EVE Search - Cannot unanchor Personal Hanger Array

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Wormholes

Cannot unanchor Personal Hanger Array

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Grey Beard Newbies On Xstacy 3	Posted - 2013.08.09 05:03:00 - [1] - Quote Someone left some stuff in it... its the last thing we need to take down besides the tower. What should we do... any suggestions or tips?
Jack Miton Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 2231	Posted - 2013.08.09 05:17:00 - [2] - Quote Shoot it. And remember: It's not a bug, it's a feature. (Seriously CCP, directors NEED to be able to remove items form these things.)
Ripley13 Scrub Fleet LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM 1	Posted - 2013.08.09 08:51:00 - [3] - Quote What jack said, destroy the hanger. You can still unanchor your tower and move it elsewhere, also what ever is still in the hanger will drop into cargo cans for you to loot up.
Chitsa Jason Infinity Explorers Exhale. 729	Posted - 2013.08.09 09:33:00 - [4] - Quote Unfortunately you will have to shoot it. Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. CSM8 Member Twitter:-á@ChitsaJason Skype: Casparas
Xen Solarus Inner 5phere 522	Posted - 2013.08.09 10:05:00 - [5] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: (Seriously CCP, directors NEED to be able to remove items form these things.) Quoted for truth. Post with your main, like a BOSS!
Random Woman Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 53	Posted - 2013.08.09 11:06:00 - [6] - Quote Chitsa Jason wrote: Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. I'd like to see the usecase that says: "It would be smart if you cant unanchor the things if someone probably not even in your corp anymore has stuff in the hangar" It's just a standard lazy ass CCP Copy Paste development that underwent no test at all. Someone took the code from stations glued it to those hangars. Now they can say we did what you wanted, also here is an instant notification about new sigs in your system. Still wondering why they dont bookmark those automatically and put an exploration sticker on it as well.
Jack Miton Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 2233	Posted - 2013.08.09 12:39:00 - [7] - Quote Chitsa Jason wrote: Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. The standard line from CCP about every stupid and obvious bug lately... gets old. personal hangers can't be taken down once put up because theyre badly designed, working as intended. smas arent meant to drop stuff when blown up, working as intended. seems legit.... someone, anyone, at CCP needs to take ownership of the bullsh*t lines they give us and fix their crap. or at the very least give a propper "we're looking into it, here's what we want to do with it" response. not just "pay no attention to it, everything is fine, go about your day".
Mr Kidd Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 1433	Posted - 2013.08.09 12:51:00 - [8] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: Shoot it. And remember: It's not a bug, it's a feature. (Seriously CCP, directors NEED to be able to remove items form these things.) I'm surprised starbase config isn't required by every player in the corp in order for them to be useable. HTFU!...for the children!
Chester Floyd Shadow Vanguard. 23	Posted - 2013.08.09 12:56:00 - [9] - Quote Chitsa Jason wrote: Unfortunately you will have to shoot it. Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. So you're the guy that got the plane ticket?
stup idity 44	Posted - 2013.08.09 14:28:00 - [10] - Quote Chitsa Jason wrote: Unfortunately you will have to shoot it. Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. And sometimes intentions are misguided. I am the Herald of all beings that are me.

Rroff Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork 288	Posted - 2013.08.09 14:35:00 - [11] - Quote I can see why they did it that way. Not really a fan of them myself tho - if you have stuff you don't want anyone to steal, blowup or whatever (aside from don't bring it to wormhole space) train one of the extra char slots to a basic hauler or better a prowler (doesn't take all that much time) and offline it with stuff in.
Indo Nira DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized. 85	Posted - 2013.08.11 23:58:00 - [12] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: Chitsa Jason wrote: Its not perfect mechanic but apparently its working as intended. The standard line from CCP about every stupid and obvious bug lately... gets old. personal hangers can't be taken down once put up because theyre badly designed, working as intended. smas arent meant to drop stuff when blown up, working as intended. seems legit.... someone, anyone, at CCP needs to take ownership of the bullsht lines they give us and fix their crap. or at the very least give a propper "we're looking into it, here's what we want to do with it" response. not just "pay no attention to it, everything is fine, go about your day". *** you guys are thickheaded. pretty sure that from the very first moment these things were announced, ccp stated that this is how it's gonna work. at least for now. i'm positive that actually means it's working as they intended it to work
Dringy Tsero XYRESIC. 5	Posted - 2013.08.12 01:09:00 - [13] - Quote I remember reading that ceo's and directors were supposed to be able to at least view the contents..... But that went out the window. Least then you could weigh up the options, (unanchor???? Or destroy, hrrrmmmm) They are just poco's that you anchor in your tower force field atm. Just something to feed all the people who are fed up with pos's Don't get me wrong they are great. But I don't know why you add such a useful module and not allow ceo's to ATLEAST view what they would destroy..... Blowing up the module to get friendly corpies stuff out.... Come on CCP you can do better than that. Pos's aren't permanent they can be knocked into reio and killed in under 2 days, and your mates can't even save your stuff..... 'Working as intended' = don't want to spend time on the sh#t Pos's, let's just cut and paste the poco code.
Jack Miton Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 2240	Posted - 2013.08.12 01:35:00 - [14] - Quote Indo Nira wrote: **** you guys are thickheaded. pretty sure that from the very first moment these things were announced, ccp stated that this is how it's gonna work. at least for now. i'm positive that actually means it's working as they intended it to work i know this, and it's fkn stupid.
ChaseTheLasers Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium Kill It With Fire 58	Posted - 2013.08.12 17:05:00 - [15] - Quote How hard would it have been to just eject the items into a can on unanchor? Even that's not ideal, but come on, the code for that can't be hard.
Nix Anteris Bite Me inc Bitten. 135	Posted - 2013.08.12 18:42:00 - [16] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: (Seriously CCP, directors NEED to be able to remove items form these things.) No, you need to be able to destroy the contents when unanchoring. Trusting directors.. pfff
Sith1s Spectre Sky Fighters 158	Posted - 2013.08.14 12:57:00 - [17] - Quote What Nix said. Perfect solution is the items are destroyed when the damn thing is unanchored. CCP please consider hats as a clothing option for our spaceship barbies.-á Artist impression of what this could potentially be http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t66/ROBC5Z06/sithsig_zps86971c83.jpg
Jack Miton Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 2252	Posted - 2013.08.14 13:05:00 - [18] - Quote Nix Anteris wrote: Jack Miton wrote: (Seriously CCP, directors NEED to be able to remove items form these things.) No, you need to be able to destroy the contents when unanchoring. Trusting directors.. pfff sure, cos then anyone with roles needs to be trustworthy...
Svodola Darkfury Heaven's End League of Infamy 242	Posted - 2013.08.14 20:45:00 - [19] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: Indo Nira wrote: **** you guys are thickheaded. pretty sure that from the very first moment these things were announced, ccp stated that this is how it's gonna work. at least for now. i'm positive that actually means it's working as they intended it to work i know this, and it's fkn stupid. CCP says something will work poorly. We give feedback about it. They ignore it. Problems arise, and we're not allowed to give additional feedback? POS's need some love, the role systems are rendered ineffective in regards to POS management, and we've actually LOST functionality in POS warfare due to "attack on aggression" not being an option anymore, and POS mods not dropping items over 27.5k in size. These band-aid patches to the POS system are great and all, we love getting little tid bits of functionality, but somebody needs to bite the bullet and start fixing/redesigning the system. Svo. CEO of Heaven's End; Seller of Wormholes.
ExookiZ The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People 85	Posted - 2013.08.17 13:25:00 - [20] - Quote I would recomend not using them at all. I dont allow them in my WH. maybe once ccp realizes theyre not even being used theyll look into them more....wait nvm. unfortunately you need to blow it up.



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.