Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 15:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ran into a gate camp of 5 BCs and better while in my Procurer. Dead in 8 seconds. Wondering if I am missing something about how to survive here - or whether realistically there is any chance of someone surviving these.
The Context
1. My Warp Technique and Modules Used
I arrive at the camp having come through the gate. I have 2 warp stabs on the low slots of my Proc, and there are no bubbles. I am in the jump cloak, and take a few seconds to assess the situation: 5 large BS or BC class craft, most of the same corp, positioned around the gate in such a way as to bring anything that de-cloaks under most or all of the gunnery of the group.
The procurer has two shield hardener rigs for EM and Thermal, and the adaptive invul in the middle slot. Net hit points 20K.
I have shortcuts or a quick mouse established to do the following :
align to next gate engage afterburner disengage afterburner engage adaptive invul warp to stargate
The above means that the warp to the next stargate will begin in about 8.3 seconds. I do this. In less than 8 seconds, dead. 5 gatecamp non-creative kill ganking ships (with t2 weaps and modules allowing insta-lock, of course) did 20K damage in less than 8 seconds. There was no lock warning, meaning insta-lock - I was locked the millisecond after I came out of warp. (Makes one wonder what all the fuss is about in the game mechanics regarding signature radius )
Conclusion : no way to survive these things.
Request : point out how there is a way to survive. What I am doing wrong, what modules I should be using, etc. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1266
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 16:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sometimes a bird will just sh!t on yer head...  "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
612
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 16:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cloak/micro warpdrive trick?
Hope for a celestial (planet, moon, etc) that is easier to align to than.the next gate?
Get a friend to scout for you in a cheap ship/clone.
If possible, fit a damage control II in one of your low slots to increase tank.
Fly a better ship for this job such as a venture. |

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 16:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:Cloak/micro warpdrive trick?
Hope for a celestial (planet, moon, etc) that is easier to align to than.the next gate?
Get a friend to scout for you in a cheap ship/clone.
If possible, fit a damage control II in one of your low slots to increase tank.
Fly a better ship for this job such as a venture.
If you fit a DC2 in 1 of the 2 possible low slots, you can then be scrammed.
Why is a venture better? Seriously, I have no clue here why that's better.
The job is solo low sec mining. Ventures- it would seem to me - suck because they can be killed by NPCs in 0.2. Also, if you warp into a belt and a ganker is already there and in range, the venture is gone in 1 shot.
Easier alignments do not matter AFAIK in the context I outlined. No matter what you align to or are jumping to, the warp sequence begins in no less nor more than 8.3 seconds, give or take about .2 seconds for my own actions. It cannot be less until my AB skill is trained up (it is already at level 4 now). The procurer has 20k hit points, so one would think that you could survive almost anything for 8 seconds. Apparently not. ]
I do the cloak microwarp thing with other ships, in the context above it wasn't possble because I was entering the system with the belts that had the ore I needed, and that system has no stations to swap out a cloakie, and the proc has 1 high slot, and only 1. |

Marcetti Mastari
Mastari Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 16:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Not that it matters much in that situation but I'm pretty sure using your AB will result in a longer align time than if you just aligned normally. |

Zack Sran
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Just a few things. First, fitting stabs in lows is useless. Heres why. If on a gate, as in you just come through and there are people waiting for you reaproach gate and turn on Your tank. If they attack you then just warp back and reroute the attackers have agro and cant follow. For solo lowsec Mining, always check map stats of people in system and ships destroid stay out of high pop areas. If you fly into one all ways expect the gate camp. You should always fit for tank before anything else( Ie : Max yield )if solo low sec. also gate camp bs fit sensor boosters that plus your bloomed radius from your rigs equals insta lock. last point, don't get pissy when You choose to take a risk and loose a ship to one of the most common mechanics in the game **** happens.
edit: Second point on the stabs thing if you are in a belt in low you should be aligned and always running short scan 500,000 range. if anything shows up On Scan warp off. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
3301
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Marcetti Mastari wrote:Not that it matters much in that situation but I'm pretty sure using your AB will result in a longer align time than if you just aligned normally.
This.
Using the AB...especially on a Procurer will result in a much longer time to get into warp. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Marcetti Mastari wrote:Not that it matters much in that situation but I'm pretty sure using your AB will result in a longer align time than if you just aligned normally.
Nope.
It depends on the agility of the ship. I have timed and tested it on every ship that goes into low sec and the possibility of gate camps.
When you engage the warp, you notice that your speed needle starts going up. Warp actually starts when the needle is at 3/4 of the way to full speed. For some ships, particularly industrials, this can take a long time, my longest was 16 seconds.
However, when you fit an AB module, you can do this. Engage the AB right after you have aligned or started the warp to gate process. Immediately turn the cycle off (red highlight around the module now). The AB cycle lasts, depending on skills 10 seconds or less. In my case, it is 8 seconds. The red highlight simply means the module will not continue to function at the end of the current cycle.
Once you engage/disengage the AB module, two things happen: 1. your speed indicator display changes to reflect your new TOP speed (which is higher than your normal speed), and the needle is positioned and moves along the dial according to what your accel rate is and what your top speed is. Since the AB is currently cycling, your top speed is higher, but your accel rate is also higher.
At the end of the AB cycle, the speed dial and needle display is reset to reflect your new top speed, which is now lower than it was with the AB engaged. In the case of this particular procurer fit, the needle jumps from a few notches *below* 3/4 speed to way above 3/4 speed, sometimes full speed, and the warp to stargate commences immediately.
What is going on here is that you are using the ab to increase your rate of accel during the warp initiation process, and because the AB will not cycle (because you turned it off) as soon as the AB cycle ends, warp starts. So, the net net of this is that you initiate warp depending on your Afterburner skill, which in my case gives me an AB cycle of 8.0 seconds.
If you simply left the AB on and did not have it cycle off, it would take longer to initiate warp than if you had not turned it on at all. But, that's not what we are doing here.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Marcetti Mastari wrote:Not that it matters much in that situation but I'm pretty sure using your AB will result in a longer align time than if you just aligned normally. This. Using the AB...especially on a Procurer will result in a much longer time to get into warp.
Once again, read the above.
I have used a stopwatch to time my warp initiation cycle with and without the ab (using the method described). The cycle is longer without the ab on/off method. No two ways around that.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
Zack Sran wrote:Just a few things. First, fitting stabs in lows is useless. Heres why. If on a gate, as in you just come through and there are people waiting for you reaproach gate and turn on Your tank. If they attack you then just warp back and reroute the attackers have agro and cant follow. For solo lowsec Mining, always check map stats of people in system and ships destroid stay out of high pop areas. If you fly into one all ways expect the gate camp. You should always fit for tank before anything else( Ie : Max yield )if solo low sec. also gate camp bs fit sensor boosters that plus your bloomed radius from your rigs equals insta lock. last point, don't get pissy when You choose to take a risk and loose a ship to one of the most common mechanics in the game **** happens.
edit: Second point on the stabs thing if you are in a belt in low you should be aligned and always running short scan 500,000 range. if anything shows up On Scan warp off.
1. Checking stats. Did that. Do that all the time. Good advice.
2. Stabs in low - dont want to have this argument. Its a valid choice for travel and non-combat ships.
3. The Proc is a tank by default, but having shield or armor tank modules isn't going to do a whole lot in this situation. The cycle time alone for shield and tank modules is longer than it took for the Proc to get destroyed. Read the OP, each ship got off 1 shot - the total damage of those shots was more HP than the Proc has, from start to finish the engagement lasted LESS THAN 8 SECONDS.
4. Reapproach Gate - sorry that takes about 2 minutes in a procurer. If there were tank modules that could fix 20K damage in 8 seconds, or even 40 seconds since the gankers here were using 1400mm Artilery, then I would consider this. No tank modules I know of have the capacity to repair that much damage in 8 or 40 seconds.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 17:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Time to Warp Initiation in Various Ships With And Without AB Cycling
Mammoth
Without : 16.2 seconds With: 12.5
[will edit this post further as new data is generated] |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
2291
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 18:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
*sigh* Some of the advice above is sound OP. You're simply hitting your head against the wall hoping for a different result.
- stabs are utterly useless unless you can fit 4 or more. They are also directly countered by Heavy Interdictors and their scripted "infini point." A damage control on the other hand increases your tank by almost HALF.
- the best way to not get killed is to avoid getting into a situation where you might get killed in the first place. To do this try using "back-end" gates that are far from trade hubs. Or use a blockade runner and haul your stuff deep into low-sec.
- Ventures are perfectly suited for low-sec because they are quick and mobile. They don't need a tank when they can simply warp off as soon as something appears on grid. The only place they are most vulnerable is on the undock of a station. Use insta-warp bookmarks and/or warp off to the celestial most in line with your undock path. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Shadow Adanza
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 18:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Todath Narod wrote: warp to the next stargate will begin in about 8.3 seconds. I do this. In less than 8 seconds, dead. 5 gatecamp non-creative kill ganking ships (with t2 weaps and modules allowing insta-lock, of course) did 20K damage in less than 8 seconds. .
8.3 seconds is more than enough time to get a lock and do 20k damage in arty fit bcs, especially if they're remote sebo'd. Hey! You're no zombie! |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
370
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 18:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
You have no ******* clue how game mechanics work and when people do try to help you, you disagree?
Why bother posting then, figure it out yourself smart guy...
derp? |

Shahai Shintaro
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis Dragonaors
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 18:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
You mention there were 5 of then and you only had 2 stabs. If 3 got points on you, your only option was too burn to gate. Also, I'm assuming they were Insta lock tornados. Each one alone can easily lock a frig in under 2 seconds and lay out at least 10k alpha |

Haulie Berry
511
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 18:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Stabs are for stupids.
Quote:5. Too bad you choose to characterize this entire thread as an example of pissy. Simply wondering if I am missing anything.
What you're missing is the exercise of an appropriate degree of caution when bringing a ship that handles like a pregnant cow into low sec.
You didn't scout the gate. I'm betting you didn't even check the map stats. You just Leeroyed on in there. |

Archibald Thistlewaite III
102
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 19:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Todath Narod wrote:Zack Sran wrote:Just a few things. First, fitting stabs in lows is useless. Heres why. If on a gate, as in you just come through and there are people waiting for you reaproach gate and turn on Your tank. If they attack you then just warp back and reroute the attackers have agro and cant follow. For solo lowsec Mining, always check map stats of people in system and ships destroid stay out of high pop areas. If you fly into one all ways expect the gate camp. You should always fit for tank before anything else( Ie : Max yield )if solo low sec. also gate camp bs fit sensor boosters that plus your bloomed radius from your rigs equals insta lock. last point, don't get pissy when You choose to take a risk and loose a ship to one of the most common mechanics in the game **** happens.
edit: Second point on the stabs thing if you are in a belt in low you should be aligned and always running short scan 500,000 range. if anything shows up On Scan warp off. 1. Checking stats. Did that. Do that all the time. Good advice for everyone. 2. Stabs in low - dont want to have this argument. Its a valid choice for travel and non-combat ships. On the proc the only effect of having stabs in low is A) no mining upgrades and B) have to get to within 7k of the roids to mine them. Big deal. The positive effect of stabs is : you can't be scrammed or destabbed, unless there is a bubble which is extremely rare for what I do. If I didn't have stabs in low, I would have been destroyed 3 or 4 times more than I have. In fact, this is the only time I've actually been destroyed in a ship with stabs. 3. The Proc is a tank by default, but having shield or armor tank modules isn't going to do a whole lot in this situation. The cycle time alone for shield and tank modules is longer than it took for the Proc to get destroyed. Read the OP, each ship got off 1 shot - the total damage of those shots was more HP than the Proc has, from start to finish the engagement lasted LESS THAN 8 SECONDS. 4. Reapproach Gate - sorry that takes about 2 minutes in a procurer. If there were tank modules that could fix 20K damage in 8 seconds, or even 40 seconds since the gankers here were using 1400mm Artilery, then I would consider this. No tank modules I know of have the capacity to repair that much damage in 8 or 40 seconds. 4.5 What sig radius to you need to have to avoid getting locked up in about 5 seconds? Are there any modules or rigs that lower sig? 5. Too bad you choose to characterize this entire thread as an example of pissy. Simply wondering if I am missing anything. Even if this happens again, I don't care about losing the ship, just want to have a loss rate that makes going for the rare ores in low sec worthwhile. Right now its kind of a wash.
1. Good idea
2. You don't know how stabs work. It's a numbers game, you need more warp core stabs. than they have warp points. Most warp scramblers have 2 points (faction ones can have 3)
3. On a Proc. you want buffer and resists if you want fit a tank.
4. To reapproach the gate you will need a MWD and a good tank, I doubt a Proc. can fit both.
4.5. Don't know the numbers for that but a gate camp will be set up to lock you in 1-2 secs. You won't be able to alter that in a shield tank barge.
5. You are missing friends to scout for you.
6. Use a Venture, its what its designed for. |

Garresh
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Maps have Intel. Pilots in space. Ships destroyed in last hour. Use them.
Use a venture. Its MEANT for lowsec. Its fast, agile, naturally stabilized, and has good mining to boot.
MWD cloak when travelling and refit on arrival.
With these tools you evade at least 95% of gate camps. I got busted a few times early on in eve. After about 6 months in I started using those tools and I have not died to a gate camp in like 3 years, and I LIVE in lowsec. So yeah. This Space Intentionally Left Blank |

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:53:00 -
[19] - Quote
Garresh wrote:Maps have Intel. Pilots in space. Ships destroyed in last hour. Use them.
Use a venture. Its MEANT for lowsec. Its fast, agile, naturally stabilized, and has good mining to boot.
MWD cloak when travelling and refit on arrival.
With these tools you evade at least 95% of gate camps. I got busted a few times early on in eve. After about 6 months in I started using those tools and I have not died to a gate camp in like 3 years, and I LIVE in lowsec. So yeah.
1. Map stats. As I said, did that, do that all the time. Its good advice for everyone.
2. So a Venture would have survived here. I have a Venture - have used it. Have gotton blown up in 1 shot. If you say a Venture is better in this situation, I hope you can explain exactly why it is in this situation a Venture would have survived while the Proc didn't. As you are an experienced gate camp avoider/surviver I believe you, but it needs to be clear to me here why a Venture would have had a better outcome.
3. Refitting. As I mentioned, I do use cloakie and refit. Couldn't do that here as the system had no stations and was the destination system.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:Stabs are for stupids. Quote:5. Too bad you choose to characterize this entire thread as an example of pissy. Simply wondering if I am missing anything. What you're missing is the exercise of an appropriate degree of caution when bringing a ship that handles like a pregnant cow into low sec. You didn't scout the gate. I'm betting you didn't even check the map stats. You just Leeroyed on in there.
Did check map stats, do that all the time, good advice for everyone. Standard practice is to look at pilots in space, number of ships killed in last 24, then in last hour, number of jumps, pilots docked and active, etc etc. Usually by looking at these stats you can tell if there are a lot of gankers around or even a gate camp. Course, that doesn't work if you are the first person the gate campers kill after they get set up.
Scouting the gate is a good idea, with the right ship (which one IDK) it might be possible to see the camp and actually survive it. You would need one that can initiate warp in about 2 or 3 seconds. Or, just accept the fact that you lose the scouting Velator instead of the mining Procurer. Drawback = 40% - the time needed to do this. Scouting and going back to get mining ship takes time - but if I run a time value calc it might be worth it assuming I survive and dont get podded in the scout and lose my crappy-to-veterans-but-expensive-to-me implants.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Todath Narod wrote:Zack Sran wrote:Just a few things. First, fitting stabs in lows is useless. Heres why. If on a gate, as in you just come through and there are people waiting for you reaproach gate and turn on Your tank. If they attack you then just warp back and reroute the attackers have agro and cant follow. For solo lowsec Mining, always check map stats of people in system and ships destroid stay out of high pop areas. If you fly into one all ways expect the gate camp. You should always fit for tank before anything else( Ie : Max yield )if solo low sec. also gate camp bs fit sensor boosters that plus your bloomed radius from your rigs equals insta lock. last point, don't get pissy when You choose to take a risk and loose a ship to one of the most common mechanics in the game **** happens.
edit: Second point on the stabs thing if you are in a belt in low you should be aligned and always running short scan 500,000 range. if anything shows up On Scan warp off. 1. Checking stats. Did that. Do that all the time. Good advice for everyone. 2. Stabs in low - dont want to have this argument. Its a valid choice for travel and non-combat ships. On the proc the only effect of having stabs in low is A) no mining upgrades and B) have to get to within 7k of the roids to mine them. Big deal. The positive effect of stabs is : you can't be scrammed or destabbed, unless there is a bubble which is extremely rare for what I do. If I didn't have stabs in low, I would have been destroyed 3 or 4 times more than I have. In fact, this is the only time I've actually been destroyed in a ship with stabs. 3. The Proc is a tank by default, but having shield or armor tank modules isn't going to do a whole lot in this situation. The cycle time alone for shield and tank modules is longer than it took for the Proc to get destroyed. Read the OP, each ship got off 1 shot - the total damage of those shots was more HP than the Proc has, from start to finish the engagement lasted LESS THAN 8 SECONDS. 4. Reapproach Gate - sorry that takes about 2 minutes in a procurer. If there were tank modules that could fix 20K damage in 8 seconds, or even 40 seconds since the gankers here were using 1400mm Artilery, then I would consider this. No tank modules I know of have the capacity to repair that much damage in 8 or 40 seconds. 4.5 What sig radius to you need to have to avoid getting locked up in about 5 seconds? Are there any modules or rigs that lower sig? 5. Too bad you choose to characterize this entire thread as an example of pissy. Simply wondering if I am missing anything. Even if this happens again, I don't care about losing the ship, just want to have a loss rate that makes going for the rare ores in low sec worthwhile. Right now its kind of a wash. 1. Good idea 2. You don't know how stabs work. It's a numbers game, you need more warp core stabs. than they have warp points. Most warp scramblers have 2 points (faction ones can have 3) 3. On a Proc. you want buffer and resists if you want fit a tank. 4. To reapproach the gate you will need a MWD and a good tank, I doubt a Proc. can fit both. 4.5. Don't know the numbers for that but a gate camp will be set up to lock you in 1-2 secs. You won't be able to alter that in a shield tank barge. 5. You are missing friends to scout for you. 6. Use a Venture, its what its designed for.
1. thanks 2. wrong. Destabs = -1. Scrams = -2. 2 Stabs = -2. 2 Stabs defeats 1 scram. 1 Stab does not defeat 1 scram. 3. had adaptive invul and 2 rigs for resists. 4.5 Yes I think that's about right. Question is, is there anything that can allow you to survive the post lock 5 seconds? 6. People here keep saying use a venture but dont explain how the outcome would have been different in that ship.
|

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:08:00 -
[22] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:*sigh* Some of the advice above is sound OP. You're simply hitting your head against the wall hoping for a different result.
- stabs are utterly useless unless you can fit 4 or more. They are also directly countered by Heavy Interdictors and their scripted "infini point." A damage control on the other hand increases your tank by almost HALF.
- the best way to not get killed is to avoid getting into a situation where you might get killed in the first place. To do this try using "back-end" gates that are far from trade hubs. Or use a blockade runner and haul your stuff deep into low-sec.
- Ventures are perfectly suited for low-sec because they are quick and mobile. They don't need a tank when they can simply warp off as soon as something appears on grid. The only place they are most vulnerable is on the undock of a station. Use insta-warp bookmarks and/or warp off to the celestial most in line with your undock path.
Im not hoping for anything. Asking questions to get information and challenging the answers for reliability.
I do a lot of checking to avoid possible situations I know are a problem. For example, often a low sec system bordering hi sec will have a gate that campers favor. It may also have other gates that link to another low sec system, they don't camp there. On routes where it is possible, I avoid these favored gates (out of experience 
I can see the possibility of a Venture being A) more difficult to lock due to lower sig and B) quicker to warp out and thus avoiding getting hit at all. Just wanted someone else to say this with authority. Drawback = 55%. Venture ore gathering speed is terrible, Venture ore hold is also terrible. But, that's life. |

Garresh
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
Venture would change the outcome. You said you died in 8 seconds to the first volley. That means it took them probably 4-5 seconds til most of then locked. A venture can align faster than most and is stabbed. With 2 more stabs that's 4 points. The likelyhood of more than 1 scram in range is small. Combine those factors and ventures are, at this point, probably one of the best gatrcamp busting ships in the game short of a covops. This Space Intentionally Left Blank |

Dyphorus
VC Academy
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:30:00 -
[24] - Quote
Todath Narod wrote:The job is solo low sec mining.
This is your problem. For the time you spend dodging roamers, gate camps, system campers, not to mention the logistics issues low sec presents and the ships you will loose.....
High sec mining will be much more profitable.
If you want to mine low sec, find a low sec corp that has an area of control that is relatively safe. There's not enough profit vs high sec ore to make it worth your time/effort/risk.
|

Lambert Simnel
PWLS Enterprises
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
I think the point most people are making is that the best defence is not to be there in the first place. If you are taking such a slow aligning ship into low or null then you will not escape gate campers who know what they are doing whatever the fit.
If its a system you mine regularly, use an alt in a covert ops/recon ship to scout the gate for you. These ships should have no problem evading the camp if it is there already. If not, your alt should set up a bookmarked observation spot at a good distance from the gate so you can always see what's there before you enter.
If your cargo/ship is high value then fit your alts ship with a dual web and get them to web you through the gate. It means you will almost insta-warp (although your alt will likely die). |

Haulie Berry
514
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Quote:3. had adaptive invul and 2 rigs for resists.
Just to be clear about something: That ain't a tank. |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
160
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
I am unsure why the OP is puzzled with the outcome.
You were engaged by 5 "BS or BC" sized ships. There is a significant difference between the two, by the way but even, for arguments sake, we call them 5 BCs; that is at least 5 points that can lock you in well under 8 seconds - you weren't going to warp off under any circumstances. That is also taking out of the equation the type of ships, damage type applied and the point that your '20k tank' was measured in terms of "effective" hit points.
As to your question of avoiding such outcomes, the short answer is "no" with an 'if' or the long answer is "yes" with a 'but'. The former involves sticking to hi-sec mining, while the latter has been covered in previous posters' responses, namely scouting, using a different (more versitile) ship, fitting advice and so on.
|

Haulie Berry
514
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:37:00 -
[28] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:I am unsure why the OP is puzzled with the outcome.
You were engaged by 5 "BS or BC" sized ships. There is a significant difference between the two, by the way but even, for arguments sake, we call them 5 BCs; that is at least 5 points that can lock you in well under 8 seconds - you weren't going to warp off under any circumstances. That is also taking out of the equation the type of ships, damage type applied and the point that your '20k tank' was measured in terms of "effective" hit points.
As to your question of avoiding such outcomes, the short answer is "no" with an 'if' or the long answer is "yes" with a 'but'. The former involves sticking to hi-sec mining, while the latter has been covered in previous posters' responses, namely scouting, using a different (more versitile) ship, fitting advice and so on.
Yeah, his know-it-all tone, combined with a complete lack of any worthwhile knowledge about the game seemed familiar, so I checked his posting history and, oh, right - he's the guy who started a thread about breaking free from tackle that began with (I'm paraphrasing here), "Everyone knows the best way to avoid being scrammed is to fit warp core stabs," then, despite the fact that he was asking for advice, proceeded to ignore everyone who pointed out that warp core stabs are garbage because he's been here for like 3 minutes and knows all about staying safe.  |

Bloodmyst Ranwar
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:45:00 -
[29] - Quote
1. Use a scout.
2. Utilize a ship which is much more versatile. Like many others have said, the Venture
3. If you are not prepared to do either steps 1 and/or 2, stay in high sec and don't waste your time.
I really don't see the reason in getting so technical here when the situation is so black and white. |

Todath Narod
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 00:13:00 -
[30] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:I am unsure why the OP is puzzled with the outcome.
Not puzzled. Puzzled why you think the OP and thread is about me being puzzled.
Expectation : that I was actually not missing something and this is what you get when you do what I do and there is no way to mine lowsec without losing a proc to a gatecamp like this. So, actually, the opposite of puzzled.
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |