Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alexa Coates
Federation Navy Assembly Group LLC
585
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 23:16:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ripblade Falconpunch wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Yes, I'm one of those people who wants to have my character emote to other characters in shared spaces.
Second Life and Pixel Barbies is that way -------> Don't let the stupid looking new launcher hit you in the ass on your way out. I bet you watch poarn movies then whine about the plot. That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers. |
Ripblade Falconpunch
State War Academy Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 23:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Ripblade Falconpunch wrote:Second Life and Pixel Barbies is that way -------> Well for people like you, space invaders is that way too. Go play your silly pew pew spaceships game, I'm looking for a complete sci fi virtual world.
Like I said....
Second Life is that way ------>
Thanks for making my point. You aint getting it here. Not now, not ever. |
Ripblade Falconpunch
State War Academy Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 23:23:00 -
[33] - Quote
Alexa Coates wrote:I bet you watch poarn movies then whine about the plot.
Only when the "actors" look like your avatar.......
But no, seriously. I never complain about poarnoz. |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
3395
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 23:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ripblade Falconpunch wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:Ripblade Falconpunch wrote:Second Life and Pixel Barbies is that way -------> Well for people like you, space invaders is that way too. Go play your silly pew pew spaceships game, I'm looking for a complete sci fi virtual world. Like I said.... Second Life is that way ------> Thanks for making my point. You aint getting it here. Not now, not ever.
We already have orbital bombardment, and ground troops that outnumber capsuleers 3:1, and CCP Unifex is starting up CCPs mobile division. What does any of that have to do with pew pew spaceships? Not much, when you come to think about it. But then the State War Academy doesn't really have much say in the future direction of CCP or EVE Online, does it?
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Drachiel
Mercury LLC
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 09:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
Naomi Hale wrote:mechtech wrote:CCP simply can't touch Incarna for Eve for a few more years. The press and player backlash from that event really hurt CCP.
I agree though, a nice station lounge with a corp meeting room and perhaps some gaming tables would be quite nice for fostering social interaction and improving the new player experience without demanding too much development effort.
Incarna doesn't need active gameplay... tying in gameplay to incarna just hurts the core game. The original idea of Incarna being a social hub is just fine, the problem was just that Incarna existed as a single-player closet..
Because of the nature of the Carbon framework, we can expect to see a similar feature some time down the line, once the Incarna name is less toxic (or maybe they'll scrap the name "Incarna" and call it something else). Is Incarna toxic? I always had the impression it was monocle-gate that was the real complaint and that was geared more toward the 'real money for virtual goods' side of things. Would the players have reacted less outraged if it was -ú60 for a shiny addition to a ship over a monocle for an avatar?
You're right.
Incarna-haters bandwagoned the actual issue so they could issue smug "told you so"s on the forums. Microtransactions in a subscription game is and was the problem. That said I think Incarna was an underwhelming release that needed to do more for ships in space, because rebalancing is just changing numbers and the game sorely needed it. |
Arduemont
Rotten Legion Ops
1482
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 10:04:00 -
[36] - Quote
I'll say the same thing I always say in WiS threads. CCP need to put some development time into it. I'm convinced it would make a massive difference to player numbers amongst other things. But when it's done it needs to accommodate to everyone's needs. If they're going to start, they should start with their exploration prototype which is high content, everyone friendly. PvE, PvP, Exploration, puzzles, and connected to the Eve universe in a meaningful way. If you want it, support the old Team Avatar's prototype thread
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=161511
As a side note, I want to see player lounges eventually. I just don't want to see CCP release them first and have the bitter dicks (I won't honour them with the name 'vets') throw a hissy fit because their "exclusively spaceships" game (if they believe that they had better pull their heads out of their asses) has been tampered with. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |
Nessa Aldeen
First Among Equals
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 11:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:If you think CCP is going to invest any more money than it's contractually obliged (Dust, Play station, Lounge) before Star Citizen is released your insane. CCP will of course keep the money train that is EVE on the rails to farm it till the last second but new game content such as walking in stations is nothing more than a pipe dream.
Eve is a cash cow on it's last legs, why do you think all these plex deals occur and now a total neglect to enforcing bans on botting? Zero investment is taking place and the policy is cash, cash, cash for the time being. Maybe Star Citizen will flop but CCP is not going to bet on that by investing in EVE before it's clear.
Yes, it's true EVE is dying because your assessment is very accurate. Since EVE on it's last legs, do you mind contracting all your stuff when you leave for Star Citizen or .insert some other crap game.? |
Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
988
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 11:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
Wow that is surprising!
My door is still locked, perhaps i need a sony keycard to get out and enjoy the view. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is this game doing this to me"
|
0Lona 0ltor
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
39
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 11:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Sure EVE is totally healthy that's why CCP punted 1/2 the dev team last year... What new content has eve had in the last year except dust integration which it was contract bound to do with Sony? Let me answer that for you, nothing more than skins for ships and a few minor balances which were designed to nerf unwanted PVP and too keep subscriptions up, woopde doo because ship skins & ship tweaks are million dollar investments? Eve is being manned by a skeleton crew who push out just enought content to keep the train rolling. CCP announces that account log ins are up but what they fail to announce is that they are just letting botting and ISO boxing fly like never before.
I'm not flaming CCP for this because it's the owners decesion not all the Devs have a say. If I had a 10 year old product with a dated UI & engine I'd not be in any hurry to throw money into it while over my shoulder a new space shooter & space MOMPG is getting beta released this year. I'd wait to see how much player base jumps ship & to see the threat Star Citizen is going to pose. CCP are going to be even more cautious about development in light of the two crushing failures that is DUST & there vampire WOW clone. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14346
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 11:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
Naomi Hale wrote:I'm mad because I'm paying to play a game and the money is going to provide PS3 users something for free that EVE Players were supposed to get. OoookGǪ you're paying to play a game and that service is being delivered to you. So what are you mad about? How CCP chooses to spend its petty cash? It's a two year old E3 promo slapped together to provide some hype connected to the Sony keynote where Dust was introduced to the world.
It's cheap marketing. It's not something that's even remotely connected to EVE and what EVE players are GÇ£supposed to getGÇ¥.
0Lona 0ltor wrote:If you think CCP is going to invest any more money than it's contractually obliged (Dust, Play station, Lounge) before Star Citizen is released your insane. CCP will of course keep the money train that is EVE on the rails to farm it till the last second but new game content such as walking in stations is nothing more than a pipe dream.
Eve is a cash cow on it's last legs, why do you think all these plex deals occur and now a total neglect to enforcing bans on botting? Zero investment is taking place and the policy is cash, cash, cash for the time being. Maybe Star Citizen will flop but CCP is not going to bet on that by investing in EVE before it's clear. People keep talking about Star Citizen as if it were in any way comparable to EVE. It isn't. The reason WiS was scaled back was because the players managed to get through CCP's thick skulls that they're spreading themselves too thin and that the core audience of EVE is one that wants spaceships. That's why the new game content for EVE is geared towards spaceships, with a far distant promise to fork that part of CARBON back in when it's actually ready rather than treat EVE as a pre-alpha testbed.
The PLEX deals are the same as ever, and botting bans have been handed out more vigorously in the last couple of months than for a long time. Something that is showing continuous growth (aside from a short spite of massive mismanagement) is not Gǣon its last legsGǥ unless you're privy to some spectacular inside information about Enron-class fraud going on in the depths of the Reykjavik officeGǪ
Quote:Sure EVE is totally healthy that's why CCP punted 1/2 the dev team last year... GǪand made sure that EVE was hit far less than the teams working on WoD. Since then, we've seen a pretty major upgrade to the server code; a long-term project to revamp every ship in the game; a long-term project to revamp the entire political arena; a long-term project to update the UI to modern standards; a mid-term project to update the graphics engine; new mechanics being added to the game GÇö all hallmarks of product that's not meant to last waitwhat?! GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |
|
Arduemont
Rotten Legion Ops
1483
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 12:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
0Lona 0ltor wrote:Stuff....
Although I outright support WiS developement, "Eve is dying" is a terrible argument for it. Because it really isn't. Sub numbers, and active players are up, botters are down, and the last expansion brought in more new players than any previous expansion. Doesn't really matter how much we complain about content additions, ultimately the game is thriving.
That said, Eve really does need to look to the future. WiS adds the fantastic opportunity for free to play content. The MMO market is headed there eventually and it won't be long before new sub MMOs wont work. Eve will probably continue to work because it has a dedicated playerbase but CCP still need to keep up with the pace.
Imagine if you will, an Eve Online where the stations are fleshed out, and anyone can play Eve for free. Free accounts come in, and can walk around but can't leave station in their own ship unless they pay for a pilots licence, which also gives them skill training abilities. If you need to move to another system you need to find someone with a licence to take you there. Imagine the tears you would get from ganking a passenger hauler filled with free accounts. It would be glorious. There would be a lot more courier contracts for the carebears because many players wouldn't be able to haul goods themselves. Everyone benefits.
Having said the above, I am not sure the Eve servers could handle the amount of players that would be brought in by a free to play model. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
477
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 13:29:00 -
[42] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:
3D work should port nicely, but the engines are totally different. Avatars, and multiple avatars on screen, are solved problems in the UNREAL engine (which DUST uses) long since.
Most of the issues around avatar gameplay and CARBON have been solved, or are being solved, by the WoD team. They had to fork CARBON to do it, so it's not just a matter of taking their work and plugging it back in--but then, code trees get forked all the time, as it were, and there are lots of nice tools available for merging changes back into the trunk. In the mean time, it's not really shocking that avatar gameplay is being developed for a property where it's the only gameplay.
I believe Hilmar, or someone senior, was quoted as saying that what we have in EVE is a "prototype," and their technology has advanced considerably beyond what we see. The only questions are whether they'll roll that work back into EVE, and, if so, when.
Given the reaction to Incarna-the-release, I don't think they'll do it before they're absolutely confident that they have something good.
Right on.
A good bet to when human avatar based gameplay will be introduced in Eve-O is after WoD has been released. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |
Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
137
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 14:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote: Go play Second Life then, EVE is not for you.
But, if our lives all revolve around EVE, then we'd have to play second EVE and that doesn't exist... o_O There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |
Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
137
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 14:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
Kult Altol wrote:What do want? WiS! When do we want it? NOW!
CCP - And here we present WiS!
Cry baby crowd - OH GHOD YOU'RE RUININ' DA GAME!!!! GTFO! There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |
Ghazu
576
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 14:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:0Lona 0ltor wrote:Stuff.... Although I outright support WiS developement, "Eve is dying" is a terrible argument for it. Because it really isn't. Sub numbers, and active players are up, botters are down, and the last expansion brought in more new players than any previous expansion. Doesn't really matter how much we complain about content additions, ultimately the game is thriving. That said, Eve really does need to look to the future. WiS adds the fantastic opportunity for free to play content. The MMO market is headed there eventually and it won't be long before new sub MMOs wont work. Eve will probably continue to work because it has a dedicated playerbase but CCP still need to keep up with the pace. Imagine if you will, an Eve Online where the stations are fleshed out, and anyone can play Eve for free. Free accounts come in, and can walk around but can't leave station in their own ship unless they pay for a pilots licence, which also gives them skill training abilities. If you need to move to another system you need to find someone with a licence to take you there. Imagine the tears you would get from ganking a passenger hauler filled with free accounts. It would be glorious. There would be a lot more courier contracts for the carebears because many players wouldn't be able to haul goods themselves. Everyone benefits. Having said the above, I am not sure the Eve servers could handle the amount of players that would be brought in by a free to play model. oh sure i am so going to log in and haul them freeloading wow refugee emoters around for what 10k isk? http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984 |
Kharamete
Feral Solutions Inc
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 14:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
Jowen Datloran wrote: A good bet to when human avatar based gameplay will be introduced in Eve-O is after WoD has been released.
Human avatar based gameplay has already been introduced to the Eve-O universe. It's called Dust, and by all accounts it works pretty nice.
Here's the thing. The different graphic engines only apply to the clients. The server doesn't use any graphics, so the server doesn't need to cater to different graphic engines.
And there's been made a big deal out of merging Eve and Dust of late. So, on the server-side, human based avatar gameplay already exists.
I know the actual servers are different, but data is shared among tranquility and whatever the dust server is called. So, the two servers can communicate and share data. It seems trivial to me to make it so that human avatar data is exchanged as well.
The dust servers do the human avatar gameplay. The eve server does the flying in space thing.
It's all a matter of slushing players between the two servers.
And graphically, it's all handled by the client anyway. --- CCP FoxFour:-á"... the what button... oh god I didn't even know that existed. BRB." |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1757
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 17:17:00 -
[47] - Quote
After reading this thread, I decided to check it out for myself.
I thought this was pretty ingenius on CCP's part!
I already got my dropsuit avatar with hovering Drone pet.
I will be standing in the center of the "Mall" and advertise DUST.
You guys should ALL DO THE SAME! More people interested in DUST 514, merrier we all are! |
Roime
Ten Thousand Years Shinjiketo
2905
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 17:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
Naomi Hale wrote: Is Incarna toxic? I always had the impression it was monocle-gate that was the real complaint and that was geared more toward the 'real money for virtual goods' side of things. Would the players have reacted less outraged if it was -ú60 for a shiny addition to a ship over a monocle for an avatar?
This is worth repeating.
If NeX store would have had MT mods or ships, all of EVE would have rioted and not just a bunch of OCD nerds.
Riots were not against WiS, but against the MT crap. Of course WiS team failed to deliver on a grand scale, and game balance had been neglected, but EVE populace is not against WiS as an idea.
That said, I don't think CCP can deliver any major features with it's current resources earmarked for EVE Online.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |
Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1010
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 17:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:LOL you logged into Playstation Home.
Quality |
Mara Villoso
Big Box
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 17:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:I'm looking for a complete sci fi virtual world. Amen.
|
|
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1015
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 17:34:00 -
[51] - Quote
event horizon was a sick movie... thats what the op is talking about right? Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
Drachiel
Mercury LLC
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 19:27:00 -
[52] - Quote
Kharamete wrote:Jowen Datloran wrote: A good bet to when human avatar based gameplay will be introduced in Eve-O is after WoD has been released.
Human avatar based gameplay has already been introduced to the Eve-O universe. It's called Dust, and by all accounts it works pretty nice. Here's the thing. The different graphic engines only apply to the clients. The server doesn't use any graphics, so the server doesn't need to cater to different graphic engines. And there's been made a big deal out of merging Eve and Dust of late. So, on the server-side, human based avatar gameplay already exists. I know the actual servers are different, but data is shared among tranquility and whatever the dust server is called. So, the two servers can communicate and share data. It seems trivial to me to make it so that human avatar data is exchanged as well. The dust servers do the human avatar gameplay. The eve server does the flying in space thing. It's all a matter of slushing players between the two servers. And graphically, it's all handled by the client anyway.
Yeah, but Carbon graphics look impressive and DUST graphics look like a PC game from 2005 running on a cheap (720P) monitor with textures set to low. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |