EVE Search - Remove Dust 514 from EvE Petition

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Remove Dust 514 from EvE Petition

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Akrasjel Lanate Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate 1237	Posted - 2013.10.17 08:29:00 - [31] - Quote This again So much hate twoard Dust
Remiel Pollard Stirling Iron Society 1785	Posted - 2013.10.17 08:36:00 - [32] - Quote I've never understood the mindset of people who want to discard an idea, working or otherwise, just because it doesn't function the way they perceive it should, instead of trying to build on the idea and make it better. A mentality that only a wasteful society would adopt. If we were to apply this ideology to people, no one would ever be employed or even considered useful or relevant. DUST is still a work in progress. So is EVE, as a matter of fact. For one thing, having DUST connected to EVE helps to accelerate that progress. Removing it now would be wasteful, and a step backwards in its development. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
Amhra Rho Accujac Elimination 148	Posted - 2013.10.17 08:40:00 - [33] - Quote Dust bunnies don't bother me none. There's real reasons why your Eve character doesn't do /dance.
gobbybobby KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 18	Posted - 2013.10.17 08:56:00 - [34] - Quote Well you can launch strikes on planets, thats sort of interaction. But yer apart from that, dust sucks in its current state. Might be better in 2 years tho!
Captain Africa GRIM MARCH 67	Posted - 2013.10.17 09:07:00 - [35] - Quote Dalmont Delantee wrote: Petition to remove Red Teufel from Tranquility and put it on the chinese server. He is a pointless poster and has the most unpolished and contact poor posts. At least allow him to post on the WoW forums or the Runequest forums so they can suffer too Signed !
Marexlovox BLOMI BricK sQuAD. 9	Posted - 2013.10.17 09:30:00 - [36] - Quote Bring it to PC, that it all.
Thanos The Mad-Titan Viziam Amarr Empire 21	Posted - 2013.10.17 11:46:00 - [37] - Quote Red Teufel wrote: ... the most unpolished FPS to come out to date... You twerk
Raylan Scott molon labe. RISE of LEGION 0	Posted - 2013.10.17 13:43:00 - [38] - Quote Xen Solarus wrote: Can't say i agree, Dust has the potential to bridge that gap between people who don't usually play games like EvE. Thats worth exploring imo, as more EvE players is always a good thing. With the upcoming changes to highsec custom offices, Dust has the potential to actually start effecting the EvE universe more. Atm, i fail to see how it has much impact at all, but that doesn't mean we should just abandon it. Making it available on the PC would be the best call imo. So in summery, make it have more effect on the EvE universe, and make it playable on the PC too. Sorted! I've got 2 eve characters because of Dust. I'm new and I'm terrible at Eve, but all the same I've got two characters. I know dozens of people who have done the same. NOBODY is more frustrated with the slow development of Dust than the Dust players. I have spent a lot of money and time waiting for the game to become something more than it is. I had almost lost all hope, but the FW rebuild that is coming sounds like a step in the right direction. I really thought that there would be some connection between Planetary Interaction and Dust. I actually skilled into it in the hopes that I could get some easy ISK with the ability to protect my assets on the ground. The passive SP gain along with the investment of time and money by Dust mercs will keep even the most bitter of vets at arms length of the game. I go back and forth, but I think the game will succeed. The Dev team just needs to start hitting some homeruns.
Raylan Scott molon labe. RISE of LEGION 0	Posted - 2013.10.17 13:44:00 - [39] - Quote Marexlovox wrote: Bring it to PC, that it all. I hope not, I am TERRIBLE at FPS with KB/M.
Aivo Dresden Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 68	Posted - 2013.10.17 13:49:00 - [40] - Quote I would play Dust if it came to PC. Having it on PS3 only was a poor decision.
Raylan Scott molon labe. RISE of LEGION 0	Posted - 2013.10.17 15:24:00 - [41] - Quote Aivo Dresden wrote: I would play Dust if it came to PC. Having it on PS3 only was a poor decision. I think they wanted to get a piece of the HUGE console market. So I'm not sure how that was a poor decision. The biggest mistake is not having it ready for the launch of the PS4.
Sol Weinstein Lunatic Warfare Federation 105	Posted - 2013.10.17 15:41:00 - [42] - Quote What is this "EvE" you speak of?
Red Teufel Mafia Redux Phobia. 237	Posted - 2013.10.17 15:44:00 - [43] - Quote hmmm....same universe but they have different forums as well O_o.
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba Crunchy Crunchy Zero Hour Alliance 176	Posted - 2013.10.17 15:54:00 - [44] - Quote I demand all the bunnies be attached to my Nighthawk to drag it around New Eden as a show of force against the vile drake-a-fakation. Also drop that crap, split team shove half to get WiS up (time for the burn) and the rest on Valkyrie. PS4 is a no go with Planetside 2, CCP missed the boat.
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp 4751	Posted - 2013.10.17 16:00:00 - [45] - Quote I'm not sure why people are worried about the PS4. When DUST was first developed CCP stated that they would be ready when the PS4 hit the market... so unless something has changed this bit at least is a non-issue. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base.
Raylan Scott molon labe. RISE of LEGION 0	Posted - 2013.10.17 16:53:00 - [46] - Quote Ranger 1 wrote: I'm not sure why people are worried about the PS4. When DUST was first developed CCP stated that they would be ready when the PS4 hit the market... so unless something has changed this bit at least is a non-issue. It's not going to be available on the PS4 for at least a year according to CCP. I'm not as worried about it as some, but it will hurt the player numbers a bit.
Malcolm Shinhwa bad touches 428	Posted - 2013.10.17 17:09:00 - [47] - Quote If the analysis of recently released CCP financials is to be believed, economics will be removing Dust from the eve universe soon. Hey CCP, please slush my fund like you did for SOMER Blink.
Plane Walkerz Crimson Reavers 0	Posted - 2013.10.17 20:02:00 - [48] - Quote I don't think removing Dust is the answer gentlemen, on the contrary an all in approach would be a great answer. Switching to a new platform isn't ideal either but perhaps bringing it to the PC would help, plans to support it on the PS3 while also supporting alternative platforms would make it easier for many new people to access. I support a steam distributed platform for future play-ability. My current belief is that without a market, Dust will wither and die, no matter what devs try to do to stop this or port it somewhere else, perhaps some of you may agree and lend support to the plans for a market sooner than SOON tm. -The Unknown- Sleepers abound and hunger for blood There are few brave enough to look for a fight with these tyrants, but those who are brave and hold true to their goal will prevail
Hungry Eyes Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 450	Posted - 2013.10.17 20:11:00 - [49] - Quote dust doesnt matter and PI doesnt matter in EVE. CCP should look into this.
Felicity Love Caldari Provisions Caldari State 904	Posted - 2013.10.17 20:19:00 - [50] - Quote While I love great artwork and any new Sci-fi game that pushes the borders of imagination and fun, I've always seen DUST as just a waste of money with the additional "collateral damage" of taking time, money and dev resources away from EVE. While "Valkyrie" may be on the right track with a number of ideas, DUST for all it's hype is precious more than a distraction from why WE are all really here. SPACESHIPS. C'mon Helmar, flush this mess out the airlock and redouble your commitment to SPACESHIPS. Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies"
The Spod Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 107	Posted - 2013.10.17 20:36:00 - [51] - Quote Signed. The "pay to inject equipment into economy" crap does not belong on tranquility. Dust514 is an incarnation of "greed is good" and merely an attempt to circumvent the roadblock faced at monoclegate, where the masses would not conform to paying rl cash to get stuff in EVE. In short, no aspect of New Eden that is prone for economic warfare should have cash injected items.
Arduemont 12 pound opinion 2183	Posted - 2013.10.17 20:51:00 - [52] - Quote Sooo..... You want Dust removed... AND ... you want it attached meaningfully to TQ? Okay. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice."
Red Teufel Mafia Redux Phobia. 242	Posted - 2013.10.18 04:27:00 - [53] - Quote Arduemont wrote: Sooo..... You want Dust removed... AND ... you want it attached meaningfully to TQ? Okay. Or Else! Arduemon... Or Else
IbanezLaney The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing 594	Posted - 2013.10.18 04:51:00 - [54] - Quote +1. Supported. Been saying for months now it needs it's influence on FW removed ASAP. Some random in a 20min dust match should not be able to undo many hours of FW plexing in eve. The balance is all wrong and it's just an annoyance. Dust matches are also too easily thrown to influence FW contested rates. Sitting on a PS3 while dropping nades at my own feet for 20min while I let the side I need to win get on with the job is hardly an action that should effect FW/Eve. But it does. I am not a hater - Dust was a great idea. Shame it didn't work as I really wanted it to. Time to move on and let eve continue without it. If you want to get your soul to heaven, trust in me. Now don't judge or question. You are broken now, but faith can heal you. Just do everything I tell you to do. (Opiate - Tool)
Jarod Garamonde Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance 349	Posted - 2013.10.18 04:58:00 - [55] - Quote IbanezLaney wrote: +1. Supported. Been saying for months now it needs it's influence on FW removed ASAP. Some random in a 20min dust match should not be able to undo many hours of FW plexing in eve. The balance is all wrong and it's just an annoyance. Dust matches are also too easily thrown to influence FW contested rates. Sitting on a PS3 while dropping nades at my own feet for 20min while I let the side I need to win get on with the job is hardly an action that should effect FW/Eve. But it does. I am not a hater - Dust was a great idea. Shame it didn't work as I really wanted it to. Time to move on and let eve continue without it. Having been in the real-life military, during a war, and participating in offensive hostile actions in said war, I can tell you that DUST activity should have MORE of an influence on FW than it already does. Navies don't take and hold ground. That's what foot Infantry is for. Navies provide support, whether by transportation, blockading shipping lanes, cutting supply lines, supplying friendlies, or providing fire support, a navy augments the on-ground forces, and nothing more. DUST integration should be furthered. Furthermore, when requesting live Orbital Bombardments, DUSTbunnies should have to call for fire on my voice channel and light a beacon. I really want to say "Shot, over" and "Splash, over" into my vent mic, and hear the proper response back.... just so I can know how the guns felt whenever I called for fire, back in my Forward Observer days. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II
Ptraci 3 R Corporation 1374	Posted - 2013.10.18 04:59:00 - [56] - Quote Red Teufel wrote: This is a petition to remove Dust 514 from our server TRANQUILITY. Dust 514 is irrelevant to our game-play and the most unpolished FPS to come out to date. With no news it will go on to next gen consoles or PC it is a sinking ship that doesn't deserve to be part of our universe. Please remove Dust 514 from TRANQUILITY CCP also CCP please watch. Link Couldn't finish that video after I started watching it- does that make me a bad person? Didn't finish your post either. Sigh.
SmilingVagrant GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2085	Posted - 2013.10.18 05:12:00 - [57] - Quote Raylan Scott wrote: Aivo Dresden wrote: I would play Dust if it came to PC. Having it on PS3 only was a poor decision. I think they wanted to get a piece of the HUGE console market. So I'm not sure how that was a poor decision. The biggest mistake is not having it ready for the launch of the PS4. "A huge mistake" would be that console players flock from game to game. It was doomed the minute the next COD came out. Not that putting it on PC would have been better. Let me think, DUST or Planetside, who wins?
IbanezLaney The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing 594	Posted - 2013.10.18 05:44:00 - [58] - Quote Jarod Garamonde wrote: IbanezLaney wrote: +1. Supported. Been saying for months now it needs it's influence on FW removed ASAP. Some random in a 20min dust match should not be able to undo many hours of FW plexing in eve. The balance is all wrong and it's just an annoyance. Dust matches are also too easily thrown to influence FW contested rates. Sitting on a PS3 while dropping nades at my own feet for 20min while I let the side I need to win get on with the job is hardly an action that should effect FW/Eve. But it does. I am not a hater - Dust was a great idea. Shame it didn't work as I really wanted it to. Time to move on and let eve continue without it. Having been in the real-life military, during a war, and participating in offensive hostile actions in said war, I can tell you that DUST activity should have MORE of an influence on FW than it already does. Navies don't take and hold ground. That's what foot Infantry is for. Navies provide support, whether by transportation, blockading shipping lanes, cutting supply lines, supplying friendlies, or providing fire support, a navy augments the on-ground forces, and nothing more. DUST integration should be furthered. Furthermore, when requesting live Orbital Bombardments, DUSTbunnies should have to call for fire on my voice channel and light a beacon. I really want to say "Shot, over" and "Splash, over" into my vent mic, and hear the proper response back.... just so I can know how the guns felt whenever I called for fire, back in my Forward Observer days. I really do not think something that is 100% exploitable should have more effect on eve. Which FW faction is your corp fighting for in Eve and what effects that Dust has had to you believe should be increased? If you want to get your soul to heaven, trust in me. Now don't judge or question. You are broken now, but faith can heal you. Just do everything I tell you to do. (Opiate - Tool)
Jarod Garamonde Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance 349	Posted - 2013.10.18 05:47:00 - [59] - Quote IbanezLaney wrote: Jarod Garamonde wrote: IbanezLaney wrote: +1. Supported. Been saying for months now it needs it's influence on FW removed ASAP. Some random in a 20min dust match should not be able to undo many hours of FW plexing in eve. The balance is all wrong and it's just an annoyance. Dust matches are also too easily thrown to influence FW contested rates. Sitting on a PS3 while dropping nades at my own feet for 20min while I let the side I need to win get on with the job is hardly an action that should effect FW/Eve. But it does. I am not a hater - Dust was a great idea. Shame it didn't work as I really wanted it to. Time to move on and let eve continue without it. Having been in the real-life military, during a war, and participating in offensive hostile actions in said war, I can tell you that DUST activity should have MORE of an influence on FW than it already does. Navies don't take and hold ground. That's what foot Infantry is for. Navies provide support, whether by transportation, blockading shipping lanes, cutting supply lines, supplying friendlies, or providing fire support, a navy augments the on-ground forces, and nothing more. DUST integration should be furthered. Furthermore, when requesting live Orbital Bombardments, DUSTbunnies should have to call for fire on my voice channel and light a beacon. I really want to say "Shot, over" and "Splash, over" into my vent mic, and hear the proper response back.... just so I can know how the guns felt whenever I called for fire, back in my Forward Observer days. I really do not think something that is 100% exploitable should have more effect on eve. Which FW faction is your corp fighting for in Eve and what effects that Dust has had to you believe should be increased? Dude, I quit FW last year. I'm a pirate, again. Couldn't you tell from the eyepatch? Regardless, my opinion on the matter still stands. Every other mechanic in this game has a semi-reality-based aspect. DUST should take full advantage of what it can/can't potentially influence. "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II
adarma Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 20	Posted - 2013.10.18 06:15:00 - [60] - Quote *signed Eve would have been in an utterly different place if all that development time, energy and resources should not have gone to a console game for children. Still, if anything can be salvaged for the future...

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,02s, ref 20251007/1853
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.