| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Hyper Snyper
Pervicax Socium The Unthinkables
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Man CCP those are some killer ships. Lucky guys who win this tournament. However I kind of feel that it's a waste of sorts that these are pirate ship. Would anyone ever pvp in them? I think the Chremoas is absolutely badass. Would it be possible to have something similar looking available as a tech 2 version of the dramiel? Obviously with reduced stats of whats available for the tournament as not to detract from the reward for winning but still better then the standard dram. Give your opinions but keep flaming to minimum. |

ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1593
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
I've been wondering if CCP are ever going to produce cloaky gunships that aren't T3s for a while now. Seems like, for the general circulation, the answer is no.
...saying that, the new Helios can put out ~100dps and gets a fair tank for a frigate that also has a cloak. Good for wolfpack ops. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |

Silivar Karkun
Imperium Aeternam Phantom Armada
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hyper Snyper wrote:Man CCP those are some killer ships.  Lucky guys who win this tournament. However I kind of feel that it's a waste of sorts that these are pirate ship. Would anyone ever pvp in them? I think the Chremoas is absolutely badass. Would it be possible to have something similar looking available as a tech 2 version of the dramiel? Obviously with reduced stats of whats available for the tournament as not to detract from the reward for winning but still better then the standard dram. Give your opinions but keep flaming to minimum.
T2 pirate hulls? heck no! 
now if they released more hulls to the pirate lines it would in fact, a good content injection. the Moracha uses the Ixion hull, one of the most seen angel ships in the game (the pirate Kruul uses one).
it doesnt have sense that for example the guristas have several versions of both destroyers and battlecruisers, and we dont get to see those types of ships avaliable for players.
there are gurista versions of the ferox and the cormorant, another hull for the bantam and even a gurista osprey.
the angels have the same, they have the Medusa, the Hydra, the Ixion and the Echo as aditional models.
i dont understand why CCP doesnt complete the pirate ship lines, we have navy battlecruisers so it has sense we get also navy destroyers and pirate destroyers and battlecruisers. |

Hyper Snyper
Pervicax Socium The Unthinkables
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
So perhaps add another ship to the line that uses the Chremoas hull? Reduced stats but still a cov ops kind of ship. |

Mildew Wolf
89
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
395
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
black ops moracha fleets anyone?    Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin
you're welcome |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2331
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 16:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them
I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Whether the winner is willing to use them or not is pretty irrelevant, as there will be so few of them most players will never see one anyway. Fact is, they should be releasing "real" interesting content for pirates, to pirates. These ships themselves (with the stats they are likely to have) may be OP as they stand, but honestly the concept behind them is pretty fantastic and they should've considered stuff like this for, I dunno, a themed pirate expansion (for starters.) Something I've certainly seen numerous forum threads about in the past regarding expansions/low-sec love. It's just shortsighted of them to make hulls/ship-types like those so bloody limited they are more likely to collect dust in a collectors hangar then ever see the light of day. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
19903
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.

For the record: Moracha is Spanish for 'dark purple'. 
Chremoas is just an absolutely made up word, as far as I can determine. |

Mystical Might
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
I promise to PvP in a Moracha if VoC wins the tourny.
NPNP. |

Hyper Snyper
Pervicax Socium The Unthinkables
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dun'Gal wrote:Whether the winner is willing to use them or not is pretty irrelevant, as there will be so few of them most players will never see one anyway. Fact is, they should be releasing "real" interesting content for pirates, to pirates. These ships themselves (with the stats they are likely to have) may be OP as they stand, but honestly the concept behind them is pretty fantastic and they should've considered stuff like this for, I dunno, a themed pirate expansion (for starters.) Something I've certainly seen numerous forum threads about in the past regarding expansions/low-sec love. It's just shortsighted of them to make hulls/ship-types like those so bloody limited they are more likely to collect dust in a collectors hangar then ever see the light of day.
You hit it on the nail my friend. |

Silivar Karkun
Imperium Aeternam Phantom Armada
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:22:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hyper Snyper wrote:Dun'Gal wrote:Whether the winner is willing to use them or not is pretty irrelevant, as there will be so few of them most players will never see one anyway. Fact is, they should be releasing "real" interesting content for pirates, to pirates. These ships themselves (with the stats they are likely to have) may be OP as they stand, but honestly the concept behind them is pretty fantastic and they should've considered stuff like this for, I dunno, a themed pirate expansion (for starters.) Something I've certainly seen numerous forum threads about in the past regarding expansions/low-sec love. It's just shortsighted of them to make hulls/ship-types like those so bloody limited they are more likely to collect dust in a collectors hangar then ever see the light of day. You hit the nail on the head my friend.
that, only recently we got navy battlecruisers, how long until we get more pirate ships? |

Hyper Snyper
Pervicax Socium The Unthinkables
36
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:War Kitten wrote:Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.  For the record: Moracha is Spanish for 'dark purple'.  Chremoas is just an absolutely made up word, as far as I can determine.
Chremoas is a demon.
"Chremoas: In the Ars Theurgia, Chremoas is one of ten great dukes who serve the infernal prince Bidiel. Chremoas oversees no fewer than two thousand and four hundred inferior spirits. When he manifests, he is reputed to take a human shape that is beautiful and pleasant to look upon." |

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
973
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 17:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
For a moment I though this read " LA CREMOSA Y LA MOROCHA" ... And I was LIKE OMG ....
Though this was some XXX amateur argentinian film reference ... left confused 
Here, have this Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |

Julius Priscus
118
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 18:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
who gives crap about these new ships?
they will almost never see the light of day. more 1's and 0's that take up space on my pc lol. -»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
19916
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 19:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Hyper Snyper wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:War Kitten wrote:Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.  For the record: Moracha is Spanish for 'dark purple'.  Chremoas is just an absolutely made up word, as far as I can determine. Chremoas is a demon. "Chremoas: In the Ars Theurgia, Chremoas is one of ten great dukes who serve the infernal prince Bidiel. Chremoas oversees no fewer than two thousand and four hundred inferior spirits. When he manifests, he is reputed to take a human shape that is beautiful and pleasant to look upon."
Thanks. |

Alexa Coates
Federation Navy Assembly Group LLC
654
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 19:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
I just hope this sets a precedent for more cruiser sized black ops ships/cloaky boats. That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers. |

Andrea Griffin
543
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 19:58:00 -
[18] - Quote
Silivar Karkun wrote:i dont understand why CCP doesnt complete the pirate ship lines, we have navy battlecruisers so it has sense we get also navy destroyers and pirate destroyers and battlecruisers. I think the reason is power creep and a lack of a niche. "Faster, More Damage, More EHP!" isn't really much of a niche - it doesn't provide something that's really unique and special. The current line of pirate ships offer a few combinations that aren't typically available in the standard ship lines (for example, a shield tanked drone boat like the guristas line, or a shield tanked laser boat like the sansha line).
If you can think of a really good role that doesn't exist in the current line of ships then adding a new ship line could make a lot of sense, but just adding more ships for the sake of adding more ships doesn't really add a lot of value.
If by adding a ship the result is, "Why would you ever want to use old ships X,Y, and Z? A is clearly superior!" then it's a bad thing to add.
Right now CCP is working on balancing the ships we currently have which is already a big undertaking. Let's see what holes exist after that before we go ahead and add more things.
GÖÑ CCP Sreegs is my favorite developer. |

AyayaPanda
Team Pizza No Holes Barred
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 21:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:War Kitten wrote:Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.  For the record: Moracha is Spanish for 'dark purple'.  Chremoas is just an absolutely made up word, as far as I can determine.
Moracha came from the Lesser Key of Solomon as well:
one of the 12 dukes of Soleliel |

Mildew Wolf
89
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 21:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Dun'Gal wrote:Whether the winner is willing to use them or not is pretty irrelevant, as there will be so few of them most players will never see one anyway. Fact is, they should be releasing "real" interesting content for pirates, to pirates. These ships themselves (with the stats they are likely to have) may be OP as they stand, but honestly the concept behind them is pretty fantastic and they should've considered stuff like this for, I dunno, a themed pirate expansion (for starters.) Something I've certainly seen numerous forum threads about in the past regarding expansions/low-sec love. It's just shortsighted of them to make hulls/ship-types like those so bloody limited they are more likely to collect dust in a collectors hangar then ever see the light of day.
idk it seems like people losing expensive rare ships is kinda revenant these days...gets a lot of attention. and i personally think its a better game with people willing to risk those kind of rarities. better than a game where people just want more cov ops cloaks etc that are unnecessary and only serve to make things unbalanced and obsolete existing ships/roles. yes i like new things too but only when it actually makes the game better...something not easy in such a complex environment |

Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.10 23:18:00 -
[21] - Quote
I fail to see how a frigate, that can fit two guns and a covops cloak obsoletes anything else. It cannot fit torpedoes/bomb launchers, therefore stealth bombers aren't hurt and if it wants to fit a probe launcher say goodbye to either a gun, or the cloak. therefore doesn't hurt covops either. Also comparing a derped Revenant to the loss of alliance tourney ships is sort of apples to oranges. AT ships are/have been lost (and are arguably far more useful than a Revenant,) but they rarely make the headlines when it happens. Exceptions perhaps being the ones featured in PVP videos/lost in the AT.
Basically my point is this sort of new ship content is better served in the hands of the wider community rather than with the few nerds with too much time on there hands, and more than likely lacking the testicular fortitude to risk them in the first place, that compete/win the AT. Give them useless trophy ships, or PLEX for there accounts, because that's exactly what these nice designs are likely to turn into. It's basically a waste of a good design idea. |

Stegas Tyrano
GLU CANU Open Space Consultancy
542
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 03:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
Too bad the Ixion will only be available to a select few. Herping your derp since 19Potato --á[Proposal] - Ingame Visual Adverts |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
2897
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 05:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Dun'Gal wrote:I fail to see how a frigate, that can fit two guns and a covops cloak obsoletes anything else. Look at the stats. The frigate has the equivalent of ~8 effective guns. And no decloaking delay.
The Cruiser has something like 10+ effective turrets, can use covert cloaks, and can web out to ranges half that of that of the Rapier (20km+ with regular web... 28km+ with a Fed Navy web... and with Loki links it can touch things even farther away).
Basically you're looking at a covert-ops Thrasher and a Tornado-Rapier hybrid.
Even taking away the silly stats, the concept of them of OP. There is a reason cloaking specialized ships are pre-nerfed. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
37
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 05:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
I get that these ships as they are , are OP. Definately not saying they aren't, however, the concept itself is not OP. Unless of course you're a carebear afraid of AFK cloakers. In which case, you're a baby. When you take away the insane AT stats you're left with a bomber thats suited for fighting frigs, and a cloaky Loki, without ridiculous resists, etc. At the same time maintaining the roles for the aforementioned ships that they would be similar to, not replacing them. I'm not asking for OP death machines, I'm just saying the idea behind these ships is interesting, and they should've used this particular idea for ships everyone can use not a very rare few. |

cerbus
www.caldariprimeponyclub.com
106
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 07:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Silivar Karkun wrote:Hyper Snyper wrote:Man CCP those are some killer ships.  Lucky guys who win this tournament. However I kind of feel that it's a waste of sorts that these are pirate ship. Would anyone ever pvp in them? I think the Chremoas is absolutely badass. Would it be possible to have something similar looking available as a tech 2 version of the dramiel? Obviously with reduced stats of whats available for the tournament as not to detract from the reward for winning but still better then the standard dram. Give your opinions but keep flaming to minimum. T2 pirate hulls? heck no!  now if they released more hulls to the pirate lines it would in fact, a good content injection. the Moracha uses the Ixion hull, one of the most seen angel ships in the game (the pirate Kruul uses one). it doesnt have sense that for example the guristas have several versions of both destroyers and battlecruisers, and we dont get to see those types of ships avaliable for players. there are gurista versions of the ferox and the cormorant, another hull for the bantam and even a gurista osprey. the angels have the same, they have the Medusa, the Hydra, the Ixion and the Echo as aditional models. i dont understand why CCP doesnt complete the pirate ship lines, we have navy battlecruisers so it has sense we get also navy destroyers and pirate destroyers and battlecruisers. lack of models isnt an excuse, they're already there, just that they have to add them as playable versions, maybe invent some new hulls for the Sansha which they actually lack models and the Blood Raiders too (too many Amarr versions and only 2 unique hulls). but for the most part, the Serpentis, the Angels and the Guristas have a complete set of subcap ships.
There are models in the client files already for every Serpentis and Gurista ship, with unique textures for almost all of them.
just say'n :| Ship Customisation Survey - www.tinyurl.com/cppcsurvey |

Mildew Wolf
89
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 08:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dun'Gal wrote:I get that these ships as they are , are OP. Definately not saying they aren't, however, the concept itself is not OP. Unless of course you're a carebear afraid of AFK cloakers. In which case, you're a baby. When you take away the insane AT stats you're left with a bomber thats suited for fighting frigs, and a cloaky Loki, without ridiculous resists, etc. At the same time maintaining the roles for the aforementioned ships that they would be similar to, not replacing them. I'm not asking for OP death machines, I'm just saying the idea behind these ships is interesting, and they should've used this particular idea for ships everyone can use not a very rare few.
in my experience it is usually the "carebear afraid" "baby" that are wanting more cov ops cloak powerful ships. i think this stems from a misunderstanding that the cov ops cloak will help them more than it helps the people they are afraid of... almost every risk averse person i know starts off trying pvp in a stealth bomber for this reason
thats not to say there couldnt be any room for more cov ops ships. ccp previously mentioned a potential larger sized cov ops meant to kill capital ships. to me this is the way to go. entirely new roles that make sense are good for the game. shoehorning new ships into already existing roles is just unnecessary while likely creating unforeseen balance problems or obsolescence of existing ships |

Ottersmacker
Genos Occidere
388
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 15:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dun'Gal wrote:I fail to see how a frigate, that can fit two guns and a covops cloak obsoletes anything else. It cannot fit torpedoes/bomb launchers, therefore stealth bombers aren't hurt actually it's gonna obsolete the turret/rocket stealth bombers -.- oh noes i just locked an open door.. strange, yet symbolically compelling. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1210
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 16:09:00 -
[28] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:War Kitten wrote:Mildew Wolf wrote:hopefully someone that isnt too "risk averse" wins them I hear PL doesn't afraid to lose expensive unique ships.  For the record: Moracha is Spanish for 'dark purple'.  Chremoas is just an absolutely made up word, as far as I can determine.
Chremoas is some sortof demon creature thingy Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg
I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

412nv Yaken
The Conference Elite Rainbow Dash Friends
44
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 22:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
Hyper Snyper wrote:Man CCP those are some killer ships.  Lucky guys who win this tournament. However I kind of feel that it's a waste of sorts that these are pirate ship. Would anyone ever pvp in them? .
Answer yes and they would get owned lol
http://www.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=19567004 |

Felicity Love
Whore and Peace
830
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 01:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
Nice ships... and 90% of them are doomed to gather dust and/or only be endlessly spun around in various Epeeny videos that will soon appear on Youtube. Sad, really.

Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |