Every WH in the game has at least one static wormhole, some have two.

These static wormholes always go out to the same class of wormhole. So when you hear that someone lives in a C4 with C2 static for instance, then their home WH is a C4 and the static will ALWAYS lead to a RANDOM C2 system.
So you can't do PI in your static as it will only be there for 16 hours then it will expire and a new static system will spawn in another RANDOM C2. (Some other classes of WH expire after 24 hours).

PI in WH's is only done in the WH you live in.

So the part in this site: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Wormholes

Wormhole Identification
Wormholes to High Security (1212) Systems
N110staticClass 1

for example (bad copypaste sorry)
Does it mean the wormhome from High security wil always go to a random c1? or viseversa.

Then its sad for one trying to live outside a wormhole with PI :/

So if your in known space and want to get back to your WH, you either need friends inside for easier find of entrance, or just scan around randomly and hope your lucky?

It means that the C1 wormhole you looked up has an N110 static, this will always lead to a highsec system. K-Space systems do not have statics, but they do have wandering wormholes.


Correct, you cannot do wormhole PI unless you live in the wormhole you're doing PI in.


You need friends, or a scan alt in side the wormhole, Just scanning around randomly and hoping you get lucky from highsec has such a low chance of happening you may as well consider it zero chance.

TIP: never leave your wormhole without 2 or 3 alts who can scan inside, because if you get killed and can't get back before the time on your static runs out. The odds of you finding that hole again are very slim very very slim.

Fixed it for you

Fixed it for you

"Probably won't last another day" - This is the wormhole's main life, and has over 25% of its total time remaining

Oh, and the OP's question was answered pretty clearly in the stickied FAQ, FWIW.

That OP guy seems like a stupid fella now eh?

Never said that, and didn't intend to imply it. I guess I was, more than anything, just pointing out that the FAQ exists. In defense of the OP, after rechecking the FAQ it is not as clear as I remembered. Lots of clarification about statics, but the specific question about it leading to exactly the same system over and over was not addressed. It's been mentioned in a lot of other threads in the past, and I have answered it individually a lot of times, so I thought it was in the FAQ, too. I will suggest that Svodola add that bit of info.

For what it's worth, that 25% figure is not quite correct. It's a stat that was arrived at by someone early on and has persisted, but it is inaccurate.

That message actually means that it has over 4 hours (plus or minus a bit of variance in our experience). In the case of 16 hour wormholes, 4 hours is 25% of 16, so that 25% stat works out. But in the case of 24 hour wormholes, the end of life threshold is also 4 hours.

In case you say, "But I saw a wormhole last for longer than 4 hours in End-Of-Life status"... Yes, I have also seen them last longer than 4. I once had one persist for well over 4 hours, somewhere around 4:45. Never anywhere close to the 6 hours that would correspond to the 25% figure.

Oh, and the OP's question was answered pretty clearly in the stickied FAQ, FWIW.