Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
cheese monkey
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
135
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
So you can buy back sec status for isk (and low sec tags)
This is a bad idea. Just terrible. |
ACE McFACE
Radical Astronauts Plundering Eve
1246
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why? Or is saying that its terrible reason enough? You should be notified if someone quotes your post so you can continue the argument! |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1541
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
They're not going to magically appear on the market, you know? Sovereignty and Population Moulds and water for the sandbox. |
cheese monkey
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
135
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
ACE McFACE wrote:Why? Or is saying that its terrible reason enough?
Saying that it is terrible is enough. Think about it.
I mean, it's almost game breakingly bad. |
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
436
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
And you know why the OP thinks it's bad? Because all those he has attacked and annoyed in the past will be able to buy back their sec status after ganking him. Remember me monkey? Cause I sure remember you... |
admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
512
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
cheese monkey wrote:ACE McFACE wrote:Why? Or is saying that its terrible reason enough? Saying that it is terrible is enough. Think about it. I mean, it's almost game breakingly bad.
If it leads to an increase in ships asploding it certainly won't be bad for miners, builders or gankers. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
Manny Moons
New Order Logistics CODE.
66
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
cheese monkey wrote:Saying that it is terrible is enough. Think about it.
I mean, it's almost game breakingly bad. You could always buy sec status. This change just makes it a little more obvious.
|
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
It is always best approach to whine instead of figuring out how to take advantage of changes.
I definitely hope belts in Molden Heath will burn again because of Tags4Sec. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Implying Implications
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
336
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
You're terrible. sÅ»µä¢püäpü»µ¡út+¬pÇé |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1064
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
marmite is terrible
vegemite 4 lyfe |
|
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3289
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
cheese monkey wrote:ACE McFACE wrote:Why? Or is saying that its terrible reason enough? Saying that it is terrible is enough. Think about it. I mean, it's almost game breakingly bad.
Yeah, I still don't see a problem. Why do you think it would be "almost game breakingly bad"? This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
596
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
It's a needed change, lowsec pvp belts will be on fire again.
Also you can only buy tags that someone else got from a lowsec belt, they are not created from thin air. It's a good element for conflict in lowsec. |
Drunken Bum
237
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
I gank indiscriminately. Gankers, miners, industrialists, women, children, small animals. I gank everything in high sec just for something to shoot at when there's not enough action in my wormhole. I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. This tag change isn't going to affect me at all. Same goes for most gankers. Its amazing how little people know about how this game works... even if I were to use my main account to gank and drive its sec down, it still wouldn't be that big of an issue. Just a minor annoyance. Spare some change?-á |
Noriko Mai
800
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Drunken Bum wrote:[..] I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. [..] This is not allowed and agains the EULA/TOS iirc. |
Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:Drunken Bum wrote:[..] I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. [..] This is not allowed and agains the EULA/TOS iirc.
are you sure?
biomassing the char is not allowed - letting the account lapse and starting another one ... |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1064
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:Drunken Bum wrote:[..] I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. [..] This is not allowed and agains the EULA/TOS iirc. are you sure? biomassing the char is not allowed - letting the account lapse and starting another one ... if biomassing the character was not allowed, which is on a paid account, do you think ccp would allow unpaid trials to do this? |
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:52:00 -
[17] - Quote
Drunken Bum wrote:I gank indiscriminately. Gankers, miners, industrialists, women, children, small animals. I gank everything in high sec just for something to shoot at when there's not enough action in my wormhole. I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. This tag change isn't going to affect me at all. Same goes for most gankers. Its amazing how little people know about how this game works... even if I were to use my main account to gank and drive its sec down, it still wouldn't be that big of an issue. Just a minor annoyance. I like you attitude on ganking.
As for this, "...I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one...". Everyone knows this, but CCP pretends not to. |
Turgesson
Five-0 Shao Khan.
42
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:It is always best approach to whine instead of figuring out how to take advantage of changes.
I definitely hope belts in Molden Heath will burn again because of Tags4Sec.
Considering security status washing is going to be much faster and easier than it is now I seriously doubt anyone will really care about the tags. (they're changing the ss gain tick from 15 minutes per system to 5 minutes no matter where you are)
I hope I'm wrong but the tag ratting seems like the new reason to get in a cloaky and go look for the "good" rats avoiding all fights along the way. If they modified the damn statics and changed the drops to tags then we would have an interesting new thing to play with but they don't listen too good. They don't want farming unless you move around a bit or orbit a FW thingy?
Some of the other stuff they're doing will bring targets in the short term until all the farming "explorers" get sick of being assploded while trying to play the new mini-games for poop loot in low since the ones in high sec will be overrun with alts, idiots and the Jun Horde of gankers. I'm almost allowed back in high sec after years and can't wait to explode...err I mean explore all these new awesome sites....screw the tags let the shitfit farmers farm so we can get buy backs on the cheap. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1064
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Turgesson wrote:Considering security status washing is going to be much faster and easier than it is now I seriously doubt anyone will really care about the tags. (they're changing the ss gain tick from 15 minutes per system to 5 minutes no matter where you are) They also mentioned reducing rat sec gains so sec gain per hour is about the same. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1064
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Turgesson wrote:Considering security status washing is going to be much faster and easier than it is now I seriously doubt anyone will really care about the tags. (they're changing the ss gain tick from 15 minutes per system to 5 minutes no matter where you are) They also mentioned reducing rat sec gains so sec gain per hour is about the same. I was unsure I'd remembered this properly so I checked the vid anyway
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp/c/2204044
42 minutes in, a guy with a striped shirt asks the question |
|
Turgesson
Five-0 Shao Khan.
42
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Turgesson wrote:Considering security status washing is going to be much faster and easier than it is now I seriously doubt anyone will really care about the tags. (they're changing the ss gain tick from 15 minutes per system to 5 minutes no matter where you are) They also mentioned reducing rat sec gains so sec gain per hour is about the same.
I missed that part. The dev blog should be an interesting read if we get one...I doubt we will but maybe the patch notes will read better than "your home systems have been made into ghost towns" like last time? |
Drunken Bum
244
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 15:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:Drunken Bum wrote:[..] I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. [..] This is not allowed and agains the EULA/TOS iirc. Biomassing the toons after driving their sec status down isnt allowed. Theres nothing against making more accounts though. This is alts online. Spare some change?-á |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1064
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 16:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Drunken Bum wrote:Noriko Mai wrote:Drunken Bum wrote:[..] I use throw away trial accounts. Their sec status racks up, i make another one. [..] This is not allowed and agains the EULA/TOS iirc. Biomassing the toons after driving their sec status down isnt allowed. Theres nothing against making more accounts though. This is alts online. "Abusing the Buddy System is considered an exploit and will not be tolerated. Incidents will be handled on a case by case basis and action taken may include bans for all accounts involved and/or confiscation of ISK and items. Abuse includes, but is not limited to; farming gifts, making throw-away alts for grief-play purposes."
I'd suggest asking a GM if what you're doing is ok. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |