| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:35:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:39:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no  --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:41:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood Business is still good and gonna continue to be in the future with an outpost or not.
Except, it won't be. If you know how to build motherships (and more) without such a facility you're far smarter than, well, anyone in the universe. And, with respect, we know that you're not.
As for neutral?
Well, your inability to prove or show that to our satisfaction is costing you a pretty penny right now.
How much will they be really losing you think? /emote gets popcorn
Time. Reputation (you think anyone is going to pay a deposit now?).
It also increases your costs. Costs that we, our friends, those that we want to profit, don't have.
Perhaps that was our primary motive, and not the destruction of a [g] alt corp?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:42:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no 
Quite a step-away from the standard G doctrine of caution and discipline, no?
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Blacklight
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:44:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no 
Quite a step-away from the standard G doctrine of caution and discipline, no?
Well just because it was important enough to suicide a 100 man fleet in doesn't mean they have any vested interest in the system now does it? .... or does it?
Eve Blacklight Style
|

NATMav
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:48:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no 
Quite a step-away from the standard G doctrine of caution and discipline, no?
Well just because it was important enough to suicide a 100 man fleet in doesn't mean they have any vested interest in the system now does it? .... or does it?
We can only wait for you to bring it for so long.
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:59:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no 
Quite a step-away from the standard G doctrine of caution and discipline, no?
Well just because it was important enough to suicide a 100 man fleet in doesn't mean they have any vested interest in the system now does it? .... or does it?
BL alot of our pilots were bored with the poswars in tribute and were looking forward with a great fight. fights which we always looked for against each other (i still take it u like to fight G?). We suicided, yes. But we were sooooooo bored. And dont tell me that u never did that mkay? 
Otherwise it makes no sense telling the truth here, i should know better... --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 05:59:00 -
[68]
Originally by: NATMav
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse 2) You expect us to sit back and do nothing about the biggest blob at all that is aimed to be a strike against G/IRON? You expect a pvp alliance to NOT fight? Honestly....
If it was aimed at such a dud target, why justify it with your reaction? If you guys really weren't connected you would have just left ec to burn.
and let you ran rampart with ur uber blob? lmao, no 
Quite a step-away from the standard G doctrine of caution and discipline, no?
Well just because it was important enough to suicide a 100 man fleet in doesn't mean they have any vested interest in the system now does it? .... or does it?
We can only wait for you to bring it for so long.
Oh, we've brought it. We bring it all the time, who are you again?
Once we're done here, are you guys gonna bring it? I'd wager ALOT of isk that you guys will just whimper away, claim that you need to "rebuild" and we'll never see an attack on the starbases of Delve.
Ever.
There's a challenge for you, put together a force like we have, hell, put together a force of ANY type, bring it to NOL, we've got lots for you to shoot at there.
Can you do this amount of damage to us? I don't think so.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:00:00 -
[69]
We never suicide.
Ever.
Especially not haulers.
*cough*
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:03:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Dianabolic We never suicide.
Ever.
Especially not haulers.
*cough*
You did for example in XZH i was there and it was UBER suicide, tsktsktsk  --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:04:00 -
[71]
Edited by: Dianabolic on 02/04/2006 06:04:40 **IT TAKES TWO OF US, YES IT DOES, IT TAKES TWOOOOOO OF US**
Yes, a double post ladies and gentlemen, the wonders of da intarweb.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:04:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic We never suicide.
Ever.
Especially not haulers.
*cough*
You did for example in XZH i was there and it was UBER suicide, tsktsktsk 
I was being sarcastic, sorry 
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:06:00 -
[73]
Edited by: Cmd Woodlouse on 02/04/2006 06:06:48
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse
Originally by: Dianabolic We never suicide.
Ever.
Especially not haulers.
*cough*
You did for example in XZH i was there and it was UBER suicide, tsktsktsk 
I was being sarcastic, sorry 
I know 
And what was your interest? And dont tell me fun then  --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Metal Dude
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:12:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood
Originally by: Dianabolic heh, I was looking for this thread aswell :D
"BoB now offering a cloning service for free" :p
First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
Here we begin
Good Job BOB/5/ASCN/F-E and whoever you also have napped..
However What i dont get its why all you people has chosed to attack the TRUST outpost. TRUST is neutral to all.. And its bad Intel and lies to tell the EVE community that one of TRUST corps is an G alt corp WTF??
TRUST sells to any1 who wants to buy a fine selection of tech 2 products and are political neutral..
People in TRUST are actually insulted that BOB claims that..
But anyway good job BOB in a couple of days you can write a fine forum post about how you killed TRUST and TRUST is dead..
However even when all this is happening TRUST still produce and sell tech 2 ships and mods. And TRUST gonna continue todo that and be political neutral.. And will continue todo in the future
No matter how much you claim TRUST is dead after this event of power..
Business is still good and gonna continue to be in the future with an outpost or not.
Fact is the moment that BlacklightĘs post went up on the forums, GIRON fleet immediately left D-7, FE controlled space and started making their way toured EC-. If TRUST outpost was not important to them, why such a harsh reaction?
This reminds me of RA(T) claiming no association with RA, but being involved in all of their battles. It does not matter what TRUSTĘs claims are, the belief is that TRUST & GIRON are working together and will be treated as such.
Considering that TRUST built the outpost practically in GIRON space with GIRON allowed TRUST to build it there and are selling them capital ships, how stupid do you think people are? Should we just believe that they are neutral because they say so? Actions speak louder then words.
As Stan says, facta non verba and we play this game by that model. TRUST will now reap the consequences of their actions and suffer because of who they choose to do business with, just like our allies have to suffer because they are associated with us. If that is so hard to understand then go ask GIRON or CELES why they are shooting F-E and KAOS.
The truth will set you free
|

NATMav
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:13:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Oh, we've brought it. We bring it all the time, who are you again?
I'm the guy that is in EC with you right now, and busted through your uber camps not once, but twice. 
Quote: Once we're done here, are you guys gonna bring it?
Just so we're all clear...when will you be done? Is this a "roadtrip", or can we expect you to stay around when ASCN gets bored and leaves?
Quote: There's a challenge for you, put together a force like we have
Okay, we'll start NAPing the major alliances of EVE ASAP....oh wait....you already have them all in your back pocket. Stop calling for people to attack you on your turf when you NAP anyone and everyone that could actually do it.
|

Luc Boye
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:15:00 -
[76]
Originally by: NATMav I'm the guy that is in EC with you right now, and busted through your uber camps not once, but twice. 
Oh fck me sideways you just won eve.
|

NATMav
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:17:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Luc Boye
Originally by: NATMav I'm the guy that is in EC with you right now, and busted through your uber camps not once, but twice. 
Oh fck me sideways you just won eve.
Sweet. I guess I can stop playing now.
|

Lunas Feelgood
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:18:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood Business is still good and gonna continue to be in the future with an outpost or not.
Except, it won't be. If you know how to build motherships (and more) without such a facility you're far smarter than, well, anyone in the universe. And, with respect, we know that you're not.
As for neutral?
Well, your inability to prove or show that to our satisfaction is costing you a pretty penny right now.
First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
Dear Dianabolic If you think taking the outpost gonna cripple TRUST tech 2 production then you as wrong as you intel is about TRUST being supporting G..
Again TRUST is neutral..I really cant say this to many times..
And you say it costing TRUST a pretty penny right now? Yes it does but TRUST gonna get ower this. Why? Because TRUST got more satisfied customers then you fleet got EGO¦s and that says quite alot
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:19:00 -
[79]
Our operation will last as long as we have planned it to, just as they always do.
As for nap'ing and engaging in the art of diplomacy, I'm sorry that you guys find it difficult to actually, you know, talk to people, to build relationships of any fashion, to counter us.
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
That must suck.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Luc Boye
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:20:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
Dear Dianabolic If you think taking the outpost gonna cripple TRUST tech 2 production then you as wrong as you intel is about TRUST being supporting G..
Again TRUST is neutral..I really cant say this to many times..
And you say it costing TRUST a pretty penny right now? Yes it does but TRUST gonna get ower this. Why? Because TRUST got more satisfied customers then you fleet got EGO¦s and that says quite alot
If this whole shimmy in ec-p doesn't hurt you or your corp, why are you posting in this thread?
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:22:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood Business is still good and gonna continue to be in the future with an outpost or not.
Except, it won't be. If you know how to build motherships (and more) without such a facility you're far smarter than, well, anyone in the universe. And, with respect, we know that you're not.
As for neutral?
Well, your inability to prove or show that to our satisfaction is costing you a pretty penny right now.
First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
Dear Dianabolic If you think taking the outpost gonna cripple TRUST tech 2 production then you as wrong as you intel is about TRUST being supporting G..
Again TRUST is neutral..I really cant say this to many times..
And you say it costing TRUST a pretty penny right now? Yes it does but TRUST gonna get ower this. Why? Because TRUST got more satisfied customers then you fleet got EGO¦s and that says quite alot
If all TRUST do is tech 2, I look forward to you removing the capital ship sales from your website.
So, unless you wanna make it official, Lunas, I guess until it becomes that you're just breathing alot of hot air.
As usual.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:26:00 -
[82]
Edited by: Cmd Woodlouse on 02/04/2006 06:27:55
Originally by: Dianabolic
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
That must suck.
G doesnt "fear" anyone - omg its just a game. And they dont NAP coward and benderalliances. If G will go down cause of that, it makes me damn proud to have been a part of it. --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:28:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse Edited by: Cmd Woodlouse on 02/04/2006 06:26:49
Originally by: Dianabolic
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
That must suck.
G doesnt "fear" anyone - omg its just a game. And they dont NAP coward and benderalliances. If G will go down cause of that, it makes me damn proud to have be a part of it.
Don't get a complex Mr Sebiestor Tribe, I was talking to Loony Feelsbad ;)
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:29:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse Edited by: Cmd Woodlouse on 02/04/2006 06:26:49
Originally by: Dianabolic
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
That must suck.
G doesnt "fear" anyone - omg its just a game. And they dont NAP coward and benderalliances. If G will go down cause of that, it makes me damn proud to have be a part of it.
Don't get a complex Mr Sebiestor Tribe, I was talking to Loony Feelsbad ;)
Actually the Tribe pwns --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Lunas Feelgood
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:29:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Dianabolic Our operation will last as long as we have planned it to, just as they always do.
As for nap'ing and engaging in the art of diplomacy, I'm sorry that you guys find it difficult to actually, you know, talk to people, to build relationships of any fashion, to counter us.
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
That must suck.
First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
Dear Dianabolic TRUST dont want to counter you.. All TRUST cares about is satisfied customers..
And you can kick TRUST ass as many times you want if it makes you feel better..
BTW just to show that TRUST is political neutral I will be happy to sell you a batch of WCS if you want
|

NATMav
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:30:00 -
[86]
Originally by: Dianabolic Our operation will last as long as we have planned it to, just as they always do.
As long as its convenient for you to do so then, I can assume.
Quote: As for nap'ing and engaging in the art of diplomacy, I'm sorry that you guys find it difficult to actually, you know, talk to people, to build relationships of any fashion, to counter us.
I'm sorry that you don't think it is possible to counter BoB - with an attitude like that, no wonder we kick ass - you're just afraid of us, so afraid that you're resigned to being inferior.
Well it's pretty obvious that the game is stacked well in your favor. When you take a look at the major (region-holding) alliances of EVE, you outnumber the "good guys" at least 7-2, before even counting pilot numbers, which is a much larger spread. And it is also obvious that if someone were to bring it to your space, they wouldn't be fighting BoB, but rather 2/3rds of 0.0.
|

Tiuwaz
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:31:00 -
[87]
wtf woody, you left G? 
Originally by: Oveur ****! Lets nerf it!
To the nerfmobile!
|

Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:32:00 -
[88]
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
...TRUST dont want.. All TRUST cares about...
...you can kick TRUST ass...
...to show that TRUST is political neutral...
blah blah blah.
Sort out your terms please, thanks, you're just a walking talking dancing and a prancing contradiction.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|

Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:37:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Tiuwaz wtf woody, you left G? 
yes and u can contact me in game if like to hear the real truth, i have nothing to hide  --------------------------------
Darkness and humanity. |

Lunas Feelgood
|
Posted - 2006.04.02 06:39:00 -
[90]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Originally by: Lunas Feelgood First this is my own views and dont reflect my corp or TRUST views..
...TRUST dont want.. All TRUST cares about...
...you can kick TRUST ass...
...to show that TRUST is political neutral...
blah blah blah.
Sort out your terms please, thanks, you're just a walking talking dancing and a prancing contradiction.
Dear Dianabolic get in contact with TRUST diplomat im not the guy you need to talk about terms im affraid. I only spoke my points of veiws and not TRUST alliance..
But dear Dianabolic im still hoping that you will be my first customer in TRUST..
Im here to satisfied you with whatever tech 2 ship/mods we got..I only care bout making you happy and a satisfied customer.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |