mssge me ingame if you have one for sale or trade ........
|
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.07.27 01:28:00 -
[2]
Read my post in "modules and ships" or "patch review", called "battleship balance".
Trust me, as the balance in the game is right now, YOU DON'T WANT A RAVEN.
I'll buy one myself in the future, but not now. Until they change things, I won't consider buying a Raven. (And neither a Minmatar battleship)
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
Starwolf
|
Posted - 2003.07.27 14:44:00 -
[3]
Erm, actually one on one I think the Raven may just be the best BS in game, don't take too much notice of the previous post, his figures and load-outs are way wrong :)
message James Kirk for BYOM deals on Ravens.
Tyrell Corp
|
Halo Jones
|
Posted - 2003.07.27 18:19:00 -
[4]
please inform us of a good assault loadout for a raven then.......
as since they mauled it going form beta to live, i'd love to know
Oberon Incorporated. |
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.07.27 22:26:00 -
[5]
Even if you carry 2 EM hardeners and 1 Thermal hardener, giving you 91% resistance against EMP and 76% resistance against thermal:
by the time your first missiles hits the enemy, an armageddon has already inflicted more than 7000 damage upon you...
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
Halo Jones
|
Posted - 2003.07.27 23:30:00 -
[6]
yukk - best way to do damage in a revan, disturbingly appears to be, MWD right beside the ship of interest and equip each hi-slot with a loot large smartbomb, activate in turn to do repeative damage - very effective, but tbh..... not a tactic anyone could chose or risk
Oberon Incorporated. |
Morkt Drakt
|
Posted - 2003.07.28 01:47:00 -
[7]
The Raven is a much maligned ship.
Few understand its real potential or grasp what it is really capable of.
For instance:
|
Digital Sin
|
Posted - 2003.07.28 05:02:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Digital Sin on 28/07/2003 05:03:32
Edited by: Digital Sin on 28/07/2003 05:02:21
heh i actually chuckled pretty hard at that one morkt :D
caldari are my people, i love their ships, i love the theory of their ships, and what they stand for. shields, railguns and missiles.
shields last good- check.
railguns do decent damage and track pretty well- check.
missiles- my god man, do you want the enemy to die of old age?
i have been pondering slight tweaks to missiles and what to do with them. currently i doubt that PKers would use em much, due to cost. thus, lets throw all this micro management crap out the window. make these things worth their price tag. currently i can wreck someone 2x over with energy weapons that cost absolutely zilch to operate.
missiles should fly at 2000m/s for light, 1500m/s for heavy, 1200m/s for cruise missiles and 800m/s for torpedos. higher tech levels should only improve damage. also, they shouldnt detonate on asteroids and crap. only the target. this is 20,000 years in the future and the best they can come up with is "follow the leader" guidance systems?
"To be content,to be comfortable, is to be complacent. No one learns anything from pleasure..pain on the other hand is a most efficient instructor" |
Yurito
|
Posted - 2003.07.28 10:00:00 -
[9]
Boris A took down a MOA with missiles in a Rifter... I'd say it depends on which missiles :P
O_o |
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.07.28 11:10:00 -
[10]
That must have been a very bad Moa pilot.
Well, the Raven can take very much damage, so it's almost impossible to kill.
But it's also almost impossible to kill anything if you use a Raven.
Hence, the only use of a Raven is to have it warping in first to take most damage. But I'd still prefere using 3 disposable cruisers in a battle rather than one expensive Raven.
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |