| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 27 post(s) |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
616
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 01:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Seriously great work guys, these are AMAZING changes that everyone has been waiting for and I cannot wait to see them implemented. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 22:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:The new way is better, in RL most of the times there is a scarcity of resources and prices factor in that scarcity.
The old way had a BIG flaw: with the multiboxers and botters, ices price would slowly tend to zero over time (actually to the equivalent of 1 PLEX a month). Now divide 1 PLEX value for the hours in a month (bots don't sleep) and you'll get how low ice was destined to go if CCP did not step in and create a finite resources system.
The only big defect of this new system is that it's a "go in and hoard all ice with 70 alts FAST, leaving smaller miners ZERO chances and 4 hours to wait again". Every of the very few ice systems will have its 2-3 big hoard sharks, the others will just be crushed and will quit.
So the old system was flawed because there was infinite ice, but now the new system is flawed because there is a limited amount of ice.
Got it. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 22:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
If you can do the extra effort it takes to set up an organization that can get enough miners into an ice belt to one cycle it the second it spawns why shouldn't you be able to screw over people who aren't quite as organized?
If you don't like it maybe you should do something to disrupt organized playergroups like, wardec, wait no no, I know, suicide gank, no that won't work, Bump, no that's stupid. Well I guess you're boned because you are never going to leave highsec. Bye! |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yes, everyone stay out of the belts. It is too dangerous to be there, you totally shouldn't do it, it's suicide!  |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Crexa wrote:Because the idiots advocating it don't mine, never have, or are ignorant. I'd say the problem is that miners are ignorant to the fact that you can actually work with other people in a way that everyone would benefit from because they've been stuck in antisocial land all alone for such a long time. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 01:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's not effort, it's T I M E R S. There are approximately 80 systems that will have ice anomalies. No news on how many anomalies will spawn per system. Do you think every single one of them will be finished within 4 hours? |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 01:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Crexa wrote:Do you have any idea how many people play Eve and mine? Not enough to finish completely 80+ new ice anomalies within 4 hours and lock players out from ice mining in highsec.
Crexa wrote: And anyone who mines the ice nearest the hubs has an advantage. So while there may be ice in another system, you won't know that for sure. And one of the worst enemies of the industrialist is travel time.
No one will know for sure when the site respawns (except for the people who were in the site when it was last finished, but if you put effort into scouting the site you should be rewarded), so everyone gets a fair shot at finding the next one. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 02:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:EI Digin wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's not effort, it's T I M E R S. There are approximately 80 systems that will have ice anomalies. No news on how many anomalies will spawn per system. Do you think every single one of them will be finished within 4 hours? 80 high sec systems? Are you sure?
24 Amarr systems (listed from blog) 19 Minmatar systems with Glacial Mass and secstatus above 0.5 23 Caldari systems with White Glaze and secstatus above 0.5 15 Gallente systems with Blue Ice and secstatus above 0.5
is 81 systems
|

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
619
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 21:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Holderof Corp wrote:However it seem many nullbears think that high is a land of milk and honey where there is nothing but isk falling into your lap as soon as you log in.
Ice mining is welfare. You show up to the welfare office (ice belt) and get a small check every month (five minutes in our case) if you ask nicely (press F1 then wait) and have to take it to the bank (Jita) to cash it. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
621
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 02:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:More seriously, Fozzie - I would like to see some fixes for T1 module manufacturing to encourage noob industrialists.
How about it? Is it even on the list of things to do? T1 modules were removed from NPC drop tables in order to make manufacturing them better for new players. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
621
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 02:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote: Point was it will take less time to get to you than for you to get out and combat pilots as a general rule hate defensivly waiting in an gravimetric site or asteroid belt in hopes some will come along. As was stated many times before the increased reward would have been good enough if the sites still needed to be scanned down, but with the proposed changes the reward are not worth the absolute rush that will be in mining in low and empire null sec.
The idea of nullsec is that you create your own safety through player interaction instead of obtaining it for free through game mechanics.
Sitting in a site and being given enough time to escape by forcing players to scan you out, either via probes or the system scanner is hiding behind a game mechanic and hurts players' ability to interact meaningfully.
The increased reward provided by rebalanced mining sites and increased ice cost because of the new bottleneck on supply make this trade fairer. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
622
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Personally I would like to thank the shadow Goonswarm devs for this expansion, because not only will it kill the game people love so much, it also causes a whole bunch of whine threads on the forums. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
623
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 19:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Don't think so much. He talks about the past and does not seem to know how many ice miners actually are around. A ton.
The only people that know exactly how many ice miners are around are CCP. Look at the changes they're making. I don't think they're worried one bit. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
623
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 20:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
How in the world can you run an unprofitable highsec mining operation? What kind of expenses does a highsec player have? Especially a miner who does not need to purchase ammo or new ships very often. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
624
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 20:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Expenses: not so much, (mining crystals, drones, hulkageddon, corp member paychecks for showing up) but compare time and income in mining to time and income in mission whoring, ratting, COSMOS, scan sites, or just about anything else (including other passive forms of isk generation like PI). It's the least profitable thing you can be doing, grant total (and frankly, even mission whoring, who buys ammo? Make your own or use lasers)
If you're into mining because you like mining, your favourite constructive and relaxing style of gameplay is still there, it just might take a little bit longer to get there.
If you're into it for the isk, I suggest you go get a second job at McDonalds and sell PLEX. It will probably get you farther in life to boot. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
624
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 12:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Just undo the barges buffs and let PLAYERS kill miners and define supply, demand and market price. THAT's an imperfect yet sandboxy and realistic solution, not this farce.
I agree, let's move all ice mining to lowsec and nullsec.
|

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
624
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 13:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Deal. But ONLY in low sec and NPC null sec. Sov null sec is too easy to transform into an endless bot-land and there's nobody to report the bots and it's too easy for them to detect neuts in local and warp to POS / safe.
You can still run a bot empire in lowsec or NPC null. Empty regions like Stain and Outer Ring are full of them.
If limiting the amount of damage a group of botters could do was your main objective, making it easier for miners to get caught would be best because then you need to have an active defense fleet. You can't bot a defense fleet.
At the same time you can reward players for taking the additional risk, either by giving them more reward or by removing excess supply.
Odyssey is a baby step in both directions. If they took any larger steps in just one patch people would be shooting monuments in Jita because of their irrational hate of nullsec players. |

EI Digin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
627
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 15:39:00 -
[18] - Quote
You mean killing someone's ship is actually going to matter now? Sign me up! |
| |
|