EVE Search - MORE THAN 100 FITS PLEASE

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

MORE THAN 100 FITS PLEASE

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 208	Posted - 2013.05.16 03:18:00 - [1] - Quote Title says it all. 100 fits is pathetically low when playing with 3 or more races. Please allow local storage of fits to be accessed by EVE w/o the hassle of deleting everything, exporting, importing, just to post 1 darn fit in chat.
DeLindsay Galaxies Fall 165	Posted - 2013.05.16 05:18:00 - [2] - Quote Nyancat Audeles wrote: Title says it all. 100 fits is pathetically low when playing with 3 or more races. Please allow local storage of fits to be accessed by EVE w/o the hassle of deleting everything, exporting, importing, just to post 1 darn fit in chat. If you mean the "Browse" section where you have saved ship fittings then I have to agree. Why does there need to be any limit? It already has built it drop down menus that can be collapsed to see the bigger picture. The Operative:-á"There are a lot of innocent people being killed in the air right now". Capt. Malcolm Reynolds:-á"You have no idea how true that is".
Roime Ten Thousand Years Shinjiketo 2844	Posted - 2013.05.16 06:20:00 - [3] - Quote +1, the limit stinks -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -
nikon56 UnSkilleD Inc. Reverberation Project 27	Posted - 2013.05.16 08:10:00 - [4] - Quote agreed, it's a pain to import new fitting once you are able to fly 2 races the 100 limit is way to easy to go through last occurence: importing gnosis fitting, so much effective possibilitys with this one
StoneCold Somali Coast Guard BootCamp 177	Posted - 2013.05.16 08:32:00 - [5] - Quote +1, totaly agreed. My true stories
Antal Marius Marius Industries Inc. 31	Posted - 2013.05.16 22:24:00 - [6] - Quote We use to not have the limit. Now we have a limit due to them being hosted server side and not client side. Would like to see the fitting limit increased though
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 214	Posted - 2013.05.16 22:44:00 - [7] - Quote Antal Marius wrote: We use to not have the limit. Now we have a limit due to them being hosted server side and not client side. Would like to see the fitting limit increased though If there's a problem with server side hosting, I don't see why CCP could have client-side storage capability. It can't be more than a few megabytes!
Linna Excel Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 107	Posted - 2013.05.16 23:20:00 - [8] - Quote I wouldn't mind unlimited client side hosting of fits. I can has blogging skills!
Alvatore DiMarco Capricious Endeavours Ltd 122	Posted - 2013.05.17 05:10:00 - [9] - Quote Some of both, perhaps. Unlimited client-side storage with the option to have a limited number stored on the server.
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 218	Posted - 2013.05.17 20:52:00 - [10] - Quote bump, because 99% of first page is all stickies and because CCP needs to see this

Ashina Sito Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 55	Posted - 2013.05.17 20:55:00 - [11] - Quote This is a simple and easy change. The only reason why it was limited appeared to be so that CCP could sell more ship fittings for Arum with the Introduction of Incarna. Since that went out the window there is no reason for the restriction. There is also no reason that I can think of why the fittings need to be saved server side. Although that does make it easier on the player if they need a reinstall. I have hit the 100 ship fit limit. With my PvP training that I do I have lots of cheap ships to hand out to pilots so they are not risking any ISK of their own. I have all of those fittings and then my own on top of that. It is something that is limiting my ability to play. BTW. The fitting changes have been awesome. I recently fitted over 800 replacement ships and it was near wonderful. It would have taken days to get all of that fit the old way with having to drag every individual module, drone and ammo onto the ship. The only thing that could be better is to select a stack of unassembled ships then type in how many you want to assemble, select the fit and their name and let the client do the rest. Lag me out, that is fine, it would just save me so many clicks. +1 gizillion for this. Ashina
Senji Vuran 4 You Blueprints Lensmen of the Galactic Patrol 3	Posted - 2013.05.17 21:54:00 - [12] - Quote +1 to more fittings. Ashina Sito wrote: There is also no reason that I can think of why the fittings need to be saved server side. Although that does make it easier on the player if they need a reinstall. I actually have a big beefy desktop that I usually use to play Eve, but sometimes I play on my laptop upstairs while watching TV or at a friend's house, or while on vacation. I really wish LOTS more settings were persisted server-side, along with this one ... (I'm looking at YOU overview and neo-com!)
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 221	Posted - 2013.05.18 11:55:00 - [13] - Quote Senji Vuran wrote: +1 to more fittings. Ashina Sito wrote: There is also no reason that I can think of why the fittings need to be saved server side. Although that does make it easier on the player if they need a reinstall. I actually have a big beefy desktop that I usually use to play Eve, but sometimes I play on my laptop upstairs while watching TV or at a friend's house, or while on vacation. I really wish LOTS more settings were persisted server-side, along with this one ... (I'm looking at YOU overview and neo-com!) Even better, CCP could give us more of both! But honestly, fittings should work like this: After hitting the 100 fit limit server-side, EVE asks the player how much storage they want to allocate to fits (10MB? 10GB?) and then shows a counter with how much storage space in % is left to store fittings. Server side overview settings sound amazing, but lets start off with something easy that we know CCP can do with not too much effort
Jason Itiner Defensive Parameter The Mandalorians 14	Posted - 2013.05.18 12:15:00 - [14] - Quote I don't see why real-time disk access would be a pain to implement, if we can already import-export fits at any time. I support this change.
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 221	Posted - 2013.05.19 02:20:00 - [15] - Quote Bump to garner more support because first page is completely full of stickies and people are too lazy to click page 2
elitatwo Congregatio 83	Posted - 2013.05.19 04:34:00 - [16] - Quote I'll give it a bump since I wanted this not too long ago but my post went to page 4 or so. +1 agreed
Michiko Misaka Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2013.05.19 15:24:00 - [17] - Quote Bumping for more saved fittings.... And the addition of selectable Fittings Lists: Locally Saved Fittings (Unlimited number of fittings) - maybe let user allocate how much space to use for this or how many (# of) fittings and Online (you can maybe hardcap it to anywhere between 200 and 500 fittings) but make moving fittings from Online to Local and vice-versa a mere matter of select and drag or something similarly convenient.
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 227	Posted - 2013.05.21 13:04:00 - [18] - Quote Bump because this is important to everyone
seth Hendar I love you miners 55	Posted - 2013.05.21 13:47:00 - [19] - Quote Senji Vuran wrote: +1 to more fittings. Ashina Sito wrote: There is also no reason that I can think of why the fittings need to be saved server side. Although that does make it easier on the player if they need a reinstall. I actually have a big beefy desktop that I usually use to play Eve, but sometimes I play on my laptop upstairs while watching TV or at a friend's house, or while on vacation. I really wish LOTS more settings were persisted server-side, along with this one ... (I'm looking at YOU overview and neo-com!) regarding a server side hosting of neocom, i do not agree i have 2 screens on my desktop, only one on my laptop, with different resolutions on thoses, and they both have different neocom config to accomodate their specific size so i can remain efficient on both overview settings tho, would be a plus, and i would go farther. give us the possibility to have a corp level overview profile, would be a must (add a menu "corp profiles" and you are done) this way, ppl would either use a corp level config, ensuring everyone is up to date (i look at you, battlecruiser renaming), or experienced user could use their own custom overview
Antal Marius Marius Industries Inc. 32	Posted - 2013.05.21 15:22:00 - [20] - Quote The fittings were moved to server side to allow for the corp fittings. I wouldn't mind another tab under personal fittings that would allow me to choose between saving server side with a hard cap, and saving locally on my own computer(s) with either a memory cap or no cap at all (aka, those of us with very large drives)

Tierere Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation 12	Posted - 2013.05.21 20:40:00 - [21] - Quote +1
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 227	Posted - 2013.05.22 00:51:00 - [22] - Quote Tierere wrote: +1 thanks! and bump
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 227	Posted - 2013.05.23 23:36:00 - [23] - Quote Bump
Lukas Rox Aideron Technologies 24	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:15:00 - [24] - Quote +1 I already have 100 fittings stored. This game is about choice, and the amount of choices you can make regarding ships fitting is much greater than 100 ;-)
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 230	Posted - 2013.05.25 18:01:00 - [25] - Quote Bump, dammit. This is way better than all of those "nerf local" or "buff nullsec" threads and would be much easier to implement.
Trii Seo Sabotage Incorporated Executive Outcomes 19	Posted - 2013.05.25 18:47:00 - [26] - Quote YES YES YES No seriously. More fittings. Maybe an interface for moving them between corp and personal that isn't a pain in the rear. Is it Hotdrop O'Clock yet?
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 232	Posted - 2013.05.26 13:10:00 - [27] - Quote thanks, and bump!
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 234	Posted - 2013.05.26 23:45:00 - [28] - Quote rebump, until CCP tells us that they have seen and considered this idea
Drake Doe SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 213	Posted - 2013.05.26 23:59:00 - [29] - Quote Come on CCP, this isn't that much work! And people of this forum, instead of trolling idiotic threads, keep good ideas going! "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."---Vermaak Doe-- "Ohh squabbles ohh I love my dust trolls like watching an episode of Maury with less " Is he my Dad " but more of " My Neighbor took a dump on my lawn " good episode! pops more corn" ---Evernub--
Nyancat Audeles Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 244	Posted - 2013.05.27 23:52:00 - [30] - Quote bumpitybump



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.