|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
95
   |
Posted - 2011.11.05 02:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
1) people always says small alliances can't make a place on nullsec, do you agree ? if so, do you have an idea on what to do ?
2) do you consider this expansion enough to fix your beloved nullsec, or will you still concentrate your efforts on nullsec on priority for the next one ?
for example, you didn't though about FW, but did you though about how to make lowsec a more interesting place ?
3) with the new nebulaes and new battlecruisers, the winter expansion will have a lot of shiny with its fixes, while the first goal was to fix things. was it CCP who wanted shiny, or a common agreement ?
4) are the establishements out for a long time, or may they come back on the next espansion ? would you go for a closer or more far release of incarna related content ?
5) you obviously like the possibility of non consensual pvp on high sec, but do you consider the insurance for loss against concord a good thing ?
6) does your action against miners have a link to your position on ice being available so easily on high sec ? |
Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
99
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 15:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Raid'En wrote:1) people always says small alliances can't make a place on nullsec, do you agree ? if so, do you have an idea on what to do ? Nerf supercaps and boost anomaly income, as well as provide more sources of isk for starting alliance by buffing exploration and fixing the Tech problem. Looks like we've already got the supercap thing and the anomaly thing in motion. [/quote]
nothing about how small alliances can be killed by any bigger one that is bored ?
a big alliance can grind easily a small alliance territory, just to kill time if they want.
i dunno if it really happen, i heard it often, but on the others hand shooting structures and other side refusing to fight given they have no chance don't seems that interesting to kill time...
btw i don't really get why nerfing tech would help small alliances here ; if others moons become a bit more intersting, bigger alliances may come even more often. i remember seeing lots of TEST pos on some low sec, and it was not only for the best moons... |
Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 13:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:
You have to be blue to the alliance that controls the JB before you can use it, password or no.
btw currently there is no way to allow blues into a pos' forcefield without the use of a password right ?
|
Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 01:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
tengen san wrote:Weaselior wrote:Mining is dead due to the drone regions, full stop. Isn't the word out drones getting stripped from all minerals by end of the year and receive a isk bonus instead?!
that's just an idea a dev said, he never said he would really do it, nor when if so. |
Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
120
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 03:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Two step wrote:
Thought I would jump in here to point out that w-space has even more risks, in that the POS you are living out of can be completely destroyed, and all your stuff blown up or stolen. The reward is certainly higher than most other activities though.
yeah, i don't really get the issue with nullsec station taken by the enemies, as those can put their stuff on contract or on the market to get their money back.
of course there will be loss doing that, but it's not the end of the world.
concerning supercap, i think one of the biggest problems to make them disappear is the structures grind ; the place were i saw the most of them was for killing sov structures, and their shitload of HP.
so, before changing supercap to another role (and i like your ideas on this), wouldn't it be needed first to review the sov mechanics ? |
|
|
| |
|