|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 22:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
serras bang wrote: erm yeah what other bs can a caldari missle specalist fly ? and although a ship can be used for pvp it should not be ballanced with the view soley on pvp witch currently a lot of ships have been as it leave mission runners and people that just generaly wanna play for fun out in the cold.
as for current raven doing lvl 4-s as i wrote it it can but with faily major problems especialy with explosive radius and trying to kill smaller faster ships and oh yeah the setup i wrote down you need to spend around 2 billion isk on that setup.
if you dont you have a raven with a massive tank and low dps or a raven with a bad tank and mediocer dps.
Im sry to say this: Learn how to play. You dont need a 2b fit to make a raven good in PvE: - Raven dont need to be stable, its a burst tank ship - Raven is good with a single T2 Lage Shield booster [in most cases] - Keep your range with a AB, if its gets ugly against turret ships - Use 2 Kinetic hardener against Guristas - Know how you do a mission with low risk - Use Overheat You can do almost any mission with a raven, if you know how to deal with the enemy. I agree its not always easy but its not impossible.
Gypsio III wrote:If Scorps are really bad, why do they always get primaried?
Because they die fast and nobody like ECM. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 01:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:
I wouldn't call 129k EHP before links particularly fragile. And I wonder why people don't like ECM. It's almost as if they believe that the ship is a serious threat.
I dont think you get a Tank about 129K EHP if you want to use ECM on your scorpion. If you dont use ECM on the scorpion then you obviously picked the wrong ship. If the hostile FC notice you fitted for Tank instead of ECM, then he will likely switch the target, because a scorpion without ECM its not a treat.
Player dont like ECM, because it can disturb your whole fleet or at least be a nuisance, depends on your fleet size. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 01:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aglais wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:So I'm wondering....why is the caldari thread about 1/2-1/4 the length of the other races?
Have the caldari boats landed well, or is it simply less people fly them in anger so there are fewer voices commenting? Arguably, the Caldari battleships (especially the Raven) are almost the worst off. The reason I think nobody is voicing their opinions is, I'm pretty sure, that everyone who 'cares' has no problems with this because it barely effects the Raven's PvE capabilities, and as a result, the PvE near-bots who would be flying all of these ravens in L4s really have nothing to say. And then the Raven was still somewhat subpar for PvP even though it's in a slightly better position than before. Not enough has been done to address it's problems.
Actually the main problem with the raven is not the ship, but the weapon it uses. For PvE the Raven doesnt change much, it has less EHP, but ravens in PvE are usually active tanked. For PvE the raven doesnt really get better or worse, the 7th midslot is nice for the raven, but i doesnt need it on my raven. The range-bonus is a bit silly for cruise and torps need about 50% more range to make the bonus good on the raven.
For PvP, the raven is just a really bad choice. - It cant sniper, missiles have delay and you can probed fast. - Brawler doesnt work, because you has bad tank - Missiles in generally have a bad dmg application - Torps dont have enough range - Typhoon is almost better in any way.
Dunno about the other ships, didnt used them so often atm. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
11
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
Karig'Ano Keikira wrote: and personally, I think that raven's role still needs rethinking - what is it supposed to be? med range torpedo boat? Unless torps are looked into, it still won't have enough range or damage application to be of much use and tornado will outperform it as torp boat due to better damage application. Cruise missile sniper? Contradicts idea of attack battleship and rokh will likely outlast, outgun and outperform it in long range combat role. Cannot really find third use of it
Imo, either given raven double range bonuses so it can reach decent range with torps - it would make it fairly unique ship due to ability to hit 50k+ with torps or just give it double damage or double damage application bonuses and make it proper 'attack battleship' due to (excellent) damage application with missiles, hybrid of these two just doesn't work; in any case, extra launcher or -1 launcher and 10% / lvl damage bonus would go long way in giving it bit more bang for its buck
If you are looking for a better dmg application of missiles see my post in the cruise missiles thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2939186#post2939186
Would be nice to get some feedback.
I better hope CCP wont **** up on the Torpedo changes. Would be really sad if they stay as they are. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
29
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 11:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:after 28 pages I STILL haven't heard whether the thing that says the scorp has 110 base scan res on the first post is right or not.
Is it a typo? Is it the scorp's new scanres? Because right now the scorp has 75 base scan res. (Horrendously low)
Is it really 110 now? You didn't mark any increase on the first post.
I will keep posting this until someone answers tbh...
Just ckecked Duality, Scorpion has 75mm Scan Resolution. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 16:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
I see a pattern in CCP's behavior.
