EVE Search - damage stats updated (1188)

All Channels

Ships and Modules

damage stats updated (1188)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
soltys	Posted - 2003.08.29 19:36:00 - [1] This time it reflects 1188 build's weapons. Well, huh, a lot of changes. click ---------------------------------------------------------- Damage stats: click version v1.1.02 retail.
Jim Raynor	Posted - 2003.08.29 20:17:00 - [2] Quote: This time it reflects 1188 build's weapons. Well, huh, a lot of changes. click Ok, now this is getting bad, the Dual 250mm Railgun out damages the 425mm Railgun. This certainly should not be the case, the 425mm needs a ROF decrease badly. ------ ROBBLE ROBBLE
soltys	Posted - 2003.08.29 20:25:00 - [3] Edited by: soltys on 29/08/2003 20:33:46 Yep, small bug probably. Similary 220MM Vulcan AutoCannon I outdamages 425MM AutoCannon I (that has the same dot as 200mm autocannon). Also I believe, that worst close range medium projectile should be better than best close range small projectile (in hybrids and lasers they worst medium and best small close range models are equal in damage)... Also dot difference between close range hybrids and projectiles seems a little to big for me. ---------------------------------------------------------- Damage stats: click version v1.1.02 retail.
Karif	Posted - 2003.08.29 20:52:00 - [4] I'm pretty sure this is caused by the truncating of ROF to the integer in the display for most guns. =============================== Deception + Information + Skill
soltys	Posted - 2003.08.29 20:54:00 - [5] Quote: I'm pretty sure this is caused by the truncating of ROF to the integer in the display for most guns. Looks like you're right - not a single weapon with non integer rof... The return of the pretty old bug... ---------------------------------------------------------- Damage stats: click version v1.1.02 retail.
Lartfor	Posted - 2003.08.29 20:57:00 - [6] Edited by: Lartfor on 29/08/2003 21:17:07 I thought the idea of balancing the weapons was to make it so not every one would use tachs... 4.5 dmg and 12 rof ummmm... can u say more unbalanced than it ever has been... Just look at that dot and compare it to other weapons... Jim instead of decreasing the 425mm rof, just up its dmg, has same effect, and u wont be wasting ammo incredibly fast. I say a base of 3dmg on the normal 425mm rail and up to 3.65 on the guass with a rof of 10. Well just my 2 cents
Black Lung	Posted - 2003.08.30 00:40:00 - [7] Edited by: Black Lung on 30/08/2003 00:56:53 Edited by: Black Lung on 30/08/2003 00:43:29 Edited by: Black Lung on 30/08/2003 00:41:01 All I have to say is that if you get a megathron and put 2 425mm gauss' with thorium and 1 Modal Mega Neutron Particle Accelerator with antimatter, you would own everything out there. Maybe 1-3 shot kills :). I cant wait till i get like a billion isk for that EDIT- Acutally put AM in 425mm because you still get a maximum range of like 28km which is basically a normal distance for pirates. Unless you are prefer having real long range ammo. EDIT2- You know something, I just imagined if both of these were tech lvl 5 weapons. head explodes at calculating damage
Jarjar	Posted - 2003.08.30 00:58:00 - [8] 3 shot kills? I get 3 shot (as in volley - 3x7) kills on NPC cruisers, on battleships? No way. Sure, I'm using market equip, but that won't happen no matter how many 425's or modal megas you use.
Black Lung	Posted - 2003.08.30 01:01:00 - [9] Well with this damage would it be what? .5? lol
Jim Raynor	Posted - 2003.08.30 02:07:00 - [10] Quote: Edited by: Lartfor on 29/08/2003 21:17:07 I thought the idea of balancing the weapons was to make it so not every one would use tachs... 4.5 dmg and 12 rof ummmm... can u say more unbalanced than it ever has been... Just look at that dot and compare it to other weapons... Jim instead of decreasing the 425mm rof, just up its dmg, has same effect, and u wont be wasting ammo incredibly fast. I say a base of 3dmg on the normal 425mm rail and up to 3.65 on the guass with a rof of 10. Well just my 2 cents The 425mm should out damage the dual 250mm atleast. Think about it, the 425mm uses over twice the powergrid! I want dual weapons to be a nice compromise between damage and powergrid usage, but it should not be a superior gun to the 425mm.. it edges it out in damage, that shouldn't really happen. I would go for a ROF decrease on the 425mm railgun to 8seconds. Perhaps a slight damage increase, I think ROF is the problem though. Tachyons use 125 cap per shot now man! That's a LOT. They're like 1200mm howitzers now. ------ ROBBLE ROBBLE
Slithereen	Posted - 2003.08.30 02:07:00 - [11] Edited by: Slithereen on 30/08/2003 02:07:16 I applaud all these changes, as well as that on the missile improvements. _______________________________________________ "Is it me or the bad guys just getting totally pathetic?"---Clover, Totally Spies, "Hope is wasted on the Hopeless."---Mandy, The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy. "Stars are holes in the sky from which the light of the Infinite shine through."---Confucius.
Dragon Emperor	Posted - 2003.08.30 02:48:00 - [12] dual 250, dual heavy beam...etc, they are all out damage the big ones... and has better cap efficiency......
Lartfor	Posted - 2003.08.30 03:29:00 - [13] Quote: dual 250, dual heavy beam...etc, they are all out damage the big ones... and has better cap efficiency...... Yep, does not make a ton of sence. I gues u can "justify" it by saying those duel 250mm and duel heavy beams have like 1/2 the range, but still i dont think they should domore dmg.
Juan Andalusian	Posted - 2003.08.30 11:19:00 - [14] 4km acc falloff decrease for blaster? ain't that a bit steep? Pain is meant to be felt
Parallax 7D	Posted - 2003.09.06 06:28:00 - [15] sure is steep. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Marge: But, Mr. Ambassador, how are we going to get home? Ambassador: Beats me. Try getting a job and earning some money. That's what I did. By the way, ambassador's taken.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.