EVE Search - Lets crash a node

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Lets crash a node

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
ParMizaN	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:54:00 - [1] lets not Phenomena of ironies, cast the litany aside How intelligible, blessed be the forgetful
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:54:00 - [2] lets crash all of the trade nodes once a day till CCP start dealing with the macros with a firmer hand... the SWG players did this and the devs buckled... seems like the only way to get the devs to take notice that the playerbase wants more action... ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Fuujin	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:55:00 - [3] Thanks for the offer but i'll have to pass. _______________ The sword has to be more than a simple weapon; it has to be an answer to life's questions
Avon	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:56:00 - [4] Originally by: Sentani lets crash all of the trade nodes once a day till CCP start dealing with the macros with a firmer hand... the SWG players did this and the devs buckled... seems like the only way to get the devs to take notice that the playerbase wants more action... So instead of letting macro users ruin the game, you want to do it for them? Yeah, that really sounds like a solution to all our problems. ______________________________________________ The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
Toshiro Khan	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:56:00 - [5] how about lets ban sentani.
Winter Star	Posted - 2006.01.12 09:57:00 - [6] Edited by: Winter Star on 12/01/2006 09:57:08 If you do it, wave goodbye to your account. Ruining everyones play isn't very constructive. And CCP would be fully justified in suspending your acount for what is effectively a denial of service attack. _______________________________________________________ "Bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals"
Ishquar Teh'Sainte	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:01:00 - [7] Edited by: Ishquar Teh''Sainte on 12/01/2006 10:01:23 it's the weird tactic the US of A used in vietnam: we had to burn this village down, to save it from the enemy __________________________ nerf puppies!!!!!!!!!!!!!! kittens 4 TEH WIN!!!!!!!!! __________________________
mogwai	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:02:00 - [8] /wonders who will probably have some logging in 'issues' soon pretty smart to prewarn the devs that you wanna crash the node ............................................ It isnt a bug, it's a new feature
Traxio Nacho	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:02:00 - [9] Edited by: Traxio Nacho on 12/01/2006 10:02:46 Originally by: Sentani lets crash all of the trade nodes once a day till CCP start dealing with the macros with a firmer hand... the SWG players did this and the devs buckled... seems like the only way to get the devs to take notice that the playerbase wants more action... One way to get yourself banned I suppose, what do you think CCP are gonna do once you crash these nodes bring out their magic macro busting wand and get rid of them all in one swoop? Macro miners are annoying, but ruining the game for everyone just to get rid of macro miners is silly and quite childish.
Gariuys	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:03:00 - [10] Originally by: Toshiro Khan how about lets ban sentani. /signed ~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~ A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:04:00 - [11] Edited by: Sentani on 12/01/2006 10:04:27 people need to start reading between the lines Originally by: Traxio Nacho Macro miners are annoying, but ruining the game for everyone just to get rid of macro miners is silly and quite childish. they are ruining the game slowly... ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Traxio Nacho	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:05:00 - [12] Originally by: Sentani Edited by: Sentani on 12/01/2006 10:04:27 people need to start reading between the lines Originally by: Traxio Nacho Macro miners are annoying, but ruining the game for everyone just to get rid of macro miners is silly and quite childish. they are ruining the game slowly... But theres only blank spaces between the lines
Winter Star	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:06:00 - [13] That's no justification. _______________________________________________________ "Bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals"
Avon	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:12:00 - [14] Originally by: Sentani Edited by: Sentani on 12/01/2006 10:04:27 people need to start reading between the lines Originally by: Traxio Nacho Macro miners are annoying, but ruining the game for everyone just to get rid of macro miners is silly and quite childish. they are ruining the game slowly... Ah, I see. So ruining it quickly is the solution. Gotchya. ______________________________________________ The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
N3rvous	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:13:00 - [15] Originally by: Sentani lets crash all of the trade nodes once a day till CCP start dealing with the macros with a firmer hand... the SWG players did this and the devs buckled... seems like the only way to get the devs to take notice that the playerbase wants more action... So, you think ruining the game for the rest of the EVE community is a bright idea? We need more geniuses like yourself in this game.. ..I can't play the game how I want to so I might as well screw everyone else over.. Pff, dropped your name down and I hope we meet sometime soon, - N3rvous -
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:13:00 - [16] just think they should cut the cancer out before it gets to big... the mineral prices have droped by allmost 50% in 6 months.. and t1 ship prices are getting to low... a raven for less then 100 mill is just wrong... ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:15:00 - [17] its funny to read how everyones focusing on the crashing of the node... im talking about the fact that something drastic needs to be done since the devs seem to care about the macros... ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Darwinia	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:15:00 - [18] Hey, I got a better idea. Let's all quit EVE and play Solitaire. The Macro miners won't have anybody to sell ISK to.
mogwai	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:19:00 - [19] Originally by: Sentani its funny to read how everyones focusing on the crashing of the node... im talking about the fact that something drastic needs to be done since the devs seem to care about the macros... bit odd that really when the thread title say's 'LETS CRASH A NODE' as for the macro issue, there's a sticky that say's 'discuss all stuff about macro's here' ............................................ It isnt a bug, it's a new feature
Zyper	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:20:00 - [20] No actually you came here suggestion we did the same thign as peopel did in SWG, thankfully the players in EVE are more mature than what you run into there. Crashing it solves nothing, jsut makes the devs work more hard and in the end you only hurt yourself, CCP knows that the economy in this game is everything so ofcourse they will deal with it. Give them time. Being childish solves nothing in the end, it never does. Besides, macro miners are only still here because peopel buy from them, the more ppl buy the more will come.
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:22:00 - [21] Edited by: Sentani on 12/01/2006 10:23:08 im really getting sick of this comp... ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Toshiro Khan	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:22:00 - [22] Originally by: Sentani its funny to read how everyones focusing on the crashing of the node... im talking about the fact that something drastic needs to be done since the devs seem to care about the macros... No, your talking about being a retard and doing something retarded. My plan is a better idea.. In fact lets make it even better by banning the rest of Regeneration as well.
ExChange	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:22:00 - [23] ok didnt see the sticky... lets lock this thread.. regret posting it with all the flack i got in the end
Scrammer	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:24:00 - [24] Originally by: Toshiro Khan Originally by: Sentani its funny to read how everyones focusing on the crashing of the node... im talking about the fact that something drastic needs to be done since the devs seem to care about the macros... In fact lets make it even better by banning the rest of Regeneration as well. Don't blame an entire group of people for the actions of one person.
Caryna	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:24:00 - [25] Originally by: Sentani the SWG players did this and the devs buckled... ... play this game ...
Xaarist	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:24:00 - [26] i think your proposal belongs to the category "bannable actions". think - write - rethink - send is your way to go. ---------------- (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is an alien dressed as Bunny to secretly gain world domination.
Gariuys	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:25:00 - [27] CCP is doing what they can, they're not bloody miracle workers or gods, and crashing a node will do absolutely nothing. CCP ain't the SOE slackers, they work hard and do their best even if we don't feck up their game. ~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~ A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool
Traxio Nacho	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:31:00 - [28] Originally by: Sentani just think they should cut the cancer out before it gets to big... the mineral prices have droped by allmost 50% in 6 months.. and t1 ship prices are getting to low... a raven for less then 100 mill is just wrong... FYI, I remember before exodus came out Ravens were selling for around 100mil that was well before any mention of macro miners.
HippoKing	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:37:00 - [29] click soon
Sable Schroedinger	Posted - 2006.01.12 10:37:00 - [30] Edited by: Sable Schroedinger on 12/01/2006 10:38:21 Quote: just think they should cut the cancer out before it gets to big... the mineral prices have droped by allmost 50% in 6 months.. and t1 ship prices are getting to low... a raven for less then 100 mill is just wrong... so... what you're saying is. Eventually, they will damage the economy so badly that they will do themselves out of business and so fix the problem themselves? At which point, the economy will recover. Yeah!! act now! The laws of supply and demand are obviously broken! Nerf them now! edited to add quote

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.