| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Messerschmitt facility
   |
Posted - 2006.02.03 02:52:00 -
[1]
Increasing the sensor strenght of HAC's.
I mean they are elite cruisers. and yet they have the sensor strenght of a destroyer T1... Look at the Rcon ships and other, 28, 30 Sensor strenght.
I highly belive that CCP maked the overhaul for jamming but forgot to upgrade the sensor strenght of a HAC. If a Rcon ship have a 28 sensor strenght, and it is build on a cruiser carcasse, then the HAC should have somewere the same.
Please sign.
_________________________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking...
|
Noriath
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 03:26:00 -
[2]
Uhh, no... HACs are good enough as they are.
|
Messerschmitt facility
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 06:34:00 -
[3]
Yea, and jammable with a multispec without even needing any skills than the basic one
_________________________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking...
|
Selvin
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 08:34:00 -
[4]
well ... u can always put ECCM 
--
TriExporter
|
Zarch AlDain
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 10:27:00 -
[5]
Every ship should have weaknesses, I'm training towards HAC myself but I don't see a problem with them being weak vs jamming considering their other advantages.
|
Helen Tiger
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 12:32:00 -
[6]
I know I'm going to get yet a little more impopular with this post but someone has to say it :
THREAD TITLE SHOULD BE CLEAR ABOUT THE THREAD SUBJECT.
This is simply proper etiquette. By making a thread called "please sign for..." you force people to visit your thread even though they may not want to take part in your discussion.
You're not the first to do this. I often see guys post threads with such evocative names as "WTF...", "What Gives ?..."
Just imagine how happy you'd be if you wanted to buy a novel online and the title was "A story" with a summary that read "Story of a dude and a guy with that girl who messed up".
You either buy with 90% chance of being disappointed, or you go for the 10% chance of missing a good book.
As for HAC's... I agree their sensor strength seems a bit low, but that only became (somewhat of) an issue since RMR, where NPC's can target-jam you from 200km away even if you have a sensor strength of 50.
There's clearly a balance issue here.
Helen
 Originally by: Kittamaru
Bravo Helen! (...)
Never seen someone do their research before disproving another's point!
ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=287902&page=1#12 |
Alfred Nobel
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 16:17:00 -
[7]
Quote:
I know I'm going to get yet a little more impopular with this post but someone has to say it :THREAD TITLE SHOULD BE CLEAR ABOUT THE THREAD SUBJECT
I'm not exactly a member of the Helen fan club, but I have to agree. I couldn't give a fig about HAC sensor strengths, the thread's poor title hijacked me into reading it.
Gee Helen, you actually managed to sound fairly polite this time. Morning coffee wearing off?
|
CaptainSeafort
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 16:26:00 -
[8]
Edited by: CaptainSeafort on 03/02/2006 16:26:23
omg helen noob, impopular? read the dictionary, its unpopular
btw, my little contribution to the world of karma =)
"Planets and moons no longer hitch rides on player ships. Their towel privileges have been revoked." HHGG Lives on in EVE! |
Rod Blaine
|
Posted - 2006.02.03 18:37:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 03/02/2006 18:38:14
Recons have high sensors because they are EW specialists.
Other cruiser sized ships are not, hence they dont.
HAC's have better defences against damage and more firepower. Does that mean that recons should have that too ? No, because HAC's are assaults and therefore damage specialists in the dealing and tanking of direct damage.
Et voila, issue solved.
If you think the sensor strength of ships is too low overall, then say so. I still wouldn't agree but at least it would make sense to argue about that.
|
Messerschmitt facility
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 03:02:00 -
[10]
Yes I was mainly aiming it at Zealot, since this is what I fly.
It have only 3 med slots, so ECCM is not an option.
The sensor strenght is only 13, while a destroyer have 12.
I realy find it too low. I mean even Deimos have 15, that to be honest I still find it too low, but it's ok, a bit more "normal"
_________________________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking...
|
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 07:29:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Messerschmitt facility
Yes I was mainly aiming it at Zealot, since this is what I fly.
It have only 3 med slots, so ECCM is not an option.
The sensor strenght is only 13, while a destroyer have 12.
I realy find it too low. I mean even Deimos have 15, that to be honest I still find it too low, but it's ok, a bit more "normal"
Gallente have the second best sensor strength. What you should be asking for is better armour as that is supposed to be Amarr's racial strength.
I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide. |
Helen Tiger
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 10:37:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Alfred Nobel
Gee Helen, you actually managed to sound fairly polite this time. Morning coffee wearing off?
LOL  it was decaf today  so that must be it 
Originally by: CaptainSeafort
Edited by: CaptainSeafort on 03/02/2006 16:26:23
omg helen noob, impopular? read the dictionary, its unpopular
btw, my little contribution to the world of karma =)
Oops sorry about that... for the record english isn't my native language, I'm french. I guess I'm entitled to a little mistake from time to time
Helen
Originally by: Kittamaru
Bravo Helen! (...)
Never seen someone do their research before disproving another's point!
ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=287902&page=1#12 |
Valea Silpha
|
Posted - 2006.02.04 15:21:00 -
[13]
The problem with jamming is that in theory its the perfect defence agaisnt eveyrthing. Enough jammers running enough times will eventually mean you at least escape 1 vs 1. If your worried about being jammed, all you need do to compensate against someone using ECM on top of a tank is bring a friend :).
Against dedicated ECM ships then you will need ECCM or many friends.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |