Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aquiesse Erus
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 11:12:00 -
[31]
Originally by: NAFnist
Originally by: Commisar
Originally by: Jungle Jim
Originally by: Velios Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them.
I remember last time someone from M.Corp suggested something like this...
I remember the last time F-E wanted a NAP.....and left an alliance.
How can an alliance leave an alliance?
There is a corp called Forsaken Empire
|
Vandoras
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 11:36:00 -
[32]
Considering the fact that 200 ships+ in a system would make it veeery annoying for neutral players and the parties warring, due to lag, the proporsal from .5 is a good idea. Crashing nod after nod isnt exactly what i call happy gameplay. The comments off the oppurtunity to re-stock, regroup etc etc, will be a mutual benefit for both parties, and hence makes the argument invalid. And keep the smack out! The suggestion is not a sign of weakness, but rather a sign of wanting a better flow of play.
Furthermore i suggest that the warring parties contact a 3rd party/person with no influence/contact with those involved, and arbitrate a solution to the matter. Hence it will make the gameplay flow better, and fighting more efficent for all warring parties. (Not to mention new players and other corps operating in the repsectable systems will benfit from it as well) Happy fighting, and may the strong and smart stand victorious.
Vandoras---someones alt |
Darken Two
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 11:43:00 -
[33]
OMG comeon guys stop acting like a bunch of flaming idiots. The guy had an idea to make gameplay better. It might not have been a perfect idea or an idea that others want to accept, but it was only an idea. He wasn't trying to force it on anyone. What is wrong with you people and the bloody need to flame everything however innocent it might be.
Originally by: Blind Fear Generally, when trying to be a puppetmaster, it is considered good form not to wrap the strings around your neck and choke yourself.
|
DjDangle
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 11:45:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Aquiesse Erus
There is a corp called Forsaken Empire
"Was" ------------
"On My Signal, Unleash Hell"
-I speak for my corp. Not our Alliance- |
General Furyan
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 12:42:00 -
[35]
Darcuese - I think you got a nice idea, but like you see, poeple might not be ready to act and play with this kind of NAP. There is to many young childs on both side to work!
Honor and respect
- General Furyan |
Nez Perces
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 13:05:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Velios Check your mail pls Darcuese.
/emote giggles.... that doesnt sound too good...
|
Hast
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 13:07:00 -
[37]
no quarter will be given.
|
Treebeard dk
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 13:29:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Treebeard dk on 19/10/2005 13:29:22
Originally by: Darcuese Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play
Darc, I think you forgot to mention that this is your own opinion and does not reflect either corp or alliance views in any way. I certainly do not support it !
|
Aegis Osiris
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 13:40:00 -
[39]
Its a sensible idea from the point of lag, but obvious not possible for any number of reasons.
Maybe for bigger battles, if both sides agree to try and avoid the heavily populated systems, it'd be enough. Having a 100 v. 100 battle in Jita, while a hysterical idea, would drive the node into absolute fits
|
KIATolon
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 13:42:00 -
[40]
Quote: Maybe for bigger battles, if both sides agree to try and avoid the heavily populated systems, it'd be enough. Having a 100 v. 100 battle in Jita, while a hysterical idea, would drive the node into absolute fits
Gets my vote :)
|
|
Anubuss
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:02:00 -
[41]
Man one person tries to think of something that he thought would help everyone but noooooooo small minded people just cant see that.
Whats funny is the opposing alliance (F-E) has posted more positive and at the very least semi supportive responses then his actually alliance much less his own dang corp.
There is one that I will respond to in particulary. Treebeard you posted that he forgot to post that this was his own view and opinion and not that of M Corp then very hastly and in my oppinion rudely posted that you dont support it and ended that with a exclamation mark. Well dear sir if you would of read the whole thread you would of seen that he did follow up that this was his own idea and opinion.
And call me crazy but I thought corps and alliances were supposed to be supportive of their own members not bash them and ridicule them for actually showing interest in something their alliance and corp's are a part of and maybe even by doing so come up with something to maybe make it run a bit smoother. But all the Five and M Corp has seem to have done here is treat this guy rather poorly for speaking up with a idea.
And if you guys want to flame me for this post then go ahead and act all butch and bad.I could care less what you fly and even less about the war between the alliances I do my own thing with the corp I belong to and that is fine for me in the game.
Besides the more I see of the peoples conduct on these forums the more inclined I am to just play the felllow members in the corp that I usually do and forget about the rest of this BS.
Sinfully Yours,
Anubuss Bringing Death and Destruction to a galaxy near you =) |
Mindlles
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:05:00 -
[42]
Uhm uh, is darcuese still 5 and M corp? LOL _________________ http://asuya.eve-killboard.net/ |
Velios
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:22:00 -
[43]
LOL, guys, no need to try create a rift between M. and Darcuese. He is here to stay and the fact that he proposed an idea that would lessen lag for some and might be seen by many to be a good idea, does not override the reality that suggestions like this generally go through the corp, then the alliance before being proposed here, if at all.
I have spoken to Darcuese about this and he understands, he also knows the value that I place upon him as a cop member too and he wants to stay with M.Corp and the five. So F-E complainers with their equal rights banners... put them down and stop your petty trouble making.
There won't be a NAP, but not for the reason that it's not a good idea, but because of the fact that you guys declared this war, and we wish to inflict maximum damage upon you offering you no safe zones. Besides a nap such as this is impossible to enforce and goes against the very nature of the FIVE. You wanted this war now here it is. End of story. |
Treebeard dk
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:37:00 -
[44]
Signed.
|
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:42:00 -
[45]
offcourse im staying. As a matter of fact, since this post of mine could had make lots of parties seen 5 and M Corp in "afraid" state of mind...I offered to be disband both from corp and alliance. Even though this is just a game , there are some Role playing rules that i didnt followed to be honest. And i need to play my role in it. But i got backup respons so i will stay...*allthough I need to haul fuel in next POS war*.
Im a soldier and i take full consiquencis of my actions...good or bad...Not only me, but many others in 5. why do you think 5 stand strong on their feets with fists pointed toward enemy?. Discipline.
Now...of to get drunk Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Treebeard dk
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 14:57:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Darcuese Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 14:45:58 offcourse im staying. As a matter of fact, since this post of mine could had make lots of parties seen 5 and M Corp in "afraid" state of mind...I offered to be disband both from corp and alliance. Even though this is just a game , there are some Role playing rules that i didnt followed to be honest. And i need to play my role in it. But i got backup respons so i will stay...*allthough I need to haul fuel in next POS war*.
Im a soldier and i take full consiquencis of my actions...good or bad...Not only me, but many others in 5. Why do you think 5 stand strong on their feets so long with fists pointed toward enemy?. Discipline.
Now...of to get drunk
Group hugs 4tw :)
NOW GO WASH MY BS, I WANT IT SHINING SOLDIER !!
|
Ishana
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 17:40:00 -
[47]
I say we wait on the server upgrade and then give it a good test.
And by test I mean the excact opposite from your suggestion. We TRY and crash the server by having a 300+ people fleet battle in Jita and see if the new servers can take it! _________________________________________________________
|
Shayla Sh'inlux
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 17:46:00 -
[48]
Idea's not bad, but for various reasons not viable.
Would be like agreeing to keep gang sizes under 15 people for the same reason. I'd support that idea by the way as blob warfare = bleh.
|
Bulletproof Cupid
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 18:34:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Nez Perces
Originally by: Velios Check your mail pls Darcuese.
/emote giggles.... that doesnt sound too good...
ROFL, didnt spot that the 1st time i read it
--------
Phoenix Alliance
|
TURBOman
|
Posted - 2005.10.27 22:51:00 -
[50]
<3 <3 <3 Darc i lub ya
|
|
Roger Dodger
|
Posted - 2005.10.27 23:06:00 -
[51]
Originally by: TURBOman <3 <3 <3 Darc i lub ya
If you want to be a necromancer go play WoW.
|
Shittake
|
Posted - 2005.10.27 23:07:00 -
[52]
Edited by: ****take on 27/10/2005 23:07:25
Originally by: Aquiesse Erus
Originally by: NAFnist
Originally by: Commisar
Originally by: Jungle Jim
Originally by: Velios Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them.
I remember last time someone from M.Corp suggested something like this...
I remember the last time F-E wanted a NAP.....and left an alliance.
How can an alliance leave an alliance?
There is a corp called Forsaken Empire
I don't claim to a political expert within Eve, but even I know that FE is an alliance and what you talk about was FE the corp, which no longer is in existence really. Get your facts straght.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |