| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
393
   |
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
So, if I believe this dev blog :
Quote:Industrials
- All ship skill requirements reduced from 1-5 to 1. We want to overhaul Industrials roles as part of the Tiericide initiative and this is the first step in that direction. Watch out for more details when they are ready for player feedback.
Are all industrial ships still expected to require racial industrial skill at I for the next expansion ?
If yes, will they be rebalanced before the expansion hits TQ ?
G££ <= Me |
Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1474
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 23:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Altrue wrote:So, if I believe this dev blog : Quote:Industrials
- All ship skill requirements reduced from 1-5 to 1. We want to overhaul Industrials roles as part of the Tiericide initiative and this is the first step in that direction. Watch out for more details when they are ready for player feedback.
Are all industrial ships still expected to require racial industrial skill at I for the next expansion ? If yes, will they be rebalanced before the expansion hits TQ ?
All industrial will only need racial industrial skill at 1.
No, they won't be rebalanced before the expansion hits TQ.
With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
|
Chris Winter
Zephyr Corp
V.A.S.T.
108
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 01:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
And the Iteron Vs will blot out the sun... no reason to use anything else anymore, since the itty V gives more space at skill I than anything else does at skill V. |
Irvam Nebail
Imperial Salad Bar
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 02:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:And the Iteron Vs will blot out the sun...
Then we will haul in the shade |
Alexila Quant
Strategic Acquisitions Group
Tactical Research Lab
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 05:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
I sense an ITTY V Nerf incoming. The only industrial that will EVER be used after this is the itty V. No reason to use anything else. |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
425
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 08:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Up !
Still no informations about a potential rebalance ?
Everyone will just fly inty mark V. This will break every other T1 industrial ship ! CCP ? Earth calling in ! 
Do something please :D
G££ <= Me |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
210
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 11:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
So you're saying that everyone in the game will suddenly want to fly a gigantic space-wang? Doesn't it have terrible align time? I seem to recall it does.
Either way, count me out. |
Adunh Slavy
917
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 12:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Maybe they will be reblanced to do something industrial instead of just haul stuff around. |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
220
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 09:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Maybe they will be reblanced to do something industrial instead of just haul stuff around.
Mobile reprocessing facilities. This sounds good.
The Noctis should have had that ability, now that I think of it. Something where you'd need Lv5 Scrapmetal Processing and Lv5 Ore Industrial in order to get 100% yield.
|
Aethlyn
EVE University
Ivy League
225
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 11:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
I'd expect them to rebalance their align time, max velocity, etc. which could pretty much be more widespread than it is right now. The Iteron Mark V would most likely be the slowest to align and not necessarily the fastest, so the smaller industrials could find their own niche between the larger industrials and frigates.
Looking for more thoughts? Follow me on [url]http://twitter.com/Aethlyn[/url] |
|
|
zyk0
Chemical Horizons
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 14:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
Got to realize that the Itty 5 is very soft. |
Anti-social Tendencies
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
I have been making the assumption (of course we know how dangerous that is) that the Gallente Industrials will increase their cargo capacity with the level of the Gallente Industrial that is trained. So a max m3 fit Itty V will still hold 41.8k m3 of cargo for a lvl 5 pilot, but not so for a lower skilled pilot.
I could be wrong of course, but every other Indy ship increases it's cargo capacity with skill level.
otoh, I have an Itty V BPO that will be fully researched on June 5th and I'll start making them. :-)
"Patience: n, a minor form of despair, disguised as a virtue." - AMBROSE PIERCE |
Chris Winter
Zephyr Corp
V.A.S.T.
119
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 19:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
Anti-social Tendencies wrote:I have been making the assumption (of course we know how dangerous that is) that the Gallente Industrials will increase their cargo capacity with the level of the Gallente Industrial that is trained. So a max m3 fit Itty V will still hold 41.8k m3 of cargo for a lvl 5 pilot, but not so for a lower skilled pilot.
I could be wrong of course, but every other Indy ship increases it's cargo capacity with skill level.
otoh, I have an Itty V BPO that will be fully researched on June 5th and I'll start making them. :-)
The itty V has more cargo space at skill 1 than any other T1 hauler at skill 5, I think... |
Galphii
Clandestine Vector
THE SPACE P0LICE
148
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 00:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
I suspect the industrial balance will come in a point release, since they went and made the itty 5 the only indy worth flying with this expansion. I recall one of the devs (probably Ytterbium) stating that industrials will get the same treatment as the barges: 1 fast, 1 tough, one big. And I suspect the big one might become a mini freighter that we've all been clamouring for (100k+ capacity), possibly combined with the orca losing its cargo bay and gaining more of an ore bay. Just a thought 
X |
Jen Ann Tonique
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 23:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
nevermind
Jen Ann Tonique does not approve of this product and/or service. Any comments contained herin are to be taken not seriously and no person/s shall hold Jen Ann Tonique responsible for any damage real and/or imagined due to use or misuse of above comment. By reading this statement you agree to the above terms. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |