| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 16:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Justin Credulent wrote:blub blub blub QQ waaaaaa muuuuuuummmmyyyyyyy If you don't want PVP, leave the game. Simple as that. Claiming CCP should listen to the members who joined a PVP game and then complain there is PVP in it would require CCP being ********. They would also lose all the members who are actually out there playing the game as an MMO, and keep you insular solo mission running carebears, who have never done anything worth mentioning, ever. Oh look you saved the Damsel for the 800th time? Post it on EN24. I KNOW WHAT. Great plan for you. Why don't you book a holiday to the arctic and then complain it's too cold? **** off and play X3. Alt-tab to Skype if you really need to do this with friends.
This ^^^ |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 17:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
  |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 19:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:Xolve wrote:Alright alright. I lost the argument, so I'm just going to dismiss you angrily before you make me look even worse. aight "bro". concession accepted. but im not going to post on my main, because youve proven yourself to be an abusive, bullying type of person and im not going to open myself up to in-game harassment just because your little bully ego is too fragile to have the flaws in your reasoning pointed out to you...
And he wonders why he gets wardecced a lot 
|

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 19:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:Quote:And he wonders why he gets wardecced a lot ahem.
Thanks |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
112
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 05:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:If wardecs are so easily avoided, why aren't these guys posting with their mains?we exist in a vacuum. the only way to hurt other players is via wardecs. im being sarcastic to make my point, because i want you to read it and feel like a f*cking moron. 
Alas the content of most of your posts Justin , not only pointed to the reasons why you were wardecced for so long (I'd pay to wardec you permanently based on what I've read here - just for being a shiptoaster)
But also showed you to be the narrow minded moron.
For the most part Xolve was giving useful advice for dealing with unwanted wardecs - you chose to not only dismiss that advice but to resort to a tirade of abuse that really only serves to highlight the weakness of your argument.
If you are being attacked by bullies the best thing you can do is give them a bloody nose. Xolve was merely pointing out ways to do this.
Run to your decshield (mummys arms) and know that you are only playing a very tiny part of this game, that you'll never have the kind of fun that players (who have the bottle to do it, that recognise that it's only pixels that you are risking) are having.
Embrace the wonderful feeling of rescuing that damsal for the 800th time.
Chewing rocks makes you hardcore (see what I did there?) |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
112
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 06:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Oh and Justin,
Lets see if you can reply to my post without resorting to Ad Hominen attacks........ |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
117
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 14:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
You should consider one thing, however. The epic tears you have washed this forum in are indicitative of the reasons "greifers" wardec corps like yours. Your sense of entitlement and illogical, epic rage, are basically what people hope for when they target guys like you. Instead of doing anything about it, you just rage and cry.
tl;dr - you're the perfect punching bag. Congrats.
Quoted for the truth.. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
117
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 17:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:Alas the content of most of your posts Justin , not only pointed to the reasons why you were wardecced for so long i can post links, too.ooo theres another!Lets see if you can reply to my post without resorting to Ad Hominen attacks........eh? there wasnt really anything to respond to. *shrug* your entire post was just one long series of ad hominems. and since you yourself assert that ad hominems serve only to show that the person using them is a moron, well... come to your own conclusions...  You then also rage and rage against everyone who is "greifing" you telling THEM they should harden up.ah youre a little confused about my signature. i should explain it so youre not ignorant anymore. basically it is a response to all the "hi-sec should suck so bad that everyone is forced to move to null-sec because its boring out here and we want some free pew pew" threads. *pats you on the head* now you know. it has nothing to do with griefing (and actually the people griefing us are hi-sec pirates, not null-sec people). thanks! 
Is the reply I was expecting really  |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
118
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 18:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:*insert witty 1-liner* + eyeroll
Keep going , right now your intelligent argument for your cause has us on the ropes for sure.... Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
118
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 18:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:Quote:Attempted witty 1-liner from "Captain" Nathaniel Butler. Cool cool bro.
 Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
121
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 15:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:yeah. stand and fight, you cowards. video games are srs bzns.
I'd be inclined to believe that the players who believe that the most ,are the ones who are most afraid of losing their pixel ships. Most of the rage I've encountered like this has come from carebears. When I've ganked pvp'ers we tend to laugh about it afterwards or at the least say GF in local.
So I'd say that Pvp'ers are the ones who are logically less likely to worry about losing their ships, and therefore taking the game a lot less seriously.
I certainly have no problems with losing my pixel ship in a fight.
Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
122
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 17:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Captain Nathaniel Butler wrote:Justin Credulent wrote:yeah. stand and fight, you cowards. video games are srs bzns. So I'd say that Pvp'ers are the ones who are logically less likely to worry about losing their ships, and therefore taking the game a lot less seriously. The biggest difference between PvE Carebears, and PvP Pilots is essentially that PvE types literally pour all of their ISK into one or two ships, dreaming about some pimped out deadspawn rat pwnmobile; while PvP'ers spend small fractions of their wealth on a ship- and have a "lets see how much I can blow up with this investment" then mash the undock button knowing its only a matter of time.
Yeah - you worded it far better than I could  Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
122
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 17:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote:Quote:Most of the rage I've encountered like this has come from bittervets.
Define a bittervet? Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
126
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 19:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Danks wrote:Captain Nathaniel Butler wrote:Justin Credulent wrote:Quote:Most of the rage I've encountered like this has come from bittervets. Define a bittervet? People like me who think the game has gone to crap, never log in, and only troll idiots like justin on the forums.
I was more interested in Justin's definition, you see he edited a statement that I made and changed it to something that was completely out of context to the debate we were having (assuming his definition is the same as yours and mine) and makes little sense.
That's why I was interested in what he defined a bittervet as Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
126
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 20:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Justin Credulent wrote: what the bittervets who keep going on about "risk" are failing to consider is that the other half of "risk" is "benefit", hence "risk/benefit analysis".
Thanks for the definition (of sorts) it does indeed seem that you have a different definition from the norm.
This explains your edit of my statement. Lady Spank for C&P moderator. |
| |
|