1. They create a feedback thread 2. Spread nonsense 3. Waiting for Feedback 4. Reading 5 Pages 5. Adjusting some Values 6. Call it fixed and be pround, because CCP always listen to pilots 7. Never Look at that thread again, even when 100 Pages have pasted
There is a second pattern:
1. CCP claims something 2. Pilots says its not true 3. CCP says internal research showed... 4. Players asking for the data and results 5. CCP remains silence
Do you see any other patterns? |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 00:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Gimme more Cynos wrote:
Just wait till the Faction-BS rebalance, where the Typhoon will get a 7th launcher and a fifth med-slot, while the cnr gets a.. another med.. This would be death to the cnr for missions.. I allready bought one Fleet Typhoon..
Typhoon has already 5 mid-slots. Its strange to see, how every race besides Caldari get an additional Slot. Typhoon Fleet Issue, Apocalypse Navy Issue, Dominix Navy Issue, only The Raven Navy Issue remains the same.
The same goes for Marauders, every Marauder get a dmg-Bonus only the Golem dont get it. |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
53
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 14:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Deerin wrote:
[Raven, Rigor Raven] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II Ballistic Control System II
Domination X-Large Shield Booster Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Shield Boost Amplifier II 100MN Afterburner II Heavy Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800 Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile Cruise Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Cruise Missile [empty high slot]
Large Warhead Rigor Catalyst I Large Warhead Rigor Catalyst I Large Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard I
Hammerhead II x5 Hobgoblin II x5
Use furies for BS, precission(or navy....they deal about same for low sig targets) for everything else.
WTF is that!
What is this fit to be good against? |
Bucca Zerodyme
Good For Nothing Corporation Union of Independence
68
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Connall Tara wrote:Grunnax Aurelius wrote:
Because he doesn't understand missile mechanics.
Damage = Base Damage x MIN(MIN(sig / Er,1) , (Ev / Er x sig / vel)^(log(drf) / log(5.5)) )
Where sig = ship's signature vel = ship's velocity Er = Explosion Radius of missile Ev = Explosion Velocity of missile drf = Damage Reduction Factor of missile
EDIT: Keep in mind this does not take into account the enemy ships resistances.
your ability to cut and paste from stafan's own thread serves you well young padawan. however... what happens if we... work that out? EGADS! THE MADNESS OF CHECKING NUMBERS! so lets assuming the typhoon and raven are scrapping with eachother? after all surely that's the point of contention here? my stalwart opinion that the raven's own weapons are compensated for by the extra BCUII when it comes to raw torpedo damage and attesting that the typhoons advantage is in its ability to launch heavy drones? as you mention, the equation doesn't take resistances into account so lets roll ahead and just look at raw damage from a single torpedo fired from each ship? makes the numbers nice and small. so firstly the much vaunted typhoon. explosion radius: 337m target sig radius (raven with shield tank): 540 target velocity: 141 (lets ignore microwarping for the obvious reasons eh?) explosion velocity: 133.5 missile damage: 898.41 crunching all those wonderful values in we find that the typhoon deals..... *drumroll* 898 damage to the raven before applying resists! huzzah! full damage application against the raven! you sirs are clearly vindicated in all things and i shall leap from the bridges of the firth of fourth in my exuberant pennance! wait? I've not done the raven yet? oh dear considering i know nothing about missiles its only right i reveal the full extents of my idiocy... explosion radius: 337m target sig radius: (I'm feeling friendly, lets use an armour typhoon for that signature radius eh?) 330 target velocity: 143 explosion velocity: 106 missile damage: 923 (that extra BCU does add that slight little bit of love ^_^) now clearly seeing as i'm so god aweful wrong this shouldn't result in any number which could possibly compete? after all the raven doesn't have the explosion velocity bonus. AND its firing at a smaller signature target. its a forgone conclusion after all we can't honestly expect that the result will be. 903 huh... well that's curious isn't it? after all you quoted the equation at me! how could this result have turned out with the raven infact applying SLIGHTLY more damage against the typhoon than the typhoon does to the raven... one might think that the difference between the raven and the typhoon when it comes to damage application against other battleships is its drone bay... who'd have thunk it :>
Dude, you did the math wrong.
Damage = Base Damage x MIN(MIN(sig / Er,1) , (Ev / Er x sig / vel)^(log(drf) / log(5.5)) ) explosion radius: 337m target sig radius: (I'm feeling friendly, lets use an armour typhoon for that signature radius eh?) 330 target velocity: 143 explosion velocity: 106 missile damage: 923 (that extra BCU does add that slight little bit of love ^_^)
Damage = 923 * MIN(MIN(330 / 337.5, 1) , (106.5 / 337.5 * 330 / 143)^(log(5.5) / log(5.5)) ) Damage = 923 * MIN(MIN(0.977, 1) , (0.728)) Damage = 923 * 0.728 = 672.13 |
|
|
|