| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
m3talc0re X
Solar Revolutions Co.
141
   |
Posted - 2013.08.15 00:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
So yeah, there's really no reason whatsoever to use the t2 target painters. Wondering, does CCP have any plans on buffing it to make it actually useful over the pwnage? |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
5755
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 00:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
You will soon be able to use Target Painter II to distract drones. Drones will be given the AI of cats.
Yep, in large engagements, drones will run to the middle of the field, stick a leg straight in the air, and proceed to clean their nether-regions for 20 mins (2 hrs 30 mins in Tidi).
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Ehcks Argentus
EVE University
Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 00:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
There's no reason to use the T2 version of ANY midslot e-war mod except warp disruptors. Target painters aren't special.
They should all be looked at. |
m3talc0re X
Solar Revolutions Co.
141
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 08:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:You will soon be able to use Target Painter II to distract drones. Drones will be given the AI of cats.
Yep, in large engagements, drones will run to the middle of the field, stick a leg straight in the air, and proceed to clean their nether-regions for 20 mins (2 hrs 30 mins in Tidi).
Lmao
Ehcks Argentus wrote:There's no reason to use the T2 version of ANY midslot e-war mod except warp disruptors. Target painters aren't special.
They should all be looked at.
Too true. |
Kirimeena D'Zbrkesbris
Republic Military Tax Avoiders
272
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 09:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ehcks Argentus wrote:There's no reason to use the T2 version of ANY midslot e-war mod
They should all be looked at.
Price, T2 are often cheaper than meta4. if cap and fittings allow use of T2 e-war - why not?
Opinions are like assholes. Everybody's got one and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks. |
Aldap
Club Bear
271
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 09:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well the Phased's activation cost is considerably lower than the T2, and so is the CPU usage, so I dont see why anyone would ever fit a T2 painter.
My latest solo PvP videos |
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
329
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 09:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Aldap wrote:Well the Phased's activation cost is considerably lower than the T2, and so is the CPU usage, so I dont see why anyone would ever fit a T2 painter.
Exactly this, I always though that Meta4 was for tight fits PG\CPU wise and T2 gave more in exchange for using more PG\CPU...not with T2 TP's though. It was also this that keeps their price above T2 in some cases but again TP's are different.
Maybe they just want to be the "special snowflakes" of the market.
Good post OP and a firm +1 from me.
Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee"
Undocking - More Routes Out of Station
Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |
Whitehound
1827
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 10:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
The Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron is better than the Partial Weapon Navigation and they should make the Partial Weapon Navigation as good as the Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron. Better yet, make it as good as the Domination Target Painter, because it is better than the Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron and the Partial Weapon Navigation and the Peripheral Weapon Navigation Diameter. They then should make the Target Painter II as good as the Parallel Weapon Navigation Transmitter and make both as good as the Domination Target Painter. Or make them all equal and add a Mega Overlord Rage Omni Navigation Superpaintinator or short MORONS.
Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Cade Windstalker
Donohue Enterprises
Ad-Astra
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 10:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ehcks Argentus wrote:There's no reason to use the T2 version of ANY midslot e-war mod except warp disruptors. Target painters aren't special.
They should all be looked at.
They said in the command links thread that there's no hard requirement for T2 to be better than Faction, pretty sure the same applies here but with Meta 4.
The drop rates of these modules seem to be intentionally rather low to push the prices up and make the T2 modules more attractive.
If you have the cash, sure, go Meta 4, but if you don't need the fitting space then why waste your money? |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
2696
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 11:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
I have deleted a trolling post from this thread.
EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative GÇ+ EVE Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
336
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 11:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
To answer the Op, Module Tiericide has been mentioned by a few Devs as a possible future project once ship Tiericide is complete. It's almost like they consider ships more important overall. |
Egravant Alduin
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 20:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ehcks Argentus wrote:There's no reason to use the T2 version of ANY midslot e-war mod except warp disruptors. Target painters aren't special.
They should all be looked at.
Yup this. |
Simc0m
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 02:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
+1 They just need to make the T2 version a TINY bit better than the meta4 version. This way I won't need to memorize whether to fit the meta4 or meta5 for every freaking mod. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |