EVE Search - Proposal - End censorship of one the largest EVE fan sites.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Assembly Hall

Proposal - End censorship of one the largest EVE fan sites.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 83	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:22:00 - [181] - Quote Says
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 83	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:22:00 - [182] - Quote N
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 83	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:23:00 - [183] - Quote I like viking ****
Jean Leaner Kickass inc Controlled Chaos 10	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:25:00 - [184] - Quote Oh god, I love you manny
Hatsumi Kobayashi Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 29	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:29:00 - [185] - Quote Manny with the most compelling argument itt Sreegs you're really a butte, I wouldn't have thought you of all people who come out with that argument. You're beyond ********.
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 83	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:30:00 - [186] - Quote Cacks Nigerias Jaws Spacs Kites Figs Darius Johnson. Best dream I ever had was you on the toilet bowel hoping when it flushed you were carried away. K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumenK ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen K ungutsumen
David Magnus Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 26	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:34:00 - [187] - Quote At FanFest Sreegs was one of the devs on my pub crawl. He drank half the bottle of Brennevin himself that was supposed to be for the players, and then threw it all up as soon as we got off the bus but before we even got to the first pub. Reading his arguments for why Kugu is banned kind of reminds me of that time I watched him vomit in the bushes.
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 89	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:36:00 - [188] - Quote **** the ESTABLISHMENT
Illadelph Justice Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 19	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:37:00 - [189] - Quote m for manfredda i travel to k.com to read about the happenings in the eve universe. from what i've read as a regular denizen on the subject of EULA is when people accuse others (like PL) of hacks when its really legitimate spaceship business. really, k.com is an eve comedy site. free k.com free fhc
Node Crash Schrodinger's Labs 5	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:38:00 - [190] - Quote That was probably a worse devpost than Zulu trying to tell us $70 monocles were okay because of super designer jeans. And you were doing so well, CCP. Don't backslide now.

Steelshine Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 24	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:44:00 - [191] - Quote I'm just going to go ahead and declare the last two pages a cultural victory.
Illadelph Justice Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 31	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:46:00 - [192] - Quote #occupyE-O
Illadelph Justice Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 31	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:47:00 - [193] - Quote SREEGS IS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 145	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:48:00 - [194] - Quote Sellout Scrub deepthroating that Viking ITT Sellout C unt R etard Erectile Dysfunctioning Enima Riding Scrub
Jean Leaner Kickass inc Controlled Chaos 18	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:49:00 - [195] - Quote Sreegs must have realized making blanket statements and not being able to back them up is a bad idea.
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 145	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:52:00 - [196] - Quote "Screegs" The noise I make after looking at lemonparty
Illadelph Justice Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 31	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:53:00 - [197] - Quote Jean Leaner wrote: Sreegs must have realized making blanket statements and not being able to back them up is a bad idea. i thought this violated the new corporate model of openness and understanding
Jean Leaner Kickass inc Controlled Chaos 18	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:56:00 - [198] - Quote Illadelph Justice wrote: Jean Leaner wrote: Sreegs must have realized making blanket statements and not being able to back them up is a bad idea. i thought this violated the new corporate model of openness and understanding He didn't get the memo I guess
NGTM1R Schrodinger's Labs 5	Posted - 2011.10.30 05:58:00 - [199] - Quote Hey Sreegs, I'm pretty sure I can dig up some old Kugu posts that you made. Probably having to do with EULA violations too. That'd be pretty awkward, huh? Night
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 149	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:00:00 - [200] - Quote NGTM1R wrote: Hey Sreegs, I'm pretty sure I can dig up some old Kugu posts that you made. Probably having to do with EULA violations too. That'd be pretty awkward, huh? The viking lotion spray washes all sins away.

Alice Katsuko Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing 29	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:03:00 - [201] - Quote It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right?
Seymore Graves The New Era C0NVICTED 8	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:04:00 - [202] - Quote CCP Sreegs wrote: It's not an argument or really even a subject that's up for discussion. I'm informing you why it's staying this way. How you feel I look is irrelevant. You sir, are an idiot.
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 506	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:08:00 - [203] - Quote Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? i wish badposting would get you banned, your head would be the first on the chopping block
Jean Leaner Kickass inc Controlled Chaos 22	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:09:00 - [204] - Quote Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? Here's the thing: It goes against everything in hilmars letter, not to mention the REAL reason it's filtered is because CCP wants to try to hide and reduce the credibility of the guy who outed t20 and caused one of the largest scandles CCP has suffered. So now to find a way to throw the scent away, they send in resident new ****** Sreegs to tell us its for breaking the EULA, when clearly half a dozen other major eve related sites that are not in fact filtered promote botting produce what is in all practicality a GUIDE to botting or use adds for sites that sell isk. None of these are things our website does, yet this is what they choose to throw as a reason, sounds fishy to me.
Illadelph Justice Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 34	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:11:00 - [205] - Quote Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? This makes absolutely no sense to me. If all of these people are and have been mad about censorship of a fan site for this game, why would these people not want to play this game? Is that like saying "If you don't like the rules of this country you can move to mexico?"
NGTM1R Schrodinger's Labs 8	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:14:00 - [206] - Quote Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game You must have been outside smoking when the playerbase revolted and forced CCP to make many promises regarding fixing stuff and winter. The game, and all that is related to it, belong to us now. CCP lives or dies at the whim of the playerbase. So perhaps they should have renounced their bizarre, antagonistic pronouncements? Perhaps, just maybe, they should humble themselves a little? Perhaps even condescend to share their reasoning! Night
Steelshine Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 28	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:15:00 - [207] - Quote Jean Leaner wrote: Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? Here's the thing: It goes against everything in hilmars letter, not to mention the REAL reason it's filtered is because CCP wants to try to hide and reduce the credibility of the guy who outed t20 and caused one of the largest scandles CCP has suffered. So now to find a way to throw the scent away, they send in resident new ****** Sreegs to tell us its for breaking the EULA, when clearly half a dozen other major eve related sites that are not in fact filtered promote botting produce what is in all practicality a GUIDE to botting or use adds for sites that sell isk. None of these are things our website does, yet this is what they choose to throw as a reason, sounds fishy to me. Because it's the forum Eve deserves, but not the one permitted by PR shame. So we'll censor him because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.
Manfred Sideous Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 153	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:16:00 - [208] - Quote Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? Players game Players forums we already proven that. In the past 120 days we have commanded CCP take pants off head and do what we want. Screegs is our security female dog he will do what WE want. Screegs you will do it with a smile and kiss my boots while he is at.
Hatsumi Kobayashi Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 37	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:16:00 - [209] - Quote Illadelph Justice wrote: Is that like saying "If you don't like the rules of this country you can move to mexico?" F that, Mexico is where Nrom Gustav lives. I'd never move there.
Jean Leaner Kickass inc Controlled Chaos 22	Posted - 2011.10.30 06:16:00 - [210] - Quote Steelshine wrote: Jean Leaner wrote: Alice Katsuko wrote: It's CCP's game, and CCP's forums, so CCP can ban whoever and whatever it wants from these forums for any reason, or for no reason at all. If you don't like it, there are plenty of other EVE-related forums out there. They gave us an explanation for why k.com is filtered, and told us that this will not change. So whining about it and trying to demand that the filter be changed is rather silly, unless all you're looking for is attention. And to all the trolls: I don't think that preventing people from linking to k.com is good, but that's not up to me to decide. And if a customer wants to throw a hissy fit and quit a game because he can't make links to one particular site on that game's forums, than he probably doesn't want to play that game anyway, right? Here's the thing: It goes against everything in hilmars letter, not to mention the REAL reason it's filtered is because CCP wants to try to hide and reduce the credibility of the guy who outed t20 and caused one of the largest scandles CCP has suffered. So now to find a way to throw the scent away, they send in resident new ****** Sreegs to tell us its for breaking the EULA, when clearly half a dozen other major eve related sites that are not in fact filtered promote botting produce what is in all practicality a GUIDE to botting or use adds for sites that sell isk. None of these are things our website does, yet this is what they choose to throw as a reason, sounds fishy to me. Because it's the forum Eve deserves, but not the one permitted by PR shame. So we'll censor him because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight. You deserve more rep than i can give you here.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20241123/1121
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.