EVE Search - I wish to know the state of play.

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

I wish to know the state of play.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KIAEddZ	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:07:00 - [1] Who is currently at war with who. Over the next 48 hours I have to contact the parties involved, and arrange standings and clear KIAs forthcoming position. To do this I really need to know who the blimmin heck is fighting who? If someone from the following parties, preferably without smack, could just let me know your current war targets, and your current standings with the other entities in this post, taht would be grand. FE BMC FOE BB ATUK/5 PA NBSI 4s and Pals CI Appreciate any info given from the horses mouth. Will be ignoring alts and idiots. CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we is doing it in space.
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:35:00 - [2] Originally by: KIAEddZ FE - hostile BMC - umm who? FOE - dunno off hand, no contact really BB - dunno off hand, no contact really ATUK/5 - in love PA - hostile NBSI - hostile 4s and Pals - hostile CI - hostile --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
ParMizaN	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:45:00 - [3] Edited by: ParMizaN on 20/01/2006 09:45:36 Originally by: thoth foc Originally by: KIAEddZ BMC - umm who? and that would be us Phenomena of ironies, cast the litany aside How intelligible, blessed be the forgetful
ParMizaN	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:45:00 - [4] evemail being made up currently hun Phenomena of ironies, cast the litany aside How intelligible, blessed be the forgetful
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:47:00 - [5] oops BMC - again not 100% off hand, little contact, but since ParMizaN is there i'm going to guess hostile --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
Seleene	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:52:00 - [6] FE - Potential Customers BMC - ParMizaN & I need to talk. FOE - Potential Customers BB - Potential Rich Customers ATUK/5 - Potential Customers PA - Potential Customers NBSI - Neutral 4s and Pals - Is this a new Alliance?? CI - Potential Ass-Kicking Tag Team Partner because Zincol is cool Quote: Appreciate any info given from the horses mouth. Will be ignoring alts and idiots. You left out Forum *****s so I figured it was safe. - History of the MC Teaser Trailer
ParMizaN	Posted - 2006.01.20 09:55:00 - [7] Originally by: Seleene BMC - ParMizaN & I need to talk. we do? :D evemail/convo is your friend Phenomena of ironies, cast the litany aside How intelligible, blessed be the forgetful
Ithildin	Posted - 2006.01.20 10:33:00 - [8] Don t know how up to date people d like to keep their official standings, but check a href= http://eve.1019.net/ target= _blank http://eve.1019.net/ /a this here site out. The stylii-domain is down. Use http://mc.kladdpapper.com/forum/ to access MC's forums.
KIAEddZ	Posted - 2006.01.20 11:12:00 - [9] I thought FE had surrendered to 5? Does this not mean they are now neutral to you? CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we is doing it in space.
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 11:33:00 - [10] Originally by: KIAEddZ I thought FE had surrendered to 5? Does this not mean they are now neutral to you? and neutral = hostile i'm not diplomat/leadership so i have no idea of any agreements made, but they still appear on my overview (as of last nite) so current situation is we are still hostile.. --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
pershphanie	Posted - 2006.01.20 11:35:00 - [11] Edited by: pershphanie on 20/01/2006 11:35:58 FE - 4tw BMC - friendly FOE - hostile (primary target) BB - friendly ATUK/5 - hostile PA - +5 to avoid shooting each other but basically neutral NBSI - same as pa 4s and Pals - hostile (primary target) CI - nap
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 13:36:00 - [12] Originally by: pershphanie Edited by: pershphanie on 20/01/2006 11:35:58 FE - 4tw BMC - friendly FOE - hostile (primary target) BB - friendly ATUK/5 - hostile PA - +5 to avoid shooting each other but basically neutral NBSI - same as pa 4s and Pals - hostile (primary target) CI - nap NAP = +5? and i guess parm's got over your alliance name then :P --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
pershphanie	Posted - 2006.01.20 13:41:00 - [13] Originally by: thoth foc Originally by: pershphanie Edited by: pershphanie on 20/01/2006 11:35:58 FE - 4tw BMC - friendly FOE - hostile (primary target) BB - friendly ATUK/5 - hostile PA - +5 to avoid shooting each other but basically neutral NBSI - same as pa 4s and Pals - hostile (primary target) CI - nap NAP = +5? yep
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 13:47:00 - [14] Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: thoth foc Originally by: pershphanie Edited by: pershphanie on 20/01/2006 11:35:58 FE - 4tw BMC - friendly FOE - hostile (primary target) BB - friendly ATUK/5 - hostile PA - +5 to avoid shooting each other but basically neutral NBSI - same as pa 4s and Pals - hostile (primary target) CI - nap NAP = +5? yep so it's basically F-E/BMC/BB + prolly KIA v FOE, 4s+pals from eddz previous threads NBSI operate in teh area too.. do you really need mercs also? --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
pershphanie	Posted - 2006.01.20 13:51:00 - [15] Originally by: thoth foc so it's basically F-E/BMC/BB + prolly KIA v FOE, 4s+pals from eddz previous threads NBSI operate in teh area too.. do you really need mercs also? nbsi wont be there. BB will remain neutral in the conflict. fe v foe v 4s+flunkies three way action. not exactly sure who bm-c are fighting. My guess is they shoot just about everything.
Kirin	Posted - 2006.01.20 14:25:00 - [16] Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: thoth foc so it's basically F-E/BMC/BB + prolly KIA v FOE, 4s+pals from eddz previous threads NBSI operate in teh area too.. do you really need mercs also? nbsi wont be there. BB will remain neutral in the conflict. fe v foe v 4s+flunkies three way action. not exactly sure who bm-c are fighting. My guess is they shoot just about everything. Ahh so the truth comes out, Persh pulled us out of the fight with atuk so we can have a "3-way" w00t! Remember the toes you step on today are still connected to the arse you may have to kiss tomorrow.
Oberon Oblique	Posted - 2006.01.20 14:51:00 - [17] Originally by: pershphanie fe v foe v 4s+flunkies three way action. not exactly sure who bm-c are fighting. My guess is they shoot just about everything. Now that Persh thinks its a 3-way, F-E is surely committed. Count me in. -The mind is strong and the flesh is weak, but oh the flesh...
zincol	Posted - 2006.01.20 16:37:00 - [18] All Neutral at this point.
Omber Zombie	Posted - 2006.01.20 16:45:00 - [19] as far as i know (and I may be wrong as things have been moving a fair bit lately): FE - friendly BMC - neutral/friendly FOE - enemy ATUK/5 - friendly PA - neutral (happy to organise a NAP if you want) NBSI - neutral (happy to organise a NAP if you want) 4s and Pals - friendly CI - neutral/friendly ---------------------- Originally by: Seleene I maintain that OZ is evil and have nothing further to add.
Recluse Viramor	Posted - 2006.01.20 16:46:00 - [20] Originally by: Kirin Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: thoth foc so it's basically F-E/BMC/BB + prolly KIA v FOE, 4s+pals from eddz previous threads NBSI operate in teh area too.. do you really need mercs also? nbsi wont be there. BB will remain neutral in the conflict. fe v foe v 4s+flunkies three way action. not exactly sure who bm-c are fighting. My guess is they shoot just about everything. Ahh so the truth comes out, Persh pulled us out of the fight with atuk so we can have a "3-way" w00t!
C4w3	Posted - 2006.01.20 17:56:00 - [21] Dude attacking me/us will result in me kickin¦ ur ass.... And dont come saying you¦ll kick my ass. cus you would just cuddle up against me eddz and you know it. "If all the heroes are standing together around a strange device and begin to taunt me, I will pull out a conventional one.
Zarthanon	Posted - 2006.01.20 18:23:00 - [22] Originally by: Seleene FE - Potential Customers BMC - ParMizaN & I need to talk. FOE - Potential Customers BB - Potential Rich Customers ATUK/5 - Potential Customers PA - Potential Customers NBSI - Neutral 4s and Pals - Is this a new Alliance?? CI - Potential Ass-Kicking Tag Team Partner because Zincol is cool Quote: Appreciate any info given from the horses mouth. Will be ignoring alts and idiots. You left out Forum ***s so I figured it was safe. He actually has more in industry than in anything else. Originally by:** ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
Muthsera	Posted - 2006.01.20 18:35:00 - [23] Originally by: Seleene CI - Potential Ass-Kicking Tag Team Partner because Zincol is cool As Zincol is my alt I just want to say that I deeply resent it. Zincol is obviusly not nearly as cool as I am. My thoughs
CraicWhore	Posted - 2006.01.20 18:35:00 - [24] Originally by: C4w3 Dude attacking me/us will result in me kickin¦ ur ass.... And dont come saying you¦ll kick my ass. cus you would just cuddle up against me eddz and you know it. In light of how well FoE have fared in Geminate over the past few weeks, plus the information posted by Dark Sinister concerning Boba Hunter's treachery, you're hardly in a position to make threats.
C4w3	Posted - 2006.01.20 18:42:00 - [25] Originally by: Craic*** Originally by:** C4w3 Dude attacking me/us will result in me kickin¦ ur ass.... And dont come saying you¦ll kick my ass. cus you would just cuddle up against me eddz and you know it. In light of how well FoE have fared in Geminate over the past few weeks, plus the information posted by Dark Sinister concerning Boba Hunter's treachery, you're hardly in a position to make threats. LOL dude u need to get ur life right,,, me and eddz go back and it was a joke so friday bro get a beer and stop beeing an asss "If all the heroes are standing together around a strange device and begin to taunt me, I will pull out a conventional one.
KIAEddZ	Posted - 2006.01.20 18:53:00 - [26] I love c4, he is the roxor tbh Doesnt mean i wont kill him if paid to do so. But KIA has very little interest in FOE/FE/BB/4S/ATUK/5 and the other Germinate+some warring parties right now etc, we just need to know the political arena we are entering. I will be requesting a no shooty shooty policy with all entities in the above list, except NBSI and PA of course, for at least the following few weeks. I just wanted to make sure that we arent treading on anyones toes. Thanks those that took the time to post here, if the leadership from any of the above entities could contact me should they see me about, thatd be cool, althoguh I am working my way through the list as we speak. CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we is doing it in space.
thoth foc	Posted - 2006.01.20 19:22:00 - [27] quick note.. i'm not an official contact for atuk/.5. Amthrianius/LadyScarlet would be for atuk adn they will know who to talk to in delta/reign's i guess :) --thoth [5], ex-Curse Alliance ex-DSMA
Riley Craven	Posted - 2006.01.20 19:30:00 - [28] OMG WHERE IS BOB ON THIS LIST?!?!?!
HollyWood69	Posted - 2006.01.20 19:37:00 - [29] Originally by: Riley Craven OMG WHERE IS BOB ON THIS LIST?!?!?! Otherside of the map
Fal Aren	Posted - 2006.01.20 19:40:00 - [30] Originally by: Riley Craven OMG WHERE IS BOB ON THIS LIST?!?!?! Thats a north/north-eastern entity list. So BoB are irrelevent (for the time being?)

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.