| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dirk Gentry
Aqua DE Vida
0
   |
Posted - 2013.06.01 07:43:00 -
[31] - Quote
Whyyyyyy....... |
Sarah Telestrion
Telestrion Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 11:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Marcuis wrote:
Now some would say need be elite and have high skills, well I have all the required skills to lvl 5 I have even Recon 5.
[...] I have even Recon 5[...]
[...]even Recon 5[...]
I knew that this would be a bad post the moment you wrote that you even had Recon 5.
Marcuis wrote:
Rook vs Curse... Curse will win as it has Nos and Net, then Drones damage bonus and has range
Rook vs Lachesis.. Lachesis will win with its Damping range and long point bonus
Rook vs Huggin... Duel Web and Paint it also has the range
And I stopped reading the moment you tried to state your Recon was underpowered by comparing them in a 1v1 situation.
3/10 for the many replies in the case this was a troll and not just bad.
|
Meditril
T.R.I.A.D
290
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 11:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
According to my experience ECM is still completely overpowered. So you must be joking.
In my opinion CCP should reduce cycle time of ECM modules to 5 seconds (while also reducing cap usage by one forth per cycle) to make the "being jammed experience" more smooth for the victim. 20 seconds being jammed by a lucky ecm cycle is just too much for a game where many fights don't even last 20 seconds. |
Anyura
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
102
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 12:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
Or...another way to handle ECM is to reduce the number of active locks a player can have, with a cumulative effect each cycle. So first cycle, you lose one lock. Second cycle on the same target, you lose two locks, third cycle four locks, fourth cycle pretty much all of them.
This gives folks a chance to prioritize how urgently they target that Falcon. Can they afford to let it get one or two cycles, possibly losing the target they have selected? Removes some of the randomness too. =) |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
100
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 12:55:00 -
[35] - Quote
Meditril wrote:According to my experience ECM is still completely overpowered. So you must be joking.
In my opinion CCP should reduce cycle time of ECM modules to 5 seconds (while also reducing cap usage by one forth per cycle) to make the "being jammed experience" more smooth for the victim. 20 seconds being jammed by a lucky ecm cycle is just too much for a game where many fights don't even last 20 seconds.
ECM just needs stacking penalties. As of now, you can permajam mostly any command ship and below with 2 sets of EC-300s. Or remove those penalties from webbing/painting/td'ing drones. Right now it's just bad to not bring EC-300s or bigger. Especially at a time where nearly any frig can tank a set of warriors. |
Marcuis
Dotbears with Kebabs
Recursive Error
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 12:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
Seems there is a few who think this is a troll or that stupid.. I am sorry but your wrong.. There are few that understand what I am saying and few who dont get what I am saying but that is okay..but I am right when it comes to this.. That Ewar Jammers are broken compare to its counter parts ( Damps, Distruptors, Paints ).. ECM are the only ones that have what you say chance to hit or missed..Ewar needs a rebalance
[IMG]http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll34/Zuminor/marcsigcopy-13.gif[/IMG] |
Phaade
Debitum Naturae
WHY so Seri0Us
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 20:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
Karak Bol wrote:As an admitted ECM user you just forfeited all rights to complain about Ewar and eve in general, thanks and have a nice day playing this awesome game.
Seriously: You wondering why you weren-Št able to jam three (in numbers: 3) enemy ships solo, shows whats wrong with ECM.
This.
I can't believe the OP is actually attempting to make this argument. The fact that ECM completely shuts out 1 ship from being able to do ANYTHING is ridiculous IMO....much less three (3) ships, dear god.
|
Lady Naween
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
145
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 03:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
I eh.. well.. I am speechless. |
Trinkets friend
T.R.I.A.D
1057
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
Having lost in 8 SFI's vs 3 Omen Navy + 1 Falcon fights, for 6 SFI's down and 0 kills, all because of Falcon, all I can say is, pull the other one, it jingles.
Though I do agree the other EWAR drones need a buff.
Indigently pwning indifferently. Some sucker buy me a Naglfar.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
434
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 05:56:00 -
[40] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Having lost in 8 SFI's vs 3 Omen Navy + 1 Falcon fights, for 6 SFI's down and 0 kills, all because of Falcon, all I can say is, pull the other one, it jingles.
Though I do agree the other EWAR drones need a buff.
nah it only shows how bad you and your team are in pvp , probably total fail fits without support and enemy fitted vs your lame gang + had ballz too ,not like you
ecm is overnerfed unreliable crappy thing ,damps and tracking disruports are just superior
just look at the tournament
damps---> win
ecm--->looose
qq more about how a ship jammed your homorace cruiser noeccm fleet with his full racial jammers,thx |
Oshi Ryn
Pulse Heavy Industries
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 16:32:00 -
[41] - Quote
I fit two multi specs on my unbonused crane and have never not broken a tackle with them all with mid level ewar skills. |
Bigg Gun
Flying Bags Inc.
Bulgarian Space Federation
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 03:39:00 -
[42] - Quote
eh, I recently shot 3 BC's with the help of a falcon, all they could do was die. Maybe next time make em come through the gate so their OGB doesn't help em. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |