So OP...

If somebody wardecs you wont your members leave corp?

If you're getting a misrepresented response to a "harassment petition," your best bet is to petition it up the chain, with that forum post. You can't get too much clearer than that stance.

So OP...

If somebody wardecs you wont your members leave corp?

the issue here isn't war decs.

it's the lack of reason for a miner to be in a player corp.

Fix this CCP. Otherwise making us pay such high amounts of ISK per wardec, without a lock mechnic, makes legit wardecs Pointless, and Broken.

Highsec wardecs are broken beyond simple repair for all parties involved. Your "novel" and "innovative" idea wont change that. The defenders can evade by leaving their corp, while the attackers (frequently) enjoy the benefit of committing only some pvp alts to the conflict while their hauler, missioning, etc. alts are completely protected by anonymity. Forcing the defenders to endure the wardec while not giving them the chance to hit the attackers infrastructure (and NOT only the cheap pvp alts they can afford to lose) isn't really a fair solution either...

atm the defenders usually spend a rediculous amount of isk in hiring mercs to fight back; besides the fact that the attackers 'infrastructure' are the attackers ships themselves, the defenders have an equal chance in fighting back and winning (in terms of eve play anyways) fleet vs fleet (not accounting for numbers, skill, ship types, cost, etc)

Clearly your experience is very limited. Let me help correct that.

Anyone who thinks people in the wardec field "generally fly cheap ships" is in need of some training. I don't think I fly anything worth less than 500 million.

Anyone who thinks people in the wardec field "generally fly cheap ships" is in need of some training. I don't think I fly anything worth less than 500 million.

What is the point in having money if you aren't going to frivolously spend it declaring war on 9 man R&D corps?

Say for example, you wardec someone that's mining in your system; taking everything you relatively own worth in the Billions of ISK worth in POS Fuel because theres very small amounts of it, in that particular location in the region.

Ie, a single system, and the only system in the region that ice belts spawn in (even then, relatively small amounts of ice spawn every 4 hours after the previous belt has despawned)

You spend 50mill wardec'ing a single corp to scare them off from the system, to protect your assets. But that corp has brang more corps, specifically targeting that ice belt for profits. So you end up spending several hundred million ISK in wardecs.

When the wardec is active, they leave their corp, and continue mining the ice belts relentlessly. Making you completely Waste the ISK, ontop of the major profit loss from the lack of POS fuel supplies.

This. Is. Utter. BS.

The corp being wardec'd, the members within that corp, should be Kept in the corp for at least a week (50mill per week? make one week worth it.)

So the people who leave the corp and continue ice mining in that system, we at least Bump them to get them out of the ice belt, so that we can keep at least the minimum profits to keep our industrial POS's running, keeping the eve markets running.

They report us, for bumping them, under the terms of "Harassment".
Quoted from the bumping thread, "CCP considers the act of bumping a normal game mechanic, and does not class the bumping of another playerGÇÖs ship as an exploit. However, persistent targeting of a player with bumping by following them around after they have made an effort to move on to another location can be classified as harassment, and this will be judged on a case by case basis."

However, even though the capsuleers haven't removed themselves from the belt, we have been Warned under the terms of harassment.

Complete. Utter. BS.

Fix this CCP. Otherwise making us pay such high amounts of ISK per wardec, without a lock mechnic, makes legit wardecs Pointless, and Broken.

Suicide Ganking should Not be the main warfare mechanic of EVE.
Nullsec is another story, nullsec sov mechanics is fine in my perspective...

TL;DR

You spend ISK wardec'ing, and the wardec'd corp disbands but keeps doing whats causing the wardec. Disallowing kills completely.

So what your saying is, "Highsec warfare mechanics dont mean anything to me, since your complaining about it ill tell you that you Suck"

Logic?

Been to nullsec, wasnt my cup of tea
If anything, wormhole space is more enjoyable.

Only an idiot fights a war on two fronts. Only the heir to the throne of the kingdom of idiots would fight a war on twelve fronts.

I can help.

In my experience highsec wardecs are rarely ever about "fleet vs fleet". All highsec wardecs I've witnessed so far came down to "Attacker logs on (or sits in a station in the system afk all day), periodically ganks any soft industrial targets on grid, boasts about what a great pvp player he is, loggs off". Usually he will use very cheap ships, so that he could lose a dozen for each mining vessel or filled hauler he blows up. No point in anyone hiring mercenaries, putting up defence fleets etc., the attackers simply wont fight if there's any chance of a coordinated defence showing up. The result? The defenders are seriously crippled in their ability to mine, run missions etc. while the attacker can just log on an alt in a different corp and go about his buisness with impunity.