|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 43 post(s) |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
57
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 19:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. "
I don't agree, we certainly do want FiS but that doesn't mean we don't wasn more WiS. I think a lot of us do! And leaving WiS as single player prison cell CQ is a reminder that CCP can't keep its promises. The interview makes it clear there is no plan in the works or even being discussed to take WiS beyond the prison cell.
So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now.
DO NOT ABANDON WiS!! LET US OUT THAT DOOR!!!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Written Word wrote:We don't have WIS because the Carbon platform is a complete failure and they can't fix it within a remotely acceptable timetable. Nothing to do with customer outcry.
^^^^^ This
Bottom line, WiS station was promised before CCP bet on the new shiny of Carbon. Carbon is not a viable engine for WiS. CCP needs to go back and consider using another engine (like the one being used for Dust that will also has a PC version) and deliver this feature. Everyone I know wants WiS and just pulling the plug with CQ is lame.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
68
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 21:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
To the WiS haters, I never suggested stopping work in the FiS content. I am commenting that Hilmar is wrong about folks in Eve not wanting WiS, a lot do! And ending WiS development after delivering the only single player per instance prison cell MMO in the 'verse will be a constant reminder of how lame CCP is at things.
I'd suggest WoD is dead, not because there isn't a huge market for MMO vampire games, but because CCP finally realized there is no way to commercialize a game based on the Carbon engine.
What I want (and I think a lot of other folks) is for CCP to let us know there is staffing asigned to WiS, that they will farm the best suggestions that the players have offered about how WiS would make Eve better and finally they will be finding a new engine for WiS going forward.
We now have to live with a character generator a lot of us think isn't as good as the original one (at least if all we can do is sit locked in a prison cell with no promise of any improvements). I know I liked my previous portraits better.
Please CCP add some sort of interaction with other players in CQ! (you could let us tap code through the walls to the CQ next to us and at least make more like the prison cell it is!!!)
CCP show us you have a plan to go further than Captains Prison Rooms because if you claim you stopped because no one in Eve wants a WiS experience you are wrong or lying!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
68
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 21:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
arcca jeth wrote:Karadion wrote:I can say for all goons except Rho Squad that we do not want WiS. That's 4000+ people right there. so the average login per day of players is somewhere around 20-25k....remember this is down from a steady 40k to near 50-60k players online at any given time a few months ago. so at the current level of average players online, those 4k+ are still only 1/5 of the regular online population... ONE FIFTH
That makes a strong case for it. I bet less than 1/5 of Eve is in WHs, has a supercapital, does PW, has a POS, flies T3, participates in the Alliance Tournemant......
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 23:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dbars Grinding wrote:
Issler
You're going to get 300% more WiS content in the winter expansion than you did in Incarna.
Stop being being greedy.[/quote]
also this[/quote]
You mispasted that, I didn't post that, you should have the original poster of the reply to my post in your quote.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 23:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Michus Danether wrote:I think it's been said already but it's worth reiterating:
Walking in Stations is, in of itself, not a bad thing. The idea of a sci fi universe sandbox complete with cantinas, back alleys and poker games you can bet a capital ship on are all awesome and CCP *has* done a cool job developing new avatar tech.
The main rage against WiS has I think been mostly focused on the following two concerns:
1. WiS takes away from FiS development 2. WiS means NEX
as for #1 this is a legitimate concern. Developer A can only work on one thing at a time and that thing would be either WiS or FiS. There's not much getting around this except for the fact that asset-developers (people who make ships for FiS or rooms for WiS) can only work on one thing yes, but balance adjusters (such as who would rejig FW and rebalance ships) don't have much use for developing WiS anyway so there's that.
#2 is an easy fix, just remove NEX.
There's something important to realize here CCP; people aren't buying what you're selling because what you're selling *sucks*. Nobody, NOBODY! not even the WiS fanboys asked you to release ONE EMPTY ROOM and a for-real-cash clothing store. Every-time CCP talked about WiS people thought "Cantina? Cool, can't wait to go hang out in one of those while waiting for an op to start." nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody was craving a captains quarters as the most important thing of WiS.
Just put out the 4 CQ, build a cantina and people might warm up to the idea! And it's not even that huge of a commitment anymore, you've already built all the god-damn avatar and rendering tech! Just slap some bulkheads together and call it a cantina. Hell. You guys can do it, why don't you? It's like walking off the race track when you're a meter from the finish line.
I just hope you don't have sex like you do expansions, where's the happy ending for everybody? Just commit to finish even if everybody looks embarrassed and unsatisfied after but ffs finish!
^^^^^^ Exactly! My point is from now to the end of time we will bein a single person box whenever we dock to remind us CCP couldn't even been bothered to add ANYTHING past the locked door. I'm asking CCP to realize and acknowledge there is something no matter how basic it might be they could commit to deliver that makes WiS seem less abandoned in place and half done.
I think a lot of folks in Eve would want at least that before it gets totally forgotten.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
79
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 23:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. "
I don't agree, we certainly do want FiS but that doesn't mean we don't wasn more WiS. I think a lot of us do! And leaving WiS as single player prison cell CQ is a reminder that CCP can't keep its promises. The interview makes it clear there is no plan in the works or even being discussed to take WiS beyond the prison cell.
So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now.
DO NOT ABANDON WiS!! LET US OUT THAT DOOR!!!!
Issler CCP showed every intention of trying to financially shaft the space barbie WiS supporters, and here you lot are begging CCP not to abandon it. I just love that, CCP wanted you to bend over and take it, without lube whilst rifling though your wallet and now you are all upset because most players told CCP "no thanks" and they put their plans on hold. Anybody who still supports space barbie and WiS after we saw CCPs pricing policy is a mug.
I didn't need to spend a single AUR to to walk in stations. I could have totally ignored the NEX store. The fact that you seemed to so somehow think WiS is a "dress up" game says more about what you secretly want to do than what other folks would have done. I would have been happy in my character creator clothes WiS and would never have spent a cent of RL dollars in the NEX store.
Besides the biggest complaint about the NEX store was special ships and "golden ammo" which are still coming in some form even as WiS is nuked from orbit.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 00:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:damn too many posts -.- Issler wrote:
^^^^^^ Exactly! My point is from now to the end of time we will bein a single person box whenever we dock to remind us CCP couldn't even been bothered to add ANYTHING past the locked door.
Issler
YES they should roll it back and do away with Incarna. I agree
I personally would support rolling back Eve (except for all the work they have done to reduce lag) to the Eve just about when Alliances were first introduced. Liked that Eve a lot more.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
82
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 00:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Oh my, this is like some kindergarten with insane mushroom pubbies.
Yes, I and many others want WiS. No, we are not space barbies. No, you are not kewl because you limit yourself to a spaceship. Yes, I have expressed my opinion in a trillion other threads and it gets tiring. Yes, such threads will continue. No, you are stupid shooting each other for nuffin cos there is WoT, which I played all day, because I had a rough one. Yes, EVE is giving you possibilities to play other playstyles. No, not even The Mittani can change the basics of his avatar again atm and somehow I have the feeling that is why so many are against WiS. Please, Mittens. Make a more beautiful less Christopher Lee-as-Dracula toon sometime so your boys can peacefully shoot miners instead of the forum.
Sometimes on these forums lately I feel like in Groundhog Day... YES you are in the wrong game no you will not be missed yes you can keep your stuffs You can just shut up. You have no position at all. Following your forum posts and signatures, you just follow what you think is most appropriate at a given moment to be honest. Now, I'm not a space barbie, but I like more immersion. I have played this game for four years and was looking forward to WiS. I have written some more educated articles on why it cannot happen than you copy/paste troll would ever be capable of. So get a brain and then reconsider. Yes, IM the stupid one when you want them to continue producing a product that REDUCED THEIR COMPANY 20% I at least want CCP to GROW - NOT - shrink. Who's the least intelligent here?
If they had gotten WiS right from the start Eve would be at 200% current subscriptions. Not being able to leave the ship and be in a station is one of the biggest reasons I have heard from folks I knew that played eve and then left for other games. So if you want CCP to grow you want them to WiS in Eve!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 03:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote:We'll have walking in stations soon and on a machine designed for it.. the PS3 (yeah I dont' have one.. have the xbox so thats a wrinkile)
All the content will be there... let it happen in good time.. when feasible, find a way to let some percentage of the dust play be done on the pc....
... another option would have been putting out a run of the mill low resolution enviroment sorta on the level of global agenda (which is fun enough for me if it were a small sliver of a bigger game)
the PC and the Console are merging in the future anyway.. or whatever the predecessor will be called
A game configured PC will kick any consoles arse in terms of graphics, networking and physics calculations in general. So sorry, a lot of PCs would "one shot your console".
What DUST is going to be has very little to do with that WiS should have been in Eve. WiS was not meant to be FPS. And a LOT of Eve players will never have a console. I know I don't nor will I be planning on getting one.
As for them merging, actually, the exact opposite is happening.
Issler
|
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 03:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Flamespar wrote:WTB. Response from CCP?
I find it interesting how whilst Devs have been active in other threads, they have not participated in these many Incarna threads. Someone wanna link the dev blog where we got told about Incarna being shelved?
Mostly implied from several "refocus" announcements about the new focus on FiS and the interview with the big "stinky" cheese I quoted.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
96
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 05:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:You guys certainly carried on the debate without me. ..... stuff..... .... and yes, I see I blew the whole "avoid writing a wall of text" thing. I'll shut up now.
Hilmar basically said with the 3 additional CQs and some optimizations "we have Incarna and we may come back to it sometime". No one with CCP has said any additional Incarna work is currently planned.
WoD is in life support. Incarna is "done" as far as CCP is concerned and CCP isn't working or even formally planning any additional WiS work.
A lot of folks are going to argue about what constitutes "core game play" and the point of this thread is a lot of us would say that getting us on the other side of that door, even if it is something simple would be something we would trade for what I would call "special interest end game features" that some of the loudest WiS haters claim to be FiS that they feel is all Eve is about.
I would say Eve is intended to be a SciFi simulator and CCP has delivered a lot of space ship SciFi content but WiS is needed in some form to move Eve forward. I think the loudest WiS haters have Hilmar convinced we don't really care about WiS when I think a lot of us do.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
96
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 05:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
Komen wrote:Briefly:
There are lots of games where you can walk around and dress up your toon.
There's only one game where you can fly spaceships MMOifficly, and it languished for years in stagnancy to try and put Incarna and Wod and Dust together.
So those of us who play this game for the flying spaceships part were rather upset (and it's not just a minority - there's a lot of players who don't like Incarna that never posted here, as seen by the large numbers of subscriptions dropped) to see Incarna sucking up resources that could've gone to making the spaceships game better.
Could it have been a lot of folks hanging on or even resubbing to check out incarna, seeing what a joke CQ was and then learning not much more was coming or maybe folks upset about the NEX store that made folks leave?
Just as plausible, we had a bunch of folks come back to check out WiS, saw how lame it was as delivered and left as soon as they could.
There are also other MMOs to fly and fight in spaceships. What there isn't is another huge sandbox MMO with a player driven economy.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
96
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 05:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:Flamespar wrote:WTB. Response from CCP?
I find it interesting how whilst Devs have been active in other threads, they have not participated in these many Incarna threads. Someone wanna link the dev blog where we got told about Incarna being shelved? Mostly implied from several "refocus" announcements about the new focus on FiS and the interview with the big "stinky" cheese I quoted. Issler My point was ignoring the fact that the WiS has been shelved (like WoD and at the same time - lol co-incidence right?) doesnt make it not true and ignoring that is just silly
From another thread, the official DEV response I wanted:
CCP Guard wrote:We-Šve built a lot of solid character tech that can be used for all kinds of great game play in the future. Right now our focus will be on classic EVE game play, as we've committed to, so all that is on ice while we figure out what we want to do with it. And more importantly...what you guys want us to do with it.
On Ice, because even the hundreds player posts about what we want in WiS isn't clear enough??
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
117
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rees Noturana wrote:yumike wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Few, if any, people wish to prioritize Incarna content over FIS content. That path led to disaster.
What people want is for core game play development to be the priority again, but for the core tech of Incarna (and more importantly a proper content plan) to continue to be developed when and where possible.
I think most understand that especially right now, very few resources can be directed towards this work. But few is far better than none for now, especially if good sense is employeed when allocating development resources in the future.
Above all, the desire is for it not to be shelved completely... and for what work that is being done be centered around building a solid plan for inelligent game play. The EVE player base will not accept the tech being developed simply for eventual use in WOD. If it's going to be in our game, it damn well needs to serve an intelligent purpose.
Of course, but CCP seems to be only focusing on one thing at a time, a devblog in '10 said specifically that they'd had over 70% of their development staff working on incarna since apocrypha, which is no surprise our 'expansions'/'changes' have been so lame since that expansion. I think most people would happily say "Switch that to 20% and keep other stuff coming, we can wait" But in response CCP has shelved the entire thing it seems. To be honest I was surprised with how interesting some of the stuff looked at fanfest, but if it add's no gameplay perspective and is just glitter, thats a whole lot of wasted development time that could have been spent elsewhere. I think CCP has again got the signals crossed and is making a mistake by dropping the idea entirely, but it is a serious improvement over last year, and the year before. I'm getting the feeling that the HIlmar quote was an exaggeration. Other comments sprinkled throughout the forums lead me to believe that there may actually be a small team still working on Incarna. I'm loving that they are knocking out a ton of spaceship related content though. When you don't have to build an entire framework the devs can make quick changes that get to the player base much faster. If they can get Incarna to a stable point we should see the same thing there.
A dev in another thread (and I think I posted it also earlier in this thread) said it is on "Ice" because they can't figure out what would make it fun. :-( They really don't get it.
There is no team working on Incarna other than to deliver the other CQs. Then as Hilmar said, "there would be Incarna" so Incarna now means Captains Space Prison Cells.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
118
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 18:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rees Noturana wrote:Maybe it's time we just designed it for them.
I'm all for that! I'd also like them to consider building it with the engine they licensed for DUST. We know that can be commercialized!
A real common mistake that has killed many a game effort if the belief that best in class graphics is instant win, in fact there have been a number of very "pretty" games that had no interesting game play or content that failed horribly. The Unreal engine used in Dust is plenty good enough to get us our seedy bars were naughty men can slip about and create out smuggling empires or our corporate boardrooms and museum hangars.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
123
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 21:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ghoest wrote: The OP is wrong - only a small minority actively want WIS.
Many of us think it could be nice if done right - but we dont want to sacrifice any of the spaceship development for it.
And yet the thread that is in support of the FiS only focus has something like 9 posts and 12 likes and this one is still active, 15 pages and has nearly 500 likes.
You must have some other sort of sampling method for lack of support for WiS because honestly, I am seeing even more support than I could have hoped for in these forums.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 21:39:00 -
[18] - Quote
So CCP I hope you are paying attention!
When I started this thread it was to make it clear a lot of us want some form of WiS. Something on the other side of the door. We aren't asking for work on FiS to stop, but that some amount of resource stay working on the other side of the door and that WiS stays part of your plans in the near future.
While someone just claimed that this thread isn't worthy of attention because it isn't 150 pages of trolls and personal insults this has remained one of the most active threads for the last two days and has recieved an impressive number of "likes". I would say by "new forum" standard this thread has received a lot of attention and support. Another thread started shortly after this one supporting the oppositve view has been virtually ignored.
So I think the pilots of Eve are proving my point. We want some more WiS to be worked on with FiS remaing the major focus in Eve. I also think we've made it clear that we don't care if it is the "prettiest" avatar experience and using the proven technology of the Unreal engine would be just fine. Also please remove the dependency on the WoD work from Eve WiS. Eve is here today! We are here today, and for now our credit cards are here today keeping your lights on and your coolers stocked with unusual Icelandic soft drinks. So give US our WiS and when you've sorted that out get back to your teen girl vamp heart throb MMO.
We also have offered a full range of suggestions as to what we want out of WiS so your claim that you can't move forward and have to put WiS on "ice" because you have to figure out "what we want" is a distraction. You have been given plenty of ideas ranging from simple to expansive to let us through that door.
So CCP, PLEASE reconsider! Please get a small team dedicated to opening that door! Take whatever "vamp" resources that are working on WoD and put them on Eve. We are paying customers, you are nowhere near having a cent in your pockets from WoD! Let us know ambulation isn't dead!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 21:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:I actually was looking forward to WoD :P
For god's sake don't use the Unreal engine, it sux.
CryEngine or something homegrown, not Unreal.
I thnk the key point is that if Wis and WoD are dead because the character animation portion of Carbon doesn't scale (the real reason I think Wod and WiS are dead) then CCP needs to bite the bullet and get another engine, there are plenty to choose from that they could deliver both games with. But from my point of view as person with an embarassing number of paying accounts, WiS first!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 22:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote:no one said that WiS is being shelved completely. it's merely taking the backseat until FiS is brought back from the dead.
besides, i have no reason to use CQ (im not that into fantasizing or playing with dolls) unless there is a specific purpose to it. i.e. until we're able to go into the station's cantina to complete some side objective, WiS might as well not exist.
they bit off more than they could chew. diverting most manpower to WiS work was a huge mistake only because half of EVE is broken or incomplete! until EVE's current content is 100%, it would be stupid to do anything relating to WiS.
myself (and possibly the other 10-20K) have resubbed or will consider resubbing only due to promising FiS content.
There is no plan for WiS at this time any more than the remaining CQs. That has been confirmed by devs and stated indirectly by Hilmar, who claims it is because WE indicated we didn't want WiS.
I suggest they take any resources remaining on WoD and apply them to WiS or if not that then they clarify WHEN WiS can be expected back. That could make me believe there will someday be something beyond that door.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 22:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:So CCP I hope you are paying attention!
When I started this thread it was to make it clear a lot of us want some form of WiS. I hope they are paying attention to this thread and realizing that it's your post and 19 pages of you getting trolled.
Well, now that you are here I guess I am!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
135
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 22:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
Athiven SkyWolf wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:Athiven SkyWolf wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote: I hope they are paying attention to this thread and realizing that it's your post and 19 pages of you getting trolled.
And i hope everyone reads this and see you for what you are : a brainless 5 years old bully troll that should return in his basement. dude... look at the corp tag. duh And look at the corp and you will see i am not the corp founder. It was my 10 years old son whose native language is french and yet he already speak english and also writes even if making some spelling mistakes. So yes he wrote alliance with a bad spelling. Come back to me when you can also write in french and dutch like hilm without mistake then you can give him lessons. Another thing to add bully ?
I actually believe that is how alliance IS spelled in the future!!
Props to your son for being ahead of the curve!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
150
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 08:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
QwaarJet wrote:I never had any wish for WiS. Do not presume to speak for me Issler. If you did a community wide pole I guarantee that the majority would be against WiS. I hope it gets ditched completely.
I certainly never claimed to speak for you , whoever the "F" you are. I do see more folks in this thread for it than not, so go find someone else to wrongly claim is putting words in your virtual mouth on these forums.
A lot of folks want to have ambulation, at one time it seemed that CCP did too. WiS DOES NOT have to be tied to vampires, CCP could have decided to focus WoD resources on WiS which I think would make a lot of folks here in Eve happy.
So no idea what your post was intended to accomplish other than making the false claim I am trying to speak for folks that don't want WiS, I am trying to get other folks that want WiS to speak for themselves. This thread shows those folks exist.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
150
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 09:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bomberlocks wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. "
I don't agree, we certainly do want FiS but that doesn't mean we don't wasn more WiS. I think a lot of us do! And leaving WiS as single player prison cell CQ is a reminder that CCP can't keep its promises. The interview makes it clear there is no plan in the works or even being discussed to take WiS beyond the prison cell.
So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now.
DO NOT ABANDON WiS!! LET US OUT THAT DOOR!!!!
Issler Issler, it's nice that the hisec crowd have a voice in the form of your person, but unless you've been living under a particularly large rock, you may have noticed EVE's subs slipping by about 20% since last december and around 8% since June, when The Door(TM) was released. If CCP had continued working on Beyond The Door(TM), there's a very good chance that CCP would have gone down as a company by next year. If and when CCP manages to get all the stuff released that they've currently announced, and it's a LOT of stuff, as well as having finally iterated on and fixed nullsec, losec and FW, then I think there'll be leeway from the portion of the players who quit over The Door(TM). --Bomb
So Simple correction. While I might seem to be a "high sec" representative, that is not all that I am. I am one of the rare low sec dwellers. I know, a care bear low sec-er!!! How can that be?? I've been playing this as my main game for 7 years and have multiple accounts, I've been in the CSM twice, have caps of my own, lived in low sec, been part of two of the biggest null sec alliances to date. Other than building my own outpost (which I consider my personal end game) there isn't much in Eve I haven't done. I'm even one of the dozen or so people that have made Eve news make the main steam press. I'm not pointing that out for my ego, personally I wish the two incidents that made that happen wouldn't have. I'm just saying I know a little about Eve.
What I have chosen over the last couple of years would be to build what most folks would call a care bear alliance. I don't know why but that sort of cat herding is what I seem to enjoy the most. I continue to fight to try an create something in Eve that shows folks not falling into the easy path of finding your inner asshat you can act in a friendly and helpful way to other folks in Eve. Basically I'm one of the minority that still tries to live by NRDS. Can't say I always have success but I think in a lot of ways what I'm trying to accomplish is every bit has hard as 0.0 sov. Maybe, maybe not, but Eve is all about finding what YOU want to focus your time on.
So I started this thread after seeing player after player get tired of the limits of the pod and ships as the only part of the SciFi sim they thought they signed up for. I saw a lot of ex players come back when what CCP tried to pass off as Incarna was released. Very few stayed, not because there wasn't enough FiS, they left because they saw that CCP lied about ambulation and clearly was using Eve to pay for WoD and Dust. They left because they realized CCP was more interested in squeezing more cash from us in the NeX store than delivering the WiS experience that they have teased us with for nearly 5 years.
So as a person that I think I could make a case for that has committed more to Eve that 90% of the other players I believe the future success of Eve depends on showing us that this is a SciFi simulator and not just more ships of different sizes 'sploding each other in space. I firmly believe WiS needs to happen to save Eve because without it the player base will never grow beyond the peaks it has seen before.
I share that thought in these forums but when you characterize me or what I am trying to accomplish in this discussion please make sure you know of what you speak.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
153
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 09:23:00 -
[25] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
I think this thread did serve a purpose, trolls aside. People on both sides of the debate found a bit of common ground, and most have acknowledged the sane points that were made on both sides.
I think this thread only served to highlight the number of male players out there that wanted to play with Barbie dolls than GI Joe when they were young but couldn't because of (sadly) expectations and established gender roles. What's next? A lot of male players that wish that they could get pregnant?
Not a male player and grew up with barbie dolls, certainly not what I think of when I think of what WiS should be. In fact until we get on the other side of the door all Incarna is is a Barbie simulator.
What this thread did show is how many folks don't have the slightest idea of where RP fits in MMOs and how badly CCP has failed to support that in Eve. How something as simple as WiS with a corp meeting room, an NPC in a recruiting office or as a mission agent or a bar to gather in would make Eve 10000% more immersive.
Some folks like to say such intellectually impressive comments like "go back to wow!" but I don't see Blizzard laying off 20% of their staff. Fact is Eve can make FiS 500% better and without WiS it stays a niche game and CCP will slowly die on the vine or eventually find a game that can appeal to a broader audience and Eve dies anyways.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 18:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Agreed on the trolling, and yes these same points keep being brought up as new folks chime in.
As for the comment that WIS should be a distant thought for now, I can't get behind that one.
No offense, but I think now is the time for a small group of content designers to be thinking seriously about what the game plan (and game play) is going to be once they get to the point where they can think about starting work with it again.
I'm not talking a massive team, just those that specialize in the broad strokes... taking some time over the next few months to get their head around the concepts discussed in this thread and others... and figure out how to get things moving in the right direction without shooting themselves (and EVE's core game play) in the foot again.
They seriously need to set up a white board like they did for organizing their thoughts on the purpose and organization of Null Sec and establish some guidelines and goals, and define the lines they should never cross again.
I think this thread did serve a purpose, trolls aside. People on both sides of the debate found a bit of common ground, and most have acknowledged the sane points that were made on both sides.
That's pretty rare on this forum.
And perhaps, if/when WIS is looked at again in the future, this thread might just have some influence on the decisions that will be made. Anything that can help CCP to avoid causing anger on one side and disappointment on the other is a plus, however it turns out. You know, I'm not opposed to your proposal at all. As people probably know by now my personal opposition to Incarna is NeX/MT + bad engine + no content. If they have a tight group of designers go back and look at it again and perhaps base a redesign around a licensed unreal engine Theyre using Unreal 3 for Dust... why not scrap the unusable engine they have now and use that here too? Tie WiS development with Dust rather than tying WiS development with WoD (as thats just as dead as it gets)
Yikes! I totally agree with you! :-)
That totally makes sense because Dust is intended to be tied to Eve, Vampires, not so much.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
168
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 19:15:00 -
[27] - Quote
Some key points I think were misrepresented by some of the posters.
1. We lost a lot of subs, that was not just in protest of WiS.
-It was a reaction to a lame single room/player WiS -The golden ammo microtransaction face plant that is Nex (which is still here by the way) -Stagnant FiS and rage over what had clearly been CCP sucking Eve dry while using that cash to build two other games -Burnout when it became clear that nothing "new" can be expected in Eve anytime soon -CCP's clear disconnect with NeX pricing and the greed is good leaked newsletter (monocolegate)
2. CCP describes Eve as a Scifi simulator, not a space combat game.
3. This thread is not WiS over FIS. It is "CCP please keep something on the burner, not on ice" for folks that believe WiS will make Eve better.
4. There is now way to know what percentage of folks in Eve want FiS only, Wis, Wis and FiS, a fox in a box or a train. But clearly to say no one in Eve wants WiS is simply wrong.
5. WiS is not space barbies, it is key to RP and emmersiveness and the community has already shared a number of ideas that would make WiS interesting to many folks in Eve.
6. WiS can be decoupled from WoD. Branch the code and move the team on WoD to WiS. CCP can come back to WoD when they get the increase in Eve subscriptions delivering ambulation creates.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
177
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 00:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
What this thread did show is how many folks don't have the slightest idea of where RP fits in MMOs and how badly CCP has failed to support that in Eve. How something as simple as WiS with a corp meeting room, an NPC in a recruiting office or as a mission agent or a bar to gather in would make Eve 10000% more immersive.
Some folks like to say such intellectually impressive comments like "go back to wow!" but I don't see Blizzard laying off 20% of their staff. Fact is Eve can make FiS 500% better and without WiS it stays a niche game and CCP will slowly die on the vine or eventually find a game that can appeal to a broader audience and Eve dies anyways.
Issler
Spew hyperbolic nonsense often? I am a internet spaceship captain in RL so I refute your claim that CCP is not supporting RP in the game and again, when I play the speculation game on the market, when I plot or when I simply blow someone up or whatever, I am pretty immersed already. Which renders WiS completely irrelevant. Now you are just making a straw man. EVE is a niche game but it has steadily grown since 2003 and considering its age, no one can call that dying and the only fact here is that you have nothing to back that up, that EVE wouldn't survive, which I should point out that it has, without WiS because of its niche nature so to claim that CCP will go under without WiS is just plainly stupid. And Blizzard, like any other "good" employer, did lay off about 500 people in February 2011. I thought you should know since you have done your research poorly.
They pulled the plug on guitar hero because they had lost the segment. Even in the layoffs they continued to aggressively recruit for WoW.
You can ignore many of the other posters in this thread that point how they want WIS for RP but it doesn't make you right.
Trends in Eve subscriptions are not encouraging and while I don't claim its dying yet I'd argue that WiS would increase the appeal of Eve to many more gamers and revenues to CCP would climb. But it isn't likely now unless CCP wakes up that we'll ever know.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
179
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 02:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Azahni Vah'nos wrote:That should tell CCP what the communities feelings are regarding WiS. They got all the information they needed when thousands of accounts got canceled over the summer.
To say all the unsubs were because adding ambulation to Eve is such a bad idea that folks quit over it is just wrong.
I'm not even going to repeat why folks left Eve this summer, you can find my post if you care, but the lame CQ version of ambulation was a small part of a lot of bad thinking on the part of CCP that caused folks to leave.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
179
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 02:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
Elyssa MacLeod wrote: 1) Would you like to see gameplay in EVE only involve Spaceships? Yes
2) Do you like having an Avatar (3d human) in the game? No
3) Do you want to see more Avatar based gamplay in EVE? No
4) Would having establishments and other in station avatar gameplay appeal to you? No
5) What in-game content should be given higher priority? Spaceship gameplay
And your answers would be one data point and all the other folks answering that same poll would prove a lot of folks disagree with you.
But thanks for your early response.
So how are you going to react if CCP ever delivers the SciFi simulator they intend Eve to be and if has a lot more than FiS? Will you quit? (hope so)
Issler
|
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 03:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
Bomberlocks wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Elyssa MacLeod wrote: 1) Would you like to see gameplay in EVE only involve Spaceships? Yes
2) Do you like having an Avatar (3d human) in the game? No
3) Do you want to see more Avatar based gamplay in EVE? No
4) Would having establishments and other in station avatar gameplay appeal to you? No
5) What in-game content should be given higher priority? Spaceship gameplay
And your answers would be one data point and all the other folks answering that same poll would prove a lot of folks disagree with you. But thanks for your early response. So how are you going to react if CCP ever delivers the SciFi simulator they intend Eve to be and if has a lot more than FiS? Will you quit? (hope so) Issler Issler, you keep on forgetting what happend in the last 4 months. If they prioritise Wis over Fis in the near future people will unsub. That much should be obvious, possibly because it already happened. Relax, when the FiS parts of the game have been implemented and iterated upon over a couple of expansions, then it will probably be ok for CCP to iterate on WiS again, but I don't think many players will appreciate that happening after having waited for now almost two years with little or no iteration on FiS.
NOT SAYING WiS OVER FiS!!!! I am saying take the remaining WoD resources and put the on WiS and work on that as a second priority with FiS as the highest priority!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 03:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Bomberlocks wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Elyssa MacLeod wrote: 1) Would you like to see gameplay in EVE only involve Spaceships? Yes
2) Do you like having an Avatar (3d human) in the game? No
3) Do you want to see more Avatar based gamplay in EVE? No
4) Would having establishments and other in station avatar gameplay appeal to you? No
5) What in-game content should be given higher priority? Spaceship gameplay
And your answers would be one data point and all the other folks answering that same poll would prove a lot of folks disagree with you. But thanks for your early response. So how are you going to react if CCP ever delivers the SciFi simulator they intend Eve to be and if has a lot more than FiS? Will you quit? (hope so) Issler Issler, you keep on forgetting what happend in the last 4 months. If they prioritise Wis over Fis in the near future people will unsub. That much should be obvious, possibly because it already happened. Relax, when the FiS parts of the game have been implemented and iterated upon over a couple of expansions, then it will probably be ok for CCP to iterate on WiS again, but I don't think many players will appreciate that happening after having waited for now almost two years with little or no iteration on FiS. also Issler, this is why ppl keep thinking youre saying WiS over FiS cause you are.
NOT SAYING WiS OVER FiS!!!! I am saying take the remaining WoD resources and put the on WiS and work on that as a second priority with FiS as the highest priority!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
188
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 21:00:00 -
[33] - Quote
Bomberlocks wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Some key points I think were misrepresented by some of the posters.
1. We lost a lot of subs, that was not just in protest of WiS.
-It was a reaction to a lame single room/player WiS -The golden ammo microtransaction face plant that is Nex (which is still here by the way) -Stagnant FiS and rage over what had clearly been CCP sucking Eve dry while using that cash to build two other games -Burnout when it became clear that nothing "new" can be expected in Eve anytime soon -CCP's clear disconnect with NeX pricing and the greed is good leaked newsletter (monocolegate)
2. CCP describes Eve as a Scifi simulator, not a space combat game.
3. This thread is not WiS over FIS. It is "CCP please keep something on the burner, not on ice" for folks that believe WiS will make Eve better.
4. There is now way to know what percentage of folks in Eve want FiS only, Wis, Wis and FiS, a fox in a box or a train. But clearly to say no one in Eve wants WiS is simply wrong.
5. WiS is not space barbies, it is key to RP and emmersiveness and the community has already shared a number of ideas that would make WiS interesting to many folks in Eve.
6. WiS can be decoupled from WoD. Branch the code and move the team on WoD to WiS. CCP can come back to WoD when they get the increase in Eve subscriptions delivering ambulation creates.
Issler Issler, I hate to say this, but you're starting to sound like a stuck record. But ok, let us say CCP stops working on FiS and goes back to working on WiS. Do you think CCP would survive the subsequent mass unsubbing (again)? You're not on the CSM, although you were and wanted to be again, and I presume you know a fair few people who know what the loss of subs really were. Go ahead, ask them whether they think that neglecting FiS in place of Wis again would be a good idea.
Would folks please stop saying I'm saying "CCP stop FiS work for WiS work!". I haven't said that and won't!
I am saying either put the WoD remaining resourcs on WiS or make it clear WiS work will resume in some form after the winter expansion ALONG with ongoing FiS work.
Several of my posts where I try and correct folks misrepresenting what I am saying have been moderated to the corn field so I'm sorry to have to post this correction again.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
189
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 00:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Large Collidable Object wrote:This thread just needs to die This thread yes. This discussion hmmm....
So where would the discussion continue?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 19:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
So I played Earth and Beyond from launch till lights out. I played Eve briefly when it first came out (mostly for my job at the time which is another story) and quickly abandoned it to focus on E&B. When E&B lights out was announced I got back into Eve.
Here is what I found more compelling about E&B:
- Walking in stations and dealing with vendors "face to face" and meeing with my guild mates "face to face". There was even a disco. - The variation throughout space. Every system was unique! Colorful and often pretty. - Exploration was required to learn to get around. - The music and sound, in particular how the music was unique to your race and changed dynamically based on your activities and location. I still play the music sometimes as background music. - Humor - you had a good time in E&B. - Landing on and flying in planet atmospheres - Non human space MOBs - Ship personalization - Storyline was directly integrated into the game experience and was updated almost every month. - Immersion in stations, constant videos and ads were fun, even holiday music during the holiday season in stations - Mining was better - Random cool ship wrecks to salvage
What I liked about Eve better:
- Player dirven markets and Economy - Variation of ships and races/skills/carreer paths - Huge numbers of ships - Space was HUGE (but sadly looked the same everywhere) - Larger number of players on at any time - I could still play it and I had learned I was more interested in a SciFi space game with real space flight than wood elf bards.
So WiS for me was the first step to seeing Eve add back what I missed so much about Earth and Beyond. I would note that Earth and Beyond even when they plug was pulled had more subscriptions than Eve at the time. Earth and Beyond died because EA took the resources away to put on yet another elf and orc game not because there wasn't interest.
When E&B died I tried to get all my friends to move to Eve but most never got over the "I'm a ship, not a person" in Eve thing. I know without a doubt that if CCP does get us past the door, even it if is just to do basic interaction, the new subscription rate will increase and the new folks will be much more likely to stay.
So I am sure there are other folks that could tell you why the starwars game had higher subscriptions that Eve until the dreaded NPE reboot as it also showed what an avatar experience with flying in space can deliver in terms of fun.
So when the FiS zealots shout "go to WoW pathetic care bear" all I can say is they aren't taking a moment to realize that WoW isn't a SciFi game and I am here for a SciFi game. Right now there are very few choices if you prefer space to caves and forests. I'd say for the most part Eve has FiS pretty close to nailed. They have the markets and the ecconomy pretty close to nailed, they could do a little better with some aspects of mining and industry. But what they don't have is the immersion that comes from leaving your ship and remembering you are playing a humanoid in the distant future in a huge future civilization, not just some human autopilot in a ship. Once they add that next part Eve has the potential to become a mainstream game. And that means a lot more money in the pockets of CCP to deliver even better FiS.
So just FiS = Eve the size it is now mostly forever. FiS + WiS = Eve approaching WoW in player base. You FiS only guys need to realize that.
(Oh, and if CCP really wants to make Eve better, fix the sound and the music! Study after study have shown how much more emotional connection occurs when you get those right! Most folks I know in Eve don't even listen to the sounds and music in Eve which shows what a failure CCP has been with that aspect of Eve.)
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 19:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
Double posted once again, CCP your new forums are afflicted!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:I think that most of the pro WIS crowd realizes that we can only have one for now, anything else is unrealistic.
Nope, there are CCP employees still going to work everyday that are working on a dead vampire game. Not a lot, but still there. Move them to WiS now. When DUST is done and maybe bringing in cash and when some reasonable amount ot WiS is completed they can go back to work on Teenvamp Wonderland.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
One thing I find really dissappointing about CCP's response in this is that this thread is the most active and "liked" thread in the general discussion section of the forums and we still have only a single dev response and that was to tell us some posts are being moderated to the cornfield.
I would have liked to see even a lame "CCP knows that there are players interested in WiS and we will continue to take that into account in future planning for Eve feature work" from a dev. But the total lack of any response is surprising.
And haters, I'll save you some time...
I can already read you in my head, "WiS will or is killing Eve, Eve is FiS not WiS, add some comments about barbies, some unrelated stuff about NeX, ask me to leave for WoW, we can only have one, I am claiming I want WiS instead of FiS, that YOU can't see how WiS would be fun" or that "everyone quit because of WiS".
Heard it all before as has everyone else. If you are just going to repost that at least keep it brief (maybe I should just assign them all numbers)
However, if you disagree and have some new and interesting way to express it please do, I am encouraging adult discourse about the topic but seriously, if its just to repeat any of the above save everyone some time and don't. Some posts that are unsupportive of more WiS development at least seem to have some thought behind them. But many of them really don't.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:00:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Also, WOD content is a far, far cry from Teenvamp Wonderland. It's more like "I will sleep with you so I can drive your wife insane, rip out your best friends throat, make your children think you are responsible, and then leave you to die a slow death amid the shambles of your life" Wonderland. Edit: Come to think of it, this would make a good template for future Incarna content.
You never knew me as a teen...
Actually, I think even the FiSers would like that Incarna!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.
If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts That was me. For accuracy I was referring to the Incarna feedback thread which reached some 12000 replies in 3 days where as this thread is on 520ish after 5 days
So everyone that seems to like to point out the huge backlash after Incarna has to acknowledge that this was a result that after years of promise of awesome WiS coming soon (tm) we got one room and the only single player per room MMO in the 'verse. What we got was NOTHING like what we were promised. It was the I got you a pony and instead we got a steaming pile of pony droppings.
So now CCP says that four piles of pony droppings is in fact the Incarna we always were promised by CCP "now shut up and play with your ponies!"
Oh, and why this is all the Incarna you will ever get is because you have told us you hate ponies.
You also have to admit that since the forums changed threadnaughts are different. This is with out a doubt one of the most active threads "new forum".
I don't know why but for some reason old forum threads were bigger than new forums ones.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler yeah.... cause likes matter as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts
But half the numbers in this thread when you go back and remove the same negative poster that posted the same thing over and over aren't against WiS. Most of the thread when you filter the same haters that post over and over want CCP to say some form of WiS is still in plan after this expansion.
This reply should also be considered a reply to the other recent posters that basically said the same thing.
Bottom line, I didn't ask for WiS over FiS. I asked for folks to post here to tell Hilmar that a lot of us want WiS to keep being worked on in parallel to FiS going forward. That seemed to open the door for a lot of intellectually limited folk to get to explain to us how getting out of their ships confuses and frightens them. It also seemed to let a lot of closetted barbie fans to post anti-barbie sentiment to try and an hide their secret dress up fetishness.
So this thread should be making my point to CCP, many of us want WiS back in plan and want CCP to tell us it will be worked on after this expansion. To folks that the idea of WiS still happening threatens them all I can say is "F" you, we WiS fans pay our subscriptions too and if Eve is to survive WiS has to happen.
CCP, get WiS back in plan and get rich! Pretty simple!
Issler
P.S. Stop comparing old forum post numbers to new forum post numbers! The lameness of the new forums seem to make that impossible. The new forums are just too unstable to compare the two. |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 00:31:00 -
[43] - Quote
Che Biko wrote:Well, as long as we are trying to bend statistics to our viewpoint I might as well join the party.
1st post: "We want WiS" 88 likes around time of this post. 2nd post: "Abandon WiS" 29 likes around time of this post. 3rd post: "most people DO want walking in stations, just not the way it was implemented." 33 likes around the time of this post. Make of this what you will. Considering I'm willing to concede that in the rest of the posts the pro/con WiS posts likes are split 50/50, (although I think most likes would be in favour of WiS, at least as long as it does not mean abandoning FiS) that still means a majority of those that a least read some of this thread are in favour of eventually releasing Incarna.
Thanks for adding that all up!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 21:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
Cypermethren wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Cypermethren wrote:Calm down everyone.
WiS has been out in full for ages. It is know as "Second Life" tho.
People have even built a town with eve themes in there, go find it yourselves.
Play that stupid ass barbie game and leave us alone to play with our spaceships.
This is honest to god sibling rivalry. Get you're effing barbies out of the sandpit, this is where we play with the tonka trucks girl.
P.s - Mass unsubs bringing subscriber numbers to an alltime low - t he reason put in the cancel subscription box = Walking in Stations crap instead of you giving us FiS stuff
CCP announces they're working on FiS again. LArge % of subscribers resub.
Hint - those people would not have come back otherwise. Our threats were not empty.
Feel free to try and pull a similar senario, but you WiS'ers are but a speck of dust compared to the sea of FiSers The people that unsubbed were upset with good reason. Many of us were as well. Most of us have no problem acknowledging how screwed up the handling of WIS development and release was, and we do not want to revisit that. What most of us WOULD like is for the original concepts behind WIS to be realized, for a sensible plan to be made ahead of time, and for work on that concept to begin when possible WITHOUT stomping on FIS content development. It's all in the thread my friend. the problem is they released teaser video's YEARS back, of a dude walking thru a station, a pub, into a war room complete with holo display. That set the expectations. CCP knew this. They give us Mr Gimpy locked in solitary confinment instead. Whatever they had - its obvious they somehow fubard it up, big time. My hopes for WiS died with Incarna. And never again will i ever want CCP to work on it anywhere near as much because we know damn well if they do FiS suffers - and 99% of eve content = FiS. Can you believe how much work is being done, how many promices are finaly being forfilled, and dreams realised since CCP realised they ****** up and did a massive reshuffle? Its insane. And eve has been starved these resources for far, far too long. I am glad this whole debarcle happend, if it did not, many of us would still be Unsubbed. And i am sorry to you WiSers, but its obvious CCP can never forfill that promice without shafting the rest of eve, so may you're hopes of space barbies die quietly and go away so we can enjoy FiS as it's reborn once more.
Where to even start.
Just because CCP forgot about FiS, not becase of WiS but because of vampires and consoles you assume that some form of work on WiS can't be allowed because it has to result in screwing up FiS. That is just nonsense.
Then you go on to imply that this next expansion is looking like the best expansion FiS of all time. Not even close. We are getting a lot of rebalancing that was long overdue and could have been done in patches not expansions. Some yet undescribed "improvements" to FW, some new BCs which are sort of the minimum of something I'd expect in an exansion, we appear to be getting PI screwed over in low sec, some POS management changes that have yet to be explained, fonts (again something that should have been in a patch), a feature that makes lag something on purpose to maybe make major fleet fights better and super cap nerfs that really don't matter to the majority of Eve and again could have been delivered in a patch.
So I have no idea how FiS work is suddenly "all so awesome" with this next expansion.
You also need to remember this wasn't WiS development assets moved to FiS, this was all but a few vamp WiS resources thrown out the dirgible. So if CCP hadn't gotten themselves so screwed up financially WiS could still be worked on while everything in the next expansion is being delivered.
Unsubs were discussed in length in other posts and WiS was just one of many causes. Also, you have no data to support an influx of resubs because of a new bipolar "FiS Only!" CCP refocus.
So your WiS=shafting Eve thing is space madness of the worst kind.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 02:57:00 -
[45] - Quote
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:So I have no idea how FiS work is suddenly "all so awesome" with this next expansion. Then you're a moron. New ships, supercap nerfs, hybrid fixes, etc are a fantastic start to fixing the game and more than was done while CCP was focused on space barbies.
Hybrid fixes, super cap nerfs etc are all things that should have been in patches a year ago. New ships are nice but again overdue, some more stuff is "promised but has yet to be explained. You have to ask yourself just how much CCP has basically been lying about what it takes to deliver stuff if this expansion is possible in less than 90 days.
You are far too easily amused.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 03:04:00 -
[46] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:This thread is literally terrible. If you want to prioritise walking in stations over damn actual content, go play Hello Kitty Dungeon Adventure.
How exactly does creating a bar where your avatar can sit in type in local about shitfit canes count as actual content? Seriously, this thread is deluded. Sure, once the major **** is done, let them throw some resources at it, might even turn out entertaining but EvE isn't about your peoples deluded "lets all sit in a station with no effectual interaction". It's about combat, wether actual ship pvp or as some put it "market" pvp. It's a sandbox for action, not a sandbox for freaking idiots trying to cyber in a bar with a bunch of other randomly designed and grotesque looking characters.
Wow, another late to the game troll trying to spin what I was asking for and claiming that the only thing that can be rewarding for someone to do is doing just what he finds fun.
Sir, your argument has me nearly convinced..... but not about what you set out to say..... It does make me hope shooting folks in the face is added to WiS soon if it comes back.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Hybrid fixes, super cap nerfs etc are all things that should have been in patches a year ago. And they weren't because CCP was so distracted. They learned their lesson and are refocusing their attention on Eve but you are trying to stop them.
Please quote where I have said CCP should stop FiS development. Until you can please stay away from the forums as you have failed the Turing test.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:55:00 -
[48] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:ConranAntoni wrote:This thread is literally terrible. If you want to prioritise walking in stations over damn actual content, go play Hello Kitty Dungeon Adventure.
How exactly does creating a bar where your avatar can sit in type in local about shitfit canes count as actual content? Seriously, this thread is deluded. Sure, once the major **** is done, let them throw some resources at it, might even turn out entertaining but EvE isn't about your peoples deluded "lets all sit in a station with no effectual interaction". It's about combat, wether actual ship pvp or as some put it "market" pvp. It's a sandbox for action, not a sandbox for freaking idiots trying to cyber in a bar with a bunch of other randomly designed and grotesque looking characters. Wow, another late to the game troll trying to spin what I was asking for and claiming that the only thing that can be rewarding for someone to do is doing just what he finds fun. Sir, your argument has me nearly convinced..... but not about what you set out to say..... It does make me hope shooting folks in the face is added to WiS soon if it comes back. Issler Thing is, i'm not trolling. I just don't count waiting a year or two for WiS that won't offer any real content as worthwhile over content which the game was primarily designed for; space combat. Repurposing assets for uninteresting station adventures where nothing makes any kind of difference in the larger scheme of things over a new ship type or FiS content which in turn could change things is rather idiotic. But of course, keep yelling for it, i'm sure when you can walk around in a lovely NeX store jacket and click sit or stand on a chair and look at everyone else doing the same will add a ton of atmosphere.
Please learn the true stated intent of Eve as a game from CCP and also read my posts before commenting in a thread you clearly haven't bothered to read.
CCP has clearly said Eve is intended to be a SciFi simulator, not just a space combat game. Look around at everything in Eve that isn't space combat.
Also I have made it clear I am not a fan of the NeX store and never intend to purchase a single clothing item from NeX. Becauce YOUR limited mind can't see some activity as fun doesn't mean everyone agrees. If you had bothered to read this thread completely and think before spewing you'd know many folk want some form of WiS.
So I'm sorry for you that if someday CCP ever does return to their initial vision of Eve there will be work on content you don't like. My advice to you is to immediately unsub and go play Jump Gate or Vendatta Online, both are space combat games that will likely never be anything else.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
It does make me hope shooting folks in the face is added to WiS soon if it comes back.
Know what? I'd support that. I'd support anything that would let me shoot YOU in the face.
Cool!
I'll count you as pro WiS then!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 21:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Che Biko wrote:@ Azahni Vah'nos: Nice job with that detailed breakdown, that must have been quite the job. I know 'cause I started to do the same, but stopped after about 1/3 of the thread, and I only had 2 categories. Flamespar wrote:Given the huge response that this thread has gathered. Perhaps we should ask the CSM to represent our views to CCP. At the very least it would be nice for CCP to clarify what their plans for Incarna are given the uncertainty created by Hilmar's interview. I've asked the CSM to request a devblog about Incarna's future, and it looks like they won't even do that. I derive from the words of the chairman himself on that thread that he seems to not be interested in representing any "constituency" but his own.
A sad commentary on CSM 6.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 23:08:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Che Biko wrote:@ Azahni Vah'nos: Nice job with that detailed breakdown, that must have been quite the job. I know 'cause I started to do the same, but stopped after about 1/3 of the thread, and I only had 2 categories. Flamespar wrote:Given the huge response that this thread has gathered. Perhaps we should ask the CSM to represent our views to CCP. At the very least it would be nice for CCP to clarify what their plans for Incarna are given the uncertainty created by Hilmar's interview. I've asked the CSM to request a devblog about Incarna's future, and it looks like they won't even do that. I derive from the words of the chairman himself on that thread that he seems to not be interested in representing any "constituency" but his own. A sad commentary on CSM 6. Issler Put yourself forward for CSM 7.
I've run almost every year and I have thought about it. I will if I decide I can make the time commitment. If I do I have no expectations of doing any better than I have in the last two elections. I think the majority of who would be likely to vote for someone like me aren't on the forums and not interested in supporting the CSM so I'm not sure how to reach and motivate them to become involved,
Or its entirely possible I just wouldn't have that many supporters! (I'm very willing to acknowledge that possibility! )
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 23:39:00 -
[52] - Quote
mkint wrote:Ranka Mei wrote:The often childish resistence against WiS makes me think of the history of motion pictures. Right after the 'silent era' (1894-1929) silent films were replaced by 'talking pictures' in the late 1920s. Many folks -- with a very limited imagination, only accepting of what they had -- couldn't handle the extra dimension added, and started ridiculing 'talkies,' typically by making mock-movies with funnily-montaged chirping sounds (the voice audio tracks of talking movies were still of very low quality at the time; hence the chirping), arguing 'voice' added no real content, and only brought down the aesthetic quality of cinema. Their immense shortsightedness, seen from today, speaks for itself.
My point? Don't be that stupid person ridiculing the extra dimension WiS offers. I know you love your FiS, and that you think that saying 'space barbie' a lot makes you look cool, and that you think you represent the 'real' EVE-er. Well, those who ridiculed 'talkies' went the way of the dinosaur, and now look dumb beyond measure. Instead, try and wrap your brain around the notion that WiS could add an entire new immersive dimension to EVE, akin to what adding voice did for movies; and that history will make it so that you'll inevitably be on the losing side of this argument, decisively.
Sure, currently WiS is nothing more than a (very sophisticated) avatar in a slick looking 3D realm. But as a favorite space Captain of mine once said, "Try and see past what she is, and onto what she can be." HA! I'm not 100% convinced audio necessarily adds anything to movies except to make the worthless ones sell more. And I'm fairly certain it can be pretty reliably documented that WiS has thus far hurt EVE more than help it.
Your comment on the value of movie soundtracks shows how little you know. Watch "Wrath of Khan" with the sound turned off in a room with 20 other folks and see how many didn' like it as much. Soundtracks make a huge contribution to the overal film experience. Hollywood (and the most sucessful gaming companies) learned that a long time back.
And I can't wait for yout documented case that proves the WiS damage to Eve.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 23:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Is this still the thread where Issler is posting over and over with the 3 other people that want Incarna being trolled by everyone else and then Issler claims it shows how popular it is?
No, that was a completely different thread, go see if you can find that one and post there.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 00:31:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes The OP isnt counting votes, just likes (I gave you one btw)
Not really setting out to count anything. Just to prove there is support for CCP to continue with some sort of WiS work in the background while working on FiS.
Seemed have accomplished that quite nicely if I do say so myself!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
246
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 20:03:00 -
[55] - Quote
EVE Stig wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kengutsi Akira wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes The OP isnt counting votes, just likes (I gave you one btw) Not really setting out to count anything. Just to prove there is support for CCP to continue with some sort of WiS work in the background while working on FiS. Seemed have accomplished that quite nicely if I do say so myself! Issler Except every few posts you count how many people ARE fot WiS and who arent... Im for WiS, Im not for lying supporters of it.
I haven't counted ANY posts. And my post started out to prove there are SOME people that wanted WiS work to continue contrary to Himlars comments. I am saying even without counting this thread proves that nicely.
So get your facts straight.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
249
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 06:15:00 -
[56] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
I haven't counted ANY posts. And my post started out to prove there are SOME people that wanted WiS work to continue contrary to Himlars comments. I am saying even without counting this thread proves that nicely.
So get your facts straight.
Issler
Issler Dainze wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.
Just in case you were counting votes apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry. If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point. Issler ah youre not lying, youre making it up. Fair enough
I never "counted" anything. That was the number the forum provided for "likes". I quoted it. Others have counted stuff. In fact others pointed out some likes were not in favor of WiS. Doesn't matter because enough were from some WiS development to continue.
All I intended to convey to CCP was Hilmar's implication in his interview was wrong, Everyone in Eve did not hate WiS and only want FiS. That many folks wanted some WiS development to continue and not be "put on ice".
The responses in this thread proved that beyond my expectations and no counting is required to make my case.
I mostly try and ignore your responses as they are clearly trolling but you provided a legitimate reason for a bump! Keep 'm cumin'!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
250
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 11:02:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:The responses in this thread proved that beyond my expectations and no counting is required to make my case.
30+ pages of you and the other Barbie fetishists getting trolled is proof of what exactly?
I applaud your commitment to content free trollness! You do the goons proud!
But currently you are only an average troll. To move past that you need to consider branding! For example I have worked on making "asshat" a standard Eve term. I for example would call you an "asshat" not only to characterize your content free trolling but to also make the concept of me calling someone like you an "asshat" as part of the Issler brand.
There is a great Zefrank video about branding you might study to help you develop your brand!
I am sure with just a little effort you can make your insanely ugly troll face into a seriously recognized brand in Eve! Maybe calling folks space barbies could be part of your brand.
For now I will focus on my brand by calling you an "asshat" for your weak efforts at trolling!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
258
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Esiel wrote:I support WiS but I have a bad feeling it is going the way of the dead horse where good ideas are unfullfilled because CCP worries to much about keeping EVE dark and damp instead of inspiring and exciting. so i really don't understand the outrage of the wis-lovers why are they special this happens erryday you guys just need to wait a few years
We've been waiting for 5 years depending on how you count them and this is the first major feature that CCP has ever stated they are backing away from and "putting on ice indefinitely".
They claim they are doing this for at least two reasons.
1. No one really wanted WiS. This is clearly a lie.
2. They can't see any way to make it "compelling". Also a lie, there are hundreds of suggestions on the table that would be most welcome be a non-trivial portion of Eve.
So this is worse than most neglected features in Eve where CCP just quietly stops working on them, this one is being tossed out the dirgible. So why would I have any confidence it will ever get back in plan?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
268
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 01:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Scrapyard Bob wrote:As an old bitter-vet at this point - WiS where we could interact with other players in avatar form would have been good for the RP/Immersion crowd (who tend to be rather loyal customers). It would give you something *else* to do on the days where you don't feel like undocking and going to blow stuff up between tending to industry jobs and market trading.
Instead we got: - 18 months of near-zero improvements to FiS because 95% of the employees were working on WiS - Racial CQs the size of small box and about as interesting as living inside said box - Zero-interaction with other player's avatars - The inability to get out and roam around the stations - No gaming / gambling / drinking / social establishments - A handful of clothes designs, not enough variety, and extremely overpriced - Things that could not be manufactured by players (they should have been BPCs)
Ultimately, I still think WiS will be good for EVE, but not at the expense of stopping FiS development in its tracks. Which is what happened over the past 2 years, and part of why the players revolted over the summer.
it wasn't 95% of CCP working on WiS, it was 95% of CCP working on other non-eve projects.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 05:16:00 -
[60] - Quote
So again, this thread should have at least gotten a CCP "we hear you and we are looking at it", but no.
I want to respond to a couple of running comments in the recent replies.
WiS and NeX are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS!!!! WiS does not need NeX!!! Stop claiming WiS means NeX!
CCP did not focus all of CCP in WiS instead of FiS!! They focused all of CCP on consoles and vampires!!! So stop claiming WiS is why FiS work didn't happen.
Finally ask yourself, if you think the winter expansion is awesome, this is what CCP has done in less than 90 days of reasonable resources on Eve, why the heck have we been told over and over that what we wanted in general from Eve was impossible when we have been asking for most of the winter expansion for years. Clearly they had every warm bodied sentient being working on non-Eve content. There hasn't been anyone working on Eve content of any kind (and that includes WiS) for some time.
We are getting the "vampires ate my homework" excuse because if there was the amount of work they claimed they were doing for WiS in Eve and not vampires they would open the door even it wasn't as cool as promised. If history proves anything CCP is not shy about releasing unfinished content.
There never was any more WiS completed than the stations. We caught CCP in a lie. There are no vast station interiors ready to walk around in that would have been completed if they were anywhere near on track for the Incarna delivery they promised this winter. Our subscriptions went to vampires and consoles, not WiS as stated.
CCP bet the farm that Vampire games would be bigger than Eve and tried to get WoD out before the Eve community wised up. They tricked us with the promise of a "new shiny" of Incarna but couldn't deliver a vampire game either. Now once they finally have to work on Eve we see how much they could be delivering if they weren't funneling our subscriptions into non-eve efforts.
So WiS haters, you are misguided, CCP nearly killed Eve for the stuff out of Eve, not WiS which they clearly never worked on much.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 08:57:00 -
[61] - Quote
That interview is actually part lie and out of date. 80% was working on WoD with a "science fair" project to test stuff in Eve. Later CCP statements and dev posts have said "WiS is "on ice indefinitely".
That is why I started this thread.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
274
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 09:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
mkint wrote:Ranka Mei wrote:Travis J Penken wrote:What the players DID do, was to make CCP refocus on the actual gameplay in EVE. What you described here, no offense, is merely the definition of short-sightedness and impatience. CCP had laid the foundation for endless new gameplay. You just couldn't wait a few months longer: new content, beyond the door, was already announced for the Winter expansion. And the sky would have been the limit, from there on in. Incarna would have been a major step forward; but you made them take it back, because 'actual gameplay' to you apparently means having it all NOW. You do your generation proud. Quote: What was released pissed players off compleatly. No, what pissed people off (and rightly so) was the NeX store. People are not very good at separating issues, though: "Me mad at NeX, me mad at Incarna! Grrr!" you make me lol! Divorcing incarna from nex is impossible. It was the closest thing to a feature it had. Saying wiggly legs is "the foundation of blah blah blah" is mentally-ill-equipped. Exactly WHAT gameplay would it introduce? Where are the dev quotes? For the thousandth time /dance is not gameplay. Staring at a graphical representation of a monitor with nothing on it is not gameplay. GRAPHICS are NOT gameplay. You are as vacuous as the CCP marketing wh0res that have you brainwashed.
Dude, you and the folks that keep saying WiS and NeX are linked are idiots! Nex is clearly still in plan even though WiS is dead. But now NeX will be special ships and logos for your ships.
NeX lives and WiS is dead, the two are very different and you lost one thing that could expand Eve and still have the bad thing everyone unsubbed over.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
286
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 19:55:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Stahlregen wrote:Ladie Harlot have I ever mentioned how true to life your avatar is? Because it's quite uncanny. It literally took me four hours to get the avatar just right.
What a odd waste of time for a person that hates "space barbies". If your avatar doesn't matter why didn't you just make a random character and get out into those spaceships that Eve is only about?
Your strange creepy face mocks your own argument everytime you post that avatars don't matter to you.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
287
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:11:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Stahlregen wrote:Ladie Harlot have I ever mentioned how true to life your avatar is? Because it's quite uncanny. It literally took me four hours to get the avatar just right. What a odd waste of time for a person that hates "space barbies". If your avatar doesn't matter why didn't you just make a random character and get out into those spaceships that Eve is only about? Your strange creepy face mocks your own argument everytime you post that avatars don't matter to you. Issler Please tell me you read my :words: post at the top of this page before you decided to go for an easy shot at a troll who has again succeeded in baiting you with a single sentence.
I did. Didn't see much need to comment on your comments. I'd disagree that CCP could at least announce intentions of putting WiS back in plan now instead of leaving us with "on ice indefeinitely" or even better whatever resources on left on WoD get focused on WiS in some form so it isn't dead and buried. You have to remember, WiS is the first feature ever CCP has stated as no long planned to be developed furtner.
The whole point of this thread is to get CCP to tell us WiS will be coming back in a reasonable amount of time. To not get away with saying they killed it because no one wants it.
But in general I found your post to be a reasonable.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
287
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:MotherMoon wrote:Incarna was never a prototype for WoD. If yo really think that, get your facts straight.
Wod was the prototype for incarna. Remember most of us PLAYED Walking in stations at fanfest 4 years ago before WoD even had a single dev.
so suck it. lol you think the engine you saw at fanfest years ago was the same one in the game now. QFT. When CCP bought out White Wolf they threw all the old (2007-08) WIS iterations out the window and started afresh with whitee wolf's stuff. so suck it.
I've repeatedly stated what I'd really like to see CCP announce is they are going dump the WoD engine and start a next generation WiS attempt with the engine they are building Dust on. I really think if CCP was telling the truth the reason WoD and WiS are dead is the vampire engine won't scale. I know they can deploy a WiS implementation with the Unreal engine. Maybe not the best there is but you can build commercial products with it.
Oh, and the next generation WiS project is still a lower priority the FiS (just to head off the troll responses that like to claim I want FiS work to stop).
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
287
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
Stupid question I expect. Am I right in thinking that WoD never made it to beta? Was there ever some version of WoD that showed the Carbon engine supporting multi-player play at all?
I wasn't following WoD and did a quick search (found a really funny post from the producer of WoD that claimed Incarna was so late because of all the FiS work CCP was doing!!!!) and can't see that WoD ever got to beta.
Anyone on this thread that knows how far WoD got?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
287
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:06:00 -
[67] - Quote
So one aspect of the sadness that is the failure to deliver WiS so far is for about 5 years one part of my job was to be one of the primary technical interfaces between a very large Redmond, WA software company and nVidia. I found nVidia to be full of some very smart folks, but also some very agressive evangilists. Constantly pushing companies to consider agressive plans and of course create stuff that requires the latest and greatest gear from the small "n" company.
I think they are definitely part of what caused CCP to bet on technology that couldn't scale or be successful commercially on the majority of PCs today.
Just felt like sharing that.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
293
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 06:29:00 -
[68] - Quote
So we ever going to get a clarification from CCP about the real future of WiS?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
305
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 20:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
So I had an interesting thought. Seeing all the FiS stuff in the in the winter expansion and knowing how long it takes to get that much content done I suspect more was being worked on related to FiS than we knew. That much of this was in plan and being coded while we were distracted with CQ and microtransaction sparkle ponies.
I'm sure I'm wrong but it would be pretty awesome if there is some WiS working still happening that isn't being talked about and that CCP is going to surprise us with it sooner than we could expect given recent "on ice" comments.
CCP, please let this be the case!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
306
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 22:58:00 -
[70] - Quote
Razin wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:So I had an interesting thought. Seeing all the FiS stuff in the in the winter expansion and knowing how long it takes to get that much content done I suspect more was being worked on related to FiS than we knew. That much of this was in plan and being coded while we were distracted with CQ and microtransaction sparkle ponies.
I'm sure I'm wrong but it would be pretty awesome if there is some WiS working still happening that isn't being talked about and that CCP is going to surprise us with it sooner than we could expect given recent "on ice" comments.
CCP, please let this be the case!
Issler And CCP decided to keep it all a secret 'till now so that as many of their paying customers as possible would unsubscribe over the summer so that CCP would lose all that subscription money so that they have a good excuse to fire 20% of their staff. Am I getting this right? What exactly have you been smoking?
I assume you aren't a software engineer. I am and the reality of the winter expansion is this.
There are only two choices.
1. CCP can do super human feats of software engineering and deliver in 90 days an entire expansion. If you believe that it means that everything CCP said they couldn't do, all the things we asked for in the past like fuel pellets, new ships, sov changes, FW updates, weapons balancing, skybox upgrade, engine trails, new cyno effect...... they were just lying to us while the developers spent their days sitting around playing Angry Birds at thier desks.
2. Most of this was well underway already and likely was going to be in the winter expansion from the start.
As a software engineer with more experience than most I have a hard time seeing how this expansion is coming together in less than 90 days without a lot of close to complete when they "spun us" to believe they changed their focusas a result of a loud vocal fraction of Eve whinging and acts of space statue vandalism.
Most unsubs were because of NeX and fear of microtransactions combined with the really bad PR that resulted from the leaked internal memos. Add that to the total failure to deliver any real WiS when it had been hyped so much, a lot of folks that were ready to unsub anyways from boredom and the lack of evolution of Eve just hit the wall and left.
The 20% of their staff was because of a lot of bad business decisions (like develpng three games at once, funding that with Eve and then taking a path with Eve that leaves it a nitch 400K sub game instead of getting a WiS experience actually delivered that would have doubled the subscriber base)
If you really think a single thing in this expansion changes Eve in any substantial way you are easlily confused. It will change the lives of some null sec dweller super cap types, ruin PI for most casual players (once again screwing the little guy), it will give you some long overdue weapons balancing that should have been in patches years ago, some new shiny to look at and a couple more ships to fly. If you had run out of types of ships to fly already you weren't trying enough.
What this expansion won't do is evolve mining, which remains fundementally the same as when I started Eve in 1994, add anything new to trade or industry, do anything to make low sec interesting again, get more folks in 0.0, make exploration more interesting or rewarding or really change 0.0 dominance by a handful of large alliances that own the ubber moons.
So the net net of this new expansion, no new players will come to Eve as a result of this expansion. Some bitter vets may resub but I expect not so many as the game has long ago become boring to them. CCP will have new calibration for its "bread and circuses" business model and know what the minimum effort required is to keep the Jita Statue safe and Eve stays as Eve is, an interesting niche game with 400K subscribers till someone finally gets a better space game launched.
That ^^^ assuming you are correct and CCP really has killed off the idea of WiS, if they are still working on WiS Eve could be much more popular and CCP would have the revenue to make Eve continue to improve and maybe pay to finish their vapire game and keep from going out of business from the cost of running Dust.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
307
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 01:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
I assume you aren't a software engineer. I am and the reality of the winter expansion is this.
There are only two choices.
1. CCP can do super human feats of software engineering and deliver in 90 days an entire expansion. If you believe that it means that everything CCP said they couldn't do, all the things we asked for in the past like fuel pellets, new ships, sov changes, FW updates, weapons balancing, skybox upgrade, engine trails, new cyno effect...... they were just lying to us while the developers spent their days sitting around playing Angry Birds at thier desks.
2. Most of this was well underway already and likely was going to be in the winter expansion from the start.
/snip
Issler
or 3. Deployment of "Incarna" and pre-Incarna patches modified the core of the game to be more accessible and tweak-able
I doubt that. They didn't go back and rewrite major portions of code (POS fuel for example) when they did Incarna). And nothing about Incarna made art assets in space dramatically simpler, or SOV mechanics changes easer, or ship and weapons balancing easier.
The skybox fix has been in the works for some time, clearly the new ship models were. In fact so far the only thing from the winter patch that Incarna probably enabled is the "space barbie" feature of being able to view and spin the current avatar of other players. That looks like a last gasp desperate effort to develop interest in NeX store clothing.
(I really hate to say space barbie in this thread as something that CCP intended but the latest dev blog about character spinning is space barbie)
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
308
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 02:17:00 -
[72] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Issler's words "What this expansion won't do is evolve mining, which remains fundementally the same as when I started Eve in 1994, add anything new to trade or industry, do anything to make low sec interesting again, get more folks in 0.0, make exploration more interesting or rewarding or really change 0.0 dominance by a handful of large alliances that own the ubber moons."
the above is still much more important than wis also you mean 2004 instead of 1994?
Dooh! I have been playing Eve in my head since 1994 but techically, on the intertubes since 2004! Thanks for pointing that out!
If CCP had come out and said "WIS is on hold till we totally revamp mining and the moon mineral mess (One word comets!) and then we'll get back to the stations stuff" I'd be doing the "happy miner dance!". But I still believe WiS is key to the long term health of Eve and the sooner they get some part of it done the sooner they break a million subscribers. If they never get back to it I'm predicting 350K subscribers this time next year and 250K in 2013 no matter how many new ships they introduce.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 07:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
yumike wrote:@issler and a few others The reason FiS people are so pissed is because we haven't had any noticeable changes (aside from some sov changes that we've been waiting since like '06 for) SINCE '08's fall expansion.
Nobody outright hates WiS, If they want to do that fine. But when devblogs talk about how 70%+ of their development staff is actively working on it and half the remaining staff are "tq maintenance staff" yes people are likely to get a tad pissed. We were stagnant for years.
@ Development time It hasn't been 3 months, they announced their changes in august - its been 5 months.
And I feel the need to remind you that these changes have been ignored for years, some were even previously implemented.
POS fuel? Wow. So we added 4 new blueprints, 4 new items, and changed fuel type on a tower. That took an artist a couple days to do the art for, a database manager an hour and some minor code changes that maybe took a team of five two days to do?
Engine trails? Code already existed, Probably tweaked and thrown back in with updated art. A couple artists two weeks? New cyno effect? See above. Nothing game changing.
The warping through celestials objects on the other hand is new.. and would of *gasp* required new code to be written, again most the changes here are superficial and could of almost completely been handled via graphics, likely just a check written in to see if a celestial was between you and your target warp destination & at what point it was, so it knows when to trigger said effect.
The majority of the development time is likely artists working on the new ships. The guy's doing the real programming long ago developed a quick way to drop new items in and make sure everythings in place, including ships. (If they haven't then they are crazy, to be frank it was one of the first things I did when working on a certain other MMO I developed.)
None of these are massive changes, And to be honest I imagine polishing will be where the most development time is going at the moment. And features like UI scaling (for absolutely everything, which is a much more grand task then adding a new fuel type for e.g.)
@ the idea that incarna will bring new players.. Your right, I think it will too. Your numbers however are a bit ridiculous, Sub numbers double because we can walk around in a station? Granted a few probably (Hundreds and i'm being generous here) will likely do just that.. But eve is NICHE and the maingame *IS* FiS. You are being ludicrous (and probably realize this, but are just being stubborn) Even if gameplay was added to it (Like those minigames we saw at fanfest year after year.) Again it would attract how many people?
If you've ever played other MMO's with minigames in them (RF, WoW, etc) You'd know there was a few people that maybe did them *alot* but at most it was half a dozen people a realm, out of the hundreds of thousands that play them. I find it highly unlikely EVE will be at all different and would honestly like you to cite me an example of where it DOUBLED a playerbase because of a minigame that didn't really matter, I will happily correct myself and tell you how right you are and how wrong I am I love learning new things so please - do!
edit:: because after skimming over my post, it may sound like I am hating on WiS and this is false. I like EVE, however - This means I don't want it to be stagnant, i want it to see changes, balancing, additions. "Look a salvaging ship!" isnt an addition. nor is it an expansion. If CCP feels it seriously can't handle doing both WiS and FiS, Then that's fine of course it shouldn't bite the hand that has fed it (And, let's not beat around the bush - that is very much the current playerbase not the potential playerbase). This should be common sense, Especially for a business! The fact that they got away with it for as long as they did, doesn't make anyone QQ'ers. It doesn't mean your bad FiS players, it doesn't mean you are whiney WiS players - It means they made poor decisions and are correcting them. You may disagree with that - and there is nothing wrong with that so long as you have reasoning behind it that isn't fallacious.
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -Harlan Ellison
Refocus announcement was 2011.10.19 13:24. Search the forums for the announcement.
All the work was on the vampire game, NeX store and dust, not WiS. Do you think CCP is so incapable that one CQ is all that can be delivered in 3 years of effort?
So I agree POS fuel was pretty easy. We should all be hella pissed that we didn't get that sooner, Should have been in a patch. No parties and balloons for CCP for that.
Engine trails, seriously, who cares. Cyno effect, about time, it was better before they broke it.
I think if I really unwind what I'm trying to say, CCP has spun us once again, This was all incremental work that could have happened long ago. Celebration of this expansion is celebrating the greatest spin job in CCP history.
For a while a big part of my job was to evaluate of MMOs. I have also been trying to drag other gaming friends into Eve since I started. Almost all of them tried Eve and left soon after. The inability of them to leave their ship and be in the station was cited as the reason for not liking Eve more often than any other factor. They couldn't understand how something so simple was left out. So I am confident in my subscription predictions.
We saw all the unsubs WiS was was going to cause already. Most of those called WiS unsubs were actually other reasons. So we kill the future for the bitter vets is not a solution for long term health. All I wanted when I started this thread was CCP to say WiS is still in plan in a reasonable amount of time.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:28:00 -
[74] - Quote
I am sad that CCP hasn't even bothered an update on this subject.
I guess WiS will take its place next to FW and the next phase of T3, WHs and Cosmos.
Way to go CCP!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 02:18:00 -
[75] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I am sad that CCP hasn't even bothered an update on this subject. I guess WiS will take its place next to FW and the next phase of T3, WHs and Cosmos. Way to go CCP! Issler You guys who are all concerned about dressup, are getting 3 new stations to walk in, and probably some new clothes will be coming in. (CCP doesn't really advertise this much because, unlike some people, they have figured out their demographic doesn't really care about dress up.) FW is only geting a bpc sold cheaper in its lp store as best anyone can tell. You don't have the right to ***** like FW players. If you want some new pair of pants then start a proposal in assembly hall. Thats what we had to do for what we wanted in fw. 3 years after they were accepted by csm we are still waiting. You can complain after ccp has an incarna roundtable at fanfest, that no devs show up at it. In the meantime why don't you be happy that ccp is working on both fis and wis. Or are you only happy when ccp was only working on WIS like they were for the last 20 months?
Sad panda, how your life must be challenged living in a fact free universe.
WiS is not "dress up". Train "creativity" to at least lvl 2 to understand how your world view is so limited.
FW was initially implemented with a fair amount of functionality. WiS was not. The only single player instance MMORPG experience in the history of computer gaming. And all work in WiS is "on ice". They are NOT working on both. The are finally delivering something already developed related to WiS.
And your false claim they were only working on WiS for the last 20 months shows you are either a troll of daft. They were focused on other games.
And I created alts and alt corps just for FW so I have direct experience with the appointment's that has been. Oh, and CCP has said FW work will be delivered in patches post the expansion, where WiS is dead after the expansion. So at least read a little before you post krap.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 06:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I am sad that CCP hasn't even bothered an update on this subject. I guess WiS will take its place next to FW and the next phase of T3, WHs and Cosmos. Way to go CCP! Issler You guys who are all concerned about dressup, are getting 3 new stations to walk in, and probably some new clothes will be coming in. (CCP doesn't really advertise this much because, unlike some people, they have figured out their demographic doesn't really care about dress up.) FW is only geting a bpc sold cheaper in its lp store as best anyone can tell. You don't have the right to ***** like FW players. If you want some new pair of pants then start a proposal in assembly hall. Thats what we had to do for what we wanted in fw. 3 years after they were accepted by csm we are still waiting. You can complain after ccp has an incarna roundtable at fanfest, that no devs show up at it. In the meantime why don't you be happy that ccp is working on both fis and wis. Or are you only happy when ccp was only working on WIS like they were for the last 20 months? Sad panda, how your life must be challenged living in a fact free universe. WiS is not "dress up". Train "creativity" to at least lvl 2 to understand how your world view is so limited. FW was initially implemented with a fair amount of functionality. WiS was not. The only single player instance MMORPG experience in the history of computer gaming. And all work in WiS is "on ice". They are NOT working on both. The are finally delivering something already developed related to WiS...... Issler Ok you mean they already did all the work for the other 3 stations but just decided we would be overwhelmed if they released them with the minmatar station? You are not even making any sense. They didn't release them because they needed more work. They did the work leading up to this expansion and so they can now release them. You have to try to be creative to consider "walking in stations" something other than dress up. But whatever. Just because I don't want to play "Walking in stations" doesn't mean I am somehow uncreative. Here are 2 dev blogs about dress up https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=33595&find=unreadhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=16055&find=unreadNow can you show me the one for fw? Now that you I pointed these facts out to you, maybe you will realize we are living in the same universe, and it is not fact free.
They said the other three stations weren't totally complete when the first one shipped and they were going to finish them up as patches after Incarna was first released. They then added them to the "expansion"/patch called "Crucible".
There isn't a blog about FW but in the last of the dev comments about the expansion the said FW was coming shortly after the expansion was deployed so they haven't shared what but FW is being worked on. They have made it cleat the WiS is no longer being worked on after this expansion.
And CCP has never posted about "dress up", calling WiS that is a typical troll comment.
You called it "dress up" so you are limited in your ability to comprehend how something might be enjoyable to someone other than you. That you only see it that way immediately disqualifies you from any conversation about WiS.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 20:23:00 -
[77] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I am sad that CCP hasn't even bothered an update on this subject.
..... They have made it cleat the WiS is no longer being worked on after this expansion....
Issler Which is it Issler? They came out with 2 dev blogs (maybe more there was one about shaders with your avatar too) about changes in the latest expansion dealing with WIS, and you pout. Are you upset that its no longer the case that every dev blog is talking about WIS? And sorry, the fact that I recognize wis is really just dress up does not make me a troll. It makes me a realist. I see things for what they are. You seem so obsessed with some vision of what you think computer gaming and walking in stations will be in the year 3000 that you are missing reality. Reality is WIS is Dress up.
And the CEO said the are stopping further work on WiS because the Eve player base rejected it (what started this thread) and then another developer said WiS was "on ice indefinitely" because CCP couldn't see how to make it compelling.
So read more before posting.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.24 03:10:00 -
[78] - Quote
Traelox wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There are too many misconceptions in this post for it to be relevant. lol, so I've got one guy saying I invented a new type of make-believe math, and now you chalk my perception and opinions on the game up as misconceptions that are thus irrelevant. Let me put it to you straight so there's no confusion. My post summarized: 1) FiS is what started this game 2) People came to the game (and stayed) for FiS (as I also said, if you were banking on a major shift to WiS, sucks to be you) 3) The game will always be about FiS, else why is it a space-sim and not an upgraded graphics version of second life? 4) There are not enough people FiS right now to consider eve crowded or massive or making full use of the available FiS content. 5) Any more reasons to give people content that is not FiS will result in even fewer people FiS, thus that content is bad for FiS. 6) WiS or any other non FiS content piece will not win over enough users from other MMOs to make up for the lost FiS interaction as a result of introducing non FiS content. 6) **** WiS 7) Good job on EVE CCP, me love you long time. Agree or disagree, but my make believe math and irrelevant opinions are neither. New bottom line summary statement for my position on this topic:Even if WiS is the greatest thing since sliced bread, it is not good for EvE because it will take player-hours AWAY from FiS. As soon as a player makes the choice to stay WiS, that has an instant, tangible, and irreplaceable impact on the MMO environment of FiS. If you purport that WiS will augment or enhance FiS (as I saw in a previous post) Show me how player-hours spent WiS can ever be replaced in FiS. You can't prove it because it's a "0"-sum equation. Players are either WiS or FiS at any moment in time. Limit the interest in WiS and keep people undocking to play the game. Please.
CCP says Eve is a scifi simulation. Not just a space game. Already enough none FiS content to prove that.
Sorry, you fail.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 01:56:00 -
[79] - Quote
Botleten wrote:ITT 55 pages of people whining about how they want more space ken doll dress up time
Troll, thanks for the bump, please respond with some snark. We need the thread to stay on the first page!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 23:53:00 -
[80] - Quote
Mekela wrote:CCP made the decision to remake the wheel. If they had done it they would have been able to sell their avatar engine to other people. It was higher resolution than anything anyone has out there right now. They failed and with it have screwed themselves over badly
What should have been done. Use an already established avatar engine (see unreal) Worked on their new engine and not make their established game the guinea pig for the new engine.
Secondly - The Nex problem, Nex should have never been done this way. Free to Play games are a genre that will stick around but in no way will the replace subscription games, FTP games are for subscription games that failed and need a re-boot or are originally designed to be FTP neither suited Eve online.
I think you nailed all the key points.
|
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 19:21:00 -
[81] - Quote
Daemon Ceed wrote:Before CCP even spends another dime on WiS, a majority of us agree that the following needs to be fixed:
1.) Greater incentive to live in 0.0 and hold Sov there 2.) Fix lowsec, ffs. Besides roams, there's hardly any reason to be there. The fact that lowsec is mostly empty should be a clear sign of that. 3.) Make highsec Incursions less profitable so more people are enticed to try 0.0 once you complete problem #1 4.) Fix at least 70% of all the things on the "Sucking Chest Wounds" and "Papercuts" list 5.) Make a more intuitive UI that doesn't wear out my mouse every 3 months and totally scare off new players to the game. 6.) Fix POS's, please! They need a total redesign beyond just fuel blocks. 7.) Make more T2 BPO's available to those who didn't get lucky in the first lottery. Price and production competition is good! 8.) Rebalance distribution of tech moons.
Then, and only then, should you even fathom working on WiS again.
I think you'll have to prove your sampling method before I'd believe that list.
For example I bet I could find more players that would rather have a big mining improvement than care about half of the stuff on your list and I know there are more folks that want WiS than care about high sec incursions.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 19:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
Roime wrote:Nope, majority of us doesn't agree, that is just your list.
Also, in the last patch CCP delivered both FiS and WiS.
Sadly WiS that was almost completed alread as part of the last expansion and largely already finished. Likely to be the last WiS content other than lame NeX clothes for a long long long long long long long time.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 19:37:00 -
[83] - Quote
Come on CCP! It's time you respond to this thread!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 23:03:00 -
[84] - Quote
Come on CCP, a response please!
Thread stats so far
Replies - 1,150
Reads - 26,072
Likes - 1,775 |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 00:50:00 -
[85] - Quote
Niko Takahashi wrote:Flamespar wrote:Zevina wrote:WiS will be very popular as soon as player interactive aspects are implemented. Having a full body character preview was the first step in the right direction. Now other players can at least see how you dressed up your space barbie. Thats cool. I for one love it and hope all the cool announced features will come out sometime soon.
WiS is a whole new level. Playing Sims in Eve will bring lots of new players, its cool! :) I agree. No it will bring a lot of trials that will just disappear it is all fluff and unimportant fluff. No matter how bad the original UI was the CQ UI is even worse. It will bring nothing new to the game. Might get interested on few things but only for the oh ok cool 2 weeks period and then most people will turn it off. So millions wasted on development for 14 day trial spike YEYYYY.
You can have no way of knowing that until we see what they would roll out next. Like it or not a fair amount of time in many Eve pilots lives are spent docked. I mean they even brought back the ship spinner!! So something to occupy your time in a more engaging fashion will make Eve better.
Even if a large percentage of folks leave after giving Eve a try because they hear there is a new experience that still means some folks stay. Nothing about a FiS only focus will get Eve out of nitch game status.
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:59:00 -
[86] - Quote
Come on CCP, an answer please!!!
Keeping the thread alive till we get a CCP response! |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 22:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Come on CCP, a response please!
Thread stats so far
Replies - 1,150
Reads - 26,072
Likes - 1,775 You bumped this to the top of eve general for a month an half and received only 136 likes for your op claiming "some of us do want incarna." As was mentioned earlier there have already been 2 devblogs on incarna for the crucible release. Perhaps due to a mass exodus from the game when incarna was all we ever heard about, it is not the golden child anymore. Perhaps your expectations that ccp will talk about incarna every dev blog should be adjusted.
Many bumped this thread. Someone did the tedium of adding the actual pro WiS likes in the thread and they were way more supporting continued WiS development than not. I'm not going to do your work for you, go tally them yourself if you want to prove me wrong.
There have been NO dev blog since this thread was started that say anything about WiS after completion of the delivery of thw work in progress when the summer expansion was released. Yes, two developers to finishes the CQs that were meant to launch this summer. Not a word about after that.
I want ANY dev blog about WiS plans going forward after Crucible.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 02:12:00 -
[88] - Quote
Midnight Hope wrote:Taius Pax wrote:Psychophantic wrote:It's obvious WiS is popular.
Look at the numbers for June and Incarna and compare them to current Crucible numbers. Incarna attracted a lot more attention.
Incarna's what caused that huge drop in subscriptions. The community backlash against Incarna was so bad and subscription losses substantial enough they had to lay people off and practically shelve development on their other MMO - World of Darkness. I think the message was pretty clear. You are right, Incarna sucked, but Incarna was not WiS. Equating them is a mistake. Even from the WiS perpective, Incarna sucked. The backlash was because of the lack of content (only one CQ with the door closed), gameplay and the NEX-T-2-useless Store. I, for one, want to get more WiS. CCP has to find the right balance or FiS and WiS in each expansion. I would love to explore an abandoned BS or Space Station. I would love to hang out in my Corp lounge/offices. I would like to stroll down Jita promenade.
Midnight, excellent ideas!!! CCP hire this person immediately!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 00:53:00 -
[89] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Rek Seven wrote: I just don't want incarna to be added to list of content that feels half finished in this game and I can't see how I can be expected to support the game when they are this quick to go back on their promises and waste my money developing unthoughtout content.
Heart of the matter. CCP has a long way to go on restoring confidence. Personally I think remaining silent on the future of WiS does not help, or ignoring this thread, which has been going on for well over a month. Lately I've been thinking that the reason that CCP is silent regarding WiS is because they are trying to distance themselves from the ****-up which was Incarna. Will players leave until WiS is actually implemented? I'm definitely going to take a break because of it. IGÇÖm just tired of CCP promising the world and then delivering nothing. Lots of players play this game as they like where the game was heading, and wanted to be part of that journey. But now, itGÇÖs lost some of its magic.
When I started this thread all I really wanted was a definitive response from CCP. A month later and how many supporting posts and not a peep.
Lame CCP!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 07:16:00 -
[90] - Quote
This is truly the thread that "may not be mentioned" by CCP!
I honestly think that can only mean on thing. There is a fundamental issue with the avatar rendering and animation engine that won't scale and render on hardware currently available on this plane of existence. nVidia sold CCP a barrel of snake oil and got them to bet on a tech science fair project and to deploy any more WiS on this tech would result in global fire storms as everyones PC catches on fire.
If this isn't a tech issue then I am sure we would at least have gotten some "weasel words" about getting back to WiS in some form soon.
Sadly the laws of physics have done CCP in.
I'm throwing down the gauntlet CCP, if it isn't a tech issue then put the WiS with multi-avatar in a station that you were so close to deploying on the test server so we can see it, even if it doesn't have interaction other than a lot of us walking around in a box.
Otherwise let us know when we see WiS re-coded on an engine that can be deployed.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 22:22:00 -
[91] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Quote:Check old Fanfest videos from 2006-2009, you'll see all their lies an bullshit about their incarna *vision* there. I don,t think they are lies ,and that vision on WIS that time was great . Incarna had only a single room portion of WIS . Only 1 thing left for CCP is to tell us if that vision is still alive
The whole point I had with this thread! Sadly from the early notes from the recent CSM summit sounds like the CSM supports CCP killing WiS.
What about it CCP, we want it and want to know your future plans!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 21:20:00 -
[92] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Amelia Ryan wrote:But stopping WiS completely, is the wrong move, i've been playing this game for 6 years, i need something new and refreshing. They released the remaining 3 CQs which weren't released in Incarna, so WiS isn't completely dead. It doesn't have nearly the same focus as before as it seems like (and I'm strongly hopeful of this) they're looking to go back and iterate on a ton of the old cruft that's been collecting for the past 6 years. This is something which, if done right, will vastly improve the game as a whole, especially if they can go back and finally make old and boring systems like mining more fun, and if they can go through their newer systems as well and remove their rougher spots. Most importantly, however, would be that CCP goes through EVE and make it into a more cohesive universe, instead of the slightly hodgepodge soup we have now. If they additionally changed their design philosophy away from making almost every UI a cockstabbing experience by default, and instead tried to make them intuitive and easy to work with so we could spend more time having fun, that'd be dandy as well.
Dev's have stated now that those CQs are out there are NO/ZERO/NADA/BUPKISS resources on any additional WiS work. And we have a CSM re-enforcning that decision.
So unless someone keeps speaking out for WiS development to continue in some form we won't ever get through that door.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.15 23:11:00 -
[93] - Quote
The three words that cannot be spoken
Walking
in
Stations
When I started this thread I guessed it would get to 4 or five pages of support and we'd get at least some CCP weasel words about "continuing to investigate...bla bla bla.... resources.... we hear you...... now move along".
And we don't even get that. And the current CSM, don't get me started!
Still demanding a CCP response. So who here would join in a statue shooting movement?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.20 22:21:00 -
[94] - Quote
Again, CCP Please at least address the issue in this thread. Clarify the future of ambulation in Eve!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 23:19:00 -
[95] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:robbyx wrote:Flamespar wrote:robbyx wrote: .....and all your moronic arguments amount to...." please CCP, abandon everything that made EVE online the great game it is, for a wildly unpopular and unproven system that will allow me to play space dress ups with my friends...even though this has caused many job losses, many people to quit the game, the first decline in numbers ever at expansion time...i dont care about that...I WANNA DRESS UP MY AVATAR !!!!!!!! "
Again, see how the barely incoherent arguments against WiS amount only to rhetoric, finger pointing, and breath holding. Nobody is wanting Incarna to be about playing dress ups. Incarna was the latest in a long series of mistakes that caused subscribers to drop and the resulting job loss. Attributing the drop in subscribers as being sorely due to Incarna - whilst making for great (albeit simplistic) rhetoric - is lazy analysis. Nobody is asking that CCP abandon anything, quite the contrary actually. You are indeed asking CCP for WiS, which would, again require them devoting time and resources to developing it, which would in turn require them to pull people from FiS to work on WiS...unless they want to hire a whole new team to work on WiS, some how i dont think they will. As for the drop in subs due to INCARNA...for me personally and the other people i know who left, all th other stuff made me angry, but, it was the amount of time and resources used to take EVE in a direction neither they nor i wanted to have any part of, if this is the direction EVE is headed, im outties, and so were they.....thankfully CCP has re-focused back to what made EVE great. As to the "dress up" thing...give me one instance where WiS is of any benefit to the core play of EVE, just one.....how is it helpful to shooting other peoples spaceships ? Do you just want to walk around a station ? do you just want to come face to face with your friends avatars ? SWTOR has all that, maybe you'd be better of there. CCP devoted time to stuff other then WIS ,people forget the fact that WOD took a major part of it. Dust comes next . Two games a lot of EVE will never touch. Still WIS seems to be the only one to blame About devoting resources ,they still try to make a console only game only a few believe in. Nobody is crying about that or shooting statues . Crubicle was done in six weeks according to CCP so next expansion period should give enough time to make some WIS lovers just a little happy (and i don,t mean put stuff in failNEX) So WIS supporters happy and only FISwhiners happy(bc whining about a barbie seems the only thing a handfull of people can do)
That definitely makes some sense, CCP, how about it, some clarity?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 21:01:00 -
[96] - Quote
So I hope WiS supporters will join me in not feeding some reoccurring trolls in the thread.
Anyone that makes any of these comments should just be ignored
1. No one wants WiS (this thread proves that wrong). 2. We want CCP to focus on WiS entirely (we don't at this point we hope there will be some continuation of WiS work but mostly we want CCP to clarify the future). 3. Anyone that says anything aboutus wanting to play space barbies is automatically not worth a response. 4. Anyone that says Eve is a space ship only game and not a SciFi game as CCP has already said Eve is a SciFi game. 5. Anyone that seems to think that their way of playing Eve is the only "right way" and because they aren't interested in WiS no one would want WiS. That is a close minded and unimaginative response. 6. Anyone that makes this personal and not about the topic. 7. Anyone that claims the unsubbs after Incarna were just about WiS and not a lot of other things that came with that expansion or leaked internal correspondence that made many loose confidence in CCP's management.
Again, CCP!!!! This thead should no longer be ignored!!! Give us a statement to address our concerns regarding the future of ambulation in Eve!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.25 09:38:00 -
[97] - Quote
CCP, stop your shameless cowardice!! Answer our call for clarification and justification for your WiS plans.
Right now you look like reactionary cowards that are in the pocket of a pro 0.0 FiS only CSM.
Respond with your vision and plans and make this thread go away!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.26 09:11:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP!!!
How many pages does it take???!!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.27 04:31:00 -
[99] - Quote
Kuronaga wrote:Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.
Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.
Well stated
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 02:18:00 -
[100] - Quote
Soma Khan wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
It is obvious that you have no clue as to why most people DON'T play EvE and why WiS would bridge that gap and open EvE up to a much much larger audience than just the hardcore PvP players.
because eve is a niche open pvp game about spaceships? incidentally, this is why i play it, and this is why that "larger audience" doesn't. and no amount of barbie-dressup bolt-ons will ever change that, unless it does so at the expense of the main game, i.e. 'fis'
Sad Panda, Eve is a SciFi sandbox game, not a FiS PvP game (although that is a major element). That you are incapable of seeing how delivering on the long standing promise that CCP made us when they launched of Eve would finally take Eve to "mainstream" is sad for you.
Your FiS only bias will be the death of Eve. CCP will someday realize that there is only so much isks you can squeeze out of the remaining bitter vet statue shooters and find a new more profitable shiny to apply their dev resources to. It's called lost opportunity costs.
CCP will someday realize they lose money keeping a nitch game alive when the resources could produce a game with broader appeal. The shouty minority FiS only types have scared CCP away from their chance to make Eve more than it is today.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 09:19:00 -
[101] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Soma Khan wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
It is obvious that you have no clue as to why most people DON'T play EvE and why WiS would bridge that gap and open EvE up to a much much larger audience than just the hardcore PvP players.
because eve is a niche open pvp game about spaceships? incidentally, this is why i play it, and this is why that "larger audience" doesn't. and no amount of barbie-dressup bolt-ons will ever change that, unless it does so at the expense of the main game, i.e. 'fis' Sad Panda, Eve is a SciFi sandbox game, not a FiS PvP game (although that is a major element). That you are incapable of seeing how delivering on the long standing promise that CCP made us when they launched of Eve would finally take Eve to "mainstream" is sad for you. Your FiS only bias will be the death of Eve. CCP will someday realize that there is only so much isks you can squeeze out of the remaining bitter vet statue shooters and find a new more profitable shiny to apply their dev resources to. It's called lost opportunity costs. CCP will someday realize they lose money keeping a nitch game alive when the resources could produce a game with broader appeal. The shouty minority FiS only types have scared CCP away from their chance to make Eve more than it is today. Issler do you know what is keeping eve alive? the sandbox gameplay, the lion-king circle of life of the economic ecosphere, the creation and destruction of all things buildable and destructible. what product would come out of your barbie dress-up o7m8 /emoting? nothing. and where does wis fit in eve? nowhere and why don't you show ccp the horrible consequences by unsubbing right now and see how many accounts follow see if you can make hillmar apologize again
I don't generally respond to someone so limited as to lead with space barbie, but thanks for the bump.
All I can say is what about SciFi space simulator game which is what CCP describes Eve as do you not understand? Stop posting and go back to killing Eve with you limited nitch game vision of Eve.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 09:27:00 -
[102] - Quote
Anyone know what the record thread size is?
Wondering where this one rates.
This has to be close to the record for major thread specifically asking for CCP to respond without a response.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 22:24:00 -
[103] - Quote
90 pages and still not even a
CCP: "We understand there is interest in WiS and we are working in a plan to not abandon this important game element."
Which would make this thread finally end.
Come on CCP, some sort of statement has been earned!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 00:52:00 -
[104] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:CCP has answered both in this thread and several other places. WiS is on the backburner and you're not going to get a different answer than that until CCP is done working on real EvE content. You've got a purdy mouf It's ok though, not all goons are like Ladie. Quote:I see no problem with this. Like it or not, Incarna is part of EVE now, and there is a reasonable contingent that wants to see it iterated on. I hope that, with the focus on development shifted back to EVE, CCP will be able to continue to appeal to the FiS people while continuing to improve on the Incarna experience for those players that are interested in it. As long as the future developments to Incarna are in line with the general ethos of EVE, I'm all for seeing something interesting come out of it. It'd be good to get an idea of whether or not WiS is completely on halt, or simply working with a reduced staff. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=43574&find=unreadSupport the thread!
Why another thread? This one is approaching 100 pages of asking for clarification. Support this thread!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 20:40:00 -
[105] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Kuronaga wrote: There is a difference between griefing and pvp. Even from my pirating days I knew that.
But then you found Jesus and now, you want to play dress up with other like-minded cretins? And I like both griefing and pvp, for different reasons. Kuronaga wrote: Frankly you just sound mentally disturbed if you want to focus your hatred on one particular person that much.
I am sorry, armchair psychiatrist, I don't listen to bullshit and you are both stunningly and embarrassingly full of ****.
Sad demented panda crying out "look at me"!
Good news is most of Eve knows how they want to play Eve and your opinion is not only the minority, but should Eve survive even more an outlier.
More time is spent in Eve in PvE, industry and trade the pure PvP. Simple fact and easy to see with simple direct observation. The fact that CCP has put so much effort into making these key game elements conerstones of the Eve sandbox proves the CCP believes in Eve as a SciFi simulator and not just an internet spaceships shoot a stranger in the face game you seem to think it is. If you don't believe CCP thinks of Eve as a SciFi simulator then you need to learn the "google" and do your homework.
That you rant so much about folks wanting the next level of SciFi simulation (ambulation) from Eve means you lack any interest in SciFi or a basic imagination.
I've been trying not to respond to negative troll types and I am ignoring anything some of the regular trolls post here but you deserve this one response. You are wrong about Eve, CCP, WiS.
And please keep bumping the thread. I'm hoping for 200 pages. But if you insist on posting more, try and evolve your argument to more than personal attacks and claims that you alone understand how Eve is supposed to be played and you opinion is the only correct one. You don't and it isn't.
I've stated my case for WiS with solid arguments and continue to call out to CCP to clarify plans for WiS moving forward, and despite the folks that say otherwise it appears that at this moment there are no resources assigned to WiS and no plans for further development. If someone can point me at a statement from CCP other than the phrase "back burnered" as that phrase is as likely to mean no resources as some resources (I linked multiple definitions previously) I'd love to be corrected.
CCP! Open the door!!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 04:33:00 -
[106] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Alpheias wrote:Kuronaga wrote: There is a difference between griefing and pvp. Even from my pirating days I knew that.
But then you found Jesus and now, you want to play dress up with other like-minded cretins? And I like both griefing and pvp, for different reasons. Kuronaga wrote: Frankly you just sound mentally disturbed if you want to focus your hatred on one particular person that much.
I am sorry, armchair psychiatrist, I don't listen to bullshit and you are both stunningly and embarrassingly full of ****. Sad demented panda crying out "look at me"! Good news is most of Eve knows how they want to play Eve and your opinion is not only the minority, but should Eve survive even more an outlier. More time is spent in Eve in PvE, industry and trade the pure PvP. Simple fact and easy to see with simple direct observation. The fact that CCP has put so much effort into making these key game elements conerstones of the Eve sandbox proves the CCP believes in Eve as a SciFi simulator and not just an internet spaceships shoot a stranger in the face game you seem to think it is. If you don't believe CCP thinks of Eve as a SciFi simulator then you need to learn the "google" and do your homework. That you rant so much about folks wanting the next level of SciFi simulation (ambulation) from Eve means you lack any interest in SciFi or a basic imagination. I've been trying not to respond to negative troll types and I am ignoring anything some of the regular trolls post here but you deserve this one response. You are wrong about Eve, CCP, WiS. And please keep bumping the thread. I'm hoping for 200 pages. But if you insist on posting more, try and evolve your argument to more than personal attacks and claims that you alone understand how Eve is supposed to be played and you opinion is the only correct one. You don't and it isn't. I've stated my case for WiS with solid arguments and continue to call out to CCP to clarify plans for WiS moving forward, and despite the folks that say otherwise it appears that at this moment there are no resources assigned to WiS and no plans for further development. If someone can point me at a statement from CCP other than the phrase "back burnered" as that phrase is as likely to mean no resources as some resources (I linked multiple definitions previously) I'd love to be corrected. CCP! Open the door!!! Issler see you are saying all you want is a progress update or statement of intent from ccp with the future of wis and then you end it with the open the door!!!111 meme, and sad panda you are ignoring the discussions (yes i only troll 80% of the time, 20% is discussion) the core of which was that there IS NO PURPOSE OF WIS AS OF NOW look at the postings of DeMichael Crimson, and even he agrees that it will inevitably take YEARS for ccp to realize their vision, and he is fine with it, that first steps must be taken even though they may seem meaningless, that it is all in preparation for the grander scheme of things, hey i am going to repeat it for you one more time, it takes years for ccp to "fix things" christ are you new to the ways of ccp? and then here you are again repeating your juvenile open the door!!! like now!!! foot stomping, not engaging in the discussions, because you just want the door open, like it ain't no thing that just makes me want to get uncivil, stoop to your level, it makes you look gullible, and your cause frivolous what is wrong with dress-up and /emoting with a bunch of dudes? read it again DRESSING UP AND /EMOTING WITH A BUNCH OF DUDES, it's unseemly, and so is your meme flinging and yeah it's a bump, free of charge
Not engaging in the discussions? I guess you just skipped to the end of the thread. What I haven't engaged is obvious and repetitive trolls that only shout "barbie" in their argument against. I would settle for a status update but in the end I want CCP to deliver the promise of WiS.
More folks like "open the door" as a rally cry than not. As to you saying there is no point to WiS at this point, again, I guess reading the actual thread was too much work. There are plenty of folks besides me that have suggested how WiS could make Eve more fun for many of us,
I've been in Eve since the beginning, how long have you been here?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 21:59:00 -
[107] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Xuko Nuki wrote: I think it would add a level of depth and immersion. It would be a better backdrop than spreadsheets and only spreadsheets. In my opinion.
Oh i agree with you there. I want CCP to develop Incarna more but there needs to be some meaningful optional gameplay. In this thread, we've discussed the pros and cons, and possible gameplay additions for incarna for 2 months now and nobody is saying anything that hasn't already been discussed anymore. The ball is in CCP's court now and we will just have to wait and see if they're kind enough to shed some light on their plans. It would be nice if CCP did a devblog similar to the one they did on the POCO's, where the players left feedback and helped CCP design part of the game.
CCP, are you listening, Rek layed it out for you. You have the ball CCP, now do something with it! |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.07 08:53:00 -
[108] - Quote
Come on CCP, I know a lot of you from my stint in the CSM.. We deserve some clarification.
Just let us know you aren't cowering in a corner after the lame FiS only statue shooter protests. We WiS folks don't roll that way. We will forum and hope you find your way again, and we'll leave on our own terms, not as a block. Just silently part of your decline because after a thread like this without ever a simple response you tell us "f-you, go away!" Your stupid believe in our promise of ambulation means you can never be part of our 0.0 giant alliance end game focus makes you useless.
CCP, tell me WiS is dead!, I will unsub my seven accounts, kill my corp and alliance and find another game to give you $600 a month to.
Do I have to be a wood elf bard again??????
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.07 21:32:00 -
[109] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
CCP, tell me WiS is dead!, I will unsub my seven accounts, kill my corp and alliance and find another game to give you $600 a month to.
Do I have to be a wood elf bard again??????
Back in the day, they treated hysterical women with electricity, but that seems to be the least of your personal problems if you are paying CCP $600 a month for your seven accounts though I am sure they won't mind. And yes, be a wood elf again.
The dollar figure includes other players that would leave with me as well.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.09 20:09:00 -
[110] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Issler Dainze, is that you?
Nope, never post with alts. You'll know if its me.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.09 20:14:00 -
[111] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Gilbaron wrote:just give a clear statement about the future of WiS We can't really give a clear statement on the future of WiS because at this time because we have no updated plan, and only have some ideas rolling around. WiS is not our top priority for us at the moment at least, while we re-organize everything and sort out some other things, but as soon as we know more, you'll know more (or you know...really soon after as it always takes a little bit of time to write dev blogs and stuff). https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=604426#post604426jesus christ if you understand english it means, we don't know yet, we will tell you when we do,
Awesome, CCP answerd the WIS question, not here where it is asked but in a factional warfare thread. CCP, masters of communications for sure!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.09 20:20:00 -
[112] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Kuronaga wrote:The answer CCP provided held insufficient information for us. For you maybe, for us not. So CCP Guard provided an answer of - " We don't know yet, we'll tell you when we know." What more do you want? Or, what type of answer would satisfy you?
How would I have any idea he answered since his answer was in a thread about faction warfare, not here. Typical CCP poor communications.
Why wasn't that answer here?
But I agree, it is closer to an answer finally, even if you had to find it somewhere else.
Sad, sounds like WiS is dead.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.11 21:04:00 -
[113] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Jill Xelitras wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.
"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. " Issler No Hilmar, we don't want more spaceships. We want you to fix the current ones ! You may even want to release the promised ones. And then we want you to walk over to your marketing department and tell them to stop telling everybody that "walking in stations" has been finally released until it really is ready to be released on TQ. I saw Torfi walking a character through a bar and playing a cool game ... Now go and make that happen ! That's when you should start marketing WIS. Also, I'm very surprised (although I shouldn't be) that it took you until NOW to figure out that PI could be used to make low-sec interesting ... really CCP ? After all those years ? I wonder why I keep paying. "More spaceships" in this context means more focus on the spaceship part of the game, the core gameplay. So it's not to be taken 100% literally :). There have been a lot of fixes and tweaks lately and there are more coming. C'mon man...if you don't have any information that you are able to or allowed to divulge to us on the core issue of this thread then say so. At least a "I am sorry but I have no more information on the future of WiS at this time." is all it would take to keep people from getting annoyed with a reply that really only applies to one comment in a thread over 120 pages long that doesn't even really relate to the topic at hand. It is nice to know there are more bug fixes and tweaks coming though. I like hearing that info too. You are one of the better devs that actually respond on the forums Guard. Keep up the good work...but please...get us more info on the future plans of WiS if possible. There is actually no new information to be had at this time for the reason that we haven't decided the next steps for WiS yet. The summer expansion will be war themed as has been stated by our new Senior Producer, and will continue to enhance EVE core gameplay. What happens then is not certain at this point but we'll be sure to let you guys in on it as soon as we can (when we know). The tech for 3d character environments is there for the most part and we haven't decided to drop any future plans for it or anything like that. There's plenty of ideas floating around and lots of possibilities. So nothing has changed from the early stages of this thread really. Sorry to not have more juicy details at this time.
Finally!!!
/me does the CCP finally answered my thread question dance.
Not the answer I had hoped for, but what I expected.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.11 21:12:00 -
[114] - Quote
Maybe move it or start a new WiS ideas thread.
(wow, my first threadnaught!)
Thanks for everyone on both sides of the fence that were here for honest debate and not trolling.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.11 21:20:00 -
[115] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
There is actually no new information to be had at this time for the reason that we haven't decided the next steps for WiS yet. The summer expansion will be war themed as has been stated by our new Senior Producer, and will continue to enhance EVE core gameplay. What happens then is not certain at this point but we'll be sure to let you guys in on it as soon as we can (when we know).
The tech for 3d character environments is there for the most part and we haven't decided to drop any future plans for it or anything like that. There's plenty of ideas floating around and lots of possibilities.
So nothing has changed from the early stages of this thread really. Sorry to not have more juicy details at this time.
So war, more PvP focus, how many years do we have to go till industrialists and miners get some love?? Mining is core. Manufacuring is core. Trading is core. PvE is core. Yet somehow core always seems to mean direct ship to ship PvP to CCP these days.
CCP, you are listening to the minority of whiny shouters again and the future of your game is in peril.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 21:54:00 -
[116] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:You should turn on signatures, so you could read how this account will expire in less than 24 hours. You still strike me as an idiot, and that's just based off your sig. One expansion did nothing for you (which I highly doubt and if it didn't it is likely nobodies fault but your own) so you quit? That's a clear indication of a loser if there ever was one. You won't be missed. I guess you just can't please em all CCP. Crucible was a great expansion...EvE only gets better with each passing year. I hope EvE survives for a long time to come. I expect to die an old man playing EvE.
Crucible was an awesome much overdue patch.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 18:50:00 -
[117] - Quote
CCP Bayesian wrote:Rek Seven wrote:CCP Bayesian wrote:Time for some new information on our plans.
The effort is being led by a new, small team inventively named Team Avatar. We're tasked with maintenance and improvement of existing systems, developing new features for the Captains Quarters, NeX Store and Character Creator and prototyping multiplayer gameplay for Incarna. Our top priority after dealing with defects that are live on TQ is to come up with a solid vision and find the gameplay for future work on a multiplayer Incarna release.
We are interested in your ideas and will trawl this epic thread to see what you guys have been discussing. Any more suggestions would be good to put in the Features & Ideas Discussion forum just so that they are more visible to us.
I would be grateful if you could clarify... I assume that you're main tasks for now will revolve around improvements to the performance and aesthetics of CQ/avatars but when you say that you will be prototyping multiplayer gameplay for incarna, are you talking about multiplayer features that with be brought to the existing CQ experience or are you referring to the creation of a new area specifically designed for multiplayer interaction? This may help when we are making suggestions Basically, "our top priority after dealing with defects that are live on TQ is to come up with a solid vision and find the gameplay for future work on a multiplayer Incarna release". From my perspective anything we do has to be compelling and if we can find a compelling gameplay experience in expanding the CQ with multiplayer aspects then that is something we'd definitely look at. We are definitely going to be looking at letting you out of the CQ though as they'd get crowded pretty quickly. ;)
There have been tons of suggestions about "compelling" experiences that don't require some major "gameplay". Corp meeting room, dock viewing platforms, war planning rooms..... the list goes on. This sounds like the kind of answer that allows CCP to rationalize years and years of us being locked in the captains cell with nothing but new NEX store items being added. Even just letting other players in your CQ.
"Sorry players, for the third year we are unable come up with compelling ambulation, but look, new pants with a matching hat for $17.95 RL!"
I find this a very unsettling "throw the WiS fans a bone to shut them up" kind of answer.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 22:12:00 -
[118] - Quote
My point about this being a "throw us a bone answer" is simple. What we have been told that there are 5 folks, mostly in a maintenance capacity the only "new" WiS content is decorations for the Captains Cell and some new NEX stuff.
I am very happy we are being talked to but I'm disappointed in what I am hearing because I interpret the response as not much different that WiS is dead. They would have to have some folks maintaining WiS and mostly this is what it sounds like we have.
We are then told they are also trying to find a way to make ambulation "compelling" and "relevant". There were dozens of suggestions in this thread alone. If they think something simple wouldn't be a start says they could care less about anyone interested in RP.
What we are basically being told is that once again CCP is falling into the trap of thinking it has be some sort of big game play element. This lets them rationalize putting this off long term. Based on recent "major game play improvements" like the POCO I am not so confident their idea of compelling ambulation game play can be expected to be a good thing.
"Well sure, we could open the door but we don't think it would be compelling..... blah blah blah".
We don't need anything major, some common spaces would be simple and a good start. CCP, show us you actually will open the door and start with something simple. A corp lounge for example. Until I actually see some example of more than one of us in a room at once I don't believe CCP is intending to ever open the door (or even can with the current engine).
CCP, don't over think this, start simple, even if it is just some experiments on the test server to see what we think.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 22:13:00 -
[119] - Quote
And thanks everyone for making this the biggest thread on the new forums!!!
CCP, this should tell you there are folks paying you money that want that door opened in their lifetime.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:58:00 -
[120] - Quote
CCP Bayesian wrote:Sakura Imoru wrote:You said that Team Avatar is made up by 5 guys and gals right now (*fights the urge to call you "Team Power Rangers"*) . Who are the other 4? (And when will you be joined by a 6th Ranger? ) We have in no particular order: Designers: CCP Flying Scotsman CCP t0rfifrans Software Engineers: CCP Karkur CCP Bayesian QA: CCP RedDawn
Some impressive folks for sure, but is "Team Avatar" a part time effort for these folks or is their 100% focus and commitment? If this isn't the only thing they are working on then this is a bit misleading.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 05:21:00 -
[121] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:So much negativity in this thread, on both sides of the fence. I think the speculation on what CCP can and can't do is probably not helping. Like an earlier poster who speculated that they can't have two avatars in the same space, there is no reason why this can't happen, it's just a matter of priority and resources. Personally I think enabling the ability to invite avatars into your CQ is a good initial goal, as long as it is expressed to be a 'beta' feature. They could even make it something that players have to opt into, the same as they were going to do for the old 'new' neocom previously.
I agree with something simple, other folks in your CQ for example, or as I suggested a corp meeting room. I worry that waiting to come up with "new compelling game play" = never.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 19:56:00 -
[122] - Quote
Kusanagi Kasuga wrote:CCP Bayesian wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:That makes me wonder if it would be possible to get some test version into the game rather soon. For example a simple meeting area inside the "Site One" structure of the Arek'Jaalan project. Initially it would be just a meeting area. As that structure was done by the role players, it would be quite sufficient for us, and well received. To be brutally honest this is the gulf between having done it and having a lot more work to do in order to make it something we'd feel comfortable releasing. That's not to say we won't try putting multiplayer environments out on Singularity to see how well they work but we can't make any promises as to when that would be or if we even will before the technology is improved. The size of the team working on this feature is pretty prohibitive in that regard. Could you help us understand just what happened to cause the incarna features of the past to fall so dramatically behind expectations, it would also help us understand what we can expect in the future. Given how much dev-time and money was thrown at it, the community was really jarred by what actually hit TQ. I believe there are some who suspect that there was some really big unexpected problem with the carbon avatar technology, which prevented any progress on other of the expected feature set over the course of the development on Incarna.
As a person who runs software development projects for a living I am puzzled as to how what was delivered was so short of expectations. CCP would have know WiS was off the rails a year ago and should have been adjusting plans and expectations.
But back to something positive, nice to see some solid "Team Avatar" engagement in this thread!
Thanks very much for that!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:28:00 -
[123] - Quote
How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority!
Voice of Reason Party
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 03:27:00 -
[124] - Quote
Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority! Voice of Reason PartyIssler I am afraid that's impossible. Large alliances will make their member to vote for only ppl they like and that's it. CSM like idea is broken.
If folks wake up and get involved all the members of the large power blocks combined are a fraction of active accounts.
Players of Eve are starting to see the CSM can change Eve and sometimes in ways they might like want.
Issler Dainze Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 23:21:00 -
[125] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority! Voice of Reason PartyIssler I am afraid that's impossible. Large alliances will make their member to vote for only ppl they like and that's it. CSM like idea is broken. If folks wake up and get involved all the members of the large power blocks combined are a fraction of active accounts. Players of Eve are starting to see the CSM can change Eve and sometimes in ways they might like want. Issler Dainze Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate If WiS is a priority issue, then I'll support the Voice Of Reason Party with my vote. To those who supported WiS in this thread, let your voice be heard, If you don't, who do you think will advocate FiS and WiS development? Definitely won't be the current CSM.
I definitely want VOR to keep CCP's feet to the fire when ti comes to ambulation!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 21:49:00 -
[126] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:As much as I like incarna I will not vote for any CSM candidate thats running for that as a platform. CCP needs to take incanra slow not shove it down the throats again and I dont want a Eve player being the guys stomping on that wad of paper.
Don't you think it would be valuable to have a CSM member that encourages CCP to keep ambulation in their plans and not lobby for its total abandonment? The CSM was anti-ambulation. I think we need a candidate that keeps CCP thinking about it and working on ti steadily in reasonable balance with other game features.
The Voice of Reason party will make that part of our focus. The make sure CCP knows there is active interest in ambulation and to not abandon it.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 03:15:00 -
[127] - Quote
Just a note to folks that expressed interest in running for the CSM, the VoR will try and create a slate of candidates. If what you see as planks in the VoR party platform match your thinking I encourage to join in the soon to follow discussions and consider running as a VoR candidate. Once we get closer to the elections we'll try some party straw polls to like the most likely to be elected "top few" and then put all our support behind those candidates.
I'm working now to look at ways outside the forums to get the word out about the Voice of Reason.
I may be tilting at solar wind-mills but they look like giants that need a good 'sploding and I'm going to give it my best! :-)
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 01:06:00 -
[128] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:You do realize with this VoR platform of yours your just going to dilute the voting pool right? You cant tell CCP at the end of it all to give all the votes from other ppl to one guy that is part of your party. This isnt the primary this is the final race.
We are going to try and find the most electable of the candidates that support the VoR platform and ask the supporters of the partty to put their votes to that candidate(s).
But, yes, vote dillution is a concern we need to address.
We will be asking the pilots of Eve the reject a power block null candidate or a high sec sock puppet still influenced by the power block to support the VoR candidate and make sure someone represents the "little guy" and keeps things like ambulation in the CSM discussions with CCP in CSM 7.
Issler Dainze Voice of Reason Party CSM Candidate
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 22:49:00 -
[129] - Quote
Sort of an odd intervire that seems to mix up the games interchangably then call the stew of goo Eve. The line "someday I want to pick up a controller in Eve" said it all for me. Continued confusion and spread focus makes me skeptical.
But please let me be wrong and see CCP deliver ambulaton soon.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 00:25:00 -
[130] - Quote
This was the first new forum threadnaught. (and my first! )
There were some anti-WIS troll types that certainly made regular posts but once you filter all that out there were some decent conversations with a number of folks for and against ambulation, then some good dev participation in the end (finally!) that made this thread worthy of attention.
To everyone that helped keep this topic alive, thanks!
And to Team Avatar, you have fans as you can plainly see!
We really need that dev blog promised soon to keep us hoping and to get you some credibility!
I believe this thread proved there are a lot of paying subscribers that want ambulation and even consider it key to the future of Eve. I'm even trying to get someone in the CSM that will keep CCP thinking and working on the next generation of Eve exeriences we can only have once we get out that door!
Issler Dainze Not a "Space Barbie" but a sneaky smuggler type that needs to make some seedy connections in the dark corners of the stations to do some crime and slip about!
|
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 00:38:00 -
[131] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Flamespar wrote:Freylock wrote:I have no idea what these acronyms stand for. Well to answer your question. FiS (which the rabid trolls demand CCP focus exclusively on) stands for 'fascism in space', where the views of a vocal minority dictate everyoneGÇÖs experience down a narrow view. Whereas WiS, (which handsome, smart, forward thinking players like myself are asking for) stands for 'wonder in space' where players are given new ways of experiencing and participating in the EVE universe. Hope this helps lol, nice counter troll. FiS = Flying in Spaceships WiS = Walking in Stations PvP = Player verses Player PvE = Player verses Environment EvE = Everyone verses Everyone You forgot the latest one SiF = Shooting in Face!
And don't forget one that was often found in this thread!!
TiF = Trolling in Forums
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 01:09:00 -
[132] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Another great victory over the dress up the dolly fetishists for the people who love EVE is the fact that the new player introduction website fails to mention WiS, Incarna or NEX store at all.
Yet the designers though mentioning "erm you have a hanger to put stuff in" while not promoting, advertising or listing space Barbie as a feature at all.
Oops, forgot to add
ESD = The Eve is a SciFi simulation Denier
This is usually a forum troll that waste everyones time confusing the promise of ambulation in Eve with a dislike of Eve or spaceships. These can usually be quickly identified by their frequent confusing the NeX and Incarna with ambulation, the repeated use of "Space Barbie" in their rants and their denial of CCP's repeated claims that Eve is a SciFi simulator. They will often claim that only they know how Eve should be played and what CCP should focus on.
Another sure sign that someone is a ESD is they claim work on ambulation was what kept CCP from adding FiS content when it was actually work on other games.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 19:39:00 -
[133] - Quote
Razin wrote:Fuee wrote:Razin wrote:Fuee wrote:CCP needs ambulation now more than ever, this is a big year for MMO's and leaning on clicking boxes in space, going back 10 years to tidy up outdated gameplay as a "focus" is going to ruin them. If the past year showed anything, its that the above isn't just wrong, but that it is fatal for EVE Online. You guys need to shut up and get in line. According to CCP Greyscale the 0.0/sov rework will take approximately 5 years. There is also low sec and other in-space gameplay work. Maybe you'll get something new after all that has been handled. I really beg to differ, the Incarna model was clearly the problem and I don't know how anyone could say otherwise. Through the outrage a bunch of newer players who didn't know anything of "ambulation" came to think it was trendy to bash avatars. NEX was the problem CCP's greed was the problem both Soundwave and Hilmar were/are the problem (to some degree). Most of CCP staff which understood the sandbox and WiS left years ago. Who we have left now seem to be largely incompetent. As an example at the end of last years alliance tournament Soundwave announced that he was taking a month vacation, and he was going to spend it by "playing a lot of LoL to learn more about micro-transactions" Not only does that represent a ridiculous state of affairs in terms of developer competance, that's not even a good game to learn those things, try TF2. The NEX store, they went to NY and hired 7th avenue fashion consultants, just pause right there and think about what the actual problems are/were. Ambulation and WiS represent something that could not only be an extention of the sandbox we love in FiS but it could bolster it by a great margin. If done with any sense. Before it was even released at the same AT Soundwave said on air what the concept of WiS meant to him "dressing up dolls" this guy is an idiot with no knowledge of what has been discussed for years or even what WiS was intended to be at all. Don't blame WiS because you don't understand it, or because CCP didn't/doesn't. CCP's implementation of Incarna as a NeX storefront at the expense of years of FiS development was an integral part of the overall cause of last year's disaster. That is the reality. Your theoretical WIS that only you understand is a fantasy. It doesn't exist. Not because players complained about it. Not because it isn't something that would bring more customers. And not because CCP is keeping its development secret. It is because CCP just wasn't able, and is still not able to implement it. For reasons that start with feature planning and end with technical ability and resources availability. Regrettable, however crying about it on the forum won't help. CCP is a corporation and this will be a business decision. CCP either acquires the right resources and tallent and does all the required work to deliver a quality product to attract new customers, or they don't, because they decide that their core competency gives them solid income from current customers and let's not fix what ain't broke.
So, the distraction from the FiS elements of Eve were not as you stated, WiS and NeX. They were Dust and WoD. What you claim distracted CCP from FiS was a small part of the problem.
As the the rest of the claims, unless you are a CCP employee working on this element of Eve directly it is impossible for you to know what you claim.
While I am skeptical of the technology chosen for ambulation but if there are still 60 folks working on WoD the ambulation engine has to be showing some promise.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 21:47:00 -
[134] - Quote
Razin wrote:Issler Dainze wrote: So, the distraction from the FiS elements of Eve were not as you stated, WiS and NeX. They were Dust and WoD. What you claim distracted CCP from FiS was a small part of the problem.
Man you are confused. Incarna in it's released form was a demo for WoD (as well as being the NeX storefront). So by definition that is what delayed everything else. This is not a secret and stated as such by CCP management in interviews and other recorded conversations (CSM). Dust has absolutely nothing to do with any of this as that is a separate dev team in a different country under different contractual obligations.
CCP has finite resources. Every developer that was working on Dust could either have been working on Eve or replaced with someone that was working on Eve. So to say Dust didn't distract CCP from Eve is flat wrong. The fact that you think the majority of the WoD team was working on Captains Cell also shows that clues elude you.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 23:30:00 -
[135] - Quote
Marcus Harikari wrote:WiS is pointless.
Very hard to argue with such a well constructed argument.........
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 00:25:00 -
[136] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:CCP Bayesian wrote:We have in no particular order:
Designers: CCP Flying Scotsman CCP t0rfifrans
Software Engineers: CCP Karkur CCP Bayesian
QA: CCP RedDawn
Instead of trying to create the whole "open multiplayer atrium" that will have 1000 toons wondering around in Jita, causign havoc to the server and clients how about scaling it down.... An Idea- Make the "door" open to a "lift" - The "lift" goes to a private corp "meeting", "map", "directors" rooms (only other corp members can enter) - Only available if your corp has an "office" in station - Limit room capacity. Irl there would be a physical limit to the number of bodies in any given room - Possibility of allowing access to CEO/Directors of alliances member corps. Impact - Lower server overheads because there will be separate rooms with smaller numbers of people - Lower client needs because the room will be smaller and the number of people will be lower than an atrium - Limited number of 'rooms' because of corp office costs etc. - It provides something actually useful that is a small extension from CQ. Something like this will allow the 5-man team working on WIS to have a smaller, more achievable goal that that massive atrium with 1000 players in whilst providing an excellent function in game.
Team Avatar, think about ideas like these, smaller incremental improvements marching towards an immersive wonderful scifi experience!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 02:30:00 -
[137] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Wacktopia wrote:CCP Bayesian wrote:We have in no particular order:
Designers: CCP Flying Scotsman CCP t0rfifrans
Software Engineers: CCP Karkur CCP Bayesian
QA: CCP RedDawn
Instead of trying to create the whole "open multiplayer atrium" that will have 1000 toons wondering around in Jita, causign havoc to the server and clients how about scaling it down.... An Idea- Make the "door" open to a "lift" - The "lift" goes to a private corp "meeting", "map", "directors" rooms (only other corp members can enter) - Only available if your corp has an "office" in station - Limit room capacity. Irl there would be a physical limit to the number of bodies in any given room - Possibility of allowing access to CEO/Directors of alliances member corps. Impact - Lower server overheads because there will be separate rooms with smaller numbers of people - Lower client needs because the room will be smaller and the number of people will be lower than an atrium - Limited number of 'rooms' because of corp office costs etc. - It provides something actually useful that is a small extension from CQ. Something like this will allow the 5-man team working on WIS to have a smaller, more achievable goal that that massive atrium with 1000 players in whilst providing an excellent function in game. so we got a 5 dudes to meet up and do what? i hope nothing too unseemly. a map for planning what? yeah i know our alliance leadership really sorely needed that "feature" to "plan" for the invasion of Branch. here we have a circle-jerking wis-loving support group drowning and grasping on any sort of a floating drift wood of useless ideas, i like your idea, no i like you for liking my idea, oh i like that, me too while ignoring the glaring problems that wis simply lacks substance, hell why don't you just admit and come out and say it all i want is to 07m8/dance with 1000 dudes but i can start with 5 please it is really important to me. here's an idea, for those with super high standings, they get the honor and privilege of being granted an audience with the major faction leaders, a meeting in personal avatar form. hell you are god damn right you deserve it if you did the grind after all you've done for the faction. eg. for amarrian loyalists they get to see the empress flanked by her royal templars or whatever, and you have to /kneel before you can speak to the empress, and she is really really really really hawt and there will be a few dialogue things like "gj on the grind here's your symbolic reward" and the RPers will be all YAY! DIS IS AWSUM! OH DID YOU SEE THAT TEMPLAR?! IT'S EXACTLY LIKE IN THE BOOK!
It must be tough when your clone's noggin is all full of space worms...
So let me bounce a theory off of you.
CCP can do more stuff to make Eve better if they have more money. Money mostly comes from folks that subscribe to play the game. Let's call those folks "subscribers". So given that set of facts, here is my theory!
If Eve has more subscribers... now follow me here.... CCP will have money.... OK, here comes the tricky bit... and CCP will use the money to keep making Eve better!! Wow! I mean, pretty radical of me to suggest!!!
Now here is where it gets tricky, many games have more of these subscriber things, and one reason is that folks like to related to their characters, and at the moment, very few spaceships can subscribe and play Eve. As there aren't that many spaceships we know of and most of them are not self aware. Also, most don't have a form of payment accepted by CCP.
On the other hand, there are lots of PEOPLE that would like to play a game about PEOPLE in a scifi setting. These people have found Eve not to their liking because they want to see a representation of a PERSON in this scifi world. If we can get something in the game that makes them feel they can relate and connect, they might become subscribers!!
I'm just putting that out there for you to share with your brain worms.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 23:57:00 -
[138] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:duhr typical i want barbies and dudes to emote with
So is this close to your inner voice?
FiS
Or is this closer?
Space Madness
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 19:17:00 -
[139] - Quote
You seem to be spending a lot of time taunting me and decrying my CSM efforts.
My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts. A big piece of my job for a large software company here in the PACNW was in the PC gaming world. If you are at all clever with "the google" you can likely figure out a little more about that. So as a result I have exposure to a large number of gamers. Many that have played Eve, few that remain. One of the reasons all that left Eve cited was that they wanted to have an avatar experience. That other games gave them an experience they felt they could more related to.
I also have encountered a very large number of players in Eve and most of the folks I've interacted with expressed a desire to see ambulation in Eve. I think this thread makes a strong case for that as well.
So am pretty confident that my DIRECT experiences and observations make my theory about how important ambulation is to expanding the Eve player base more relevant the the what goes on in your noggin.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 20:09:00 -
[140] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts. Citation needed. Please show us these "facts" you claim to be in possession of.
My first hand real life experience and the support in this thread. No citation needed.
How about for once one of you fail puppy ambulation detractors show your evidence that folks haven't chosen to leave Eve because they couldn't have an avatar experience. Or better yet explain why so many other MMO games have higher subscription levels? Is it because folks don't like space? Not easy to prove given the popularity of franchises like Star Trek and Star Wars.
So how about you prove your point for a change because all you ever offer is "is not!!!" while stomping your feet.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 20:37:00 -
[141] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts. Citation needed. Please show us these "facts" you claim to be in possession of. My first hand real life experience and the support in this thread. No citation needed. How about for once one of you fail puppy ambulation detractors show your evidence that folks haven't chosen to leave Eve because they couldn't have an avatar experience. Or better yet explain why so many other MMO games have higher subscription levels? Is it because folks don't like space? Not easy to prove given the popularity of franchises like Star Trek and Star Wars. So how about you prove your point for a change because all you ever offer is "is not!!!" while stomping your feet. Issler I did not assert anything, you did. I simply asked for your evidence. I don't have anything to prove because I did not make a baseless assertion under the guise of "facts" like you just did. Your "first hand real life experience" is not facts. You said you had "actual facts". I'd like to see these otherwise you are just making stuff up and trying to evade that you don't have any facts you can back up with evidence.
My real life experiences most definitely are "facts". You can choose to claim I'm lying but I'd ask you for your proof that I am.
All of my team played Eve as part of our ongoing testing of current games against our unreleased technologies. The majority of our team could be described as serious gamers. They all play MMOs actively. I was the only one on the team that continued to play Eve. Everyone else moved onto other games. The same for RL friends and family. This is a sample size of over 50 people.
In every case the lack of an avatar experience was one of the complaints about Eve.
So how about you offer an argument with more substance than "is not!!!!" because all you are doing is looking like yet another ambulation hater and bumping a thread that continues to bring attention to a feature you oppose.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 22:51:00 -
[142] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts. Citation needed. Please show us these "facts" you claim to be in possession of. My first hand real life experience and the support in this thread. No citation needed. ....Issler Issler you have bumped this thread to the top of eve general since October of 2011. In that time this thread has had: 2,981 replies, 71,804 views but only 187 likes for your original post. I think the lack of support for your op tends to prove ccp made the correct decision in going back to spaceships. I'm not saying they will never get back to WIS. But its clearly not the most pressing issue for players despite your efforts to garner support for it.
So if I respond to you is that just to bump the thread?? I have gone days and ignored this thread. There were lots of folks posting regularly, I never needed to bump it. In fact this thread lives on even today without me doing much of anything.
As for likes, someone did the somewhat tedious job of adding the pro-ambulation posts and the anti-ambulation post likes and the pro ambulation posts were ahead by a huge margin. So most of the likes are in support of my thread if not post #1 directly.
Besides, using your logic I personally have over twice as many personal likes as you so I must be at least over twice as right!
I have never said ambulation needs to be priority number one, I have continually said I just want to make sure it continues to get some attention from CCP and we get to see some progress made on the promise of life in Eve outside our pods. And I stand firm in my belief the future of Eve depends on CCP delivering the promise of a complete scifi simulator experience and that ambulation has to be a large part of that.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 23:21:00 -
[143] - Quote
uhm, wow!
/me does the megathread for ambulation dance
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 23:30:00 -
[144] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:So how many people who post in this thread are going to vote for Issler?
So when I started this thread it definitely wasn't because of any CSM plans.
I haven't seen any other candidates put support of ambulation in their platform. I hope we do get some folks in the CSM 7 that will remind CCP how much many of us want ambulation to continue to get some attention in the future.
For now though I'll keep my ambulation support peanut butter in this thread out of my CSM 7 issues discussions chocolate over in Jita Park.
So folks interested in my CSM 7 aspirations would be welcome to discuss support for or lack of over in Jita Park.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 00:20:00 -
[145] - Quote
Cearain wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Cearain wrote: Issler you have bumped this thread to the top of eve general since October of 2011.
In that time this thread has had: 2,981 replies, 71,804 views but only 187 likes for your original post.
I think the lack of support for your op tends to prove ccp made the correct decision in going back to spaceships.
I'm not saying they will never get back to WIS. But its clearly not the most pressing issue for players despite your efforts to garner support for it.
Those stats mean nothing, especially if you look at all the other posted replies in this thread. Total up the amount of 'Likes' for Pro-Wis replies and compair those to the amount of 'Likes' for the Anti-WiS replies, then post the results. Obviously you didn't bother to read thru this thread. Attacking Issler and this thread because of CSM voting only shows how little you really know. Silence, oh ye of little faith, lest ye incur the wrath of the Allmighty. These stats tend to show not many agree with his position no matter how you want to put it: Just because all 187 of you tend to give eachother a bunch of likes doesn't mean there are more than 187 of you. Just because it might be the same 187 people viewing this page over and over doesn't mean there are more than 187 of you. Just because it is the same 187 of you replying to eachothers posts and getting upset at people who disagree with you, doesn't mean there is more than 187 of you. You see the point is you guys have bumped this to the front page of the most frequented eve forum since october of 2011 and only 187 people like the original post. That tends to show that very few people agree with him.
I think it is you that is confused about what likes mean.
A couple of things:
1, The thread is still alive because of lots of different people, now including CCP devs keep posting, 2. The thread has 5200+ likes spread throughout all of the replies with the vast majority being in support of ambulation.
If you really believe it is the same handful of people then prove it or STFU. Feel free to go through the 3K+ posts and tabulate the posters names and also the likes for and and against.
In the mean time, keep looking like a tragic victim of space induced madness with your weak arguments and lack of statistical insight.
If I can prove more than 187 characters posted will you biomass yourself and drop your subscription? Wait, I know what's coming, whatever number I ended up with you'd say they were all my alts.......
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 00:36:00 -
[146] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:why can't we just all be friends?
/me hugs CCP karkur
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 00:55:00 -
[147] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:CCP karkur wrote:why can't we just all be friends? Well if you enable the option to invite other players to our CQs then we can be
Open the door to the secret friends clubhouse!!! Next new ambulation feature!!!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 03:50:00 -
[148] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:You seem to be spending a lot of time taunting me and decrying my CSM efforts. My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts. A big piece of my job for a large software company here in the PACNW was in the PC gaming world. If you are at all clever with "the google" you can likely figure out a little more about that. So as a result I have exposure to a large number of gamers. Many that have played Eve, few that remain. One of the reasons all that left Eve cited was that they wanted to have an avatar experience. That other games gave them an experience they felt they could more related to. I also have encountered a very large number of players in Eve and most of the folks I've interacted with expressed a desire to see ambulation in Eve. I think this thread makes a strong case for that as well. So am pretty confident that my DIRECT experiences and observations make my theory about how important ambulation is to expanding the Eve player base more relevant the the what goes on in your noggin. Issler you mean you worked at microsoft? they make mmos? you know experience in the gaming industry are good credentials to show for csm candidates so list them just sayin. explain how you want priority on wis while not taking any resources away from fis, please. NO Ur NOGGIN
Microsoft did make MMO's but I am referring to the policy of our team that made technology I worked on and that is used on all PC games, to adopt a game and play it daily with the latest internal builds of our technology. Do a little homework and you'll find me on 4 patents that make those little pixels move around so well, I also helped get Xbox started.
I've shared my history in the past. Do some homework, not my job to "impress" you in this thread.
I have never said ambulation is my top priority, I've advocated a balanced approach, so stop making stuff up.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 03:57:00 -
[149] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Cearain wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Cearain wrote: Issler you have bumped this thread to the top of eve general since October of 2011.
In that time this thread has had: 2,981 replies, 71,804 views but only 187 likes for your original post.
I think the lack of support for your op tends to prove ccp made the correct decision in going back to spaceships.
I'm not saying they will never get back to WIS. But its clearly not the most pressing issue for players despite your efforts to garner support for it.
Those stats mean nothing, especially if you look at all the other posted replies in this thread. Total up the amount of 'Likes' for Pro-Wis replies and compair those to the amount of 'Likes' for the Anti-WiS replies, then post the results. Obviously you didn't bother to read thru this thread. Attacking Issler and this thread because of CSM voting only shows how little you really know. Silence, oh ye of little faith, lest ye incur the wrath of the Allmighty. These stats tend to show not many agree with his position no matter how you want to put it: Just because all 187 of you tend to give eachother a bunch of likes doesn't mean there are more than 187 of you. Just because it might be the same 187 people viewing this page over and over doesn't mean there are more than 187 of you. Just because it is the same 187 of you replying to eachothers posts and getting upset at people who disagree with you, doesn't mean there is more than 187 of you. You see the point is you guys have bumped this to the front page of the most frequented eve forum since october of 2011 and only 187 people like the original post. That tends to show that very few people agree with him. I think it is you that is confused about what likes mean. A couple of things: 1, The thread is still alive because of lots of different people, now including CCP devs keep posting, 2. The thread has 5200+ likes spread throughout all of the replies with the vast majority being in support of ambulation. If you really believe it is the same handful of people then prove it or STFU. Feel free to go through the 3K+ posts and tabulate the posters names and also the likes for and and against. In the mean time, keep looking like a tragic victim of space induced madness with your weak arguments and lack of statistical insight. If I can prove more than 187 characters posted will you biomass yourself and drop your subscription? Wait, I know what's coming, whatever number I ended up with you'd say they were ll my alts....... Issler I simply pointed out some facts. Point of fact: This thread has been bumped to page one of eve general since october of 2011 Point of fact: there were only 187 likes for the original post as of my last post. Now you can try to explain these facts away. Like someone was saying maybe people posting here didn't read the original post. I mean I think that is a pretty funny explanation but whatever. If pointing out facts makes you angry unless I also prove something else to you I am sorry. But I am not going to stfu just because the facts I point out make you upset. BTW do you know how many times you have posted in this thread? Just curious.
....and 3K likes throughout the thread, the majority supporting the point of the original post. The thread was bumped much more often by other folks, not me, and I have no idea how many times I posted, I do know I tried to answer any non-troll post.
A lot of folks when a thread gets huge go to the end and like the later posts so your first post like thing is nonsense, I never asked folks to like the first post if they agreed, I asked them post in the thread if they supported ambulation, and guess what, they exceeded my expectations by a huge margin.
So why don't you go off and count all the posts by author and the likes for and against and then amaze me with your incredible intellect!
And for a bonus, show me any thread you've started that ever amounted to anything.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 04:55:00 -
[150] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=714492#post714492 not making it up call it a momentary slip and i will let it go, wis priority is not acceptable, continued development at diminished capacity is
look, it's one thing for me to sperg about Issler Dainze, and another for me to google you as the RL person, unless "Issler Dainze" is on your resume and public records how do i find out about your background.
if you think all your potential constituents and other undecided voters need to "do their homework" in case they might want to vote for you, then so be it. what i meant is you can post that background stuff on your election website or jita park thread doofus
A priority, yes, of course, top priority, no.
It would take you seconds to find who I am in RL since it is part of the previous CSM records in the Eve wiki.
I have a background web page ready and will be spending a lot of time talking about my background and qualifications in the context of the CSM 7 elections. This is the ambulation thread, not the "me for CSM 7" thread.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 05:06:00 -
[151] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts.
Still waiting to see these facts of yours, ones I and others can verify. Please try not to evade this time by trying to shift the onus to me and just admit you have nothing but what you *believe* to be true. I can believe you might have filed a patent for a company as a clerk or paper-pusher someplace, but you were never responsible for creating any patentable IP unless it was for shoveling BS around. But please do go on, while we're at it I'd like to introduce you to my wife, Morgan Fairchild.
I most definitely contributed considerable IP to the DX shader model and am listed as an inventor for four of the patents, present at several major technical conferences about the standards I helped develop and assisted virtually every hardfware company making compatible hardware comply with the DX9 standards and even recieved several quite nice bonuses when the patents were granted, but I expect you enjoy Morgan more than I enjoyed what I did with the money....
Also contributed to patents at Compaq and Motorola in the 35 years I've been an engineer in the PC space.... but again, your imaginary spouse is very impressitve....
So what do you do for a living, does it involve fast food fryers??
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 05:35:00 -
[152] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:http://ip.com/patent/US8035646that's actually pretty impressive so it's literally your fault that the game industry has a Console over PC mentality nowadays.
Well, high end PCs still are better at graphics than consoles..... but sure, blame me!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 06:22:00 -
[153] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts.
Still waiting to see these facts of yours, ones I and others can verify. Please try not to evade this time by trying to shift the onus to me and just admit you have nothing but what you *believe* to be true. I can believe you might have filed a patent for a company as a clerk or paper-pusher someplace, but you were never responsible for creating any patentable IP unless it was for shoveling BS around. But please do go on, while we're at it I'd like to introduce you to my wife, Morgan Fairchild. I most definitely contributed considerable IP to the DX shader model and am listed as an inventor for four of the patents, present at several major technical conferences about the standards I helped develop and assisted virtually every hardfware company making compatible hardware comply with the DX9 standards and even recieved several quite nice bonuses when the patents were granted, but I expect you enjoy Morgan more than I enjoyed what I did with the money.... Also contributed to patents at Compaq and Motorola in the 35 years I've been an engineer in the PC space.... but again, your imaginary spouse is very impressitve.... So what do you do for a living, does it involve fast food fryers?? Issler Still waiting to see those facts you claim to have.. Your attempts to distract from that via irrelevant chest-beating notwithstanding.
What it must be like in your head..... |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 20:01:00 -
[154] - Quote
HELIC0N ONE wrote:5 years from now when there's still been effectively no further development to Incarna bar the slightest cosmetic tweaks, will Issler still be posting in this thread?
So ambulation and Incarna are two different things. Better question is will all the goons quit Eve when team avatar delivers something compelling? We can only hope.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 21:14:00 -
[155] - Quote
Lt Angus wrote:omg why did i read all of that
I would like to award you the medal of:
Awesome Thread Reading
for that major accomplishment!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:08:00 -
[156] - Quote
Vladimir Plinnikov wrote:I looked at Eve back when it was first released and passed because it didn't seem so much as a "sci fi opus/simulator" as I was looking for. I didn't want to be some lame guy in a smelly pod, I wanted to command a freakin spaceship captain, walk across the bridge and shout orders, manage and train my crew, perform damage control on the fly. I subbed to Eve and brought a few friends with me when I heard about Incarna, I thought it would be the beginning of really opening up a true sci fi universe.
Can't say I haven't enjoyed my time in Eve so far because I have.
Can't say I'm going to unsub because all I got was a 15x15 room with a balcony.
Can't say I'm awesome at pew pew because I'm not
I can say though that I do not want CCP to dump Incarna.
It was stated once that the developers wanted to create a living science fiction world. Give us that world. (and hats)
On a side note OP I thought I read somewhere that you r thinking of running for CSM7. Is this true? I didn't see you in the CSM7 thread as being a candidate. From what I've read I seem to agree with a lot of your ideas and would like to see someone else in CSM7 besides the 400 I want to kill you candidate choices.
Thanks for asking about the CSM. I am a candidate (took a couple of days to sort out some paperwork). You should be able to find me in the candidate list now.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:02:00 -
[157] - Quote
Well, I made a thread that got linked in a dev blog! Wow! I'm not worthy!
Now on to the reality. Nothing I saw in the dev blog gave me much hope of seeing anything interesting in my Eve lifetime given how many years have gone by with no actual content.
It makes me sad the dev blog leads with sleeve tattoos as if that is what keeps us from loving WiS. Honestly, that smacks of Incarna/NeX thinking that got us to this fail point.
Also mentioning scrapping establishments which was hugely supported and continuing with the "change in focus" line makes me think CCP is drinking the FiS is all that really matters koolaide.
Team Bipedal, you need to do better than that blog. Communications is a start, but this really under-delivered.
That we even had to wait for that information free "setting the stage for nothing meaningful" ambulation non-content "nothing soon" dev-blog should make us all ask what did CCP think our reaction to the blog should be?
Screw the tattoos, open the door CCP!!!
And soon!!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:06:00 -
[158] - Quote
The recent discussions continue to confirm that there is player interest in ambulation!
CCP, please realize this needs more that a skeleton crew. Before the space pants/barbie trolls jump in, I'm not asking to shut down FiS (in fact anyone following my CSM efforts knows I want lots of developers working on FIS content, Mining in particular) but the size of the team working on this is too small!
One other thing, I agree that at some point there should be some places where you ambulate that have risks, the best ideas I've heard seem to the graduated levels of security proposal. Putting my SciFi imaginati-designer-cap (tm) on, it would make sense to me that there would places in station where no weapons are allowed and then other places where sneaky folk slip about and places where bad men would slit your throat because they think you look funny. So I'd be fine with something like that.
Finally, I promised not to bring the CSM elections up here but I think we need someone on the CSM that vigorously supports ambulation. I'd ask anyone that wants more attention to ambulation to ask all the CSM candidates where they stand on ambulation and make sure you vote for the candidate that looks most like to continue to pressure CCP to deliver this much needed feature!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 19:39:00 -
[159] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:The recent discussions continue to confirm that there is player interest in ambulation!
CCP, please realize this needs more that a skeleton crew. Before the space pants/barbie trolls jump in, I'm not asking to shut down FiS (in fact anyone following my CSM efforts knows I want lots of developers working on FIS content, Mining in particular) but the size of the team working on this is too small!
One other thing, I agree that at some point there should be some places where you ambulate that have risks, the best ideas I've heard seem to the graduated levels of security proposal. Putting my SciFi imaginati-designer-cap (tm) on, it would make sense to me that there would places in station where no weapons are allowed and then other places where sneaky folk slip about and places where bad men would slit your throat because they think you look funny. So I'd be fine with something like that.
Finally, I promised not to bring the CSM elections up here but I think we need someone on the CSM that vigorously supports ambulation. I'd ask anyone that wants more attention to ambulation to ask all the CSM candidates where they stand on ambulation and make sure you vote for the candidate that looks most like to continue to pressure CCP to deliver this much needed feature!
Issler I agree that more than a skeleton crew is needed for WiS developement but not till after they know what the hell they are going to do with it. Right now they seem to be more focused on "let's get an idea going that he players like". Obviously there is more interest in WiS than not. This does not mean blindly making stuff that may or may not be appreciated by the community and wasting massive amounts of time and effort on something that may very well cause a lot of rage. What it does mean is use a small team to redesign and gather ideas to present to the players for an idea of what should be implemented and what would be appreciated by the community before devoting resources to it.
I agree, get the concepts in place then deliver, but the team could be bigger than it is even at this stage. Basically you have folks that maintain what is in place and very little bandwidth for design, in particular, prototyping to test ideas.
So lets get the team the resources to get those first ideas in place sooner rather than later. To me based on my software development experience that feels like more like 8 to 10 rather than 5 and they must be allowed to be 100% focused on ambulation and not shared working on other feature areas.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 19:45:00 -
[160] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:team avatar is not exactly a skeleton crew, they have 2 high-rankers a creative director, and a senior game designer.
But are they 100% focused on ambulation? I suspect not. And they need some dev and art resources to prototype some of their better ideas.
One other thing is I believe the majority of folks in Eve would be happy with something simple to start, just to see CCP is taking ambulation seriously. Let's not make the mistake of waiting till we have something massive and perfect before we players see any change in ambulation. You will never get it perfect on the first try, its the old software engineering waffle rule, you always throw the first one away, so matter how hard they try the first one will not be perfect.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 21:51:00 -
[161] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:Mashie Saldana wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:team avatar is not exactly a skeleton crew, they have 2 high-rankers a creative director, and a senior game designer.
Or more commonly known as a pre-production crew. It would be pre-production crew that they don't need to do other stuff. Like maintain whats already in game and do other non pre-production things. So, actually they do everything else more then pre-production and planing.
That is my worry, it isn't clear how much of their attention is on that planning and brainstorming and how much is nonsense like sleeve tattoos and NeX store eye candy.
Issler Dainze The Pro-Ambulation CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 06:55:00 -
[162] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:People still think this sandbox..this market simulator, is only about flying in space? *sigh* It's time to move past that and realize the dream of an integrated science fiction future sim that was originally envisioned by the creators of this fine, but lacking game. Mr Epeen do you realize that a of people are not about that vision, they are just a bunch of lispers wanting to compare pants and emote each other?
Why are all the current goons so obsessed with pants, when I was in the goons pants hardly ever were discussed!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 17:54:00 -
[163] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:People still think this sandbox..this market simulator, is only about flying in space? *sigh* It's time to move past that and realize the dream of an integrated science fiction future sim that was originally envisioned by the creators of this fine, but lacking game. Mr Epeen do you realize that a of people are not about that vision, they are just a bunch of lispers wanting to compare pants and emote each other? Why are all the current goons so obsessed with pants, when I was in the goons pants hardly ever were discussed! Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate What alt did you have in goons? Was it a goon alt or a member corp alt?
Tada O was a member of the goon alliance for about 6 months, just before the goons went to null for the first time. They were in a pretty ugly war towards the end and the then leader said corps like us were welcome to leave and come back after the war. Half of us wanted to stay and we created a second corporation to fight in the war the goons were in at the moment (The Freespacer Confederation) but most of the members of that corp were in the military and stopped playing when they were deployed.
By the time the goons had the war in hand and were making their way in null we decided to be one of the founding corps of BRUCE and we moved to Syndicate. One part of the reason we grew unhappy with BRUCE and started friction with primary BRUCE leadership is BRUCE wouldn't "blue" the goons.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 04:03:00 -
[164] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Zsamael wrote:Just my 14 pence... CCP we're fuly focused on bringing us WiS and "letting us out of that door" but then.. one dark night they realised they made a game about spaceships not about bears buying each other virtual drinks in virtual bars. Frankly the whole WiS thing doesn't really appeal to me at all as probably 90%+ of the time I'm out in space in a spaceship doing stuff that spacemen do!... Not walking a space barbie round in circles thinking "I wish I could open that door over there!". CCP kieron wrote: To those voicing concerns this will create tremendous amounts of lag for the players in space, is a waste of resources, etc., please keep in mind that PvE and/or PvP is not something that appeals to the entire player base and different players enjoy different things. A number of players have asked for something along these lines since launch, and we have an opportunity to invest time in this technology for future projects.
As t0rfi stated in the blog, if this is not something you wish to take part in, you will not be forced to do so. You will still have the option to use the current interface for all station services and will not have to use the out of pod interface.
So, this quotation still does not back-up your "MAJORITY of EVE players" claim you keep making. It simply states a "number of players". How many players is that exactly? What can you show us that quantifies a number? /In before your next Ad hominem.
How about you show me a number that proves me wrong, you can't can you.
How about you stop wasting our time asking for something it would take a CCP survey to understand, realize you have no idea about numbers, all we have is impressions and make your reasoned case against ambulation. Oh, and with proof.
How about this, I've seen the number and its 72.3444456543333321346 percent in favor of Eve. Unfortunately a nondisclosure won't allow me to share the source..... so you prove me wrong.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 20:40:00 -
[165] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Doc Fury wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Stuff
Absent a valid answer to an argument you are predictably reduced to the ad homenim again. I have made no accusations or taken a position one way or another no matter how much you read that into my request for factual information. I have simply asked for your evidence to back up your assertions that a MAJORITY (i.e. 51% or more) of EVE players want WIS, and you have still not provided anything other than "proving non-existence" and "ad homenim" fallacies. You did provide a couple of links to irrelevant information, but if somewhere in there it actually states that a MAJORITY of players want WIS I am just not seeing it. "A number of players" could be 1, 2, or it could be 10000. Who's to say? Not you or me. Where is your proof exactly? EVE has over 300K accounts and maybe 10% post on the forums (guessing). Anything else you think I am doing or saying only exists in your mind. And where is your evidence that " MAJORITY (i.e. 51% or more) of EVE players" do not want WIS? Its easy to attack somebody without any evidence in your favor. I don't claim to have any evidence and have not stated that is my position. I've attacked no one and have simply asked for proof, pointing out when he evades the question or spouts-off one of his typical ad hominems. I'd just like to see his evidence since he likes to lecture others so often about this supposed "majority". If he does not have any evidence, he could admit that it is his opinion and that he does not have any actual evidence and that would suffice. He made a claim, I did not. Trying to shift the burden of non-proof to others as you are now also attempting to do is a fallacy.
Fine, first of all, if you are talking about me it is "she". And I'll end this once and for all.
I "BELIEVE" as do many others that the majority of Eve players would like ambulation in some form.
You can't refute what I believe so now please go away, you haven't contributed anything useful to the dialog here.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 22:36:00 -
[166] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:I believe that the earth is flat and the moon is made of green cheese.
You can't refute my beliefs so now go away please.
If this thread was about either of those two things I would have to agree with your position, but its not.
As to the moon made of cheese, there is good evidence to support that position!
Moon Cheese
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 19:28:00 -
[167] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:From: Crucible 1.5Quote:Team AvatarGÇÖs Interface Enhancement Pack: Storming forward with the mission to make 'hard' a battlecry for space combat and not the UI, Team Avatar brought a new level of ease-of-use and functionality to how players interact with and play the game. The patch notes for Crucible 1.5 have the full list of updates, but here are some of the highlights:
- Character Creator Portrait snapshots now retain background, pose, and lighting settings, allowing you to switch between them without altering work you had previously done and saved. Each of the four portraits can be triggered with the F1-F4 keys, "Stand still!" Idle animation will now pause while you are sculpting your character. An invalid name will indicate such prior to the player clicking to confirm their character instead of after. The interface for tucking shirts, pants and shoes is now more visible.
- HUD and Panels Personal assets are now sorted by most assets at the top More information has been added to the Route tab in the Solar System window Icons for the selected item now has a right-click dropdown of options
- EVE Market Color coding of market orders allows you to see if the item is located along your current route Modify order window now has a button to show market details for the product in question Drag and drop functionality has been added to the market Quickbar to support quickly adding modules and items from your inventory Shift dragging blueprints into Quickbar allows you to dynamically add a shopping list for various industry jobs, such as manufacturing And someone told us that team Avatar is WiS team... well at least you can spin new four rookie ships around and besides character creation is Avatar related I was talking about percentage in that post. Look at what they did... Team Avatar is working on WiS with about 1/3 of their time 5 ppl are in team, 1 is QA, so 4 persons are developing. 1/3 of 4 is 1,33. 1,33 devs are actually working on WiS... XD thats so sad that its funny And thus they can quite truthfully say they are working on WIS.
This was exactly my fear. CCP, you need to realize you are hurting the future of your game and you need to start to be more honest with the players. One and a fraction people can't get anything useful done for ambulation. This now clearly looks to be just another PR stunt.
CCP, take ambulation seriously and open that door!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 23:21:00 -
[168] - Quote
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:if this was any other thread it would be locked for being spam. repeating shite this thread is,, nothing more, nothing less. here's the bottom line, WiS is not happening anytime soon. tm And you are repeating good part of that shite here. Just look a little at your posts. i wrote them,, i'm aware of what i said. ( nice to see you writing in an irish accent ) before you guys say it,, yes i am indeed done with this thread, last words,,,,, CCP Karkur, well said, you are aware as i am that it is impossible to please all the people all the time, but you are pleasing those who count. no more from me in this thread, lock it mods,, enough said !
Since it's my thread, I say I still see reasoned conversation in this thread and I vigorously request it remains open.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 08:31:00 -
[169] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Dramaticus wrote:173 pages over a useless feature man look at you pubbies go To be fair to the pubbies the vast majority of the posts in this thread are pro-Eve/anti-WiS.
Last time someone took the time to count the pro ambulation posts were dramatically higher than the same 7 goon trolls.
So as the few "usual suspects" goon trolls like to say. Prove it, count those posts and show us those numbers. Half of them have to be from Lady Marmot and contain either the word "pants" or "space barbie".
So prove it or STFU.
Issler Danze Supporter of Ambulation CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 19:48:00 -
[170] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Sozzac wrote:CCP Crowd Control Production need to wake up and see that there game EVE Online will no live that loong without a fullblown 3d character concept lol...you do realize Eve didn't launch last year, right? Eve has done fine without Space Barbie and when CCP tried to go that direction it cost them a large chunk of subscribers and 20% of their employees.
Over extending with too many other resources in unlaunched cash sink games is what cost them 20% of their employees, not ambulation no matter how many times you claim it was ambulation.
And I bet I've been playing Eve longer than you so yes, I know eve wasn't launched yesterday. You know once there were huge companies making things like ice boxes and buggy whips, not so many no, maybe evolving and changing is a GOOD thing.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 19:28:00 -
[171] - Quote
Supporters of ambulation I need your support!
I appear to be the only CSM 7 candidate that will make more focus on ambulation a topic in the CSM 7 if elected.
A recent podcast blogger has been trying to put together a debate on ambulation and no CSM 6 member will even agree to participate! If CSM 7 is CSM with a new hat then they will be happy to bolt that door closed forever!
I have tried to keep politics out of this thread, but ambulation supports I need your votes! If you support my efforts to keep ambulation alive then please spread the word. Get out and vote so someday soon we can get out that door!
Issler Dainze The only pro ambulation CSM 7 candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1101
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 21:38:00 -
[172] - Quote
Aida Nu wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Supporters of ambulation I need your support!
I appear to be the only CSM 7 candidate that will make more focus on ambulation a topic in the CSM 7 if elected.
A recent podcast blogger has been trying to put together a debate on ambulation and no CSM 6 member will even agree to participate! If CSM 7 is CSM with a new hat then they will be happy to bolt that door closed forever!
I have tried to keep politics out of this thread, but ambulation supports I need your votes! If you support my efforts to keep ambulation alive then please spread the word. Get out and vote so someday soon we can get out that door!
Issler Dainze The only pro ambulation CSM 7 candidate Have you seen my socks? i think i have misplaced them
I'll keep an eye out for them.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1102
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:10:00 -
[173] - Quote
Aquila Draco wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:His point has pretty much been the point of every person in this thread that want's to see the fulfillment of WiS. It is the few that are afraid of change that don't understand what WiS really means to EvE and CCP. WiS, more content and new content, not just reiteration of the same space content is what is going to keep EvE going. It is not the elite, hardcore PvP players that keep EvE going. It is the Highsec dwelling, casual players that do. This is evident by the numbers alone of who is playing where. 80% of the populace is in Highsec last I checked.
Some people seem to think that what they want is what everybody wants. This is not the case. I have said this before...I have supported and even proposed ideas in the past that I don't necessarily want to see happen but because I realize that they may be what is best for CCP and EvE as a whole, I support them. I honestly don't want to see Microtransactions of any kind in EvE. This includes PLEX. But I realize that they are a necessary evil for the survival of both CCP and EvE. So I support them to an extent.
WiS is a good thing for EvE. Anything that broadens the gameplay and creates more avenues for other players to join is a good thing. Regardless of what a player is doing in the game, it is income for CCP which means more devs, which means more stuff for FiS and WiS, which means better content and more frequent content and a longer life for EvE. But i can't understand that some ppl just cant (or dont want to) understand it, can't see the obvious. It looks like some ppl want to see EVE dead.
At one time that was the stated goals of the Goons in Eve.
Issler Dainze CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1103
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 05:46:00 -
[174] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:eve online is a complex game with great depth. the wis i see that is wanted here is not complex nor does it have any depth you all seem like a bunch of deviant freaks that want no more than dress up and emote each other in the corp room. you want social first, gameplay second. and don't tell me you had this idea and that idea, it's all shitstupid don't quit your day jobs and try to be game dev, only team avatar can do that so give them some goddamn time. eve online is a complex game with great depth. wis has to be the same.
and issler, funny how the goons, have quite a lot to lose in-game if the game is destroyed, in fact they've lost it all before and actually put the effort to getting it back again.
If you don't believe that early in the history of the goons they openly stated their goal was to ruin Eve then you need to learn your Goon history. They intended to do to Eve what they had so successfully done to other games. I'll admit these days the Goons seem to have bought into the future of Eve more that they once did.
Issler Dainze CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1231
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 07:49:00 -
[175] - Quote
Folks,
Only a few more days to vote in the CSM elections. If you want someone in the CSM that will remind CCP we need some attention on ambulation going forward please consider supporting my campaign!
Issler Dainze CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1234
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:18:00 -
[176] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:
I am not talking about ganking I am talking about wanting that EVE loose players That only person who wants EVE dead wants And that person who wants to see EVE dead is against WiS - what a surprise. [:roll:
Goon or not a goon, you want the same, dead EVE.
That's a huge straw man argument. Why do you have to be so melodramatic? Arguing that EVE will die without WIS, or that people who don't want WIS also want EVE dead is a completely un-defendable position. The sky is not going to fall if CCP can't deliver on WIS anytime soon, and EVE does not appear to be losing any existing players just because it does not have WIS now, well, other than a few here who keep threatening to quit but are still posting. I would think throwing a lot of Dev resources and cash at WIS again (like CCP did before) before having a formal, executable plan that involves meaningful, engaging, gameplay would be more likely to threaten the health of EVE. CCP delivering another incomplete expansion like "Incarna" where customer expectations were not even close to what CCP could accomplish would be a threat to the health of EVE.
CCP did NOT throw a lot of resources and cash at WiS, they threw it at vampires, consoles and NeX. And I certainly am not suggesting a huge resource allocation to ambulation. I do think the current team is understaffed.
There have been recent posts about the dwindling number of players online. To think Eve is currently on course for huge growth and a bright future requires a degree of baseless optimism I have a hard time mustering.
We need fresh experiences with lower learning curves that will attract and keep new players. Ambulation can be a big part of that. CCP needs to keep ambulation as a serious part of their plans and I think that means a bigger team.
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1257
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:00:00 -
[177] - Quote
So I see this running theme that somehow all I want is emoting with other players. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
What I am calling for when I said start small and get us something sooner is simple. If CCP starts out with the goal for the next delivery to be full on Jita sized environments and dozens of new game play elements we will never see it in our lifetime. By setting a goal for the first delivery as a "jesus feature" as Hilmar called it CCP will never ever get there and if they do they will get it wrong.
These days agile development practices are the norm. They are all about smaller incremental delivery. That is what I am calling for.
For example I suggested a corp meeting room. I don't mean something useless, for example it could have a war room feature to let you share tactical planning for an upcoming battle. Or to review logistics of upcoming mining operations. How about a recruiting office where I could interview someone that wants to join, allowing me to see what I can with the API and interview them about their history before I accept their application. Start small and build. There have been lots of other suggestions for smaller things we could get sooner that would be useful.
Also the benefit of smaller deliveries there is more opportunity to get it right. Mistakes cost less and are easier to correct going forward. The CQ was an example of "big feature set delivery" and look how that played out.
So spin it anyway you want but when you say all I want is a room to emote with my friends in you really are off the mark. In fact in virtually every other MMO I play I find emoting distracting and rarely bother to learn the commands.
Also, as to clothes and Nex, again, not my thing. What is in the character creator is fine with me. The ONLY thing I would like to see is some manner for corp and alliance members to have the opportunity to display their logo and I'd prefer that on ships first. When CCP has completed all aspects of Eve and live in a giant cave built out of the money they made being so awesome then maybe they could give a corp or alliance Tee shirt.
Issler Dainze Fan of Smaller Incremental Ambulation Feature Introduction The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1258
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 21:06:00 -
[178] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:My point is that unfortunately, while team avatar is working on gameplay, there are people like this crazed csm candidate wissler dainze, who is blatantly telling Team Avatar to "not over-think" about making wis into a viable platform of meaningful gameplay, she is in fact demanding CCP to just throw out something quick and dirty like a corp room that has no gameplay functions. And then we see a parade of freaks coming out, parroting their support, trying to influence Team Avatar their way crying about how they think a bunch of dudes emoting each others' avatars will complete EVE Online as the ultimate sci-fi simulator. Some people are just lack vision, welp. Okay, thank you for the clarification. That makes your position very clear, thanks. And apologies for not understanding that from your previous post.
So the "clarification" offered is neither a correct representation of my position and I could hardly see myself as "crazed".
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1258
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:21:00 -
[179] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:So the "clarification" offered is neither a correct representation of my position and I could hardly see myself as "crazed". /sigh Do you want a tissue or are you demanding an explanation as to why I quoted Taiwanistan to apologise to him after reading the rest of the posts in the thread? I'm guessing you missed the fact that I dropped a like on your post that explained your position. So why pull things out of context?
No, I'm sorry, I understood your post. I meant it to other readers of the thread.
Serious apologies for the misunderstanding.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1259
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:39:00 -
[180] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Guttripper wrote: There have been some very pro-active WIS supporters within this thread that have stated they do not want a FIS version within the station walls. That is, the potential to get ganked, jumped, or killed should not be a part of WIS. While there have been comments about having stations broken down into various security levels and I have mentioned some potential to have new trees of skills, again there have been a cry against such activities. It seems to boil down to WIS should be a place to chat, play games, and socialize
So Taiwanistan concludes (I believe) that if there is no meaningful game play, two avatars standing around will basically just emote back and forth (while potentially wearing fancy threads to show off)
But I could be wrong.
Why does "meaningful gameplay" have to revolve around us shooting each other? I assume you and Taiwanstan are American.. I think there are only a couple of people who have said WiS shouldn't have PVP in it. The majority of EVE players would most likely be in favour of in station PVP but it would have to be drastically different from the FiS style of combat. I think the last thing people would want is for stations to be full of people jumping around firing lasers like some twelve year old Halo player, but if we where to have that style of play, it would have to be reserved for nul sec and we would need something differentness in high sec. I've said it before and i'll say it again, it's not our job to decide what should be in WiS, we're just here to show support for its expansion through the implementation of actual gameplay PS. I'm happy to see that Taiwanistan has finally seen the light and moved over to the pr WiS camp also the products of wis activities (no clothes and other vanities should still be via NEX) has to be part of the player controlled market/industry, as demonstrated by how PI products are made, bought and sold by the players. *no it's not all about the ganking. if these conditions are not met there is no reason for wis to exist.
Yikes, my head is exploding!
Liking your post and looking outside to see if its raining frogs.
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate.
|
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1259
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 06:26:00 -
[181] - Quote
Daniel Jackson wrote:i want walking in stations, i been flying in space and twerling my ship around for 9 years! give us veterans a new frontier to venture apon
Other than your SIG, a very large like for your post!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1259
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 06:34:00 -
[182] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:There is a concept, resources are finite, so when buying a blade you want the one with the sharpest edge, not the one with the most ornate hilt. I imagine there is some austerity measures going on in CCP, times are not great. The things you described Issler corp room and etc, are the nice ornamentation on the hilt, not the edge. Gameplay is the cutting edge that will retain and attract players. With many challenges looming in the horizon, i don't see how CCP can spare the resources on ornamentation.
Also, you cannot deny the fact that the emoter freaks are out there, and unfortunately they infest like parasites on the back of your CSM platform.
Yes, I am somehow responsible for every person's idea of WiS?? Are you personally responsible for every irrational goon troll?
No, you aren't. Because unlike at least one goon troll common here that found it impossible to use the character creator and has been cursed with the ugliest face in all of Eve and an obsession with pants, you actually post some well thought out posts.
I don't paint you with the stereotype goon brush because you show reason. I ask you to give me the same courtesy, measure me by MY ideas and what I post, not the imagined worst case stereotypes of emoting NeX fashion obsessed "space barbies" because that is definitely not me and not the pro ambulation folks that posted in this thread.
Issler Danze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1271
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:09:00 -
[183] - Quote
Only a few hours left to vote for the only ambulation candidate.
Let's get that door open!
Vote for Issler -http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470 |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1277
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 23:09:00 -
[184] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Yoma Karima wrote:Funny how manny pages you have to go back just to see the original topic. Kinda shows how little support there actually is for WiS nonsense. Or how many times a day you come to it to troll and bump the thread.
I finally got around to setting her post to ignore.... my life has never been better since!
Issler
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1280
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 23:46:00 -
[185] - Quote
189 pages and 100200+ views, not to count all the pro-ambulation likes spread across the thread!
CCP, there is all the evidence you need to show we want that door opened!
Issler Dainze CSM 7 Candidate Vote Issler for Ambulation |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1283
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:47:00 -
[186] - Quote
Thanks to everyone that supported my CSM 7 efforts. Let's hope we get someone in the CSM 7 that will keep CCP's feet to the fire and get that door open!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1293
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 19:13:00 -
[187] - Quote
Romar Agent wrote:Is the voting still on? I would appreciate full WIS, but it would need to a. not try to grill my mainboard b. have some meaningfull content.
Whereas meaningfull for me would be something as simple as a poker table (perhaps like PKR) - just a way to interact with other avatars.
Voting ended, waiting for the results.
I would definitely also be happy to see something small to start.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1300
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:47:00 -
[188] - Quote
We won!!
If anyone watched the CSM panel you see Mittens is just the chair, there is no dictator in the CSM. So we won!! A supporter of ambulation will be a voice in the ear of CSM 7 working to get the door open!!!
Thanks to all of you that supported my efforts!
I am not a big fan of emotes but if I was and there was one for it I'd be dancing a victory dance!
Now lets get that door open!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1300
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:11:00 -
[189] - Quote
Dr Prometheus wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:You can watch the Eve keynote from yesterday where the CEO of CCP and the lead producer say that Eve is a core spaceship game and there will be no more "jesus features" (like WiS).
Ok - is there somebody who is not a WiS-troll that can confirm this, please? Not a "jesus" feature but an addition to the game. (Bit like Dust.) And they alread mentioned some stuff to do with your avatar like exploring abandoned (sleeper) structures etc etc.
I heard it on the live feed, but you could twist that to mean anything. So to say that was saying ambulation is dead is basically crazy talk from a pants obsessed victim of the inability to operate the character creator interface.
They also reran the future of Eve video and said that was still the vision and that was all about ambulation. They wouldn't have started the keynote with that video if ambulation isn't in their vision.
So CCP OPEN THAT DOOR!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1302
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:33:00 -
[190] - Quote
Jett0 wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:No one is saying spaceships are the heart of Eve I'm assuming this is a typo.
OOPS
It is.
Issler |
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1302
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:34:00 -
[191] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Just stay active on the forums Issler.
Count on it!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1304
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 06:01:00 -
[192] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Issler, since you are the voice for WiS on the CSM, I hope you can find it in your heart to show your support (no pun intended) for THIS idea. PLEASE?!
So more realistic character physics. I'd say a goal way down the road (way way way way down). Sure.
But I can't imagine worrying about that until we have a LOT more on the other side of the door to enjoy.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1386
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 01:21:00 -
[193] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Last I heard the future plan for THE WIS is to spend Mitten's 10 billion isk while attempting not to be suicide ganked by a bunch of PO'd Goonies
Not sure if that is the plan but sadly the mittens apology thread may become bigger than this one! Gah!
Actually, to the ambulation opponents you can't deny that multiple repeats of the vision video which almost all about ambulation says CCP still shares a vision in and outside space ships.
We must get them to open that door!!
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1944
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 19:09:00 -
[194] - Quote
Ambulation team, a question, you are monitoring this thread, can you tell us what happened to multiple pages of posts?
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1946
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 20:57:00 -
[195] - Quote
I reported a number of posts weeks ago, they may just have a huge backlog. I'd love to think at least one of the frequent "pants" posters ended up with a dose of the ban-hammer!
Issler |
|
|
|